Re: Demande d'assistance

2005-04-28 Thread Christian Perrier
>Je vous prie d'emblée de m'excuser pour tous les désagréments qu'un I'm really disappointed that the non French-speaking readers of this mailing list cannot enjoy the incredibly funny writing of this Ivorian Scam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs

Re: Publicly available mbox archives of debian mailing lists + Bug#161440

2005-04-28 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 02:39:25PM +1000, Lex Hider wrote: > So basically, the main reason debian doesn't do this is so it isn't used > by spammers to gather email addresses[?] I would imagine the reason is more like "not enough demand" or "nobody has ever bothered". Making mboxes available would

Re: Publicly available mbox archives of debian mailing lists + Bug#161440

2005-04-28 Thread Lex Hider
On 14:39 Fri 29 Apr , Lex Hider wrote: > On 10:26 Thu 28 Apr , Martin Mewes wrote: > > Hello, > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : > > > > > It would be really handy to have archives of the debian mailing lists > > > available as mbox archives. > > > > http://mbox.mewes.tv/ exists :-) > Gre

Re: Publicly available mbox archives of debian mailing lists + Bug#161440

2005-04-28 Thread Lex Hider
On 10:26 Thu 28 Apr , Martin Mewes wrote: > Hello, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : > > > It would be really handy to have archives of the debian mailing lists > > available as mbox archives. > > http://mbox.mewes.tv/ exists :-) Great! This is exactly the kind of thing I'm after. Probably the m

Re: Bug#306268: ITP: connect -- Establish socket connection using SOCKS4 or 5 and HTTP tunnel.

2005-04-28 Thread Steve Kowalik
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 20:40:09 -0400, Glenn Maynard uttered > Peter's complaint is a legitimate and important one--it really is a terrible > package name--so please don't dismiss it. Package names are a shared > namespace, and must be chosen intelligently. > I concur. When I built this program loca

Re: Bug#306268: ITP: connect -- Establish socket connection using SOCKS4 or 5 and HTTP tunnel.

2005-04-28 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:33:06AM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Peter Samuelson in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > * Package name: connect > > > Version : 1.93 > > > > That's a terrible package name. What will the GNUSTEP people do if > > they ever want to package something that man

Bug#306852: ITP: droidbattles -- A programming game

2005-04-28 Thread Kari Pahula
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: droidbattles Version : 1.0.6 Upstream Author : Andreas Agorander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.bluefire.nu/droidbattles/ * License : GPL Description : A progr

Re: Bug#306268: ITP: connect -- Establish socket connection using SOCKS4 or 5 and HTTP tunnel.

2005-04-28 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Peter Samuelson in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Package name: connect > > Version : 1.93 > > That's a terrible package name. What will the GNUSTEP people do if > they ever want to package something that manages SMB client mounts? That's what upstream calls the program (actually co

Re: Bug#306254: axe: FTBFS: "Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for axe: libxaw-dev"

2005-04-28 Thread Andreas Jochens
On 05-Apr-28 12:21, H. S. Teoh wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:42:50AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > E: Package libxaw-dev has no installation candidate > > E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for axe: libxaw-dev > > > > The new version 6.1.2-14 in 'sid' does not have this proble

uscan vs. href without slash

2005-04-28 Thread Tobias Grimm
Hi! I have a package here, where the href of the download link looks like this: http://www.web.org/download/?path=&download=mypackage-1.2.3.tar.gz I can't get uscan to make use of this. There's one line of code in uscan, that sets the target filename to "", why uscan can't download the file anmo

Re: Upgrade dependencies of a package

2005-04-28 Thread Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
El jue, 28-04-2005 a las 10:19 -0700, Shaun Jackman escribiÃ: > Does apt-get have a command to upgrade all the dependencies of a > package? Run aptitude, search for the package, go to depends line and type + to upgrade all dependencies, this works for me. > Currently I use 'apt-cache show packag

Re: Upgrade dependencies of a package

2005-04-28 Thread Russ Allbery
Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does apt-get have a command to upgrade all the dependencies of a > package? Currently I use 'apt-cache show package' and upgrade each of > the dependencies one by one, but it seems to me this is a job for > apt-get if ever there was one. If this requires

Upgrade dependencies of a package

2005-04-28 Thread Shaun Jackman
Does apt-get have a command to upgrade all the dependencies of a package? Currently I use 'apt-cache show package' and upgrade each of the dependencies one by one, but it seems to me this is a job for apt-get if ever there was one. If this requires a new command, perhaps 'apt-get upgrade package' o

Re: Publicly available mbox archives of debian mailing lists + Bug#161440

2005-04-28 Thread Graham Wilson
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:45:17PM +0200, Martin Mewes wrote: > Pascal Hakim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > > You might want to obscure those a little bit. You should probably > > munge the Return-Path from those emails, and possibly the top > > Received: header. > > Munging works are in queue. The

Re: OT: macs?

2005-04-28 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Jens Peter Secher wrote: Shouldn't that be > "Windows is like a prostitute. Sure it's got a nice make up, but you have all kinds of vira after spending some time with it." No, it shouldn't be, or the Latin scholars will take revenge on you. [sending to -curiosa where this belongs] -- To UNSUB

Demande d'assistance

2005-04-28 Thread mary afo
  Mme. Kone Mary AVENUE 12 RUE 14 11PLATEUX ABIDJANIVORY COASTWEST AFRICABonjour,Je vous prie d'emblée de m'excuser pour tous les désagréments qu'un tel  courrier pourrait vous causer.Mais même si nous ne nous sommes jamais rencontrés,je crois fermement  que sur la base du droitd'assis

Re: Bug#306639: batik: FTBFS: JAVA_HOME_DIRS incorrect

2005-04-28 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:55:01 +0200, Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Arnaud, Yo Andreas, [...] > At least this particular bug occurs on all arches. It is not very nice > to have to read, understand and manually change 'debian/rule

Re: Publicly available mbox archives of debian mailing lists + Bug#161440

2005-04-28 Thread Martin Mewes
Hi Pascal, Pascal Hakim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 10:26 +0200, Martin Mewes wrote: > > http://mbox.mewes.tv/ exists :-) > > Heh. Nice work. The first user feedback :-) > You might want to obscure those a little bit. You should probably > munge the Return-Path from those

Re: Bug#306639: batik: FTBFS: JAVA_HOME_DIRS incorrect

2005-04-28 Thread Andreas Jochens
Hello Steve, On 05-Apr-28 02:56, Steve Langasek wrote: > by Debian, so I don't think it's fair to require that contrib java packages > be buildable with any particular j2sdk package. > > By all means, please keep filing (and fixing) bugs so that we can get as > many contrib packages as possible a

Re: Bug#306639: batik: FTBFS: JAVA_HOME_DIRS incorrect

2005-04-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 08:55:01AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > On 05-Apr-27 23:07, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > Thanks for your bug reports, but you have to know that you can't file > > FTBFS bugs reports about packages that are in contrib and relay on > > packages that are not in Debian to build!

Re: Publicly available mbox archives of debian mailing lists + Bug#161440

2005-04-28 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 05:28:46PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote: > On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 03:03 -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > > > They might one day. It's possible to restrict http://lists.debian.org to > > > stop or slow down people leeching across the web archives. > > > > The day Debian maims its a

Re: Publicly available mbox archives of debian mailing lists + Bug#161440

2005-04-28 Thread Pascal Hakim
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 10:26 +0200, Martin Mewes wrote: > Hello, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : > > > It would be really handy to have archives of the debian mailing lists > > available as mbox archives. > > http://mbox.mewes.tv/ exists :-) > Heh. Nice work. You might want to obscure those a li

Re: Publicly available mbox archives of debian mailing lists + Bug#161440

2005-04-28 Thread Martin Mewes
Hello, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : > It would be really handy to have archives of the debian mailing lists > available as mbox archives. http://mbox.mewes.tv/ exists :-) bis dahin/kind regards Martin Mewes -- FAQ fuer suse-linux@suse.com -> http://www.suse-faq.de.vu/ FAQ fuer debian-user-germ

Re: Publicly available mbox archives of debian mailing lists + Bug#161440

2005-04-28 Thread Pascal Hakim
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 15:09 +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 23:55 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Pascal Hakim] > > > The reason it hasn't been done so far is not related to any technical > > > problem. There seems to be just as many people who do not want the > > > mboxes to

Bug#306737: ITP: q-lang -- Q equational programming language

2005-04-28 Thread Kari Pahula
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: q-lang Version : 6.0 Upstream Author : Albert Graef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://q-lang.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : Q equational programming l

Re: Publicly available mbox archives of debian mailing lists + Bug#161440

2005-04-28 Thread Pascal Hakim
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 03:03 -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 03:09:37PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote: > > > retained by an mbox but not exposed to the web don't seem all that > > > objectionable, especially since the web archives don't munge email > > > addresses. > > > > They mi

Re: Publicly available mbox archives of debian mailing lists + Bug#161440

2005-04-28 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 03:09:37PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote: > > retained by an mbox but not exposed to the web don't seem all that > > objectionable, especially since the web archives don't munge email > > addresses. > > They might one day. It's possible to restrict http://lists.debian.org to >

Re: Bug#306639: batik: FTBFS: JAVA_HOME_DIRS incorrect

2005-04-28 Thread Andreas Jochens
Hello Arnaud, On 05-Apr-27 23:07, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Thanks for your bug reports, but you have to know that you can't file > FTBFS bugs reports about packages that are in contrib and relay on > packages that are not in Debian to build! > The non-free JDK's are not officially supported so the