On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 09:49:22PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
Dan == Dan Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dan See, it's not Is anyone going to? or Do we agree we
Dan should? right now. It's does anyone but Dan have the time
Dan to look at http://master.debian.org/~dan
On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 08:38:57PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Greenland writes:
While I agree in principle, you might want to ask Michael Elkins first;
it's conceivable that he could be brought into any litigation
I didn't realize that the author of mutt-i was a US resident (I
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 09:42:54AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marco writes:
Look like there is consensus to move mutt-i to main. In the next days I
will upload it along with some fixes.
Do you think we should check with ME first? While I don't believe he is at
any risk of
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:56:56PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
Dan == Dan Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dan See, it's not Is anyone going to? or Do we agree we
Dan should? right now. It's does anyone but Dan have the time
Dan to look at http://master.debian.org/~dan
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 10:05:09PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
Nobody has moved on getting libstdc++2.8 back in slink, even without
a -dev.
Is anyone going to do this?
Ben
See, it's not Is anyone going to? or Do we agree we should? right
now. It's does anyone but Dan have the time to
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:15:51AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
PowerPC has
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 08:01:42PM -0500, Justin A. McCright wrote:
Is anyone going to try and get a version of this that works with newer
Apaches out before the freeze?
I'm working on it. It's very broken at the moment!
Dan
Le Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 02:31:40AM -0700, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... écrivait:
I do worry about what this might break as well. Another option would be
to have /usr/lib/perl5/debian(/$arch)? be the first element of @INC and
leave /usr/lib/perl5/$version(/$arch)? there with only the Perl
On Wed, Oct 07, 1998 at 09:34:46AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Depends what image you want for the system. The HHGTTG was good,
but I don't think it is worth naming the releases after it.
I prefer the penguins.
BTW, wasn't it Slartibartfast, one word?
Another vote for penguins. Speaking
On Wed, Oct 07, 1998 at 01:34:42AM -0700, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote:
I know what's going on with IPC, and I'm guessing the DBM test is failing
because of a bug in the libc.
So, what's going on with IPC?
IPC until very recently was completely hosed on powerpc. We have hopes
that a new
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 05:19:51PM -0700, Darren Stalder wrote:
Matt McLean, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
this is necessary since the semun union is no longer in the libc. its been
awhile since your last perl upload, and newer versions have come out.. are
you still alive? :-)
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 05:27:23PM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
I study law. And I can tell you that there´s not a problem with the GPL
licence in the KDE project. Even if the GPL (read very narrowly and literally)
prohibited the use of QT, every judge/lawyer would reinterpret this
The problem with roadrunner is this:
They explicitly disallow all servers of ANY kind. No open ports,
except maybe identd.
A friend of mine was running one just fine under linux, with dhcp and
all, but got his account terminated for having sendmail up :)
So be careful.
Dan
--
To
On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 at 12:38:19PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I think that not only should bugs be marked by the
distributions they exist in, they should also be classified by
architecture;
Actually, I think we can do the same way more
On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 at 08:09:51PM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
Actually the true killer was the upgrade of the teTeX packages. It is
pretty hard to stand seeing three time in a row Running initex [...]
This will take some time on a 486DX-2/66 at the configuration stage.
This alone consumed
Or at least offer an xterm-cons or xterm-black-bg. Also, could someone PLEASE
figure out
the remaining options to make xterm behave graphically like a console?
I can't get the combination of bold and 16 colors to work correctly.
Dan
On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 at 05:43:54PM -0500, Alexander E. Apke
Will do, then. This leaves me one big question, though. This is going
to require mixing four things:
(A) apache 1.3.0
(B) netgod's massive apache diff
(C) mod_perl upstream -- probably going to version it by date and use
the CVS tree instead of the rarer new releases.
(D) My own diff for this
Since the dynamic version of mod_perl is quite broken right now (I
believe Jules advised the perl maintainer of the problems; loading
dynamic shared objects from another DSO reults in a few undeclared
symbols from libperl.a - I'm guessing somehow the lowest level module
can't see them, and don't
On Mon, Jun 15, 1998 at 12:34:38PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
Andreas Jellinghaus writes:
what then ?
joe.
Well, that's IMHO an idea worth worth studying. When I first
installed Linux, I was coming from DOS and Borland's editors, which
joe mimics quite closely.
And joe, like ae,
is almost ready.
Source: libapache-mod-perl
Section: main/web
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Dan Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Standards-Version: 2.4.1
Package: libapache-mod-perl
Architecture: i386
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, apache (= 1.3.0), perl
Description: Integration of perl with the Apache
Now, don't get me wrong...I hate windows registries just as badly as
anyone else, and I've been using linuxconf on and off for ages. But
this has one darn good idea to it: many programs using the same data
source. For instance, I just installed this machine with one hostname
before realizing
I ran through my first x86 install today, and had a wierd problem.
After pounding my bios into properly detect both c and d drives, I
started the install using loadlin planning to avoid floppies
altogether. However, when the time came to select a partition to find
the resc1440.bin for drivers,
On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 09:55:57AM +0100, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
Not yet. A few questions: Which filesystem type has hdc1? Which version of the
boot-floppies were you using? I assume hdc2 and hdc3 were properly detected
in previous steps (initialize swap initialize linux partition), right?
On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 12:28:24PM -0400, LeRoy D. Cressy wrote:
Where or what is your /dev/hdb drive? Is your hdb drive your
cdrom? If so, it should be detected. I don't know if the
cdrom has been compiled as a module, if so they must be loaded from the
drivers
disk.
hdb is my cdrom,
24 matches
Mail list logo
