On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:38:53PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
benzina+autostrada di smacchinate di gruppo, almeno per gli
sviluppatori Debian ufficiali e quelli nella coda NM. E magari
pagare birra e patatine.
E magari anche due o tre puttanoni per la serata?
Non che mi faccia
On Sep 21, Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
il debcamp è successo: tra gli altri, HP ha pagato 15.000 euro solo per
il cibo. E IBM ha offerto una grigliata di carne.
Spero che non sia necessario spiegare la differenza tra un debcamp
internazionale con decine di developer e uno italiano con
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:15:56PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
il debcamp ? successo: tra gli altri, HP ha pagato 15.000 euro solo per
il cibo. E IBM ha offerto una grigliata di carne.
Spero che non sia necessario spiegare la differenza tra un debcamp
internazionale con decine di developer
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:15:56PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Sep 21, Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
il debcamp ? successo: tra gli altri, HP ha pagato 15.000 euro solo per
il cibo. E IBM ha offerto una grigliata di carne.
Spero che non sia necessario spiegare la differenza tra
On Sep 21, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scusa, possiamo organizzarlo anche se non ti piace? No, perche` pare che se
qualcosa non ti piace non s'ha da fare.
Non vedo perché i miei commenti dovrebbero dare questa impressione...
Forse dovresti calmarti un po' e leggere i
ciao,
qui in cc: c'e' il ragazzo che attualmente sto sponsorizzando
e che ha l'on{e|o}re di mantenere aspell-it in debian, pacchetto
che a molti puo' sembrare inutile ma che sicuramente lato end-user
italiano aiuta l'italiano medio che non e' familiare con l'inglese
ad avvicinarsi a debian .
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:10:01PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
Che dite, tentiamo di organizzarla fatta bene? La spesa non dovrebbe
essere eccessiva, e potrebbe essere un modo per stanare chi ?
interessato allo sviluppo di Debian in Italia. Nel frattempo, si
metterebbe in piedi un bell'evento
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:15:56PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Il gioco verte sul fatto che questi incontri sembrano essere molto
produttivi, dei salti in avanti nella qualit? di Debian. Su queste
premesse, non mi sembra assurdo che qualcuno abbia voglia di cacciare
fuori qualche soldino
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:15:56PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Il gioco verte sul fatto che questi incontri sembrano essere molto
produttivi, dei salti in avanti nella qualit? di Debian. Su queste
premesse, non mi sembra assurdo che qualcuno abbia voglia di cacciare
fuori qualche soldino
Suis-je le seul au monde qui, dans le Menu Debian de Gnome, a des
entrées vides pour tous les répertoires dont le nom, traduit en
français, comporte des accentués ?
Exemple : Menu Debian/Applications/Outils Système
Je précise que mes locales sont fr_FR.ISO-8859-15 (c'est dans
/etc/environment
* Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030921 16:41]:
Bad analogy. Consider the way that the Harry Potter books have been modified
for the limited vocabulary of the American audience.
I hope that you're joking. (Well, I fear that you're not.)
Cheers,
Andi
--
also sprach Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.21.1614 +0200]:
FWIW, I basically agree. goodies are welcome, but backporting
things from the unstable branch migh= t not be that good idea.
Should we stop shipping security fixes backported from development
code?
It always depends,
also sprach Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.21.1644 +0200]:
This is very standard practice for distribution kernels. It's
fairly rare for users to notice negative effects and the positive
effects (better hardware support, more features, better
performance or what have we) are generally
also sprach Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.21.1647 +0200]:
which features should be removed from grsec in order to make it
patch the debian kernel?
IP randomisation, and there might well me more. This is where
I stopped.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libcamomile-ocaml-dev
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Yamagata Yoriyuki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://camomile.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Description :
Andi writes:
I hope that you're joking. (Well, I fear that you're not.)
It's not the American audience that has the limited vocabulary. It's the
American publisher.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Title: ctzgu DI
things do happen. world OFFBEAT Open your
ïðèâåò in 1929 AtQ and make them better?XOpJ nlTNKLw the blackout Lovely day
Religion divides in 1831 First or standart class? in 1953 It's nice
Title: mKpTo MZ
in 1906 Small world! in 1845
Don't get excited! to sign here qJU in 1888 vagx tbTtTUg Take it easy! the U.S.
by seat When is the next? Real bad. in 1850 in 1948
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 04:18:10PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I do understand your position; I simply disagree. I feel that
changes which close Debian bugs should be documented in debian/changelog
whether or not they are Debian-specific
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: liblivejournal-perl
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Frank Sheiness [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.livejournal.com/files/code/lib/perl/LiveJournal/
* License :
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 11:00:14AM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 10:21, Herbert Xu wrote:
The only disagreement is with what to do with upstream changes that
happen to close Debian bugs.
Is there any chance of everyone agreeing to leave it up to the
maintainer to decide
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 02:56:35AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 05:38:50PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
As far as the BTS is concerned, it is irrelevant how a bug is fixed.
Wrong. The BTS is a front-end to users. When bugs are closed, the
submitter(a normal user)
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:07:20PM +0200, JL wrote:
Would it be possible (if a sensible question at all) to include a
feature into apt wich generates an /etc/apt/preferences.db file wich
would include any information required to build the preferences file ?
I do not understand your question.
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bad analogy. Consider the way that the Harry Potter books have been
modified for the limited vocabulary of the American audience.
Ha, the Australians want American kids to read sentences like Fred
and I managed to keep our peckers up somehow. (In the
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:07:18AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
Bad analogy. Consider the way that the Harry Potter books have been modified
for the limited vocabulary of the American audience.
You mean they were even worse before they were published in the US? Hard
to believe.
--
Marc
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:41:41PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
I've got a few points for you:
* The vanilla kernel source is readily available:
apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.22 kernel-patch-debian-2.4.22
tar xjf /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.22.tar.bz2
cd kernel-source-2.4.22
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 03:54:15PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
I run vanilla sources anyhow, so I am not too concerned as a user. But as
a maintainer of a kernel patch, I am not willing to modify the source to
make it fit the inofficial kernel Debian provides. If I were to do so, I'd
have
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:07:18AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
Also there's the issue of whether we should try to have one kernel source
tree that everything applies to. I think that perhaps we should have
options as to which tree things apply to. So we can have kernel patches
to apply
[Followups set.]
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:00:03PM -0500, Craig P. Steffen wrote:
I am prospective DD; as one of my opening packages, I intend to adopt the
sound file editor xwave. One of the bugs against it, 170005, says that
depending on the virtual package libxaw-dev is wrong.
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 11:55:37AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Simply saying that the bug was fixed in the new upstream release doesn't
tell the user why
Why a bug wa gixed is obvious, because it was a bug.
- XXX does nt delete temp file
- Fixed in new upstream release
I mean, hell this is not
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:44:59PM -0400, Lukas Geyer wrote:
Ha, the Australians want American kids to read sentences like Fred
and I managed to keep our peckers up somehow.
At least from puberty until middle age, that doesn't seem too impressive
a feat for most males...
--
G. Branden
I have been following the discussion and just want to add some things
from a user's point of view:
1.
I appreciate the additional functionality and included bug fixes of the
Debian kernels, but in the end I often have to use the vanilla kernel,
because most patches - like grsecurity - don't apply
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 07:09:55PM +0200, Sebastian wrote:
Thus, while I really like the stability of woody, I frequently need
kernel updates. This means that the kernel packages don't really fit into
Debian's concept of stable and unstable.
Debian's concept of stable and unstable applies
Hi all,
I read this :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/
debian-devel-announce-200308/msg00010.html
So we should put development packages (like cvs snapshot) in experimental, not
in unstable. But there is a problem, and I don't find any solution to solve
it. For example, let's
In-Reply-To=[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject=Re:%20Re: Debian should not modify the
kernels!
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, martin f krafft wrote:
I have uploaded a new version of grsecurity. However, it won't support
Debian kernels 2.4.20 and up. README.2.4.2x in the package will tell you
why. In addition:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:09:57PM +0200, jjluza wrote:
The announcement tells we should get out -snapshot from the name of
the package, before puting it in experimental. So there is no
difference in the package name anymore. So now, since cvs package
version is 0.0.date, apt always ask for
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:31:36PM +0300, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
The whole point of having a stable branch (currently 2.4) is to guarantee that
people can have a _reliable_ kernel that they can trust will:
1) Behave in a predictable way that is consistant with previous releases from
the
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 05:45:54PM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
* Package name: libcamomile-ocaml-dev
You should check carefully licensing issues of some unicode stuff
distributed inside the camomile tarball.
I've already had a chat with the author about that issue, I told me that
he
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-21 14:44]:
What you distribute as 2.4.22 is not 2.4.22.
So what? Most packages in Debian devate from upstream in one way or
another. That's the added value we provide. I'm happy that Herbert
carefully selects what to backport
also sprach Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.21.1906 +0200]:
Why would you have to remove features? I routinely modify my patch packages
to apply to Debian kernel source, and this has never required removing a
feature.
Because maybe you are a kernel hacker and have a clue. While I am
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 02:04:55AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 04:19:55PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Hello,
Am I having network problems or is ftp-master down?
cu andreas
it's up for me, but its key seems to be changed.
Auric and Vore are in
also sprach Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.21.1857 +0200]:
So, I'm curious why you chose to make it a part of the Debian
kernel source, rather than a separate patch (kernel-patch-ipsec or
such).
Thanks, this is indeed the right questions.
And so is this:
I suppose the more
also sprach Martin-?ric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.21.1931 +0200]:
I might as well download the upstream tarball from kernel.org
myself and then make my own debian/ folder!
No need. make-kpkg will create it.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`.
also sprach Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.21.2035 +0200]:
Er...what 2.4 kernel are you talking about? That doesn't sound
like Linux 2.4 at all.
With respect to Debian packaging, it should. The fact that Linux
2.4 kernels osciallate features is irrelevant in this discussion,
because
Le Dimanche 21 Septembre 2003 20:14, Simon Law a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:09:57PM +0200, jjluza wrote:
The announcement tells we should get out -snapshot from the name of
the package, before puting it in experimental. So there is no
difference in the package name anymore. So
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, jjluza wrote:
I read this :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/
debian-devel-announce-200308/msg00010.html
So we should put development packages (like cvs snapshot) in experimental, not
in unstable. But there is a problem, and I don't find any solution
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:11:29PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Why would you have to remove features? I routinely modify my patch packages
to apply to Debian kernel source, and this has never required removing a
feature.
Because maybe you are a kernel hacker and have a clue. While I am
On Sep 21, Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another bug I noticed is that in the ru_RU.UTF-8 locale, man won't
find the man pages under ru_RU.KOI8-R.
Hm. Yes, that is a bug (although not a regression; I think man-db
2.4.1
behaved the same way). I wonder how to solve that correctly and
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:01:40PM +0200, jjluza [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard
to say:
Le Dimanche 21 Septembre 2003 20:14, Simon Law a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:09:57PM +0200, jjluza wrote:
The announcement tells we should get out -snapshot from the name of
the package, before
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:46:28PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Sep 21, Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rüdiger Kuhlmann wrote:
Another bug I noticed is that in the ru_RU.UTF-8 locale, man won't
find the man pages under ru_RU.KOI8-R.
Hm. Yes, that is a bug (although not a
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libiox-ocaml-dev
Version : 1.00b3
Upstream Author : J.H. Woodyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.wetware.com/jhw/src/
* License : BSD-like
Description :
Le Dimanche 21 Septembre 2003 22:12, Santiago Vila a écrit :
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, jjluza wrote:
I read this :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/
debian-devel-announce-200308/msg00010.html
So we should put development packages (like cvs snapshot) in
experimental, not
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If the snaphots are betas for version 1.5, the solution is to give it
a version number like 2:1.4.20030921-1, so that whenever 1.5 is
officially released you can upload it to unstable as 2:1.5-1.
[ If the snapshots are betas for 1.4.1, use
On Sunday 21 September 2003 23:10, Remi Vanicat wrote:
Why use epoch ? 1.4.0.20030921-1 should work (or am i missing something
here ?)
epoch should only be used when needed...
and it is... since current mozilla package version is 2:1.4-4
Mike
--
I have sampled every language, french is my
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:11:29PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Also, please explain: how is the normal kernel not DFSG but
a derived version is?
See the bottom of /usr/share/doc/kernel-source-2.4.22/README.Debian.gz
--
- mdz
Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why a bug wa gixed is obvious, because it was a bug.
- XXX does nt delete temp file
- Fixed in new upstream release
I mean, hell this is not hard to understand.
That's great if I knew what the bug was. You seem to be assuming that the
only people
Hi,
Flame aside ... let's look at technical side.
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 02:44:03PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.21.1341 +0200]:
* The vanilla kernel source is readily available:
I don't consider this readily available. It's faster to
also sprach Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.21.2301 +0200]:
So you're maintaining a kernelpatch for debian that has sever security
implication but you don't know enough about it and the code it touches
to do some forward porting?
I know enough about it; I don't (yet) know enough
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
reassign 212028 general
thanks
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 03:36:03PM -0400, Daniel B. wrote:
apt-cache and its manual page uses the word dependency backwards.
This error makes the documentation hard to understand.
apt's documentation is consistent with everything
Package: general
Version: n/a?
Debian seems to use the word dependency backwards a lot, making
things confusing and hard to understand.
Per the The American Heritage Dictionary (via
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=dependency), a dependency
is:
1. Dependence.
2. Something
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 212028 general
Bug#212028: apt-cache uses dependency backards
Bug reassigned from package `apt' to `general'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
HI,
I have no issue how you ship debian kernel :-)
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:41:41PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
I've got a few points for you:
* The vanilla kernel source is readily available:
good.
apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.22 kernel-patch-debian-2.4.22
tar xjf
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 11:01:51PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Debian seems to have problems with certain firmware images. Note that the
way it's removed in kernel-source is rather useless to meet DFSG as it's
a) still in the orig.tar.gz and b) many of the arch kernel patches back
out
In looking to try and setup pinning on a couple of my machines I went
looking at the Release files for the various sites I use... For the most
part I found them to have a similar suite of attributes to work from but
I did notice a difference betwen Components and Component and just
trying
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 212028 212049
Bug#212028: apt-cache uses dependency backards
Bug#212049: dependency used backwards
Merged 212028 212049.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
This seems like a lot of argument over avoiding putting six more words
into the changelog file giving information that the maintainer clearly
already has (since otherwise they wouldn't know that they could close the
bug), and which is obviously useful for users.
Hear, hear.
You can't tell
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 03:53:00PM -0700, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
In my looking I check'd out http.us.debian.org, debian.seabone.net and
security.debian.org... The IPv6 repository was the one in question that
used Component while the others used the plural version... Although
obviously
On Sun, 18 May 2003 20:32:05 -0400, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 12:06:21PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
There is also a mechanism to order the order in which
kernel-patches are applied -- so if, say, a m68k kernel image
maintainer wanted to create a patch
Warning: This message has had one
or more attachments removed. Please read the "VirusWarning.txt"
attachment(s) for more information.
Postmaster
Goldrush World Access
http://www.goldrush.com
Microsoft
All Products|
Support|
Search|
Microsoft.com Guide
Microsoft Home
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 06:36:25PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2003 20:32:05 -0400, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
dh-kpatches provides a dependency/ordering facility which has worked
well for me in my packages. It also provides
debian-devel:!
ttp://202.103.7.45/www/909/
!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2003-10-23
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 20:12:26 -0400, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 06:36:25PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2003 20:32:05 -0400, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
dh-kpatches provides a dependency/ordering facility which has
worked well
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Daniel B. wrote:
Per the The American Heritage Dictionary (via
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=dependency), a dependency
is:
...
2. Something dependent or subordinate.
...
That is, if A depends on B, A is a dependency of B. (B is not a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:26:56 +1000
Source: defoma
Binary: defoma dfontmgr defoma-doc psfontmgr
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.11.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Angus Lees [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Angus Lees
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 18:51:32 +0900
Source: a2ps
Binary: a2ps
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.13b+cvs.2003.09.20-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Masayuki Hatta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Masayuki Hatta [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:49:21 +0200
Source: dacode
Binary: dacode dacode-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4.1-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Drieu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Perrier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:50:58 +0100
Source: powertweak
Binary: powertweak lspowertweak powertweak-extra powertweakd powertweak-gtk
Architecture: source i386 all powerpc
Version: 0.99.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:34:53 +0200
Source: resolvconf
Binary: resolvconf
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.42
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 12:40:59 +0200
Source: dupload
Binary: dupload
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.6.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:57:38 +0200
Source: wmifinfo
Binary: wmifinfo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.06-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gordon Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gordon Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:44:43 +0200
Source: kernel-patch-2.4-grsecurity
Binary: kernel-patch-2.4-grsecurity
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9.12-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:40:03 +0200
Source: wmcalclock
Binary: wmcalclock
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.25-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gordon Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gordon Fraser [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:37:13 +0200
Source: libroxen-safequote
Binary: libroxen-safequote
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.7-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Turbo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 20:44:48 +0100
Source: glibc
Binary: libc6.1-prof libc1 libc0.3-pic locales glibc-doc libc6-pic libc-udeb
libc1-prof libc0.3 libc0.3-dbg libc6.1-dev libc1-pic libc6-s390x libc6-prof libc1-dbg
libc6-dev-sparc64
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:12:05 +0100
Source: console-tools
Binary: kbd-compat console-tools-dev libconsole console-tools
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:0.2.3dbs-43
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alastair
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 14:07:11 +1000
Source: cinepaint
Binary: libcinepaint0 libcinepaint-dev cinepaint-data cinepaint
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.18.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrew Lau [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:38:27 +0100
Source: man-db
Binary: man-db
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 01:41:31 +0900
Source: rcconf
Binary: rcconf
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Atsushi KAMOSHIDA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Atsushi KAMOSHIDA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 14:49:33 -0400
Source: tpctl
Binary: tpctl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 02:23:22 +0900
Source: libjcode-pm-perl
Binary: libjcode-pm-perl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.83-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Atsushi KAMOSHIDA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Atsushi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 02:44:19 +0900
Source: aish
Binary: aish
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.13-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Atsushi KAMOSHIDA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Atsushi KAMOSHIDA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:13:17 -0400
Source: fakeroot
Binary: fakeroot
Architecture: source
Version: 0.7.7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:03:39 -0400
Source: vsftpd
Binary: vsftpd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 20:17:02 +0200
Source: gftp
Binary: gftp gftp-text gftp-common gftp-gtk
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.0.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Aurelien Beaujean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 20:42:00 +0200
Source: gftp
Binary: gftp gftp-text gftp-common gftp-gtk
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.0.15-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 15:48:30 -0400
Source: dict-devil
Binary: dict-devil
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bob Hilliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bob Hilliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:22:49 -0500
Source: kernel-package
Binary: kernel-package
Architecture: source all
Version: 8.059
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:09:18 -0600
Source: gcc-avr
Binary: gcc-avr
Architecture: hppa source
Version: 1:3.2.90.20030512-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: LaMont Jones [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:34:05 -0500
Source: gnus
Binary: gnus
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.10.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:48:07 -0500
Source: psgml
Binary: psgml
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
