Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 27 avril 2009 à 14:44 +0200, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
If you're annoyed by cc:s (well, Holger, I know you are, you told me about that
more than once :-) ), configure your mailclient to set Mail-Followup-To and hope
for the next poster's mailclient to support that header. Which actually means
that, to a certain degree, those annoyed by cc:s could themselves do something
about it.
Mail-Followup-To is:
A. Useless junk without clear semantics
B. Violating standards
C. Only supported by a handful of clients
D. Obi-wan Kenobi says: “All of the above”
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98dec/I-D/draft-ietf-drums-mail-followup-to-00.txt
Perfectly well defined.
It wasa draft and the fourth line:
Expires: May 1998 November 1997
I don't think it is perfectly defined.
Anyway, the first rule of internet:
"be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others",
so people should accept wrong CC:s without crying, and people should follow
the CoC when sending mails.
ciao
cate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
