Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi
I hereby orphan the php-elisp package. I have not had enough time
to maintain it well and think other people may be interested in it.
A new upstream version fix a few things so that is likely the first
thing to do for a new prosper developer.
Best regards,
//
I created a page to collect ideas on new user-visible changes that could be
rolled into Lenny.
Infrastructure-related changes are fine, but the ideas collected on that
page are about new things which Debian could bring to Squeeze which aren't
coming from upstream.
Examples from the past:
- apt
Hello Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
I recently converted a few quilt using local packages to the new 3.0
(quilt) format. Additionaly those packages are kept in an RCS
(mercurial here). Now the problem is: How to version control them?
[...]
You might be interested by [1]...
[1]
On Tue,28.Apr.09, 03:09:52, Noah Slater wrote:
Many of the more popular MUAs on your list have this command
Can you name any others apart from mutt that come with this by default?
Reply in Claws-Mail (and Sylpheed) does the right thing by default
(Reply-to-List if it detects a list, Reply
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 18:08 +1200, Francois Marier wrote:
I created a page to collect ideas on new user-visible changes that could be
rolled into Squeeze.
Please put your thoughts on the wiki:
http://wiki.debian.org/UserVisibleChangesInSqueeze
Who knows, some of these could even become
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 22:47 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
It would be nice if packages that provided these files at one time would
take responsibility for cleaning them up now, late that it is. I'm not sure
this could sensibly be done as a debconf snippet though.
Its not clear that all these
On Tuesday 28 April 2009 05:11:26 Russ Allbery wrote:
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
As far as I see it:
* Debian has dropped the Reply-To header because it is harmful in
some way.
* Debian has mandated that all replies must behave as if Reply-To
existed.
If this
Quoting Lucas Brasilino (lucas.brasil...@gmail.com):
Thanks a lot for you answer. By the way, can you please point me out
some updated
documentation about templates, debconf protocol, commands, etc?
If you introduce debconf templates, you may want to get them reviewed
by the
OoO En cette fin de nuit blanche du mardi 28 avril 2009, vers 05:27,
Brian May b...@snoopy.debian.net disait :
I tried hard, for many years, to love the Mail-Followup-To field, but I
must agree that it doesn't serve the purpose well enough to recommend.
(Briefly: it breaks when a
William Pitcock neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk writes:
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 14:05 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
As it sadly happens many times every day. And as long as there are
no means to enforce it (either pure social or aided by technology),
it will continue to happen.
Reply-To:
+ Mike Hommey (Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:46:35 +0200):
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:53:12AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
Yes, I know the L command, but thanks for pointing it out! My argument
is that I have to remember to use when I am replying to the Debian
+ Steve Langasek (Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:13:57 -0700):
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 06:43:00PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
I’m unsure why assigning VERS_1 to all symbols works for preserving
compatibility, whereas old binaries use symbols not associated with any
version node (i.e., @Base). Maybe
Le mardi 28 avril 2009 à 01:25 +0300, Marius Vollmer a écrit :
If all files in /etc/gconf/schemas are totally useless (i.e., nobody
reads them), why not put a big cleanup hack in, say, gconf itself that
just removes that directory entirely. (In addition to removing the
snipped from dh_gconf.)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:53:11PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
Please have a look at garlic-doc. It does not look right.
It's using `o' as the bullet character which is not supported by
Markdown/rST. This has already been identified as a case that will need
to be fixed by the individual
Le lundi 27 avril 2009 à 22:47 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
Removing that snippet would be fair; but I don't think this transition has
actually been managed very well, since on a system that's been upgraded
continuously since woody I now see that /etc/gconf/schemas/ is full of
orphaned
Le mardi 28 avril 2009 à 02:56 +0100, Noah Slater a écrit :
It's all very well having a feature like this, but if that feature is easy to
forget because Debian's lists are the only ones that want me use it, it's
hardly
of any real value. Add a Reply-To and this problem goes away.
Le mardi 28 avril 2009 à 10:11 +1000, Brian May a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
C. Only supported by a handful of clients
A number of clients won't automatically generate the header, but may
still support it for group replies. I think this
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Noah Slater wrote:
If this is such a concern, I would like to see the Code of Conduct
updates to recommend that people concerned with follow up emails set
the appropriate headers in their own clients. This was detailed
earlier in this thread.
If people want followups,
On 27 Apr 18:55, Noah Slater wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 07:48:50PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
I fully agree with this. I think having to remember which key one must
use in each context for reply is lame. This is why I do in my ~/.muttrc:
[...]
Where l/debian is the folder which
On 28 Apr 03:58, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
Ben Finney a écrit :
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
Yes, I know the L command, but thanks for pointing it out! My argument
is that I have to remember to use when I am replying to the Debian
lists, which as you can see, doesn't
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:46:01AM +0100, Brett Parker wrote:
*boggle* - you claim to be on multiple lists and yet you don't use server side
filtering and folders?! OK - now that's just plain odd.
Neither do I, does that make me odd too? By all means comment on how I
or anyone elses uses lists,
Brett Parker idu...@sommitrealweird.co.uk writes:
On 27 Apr 18:55, Noah Slater wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't use folders so I don't think this will work
for me.
*boggle* - you claim to be on multiple lists and yet you don't use
server side filtering and folders?! OK - now that's just
2009/4/28 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org:
I’m not subscribed to any list which set the Reply-To header. Could you
at least show some examples of such lists in the free software world?
Just a few (all of them form Argentina):
miembros-at-usla.org.ar; anillo-lst-at-linux.org.ar,
On 27 Apr 18:49, Noah Slater wrote:
So, user error, not software error...
This illustrates my point perfectly!
It's not user error, because I'm just doing what I've learnt to do.
Erm - how's that not user error? What you've learnt is obviously wrong. Relearn
how to use your MUA
On 090428 10:18, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Reply-to-list works with most of the major mailing list software.
I’m not subscribed to any list which set the Reply-To header. Could you
at least show some examples of such lists in the free software world?
Skåne Sjælland Linux User Group (SSLUG)
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:56:59AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Another problem on the flip side is that many people don't observe the please
cc me requests on Debian mailing lists, and that way communication gets
annoying. So in practical terms, it is safer to add more recipients to the
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:04:50AM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Anyway, the first rule of internet:
be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others,
so people should accept wrong CC:s without crying, and people should follow
the CoC when sending mails.
The
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
I’m not subscribed to any list which set the Reply-To header. Could you
at least show some examples of such lists in the free software world?
What's the free software world? Is that a separate networking domain,
or is it connected to the Internet?
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
Also, can you tell us where to write comments related to NEW uploads in plain
English, so that it can be documented in the Developers Reference?
That's actually a really good question which I would like to formulate even more
clear:
How to
Le mardi 28 avril 2009 à 14:12 +0200, Bjørn Mork a écrit :
What's the free software world? Is that a separate networking domain,
or is it connected to the Internet?
CALL THE METAPHOR POLICE!
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 27 avril 2009 à 14:44 +0200, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
If you're annoyed by cc:s (well, Holger, I know you are, you told me about that
more than once :-) ), configure your mailclient to set
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 08:56:57PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Also, can you tell us where to write comments related to NEW uploads
in plain English, so that it can be documented in the Developers
Reference? I think that debian/copyright it not the best place for
this, and apparently
Le Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:32:28PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert a écrit :
If you ask me things are quite clear: From a Debian point of view the
source includes *.orig.tar.gz, *.dsc and *.diff. The files are connected
via md5sum in *.dsc. So shipping the source of a PDF in the diff should
be
Le Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 07:36:27PM -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 08:41:14PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 01:42:04PM +, Joerg Jaspert a écrit :
Hi Maintainer,
rejected, i think we are missing the source for the pdf in doc/.
Almost
Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:04:50AM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Anyway, the first rule of internet:
be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others,
so people should accept wrong CC:s without crying, and people should follow
the CoC when
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: fofix
Version: 3.100
Upstream Author: Pascal Giard evily...@gmail.com
URL: http://code.google.com/p/fofix/
License: GPL2
Description: game of musical skill and fast
I demand that Ben Finney may or may not have written...
[snip; M-F-T]
RFC2822 (which define the semantics of ‘From’ and ‘Reply-To’) and
RFC2369 (which defines the semantics of ‘List-Post’) are
IETF-recommended standards; the other never achieved that.
Given that it's seen some use and been
Package: wnpp
Owner: Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: php-html-treemenu
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : Chuck Burgess, Ken Guest, Richard Heyes
* URL or Web page : http://pear.php.net/package/HTML_TreeMenu/
* License : BSD
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Daniel Burrows wrote:
I'm happy to support whatever markup language people want to use.
Same for me. To feed some facts to be able to compare the options
I rendered the debug blends pages with reST using the very same code
for the preprocessing which does
1. s/^ //
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 02:24:48PM +0200, Resul Cetin wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: fofix
Version: 3.100
Upstream Author: Pascal Giard evily...@gmail.com
URL: http://code.google.com/p/fofix/
Peter Eisentraut pet...@debian.org writes:
Considering that most mailing list software has an elimnatecc feature,
this is never really a problem for people who don't want that sort of
behavior.
This feature is hideously broken for people (like myself) who split
list mail into separate
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 08:25:29AM -0700, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pet...@debian.org writes:
Considering that most mailing list software has an elimnatecc feature,
this is never really a problem for people who don't want that sort of
behavior.
This feature
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:06:28AM -0400, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
Description : Provides a PHP API to create an HTML tree
Should be in 'is-a(n)' form, and is there no long description?
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52
On 2009-04-28, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 08:25:29AM -0700, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org
wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pet...@debian.org writes:
Considering that most mailing list software has an elimnatecc feature,
this is never really a problem for people who
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 04:51:56PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Daniel Burrows wrote:
I'm happy to support whatever markup language people want to use.
...
I used for markdown
...
and for reST
FYI:
As I checked popularity of similar plain text formatters via popcon,
Goswin von Brederlow dijo [Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:48:58AM +0200]:
Hi,
I recently converted a few quilt using local packages to the new 3.0
(quilt) format. Additionaly those packages are kept in an RCS
(mercurial here). Now the problem is: How to version control them?
The new format
Raphael Hertzog schrieb:
RFH: Removing spam from the listarchive
---
As you all know, Lists and the Listarchive aren't 100% Spam-free. So we
provide a 'Report as Spam' on every page in the archive. Now we set up a
system to review those nominations, as
Andreas Tille dijo [Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 04:51:56PM +0200]:
3. s/^(\s*)[.o]\s+/\1* /
This enables rendering lists using 'o' and '.' as bullets
I know 'o' is a character visually similar to a bullet... But I would
really prefer to discourage its use as such, specially if now lists
will be
On Tue,28.Apr.09, 20:56:57, Charles Plessy wrote:
Also, can you tell us where to write comments related to NEW uploads in plain
English, so that it can be documented in the Developers Reference? I think
that
debian/copyright it not the best place for this, and apparently README.source
is
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 08:12:22PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Brett Parker idu...@sommitrealweird.co.uk writes:
On 27 Apr 18:55, Noah Slater wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't use folders so I don't think this will work
for me.
*boggle* - you claim to be on multiple lists and yet you
+ Mike Hommey (Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:52:36 +0200):
Since I wouldn't dream of recommending anyone use a proprietary data
silo like Google Mail, I invite you instead to look at the ‘sup’ package
for a folder-less approach to organising email messages that many say is
superior.
Description:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 08:52:36PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 08:12:22PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Folders aren't the only way to manage lots of messages sanely; ask any
Google Mail user.
Since I wouldn't dream of recommending anyone use a proprietary data
silo
Mike Hommey a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 08:12:22PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Brett Parker idu...@sommitrealweird.co.uk writes:
On 27 Apr 18:55, Noah Slater wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't use folders so I don't think this will work
for me.
*boggle* - you claim to be on multiple lists and
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Bastian Venthur wrote:
This is a nice way to kill some free time. Is there something similar
planned for the BTS or are the mark as spam messages in the BTS
already dealed with?
They're currently handled manually, almost exclusively by Blars Blarson.
I assume more help
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 03:13:41PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 08:52:36PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 08:12:22PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Folders aren't the only way to manage lots of messages sanely; ask any
Google Mail user.
Since I
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:45:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Anyway, the exact list of Bin-NMUs is rather uninteresting. More
interesting can be, I think, the current list of known transitions
against which the Release Team works, which you were pointed at on
IRC later:
On 11734 March 1977, Charles Plessy wrote:
In my profession we often say “The person who does not make mistakes usually
does not do any work at all.”, so it is fine with me. Can I re-upload a
version
for main that you would fast-track to resolve the issue?
Also, can you tell us where to
On 11734 March 1977, Andreas Tille wrote:
How to address the fact that a rejection issue is solved now?
Reply to the rejection mail *or* have a changelog entry fixed lalala as
mentioned by ftpmaster.
--
bye, Joerg
Free beer is something that I am never going to drink and free speech is
Hello,
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 12:07 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no writes:
I don't know, but there are plenty of reasons to choose from. See e.g.
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
A stronger, and simpler, case is made by
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
RFH: Removing spam from the listarchive
---
As you all know, Lists and the Listarchive aren't 100% Spam-free. So we
provide a 'Report as Spam' on every page in the archive. Now we set up a
system to review those
Frank Lin PIAT fp...@klabs.be writes:
If the sender of the previous email is subscribed to the list:
If I select Reply:
To=mailing-list
CC=
If I select Reply to all:
To=mailing-list
CC=Previous email's recipient.
If the sender of the previous mail was NOT subscribed
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
But I'd prefer dropping 'o' as a bullet marker.
Yes, me too. But somewhere in this longish discussion it
was suggested to find a solution for currently existing descriptions
and ditch these cases later. I do not want to spend my time to
seek for the
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:54:07PM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
If the sender of the previous email is subscribed to the list:
If I select Reply:
To=mailing-list
CC=
What if you are replying to a response to somebody who is not
subscribed to the list?
The emailer you are responding
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 02:34:11PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
personally I've more difficulty on handling usenet post on different
computer: synchronize read post at home, office and offline laptop.
Unfortunately, this has also put me off NNTP. I think this is a
limitation in the
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org writes:
As I checked popularity of similar plain text formatters via popcon,
http://people.debian.org/~osamu/pub/getwiki/html/ch12.en.html#listoftoolstohigghtplaintextdata
asciidoc 0.8% installed
markdown 0.4% installed
rest2web 0.1% installed
The
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
Hmm, [‘sup-mail’] looks very interesting! Thanks for tip Ben.
You're welcome.
Caveat: I tried it and dropped it because its support for Unicode is
currently broken (Bug#520374), and Ruby isn't a language I'm able to
hack.
--
\ “He who allows
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:19:04AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
How Mutt is able to detect all mailing lists? The fields in the headers
only allow to detect the current mailing list.
You can define what are mailing lists using the lists and subcribe
config options.
--
Brian May
[Noah Slater]
Mandating something which relies on the wholesale upgrade of hundreds
of MUAs to get right by default doesn't sound like a good solution to
me. I don't care how many RFCs you wave in my face. :)
Let's see ... another series of MUA-related standards documents, RFC
2045 and
+ Frank Lin PIAT (Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:54:07 +0200):
If the sender of the previous email is subscribed to the list:
[...]
If the sender of the previous mail was NOT subscribed to the list.
[...]
And how does one (or their MUA) know which of these is the case?
--
- Are you sure we're good?
-
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 07:46 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
+ Frank Lin PIAT (Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:54:07 +0200):
If the sender of the previous email is subscribed to the list:
[...]
If the sender of the previous mail was NOT subscribed to the list.
[...]
And how does one (or their MUA)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:26:07 +0300
Source: libmail-box-perl
Binary: libmail-box-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.089-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:26:33 +0200
Source: xulrunner
Binary: xulrunner-1.9 xulrunner-1.9-gnome-support libmozjs1d libmozjs-dev
libmozjs1d-dbg spidermonkey-bin xulrunner-dev xulrunner-1.9-dbg
libmozillainterfaces-java python-xpcom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:37:44 +0200
Source: labplot
Binary: labplot
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.6.0.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Helen Faulkner he...@debian.org
Changed-By: Frank S. Thomas f...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:14:00 -0700
Source: librack-ruby
Binary: librack-ruby1.8 librack-ruby
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:22:40 +0300
Source: firebird2.1
Binary: firebird2.1-super firebird2.1-classic libfbclient2 libfbembed2.1
firebird2.1-common firebird2.1-server-common firebird2.1-dev
firebird2.1-examples firebird2.1-doc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:47:38 +0200
Source: argyll
Binary: argyll
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.3+dfsg1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roland Mas lola...@debian.org
Changed-By: Roland Mas lola...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:52:17 +0100
Source: rootskel
Binary: rootskel rootskel-bootfloppy
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.76
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-b...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:52:52 +1000
Source: ledger
Binary: ledger
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.6.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matt Palmer mpal...@debian.org
Changed-By: Matt Palmer mpal...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:32:06 +0200
Source: gnome-python
Binary: python-gnome2 python-gconf python-gnome2-dev python-gnome2-doc
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.26.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastien
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:53:33 +0200
Source: arora
Binary: arora
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sune Vuorela deb...@pusling.com
Changed-By: Sune Vuorela deb...@pusling.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:57:02 +0200
Source: libgnome
Binary: libgnome2-0 libgnome2-dev libgnome2-common libgnome2-doc libgnome2-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.26.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ondřej
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:56:20 +0200
Source: ecj
Binary: ecj libecj-java libecj-java-gcj ecj1 ecj-gcj
Architecture: source all hppa
Version: 3.4.2-3
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:49:05 +0200
Source: xymon
Binary: xymon xymon-client hobbit hobbit-client
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 4.3.0~beta2.dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Berg m...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:20:41 +0200
Source: argyll
Binary: argyll
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.3-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roland Mas lola...@debian.org
Changed-By: Roland Mas lola...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:18:02 +0900
Source: libgems-ruby
Binary: rubygems1.8 rubygems1.9 rubygems rubygems-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daigo Moriwaki da...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:48:36 +0200
Source: bird
Binary: bird
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org
Changed-By: Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:21:53 +0300
Source: padre
Binary: padre libwx-perl-dialog-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.34-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Damyan Ivanov d...@debian.org
Changed-By: Damyan Ivanov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:51:57 +0200
Source: scilab
Binary: scilab scilab-data scilab-include scilab-bin libscilab-java scilab-doc
scilab-doc-fr scilab-test
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 5.1.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:13:40 -0500
Source: rcmdr
Binary: r-cran-rcmdr
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4-10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org
Changed-By: Dirk Eddelbuettel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:33:18 +0200
Source: gforge
Binary: gforge gforge-common gforge-web-apache2 gforge-web-apache
gforge-db-postgresql gforge-mta-exim4 gforge-mta-postfix gforge-mta-courier
gforge-shell-postgresql gforge-ftp-proftpd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:10:39 +0900
Source: ccstools
Binary: tomoyo-ccstools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.6.7-20090401-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP) henr...@debian.or.jp
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:01:30 +
Source: doxygen
Binary: doxygen doxygen-gui doxygen-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.5.8-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthias Klose d...@debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:01:40 +0200
Source: bootcd
Binary: bootcd bootcd-i386 bootcd-hppa bootcd-ia64 bootcd-mkinitramfs
bootcd-backup
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:50:40 -0700
Source: libpar-packer-perl
Binary: libpar-packer-perl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.991-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:17:35 +0200
Source: octave3.0
Binary: octave3.0 octave3.0-doc octave3.0-htmldoc octave3.0-headers
octave3.0-emacsen octave3.0-info octave2.9 octave2.9-doc octave2.9-htmldoc
octave2.9-headers octave2.9-emacsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:58:03 +0200
Source: libsvn-hooks-perl
Binary: libsvn-hooks-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.17.54-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:07:38 -0400
Source: bibtool
Binary: bibtool
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.48alpha.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Barry deFreese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:10:38 +0100
Source: git-cola
Binary: git-cola
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3.7.21-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Iulian Udrea iul...@ubuntu.com
Changed-By: Iulian Udrea iul...@ubuntu.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:19:55 -0400
Source: xcftools
Binary: xcftools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Barry deFreese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:30:40 +
Source: babiloo
Binary: babiloo
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Python Applications Packaging Team
python-apps-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
