Hi Ulrich,
Ulrich Dangel wrote:
On 07/25/12 02:15, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
You don't seem to be in LDAP, nor in the keyring, so no, you're not,
unless you're posting under some alias or similar.
I am posting under an alias, but in any case, Debian's LDAP and keyring only
contain
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Monday, July 23, 2012 11:00:37 PM Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Which kind of idiotic distraction?
The one where you continue this pointless thread.
I don't think this thread is pointless; it is simply too noisy.
If it isn't clear to you
already let me try one more
Hi Russ,
Russ Allbery wrote:
Filipus Klutierochea...@gmail.com writes:
The second highest decision-making body in question is also our lowest
conflict resolution body. I for one am not interested in reading the
outcome of each small claims case.
You have been heard. I've read all of
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Filipus Klutiero
You are not a Debian developer.
I am.
You don't seem to be in LDAP, nor in the keyring, so no, you're not,
unless you're posting under some alias or similar.
I am posting under an alias, but in any case, Debian's LDAP and keyring
only
Hi Philipp,
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:31:43PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Please try using complete sentences. While you're at it,
constructive messages would be more productive than name-calling.
If you think that your messages are constructive, well, you're wrong
Steve McIntyre wrote:
Filipus Klutiero whined:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:38:21PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
although publicity of some resolutions may indeed be useful for a
wide range of developers, I fail to see many who would be interested
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 07:33:37PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:38:21PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:07:15PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 07:49:50PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Lars,
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:38:21PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Stefano,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:07:15PM -0400
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:38:21PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:07:15PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Thank you, but I would appreciate if debian-devel-announce would
stay dedicated to important
Hi Thibaut,
Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le 21/07/12 22:35, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
Hi Arno,
Arno Töll wrote:
Hi,
On 18.07.2012 02:07, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Thank you, but I would appreciate if debian-devel-announce
would stay dedicated to important announcements which may
Hi Lars,
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:38:21PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Stefano,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:07:15PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Thank you, but I would appreciate if debian-devel-announce would
stay
Hi Philipp,
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:38:21PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:07:15PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Thank you, but I would appreciate if debian-devel-announce would
stay dedicated
Hi Arno,
Arno Töll wrote:
Hi,
On 18.07.2012 02:07, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Thank you, but I would appreciate if debian-devel-announce would stay
dedicated to important announcements which may be useful for a wide
range of developers.
While you are right in general I beg to disagree
Hi Stefano,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:07:15PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Thank you, but I would appreciate if debian-devel-announce would
stay dedicated to important announcements which may be useful for a
wide range of developers.
tech-ctte resolutions do
Hi Jonas,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-07-17 at 08:07pm, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
On 2012-07-12 14:59, Don Armstrong wrote:
=== Resolution ===
The Technical Committee reaffirms the importance of preventing namespace
collisions for programs in the distribution, while recognizing
Russ Allbery wrote:
Jonas Smedegaardd...@jones.dk writes:
I believe the reason for targeting -announce as well was the initial
part about a more general principle, preserved in my quoting above,
which IMO does
Hi Don,
Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Thank you, but I would appreciate if debian-devel-announce would
stay dedicated to important announcements which may be useful for a
wide range of developers.
Because developers can override CTTE decisions, it's
On 2012-06-27 11:34, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
On 2012-04-05 20:20, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
This didn't generate as much feedback as I hoped, but I filed a
ticket asking task-desktop to install synaptic:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667703
Joey Hess changed tasks to bring
On 2012-07-12 14:59, Don Armstrong wrote:
=== Resolution ===
The Technical Committee reaffirms the importance of preventing namespace
collisions for programs in the distribution, while recognizing that
compatibility with upstreams and with previous Debian releases is also
important and that
Hi Henrique,
On 2012-07-15 20:29, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Perl HTML::Tree 5 has backwards-incompatible interface changes.
Version 5.00-1 added a NEWS.Debian entry to warn about that. As the
...
migrated to testing and I upgraded my
Hi,
Perl HTML::Tree 5 has backwards-incompatible interface changes. Version
5.00-1 added a NEWS.Debian entry to warn about that. As the entry below
shows, it is intended for developers (although it could actually make
sense to warn users too that the interface is unversioned). But it also
Hi Alexander,
On 2012-07-05 11:58, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the mysql-server-5.1 package:
#593463: [phpmyadmin] Failed ALTER query reports success
It has been closed by Debian FTP
On 2012-04-05 20:20, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
This didn't generate as much feedback as I hoped, but I filed a ticket
asking task-desktop to install synaptic:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667703
Joey Hess changed tasks to bring Synaptic in KDE, LXDE and Xfce. Only
the GNOME
Hi Matthias,
On 2012-06-27 14:54, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
Hi!
How odd that I didn't notice that bug... (I'm the GPK/PK maintainer)
Well, I think pulling in Synaptic on KDE might be a bad idea, probably
KDE desktop packages should pull in Apper instead, a KDE package
manager based on PackageKit
reassign 481129 debian-policy
merge 481129 671503
thanks
On 2012-05-17 07:48, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Excerpts from Filipus Klutiero's message of Wed May 16 18:44:21 +0200 2012:
Could you clarify how this differs from #481129?
It's 4 years later.
Sorry, forgot that I filed the bug already.
Could you clarify how this differs from #481129?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fb3d965.5030...@gmail.com
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 10:26:13PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
On Dom 13 May 2012 21:40:10 Marco d'Itri escribió:
[snip]
Does anybody actually know that people routinely try to install desktop
systems with only a CD and no networking, and
Hi Stefano, Russ and everyone,
thanks for your interest in this topic. I entirely agree that we should
do better in this area. Since the discussion problem is not specific to
debian-devel, I'm moving this to debian-project.
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:11:23AM -0700,
This didn't generate as much feedback as I hoped, but I filed a ticket
asking task-desktop to install synaptic:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667703
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Joerg,
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Hi
i took the BSP i am at right now to look at that pdiff shit, and after i
finished yelling at that code, we now are creating pdiff files for
changed Translation-*.bz2 too.
Thank you. This solves #659976.
That is, we just started, so there is only the
Hi songbird,
On 2012-03-27 14:04, songbird wrote:
hello,
regarding your recent message about synaptic in
Gnome.
i have been using it all along with wheezy in
Gnome.
i dislike any other package manager i've tried.
i need a way to generate a download list so i can
get larger files via
Hi Jon,
Jon Dowland wrote:
A Debian desktop should be a superset of KDE-desktop | GNOME-desktop
| LXDE-desktop etc. + things such as a GUI package manager.
I am not sure what you mean by that, but task-desktop already looks like
what you may have in mind. It recommends task-gnome-desktop |
Hi Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Jon Dowlandj...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:30:37PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Shouldn't there rather be a base-desktop that both KDE-desktop and
GNOME-desktop depend on? A meta package that depends on everything any
Hi,
3 days ago I installed wheezy on my laptop. The day after I realized
that no graphical APT front-end was installed. Usually, I just install
Synaptic as a habit, but this time I was surprised I had to do that as I
was specifically testing the completeness of our KDE meta-packages and
had
On 2012-02-16 05:01, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:12:28AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hum, interesting. I am aware that the ITS deals with errors in the
package given, like when the user does a typo, but I'm not aware
that one can knowingly report
On 2012-02-16 06:12, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:12:28AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Ah, OK. If the request is going to be Why am I experiencing problem
foo?, then it makes sense on debian-user. In that case, the problem
is just phrasing (in the current phrasing, the user
Hi Josip,
Josip Rodin wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:25:26PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
[Forgot to Cc joy]
debian-user's topic is user support.
For technical discussions about development, the default group is
debian-devel@lists.debian.org.
Reference:http
[Forgot to Cc joy]
Hi Andrei,
On 2012-01-15 17:59, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Du, 15 ian 12, 14:35:17, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
debian-user's topic is user support.
For technical discussions about development, the default group is
debian-devel@lists.debian.org.
Reference:
http
submission without specifying a package
thanks
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
The ITS requires a package to be specified to send a report. If the
reporter doesn't know which package is concerned, our documentation
about bug reporting says:
If you are unable to determine which
Josh Triplett wrote:
In general I don't see anything wrong with you in most circumstances,
though I think phrases like this system seem clearer and less
ambiguous than your system.
I agree. This is often seen in package descriptions, for example
On 2012-02-04 14:16, Ondřej Surý wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fellow developers,
this is just a heads up that we will upload php version 5.4 into
unstable very soon. It is currently in RC phase and we spoke to PHP
upstream and both parties think this is a good idea to
Martin Eberhard Schauer wrote:
The changes have ill side-effects:
[...]
- These (untranslated) one-liners is what one gets visiting (2), e.g. (3).
Oh-oh. This was reported as #657557:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657557
- There are no new Translation-xx files (4).
Hi archive team,
On 2012-01-22 11:08, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Hi,
as announced earlier[1] we have just changed dak to only include the
short description in the Packages indices for the testing, unstable,
experimental, p-u and testing-p-u suites. The full description can be
retrieved from the
On 2012-01-22 14:28, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Filipus Klutierochea...@gmail.com (22/01/2012):
am I missing something? The main i386 Packages.bz2 in both dists and
newdists still seems to weigh 8 MB:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/newdists/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/
Hi Iustin,
Iustin Pop wrote:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:48:35PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
- I've made the private email aliases considered harmful point [10],
in a somehow unrelated thread. I ask you to watch out for interactions
in Debian that could happen only through private
Hi Stefano,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 07:41:27AM +0900, Iustin Pop wrote:
Sorry for reviving and old email. To what extend do you think this
should apply - even at individual package level?
I ask this because of the following: recently I had a 1-1 discussion
with a co-maintainer of one
Hi Martin,
Martin Eberhard Schauer wrote:
Hi,
some time ago I read a post of the DPL regarding enhancing package
description quality. Bug reports from translators should be a means
for achieving this goal.
(quoting from the developer's reference, section 8.4:)
Best
Package: general
Severity: important
I downloaded debian-live-6.0.0-i386-kde-desktop.img and managed to write
it on a USB stick. Shutting down generally works, but restarting
doesn't. After the init scripts finish, the console prints
Please remove the USB flash drive and press ENTER to
Package: general
Severity: important
Debian Live 6's boot menu seems to contain 14 options. I used the image
debian-live-6.0.0-i386-kde-desktop.img. There are 4 Live options, 4 Text
options, 4 GUI options, and 2 more, the first being Memory test.
I tried the USB key on 3 PC, and I always only
Quoting Filipus Klutiero (chea...@gmail.com):
I must still thank you for sending a report. My first reaction was
Finally, I am just disappointed by the content.
I am disappointed by your followup and insistance.
To make it clear (sorry readers, you'll need a translation tool but I
need
Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Adrian von Bidder
avbid...@fortytwo.ch wrote:
Hi Arthur,
On Monday 20 September 2010 11.37:04 Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
[GSoC report]
Hmm. It would have been nice to hear about what the students did and how
far they got in
On 2010-09-23 05:32, Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Filipus Klutierochea...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
I would recommend requiring candidate mentors to agree to share evaluations
with GSoC admins, so admins can at least pick information on results when a
report has to be
On 2010-09-23 21:26, David Kalnischkies wrote:
2010/9/23 Filipus Klutierochea...@gmail.com:
On 2010-09-23 05:32, Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Filipus Klutierochea...@gmail.com
wrote:
[...]
I would recommend requiring candidate mentors to agree to share
Package: general
Severity: minor
The media player and my computer keys on the Chicony KU-0420 (aka Targus Slim
Internet Media USB Keyboard) are
generating wrong symbols (with XKeyboardConfig 1.8). The first generates
XF86Tools instead of XF86AudioMedia and the second generates XF86Explorer
On 2009-04-11, Filipus Klutiero chea...@gmail.com wrote:
Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
=== And the details: ===
[...]
These descriptions are very short. Assuming these are the abstracts,
that's not the students' fault. The abstracts were shortened this year
to 500 characters. I struggled
Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
=== And the details: ===
[...]
These descriptions are very short. Assuming these are the abstracts,
that's not the students' fault. The abstracts were shortened this year
to 500 characters. I struggled to shorten mine to fit this. At this
length, it's probably
Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
* KDE/Qt4 Adept 3.0 Package Manager *
-
Student: Mateusz Marek, Mentor: *NEEDS MENTOR, see below.*
Finish Adept 3.0, a fully integrated package manager for Qt4/KDE4.
Adept is currently the only viable path to a Debian native package
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:57:30 -0400
Filipus Klutiero chea...@gmail.com wrote:
(Could you add a blank line between the quoted reply and your content?
It makes the content easier for me to read. Thanks.)
I'll try
Neil Williams wrote:
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:23:37 -0400
Filipus Klutiero chea...@gmail.com wrote:
In a similar way to udebs. The .tdeb needs to be handled differently by
package management tools (things like reprepro and dak) so that uploads
of TDebs can be made by translation teams, so
Neil Williams wrote:
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 01:13:19 -0400
Filipus Klutiero chea...@gmail.com wrote:
That would be a nice improvement, but let me suggest another
implementation. To avoid introducing a second diff, why not updating the
regular diff (in the case of non-native
Package management tools need a way to tell a .deb from a .tdeb - the
two need to be handled differently by tools like dak, britney, apt,
dpkg, reprepro, deb-gview and others.
Do you mean that package management tools need a way to tell a
traditional/current .deb from a package
What purpose is served by the existence of kde (the metapackage)?
kde is the package which administrators who want to try KDE should
generally install.
Is there a reason why not to clarify its meaning by renaming it as
'kde-full'
kde doesn't depend on the full KDE (for example, it doesn't
Neil Williams wrote:
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:45:46 -0400
Filipus Klutiero chea...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] http://www.emdebian.org/media/debian-media/
That would be a nice improvement, but let me suggest another
implementation. To avoid introducing a second diff, why not updating
Neil Williams wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:06:35 -0400
Filipus Klutiero chea...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Williams wrote:
Primary Motivations (in order):
1. Updates to translations should not require source NMU's
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:21:59 -0400
Filipus Klutiero chea...@gmail.com wrote:
That would be a nice improvement, but let me suggest another
implementation. To avoid introducing a second diff, why not updating the
regular diff (in the case of non-native packages) but indicating
Neil Williams wrote:
Primary Motivations (in order):
1. Updates to translations should not require source NMU's.
I guess that means avoiding to NMU with new diff.gz -s? If so, what are
the underlying motivations?
What is the purpose of creating a new binary package format for this (as
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Obey Arthur Liu (art...@milliways.fr):
synaptic or shaman (from Chakra). I think that aptitude-gtk and adept
are not userfriendly. Using these applications was quite difficult for
Heartfelt thank yous! (I'm the guy responsible for aptitude-gtk.. :D )
Is
Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
Christian Perrier wrote:
Is this silly to think that, as most of the (good) work was made in
aptitude-gtk, an aptitude-qt development would be a better idea?
At first sight, it does sound silly to me. aptitude-gtk is a GTK+ GUI
Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Sonntag, 29. März 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Hm? Your original mail said you wanted:
Depends: (pdns-backend-ldap + pdns-recursor) | bind9
How does installing bind9 plus pdns-backend-ldap not satisfy the above?
Sure it does satisfy the depends, but installing
Neil Williams wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:15:00 -0400
Filipus Klutiero chea...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
What about a way of having a really long, detailed, nicely formatted
description on packages.debian.org but a much shorter, more basic
version in the Packages.gz file
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:45:09 +0100 (CET)
Andreas Tille til...@rki.de wrote:
I tried to find a clear advise how to reasonable format lists inside long
descriptions of packages. The only thing I know is that lines with two
leading spaces is considered verbose.
Packages.gz is already 26Mb -
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, martin f krafft wrote:
What we really should do, instead of clinging to the NIH-behaviour,
reinventing the wheel, and polishing it over and over again is ditch
the pseudo-RFC822 format we have and use Yaml instead.
http://www.yaml.org/start.html
Ben Finney wrote:
Wording and tone aside, is that expectation reasonable?
Yes.
What course of
action is open to a user of the package, with a maintainer who has
made it plain they're not interested in following (this part of)
policy?
There's nothing direct you can do as user. As a
Le February 16, 2009 05:29:21 pm Daniel Baumann, vous avez écrit :
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
You are aware that Debian Live lenny RC1 was released on *2009-02-09*?
no, i didn't know that *kidding*
Eh, maybe I didn't know that lenny was about to be released then.
I did not see any
Le February 15, 2009 06:03:46 am Daniel Baumann, vous avez écrit :
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
first of all: you are aware that you hit the *worst* possible time of
sending that email when doing it on the *very* *evening* *when* *we*
*are* *actually* *really* *releasing*, especially
Package: general
Version: 5.0.0
Severity: normal
When shutting down Debian Live running from a USB flash drive, one gets a
bunch of errors on tty1:
Cleaning up ifupdown
Unmounting temporary filesystems...umount: /live/cow: device is busy
umount: /live/cow: device is busy
umount: /live:
Package: general
Version: 5.0.0
Severity: normal
Debian Live's disk1 boot method (F4, Boot from the first hard disk) fails on 2
PCs from 2 tested with
Could not find kernel image: disk1
I do not have any computer with 2 HDDs, so I didn't try disk2.
I got this with
/releases/lenny/i386/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html#live
W. Martin Borgert added the paragraph coordinating with Daniel Baumann.
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
how/where was it decided that Debian Live would be official
(for x86) with lenny?
it was declared as such when we
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 09:34 +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
Hi!
I have been wondering over the last months about Section: kde.
What is the correct usage of this section?
..
I have tried to summarised some of the ideas of this thread in
http://wiki.debian.org/DiscussionsAfterLenny/Sections
Le January 7, 2009 02:32:24 am Joerg Jaspert, vous avez écrit :
I don't remember using sections in over 4 years of Debian usage, though
I had already used GNU/Linux for a few months before I switched to
Debian. But I doubt even a user new to GNU/Linux would use them much.
Everyone that
IMO, it would make sense to merge Debian sections into a debtags facet
so that you can have multiple sections when it makes sense. The facet
could still be controlled by ftpmasters if that was desired.
I don't understand why you suggest creating a debtags facet replacing
sections, except if you
Le January 8, 2009 05:50:02 pm Charles Plessy, vous avez écrit :
Le Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 03:02:23PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
I don't understand why you suggest creating a debtags facet replacing
sections, except if you plan to give exclusive control on it to the
archive maintenance
http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/873ag1u2hv.fsf%40vorlon.ganneff.de
On ven, 2009-01-02 at 16:55 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
I guess we actually need to consider what the sections are good for.
Asking in a random irc channel at least didn't reveal any real
answers.
So what about
The other way round works, too: Removing people who don't have that
minimal commitment from the project and their packages from the archive
would also allow us to release (a lot less) in a timely fashion.
Right... And it would also help releasing timely to remove all buggy
packages.
--
That works both ways - those who do contribute and help Debian across a
wide range of areas should be valued and supported, even if they show
that frustration from time to time. Everyone makes mistakes but why
must the most active contributors be the first target of criticism when
they criticise
The single largest factor in making the atmosphere unpleasant is people who
aren't contributing to Debian running their mouths on our development lists.
I disagree, though I know relatively well how much people contribute.
I'd rather blame the mailing lists if simple enthusiasts caused too
Le November 8, 2008 09:46:48 am Christian Perrier, vous avez écrit :
i18n work session 2: tdebs
--
(notes taken by Marc Hymers)
tdebs or translation debs are an attempt to achieve two goals, by
splitting localization material out of packahes:
- reduce space usage
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 07:29:16PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
| Package: test
| Depends: test-modules | test-source
|
| Package: test-modules
| Depends: linux-image-2.6.26-1-powerpc | linux-image-2.6.26-1-powerpc64
|
| Package: test-source
Both apt and aptitude would always try
Hi folks
Because of some recent events, I thought about the possibility for
packages to depend against kernel module packages. As we don't want to
dictate the usage of Debian provided kernels, we need a last resort
fallback to the modules source.
My first solution was something like the
In other words, if a tag indicates a special case, that special case
should be justified with a specific explanation.
I would like to see such justification expected for every such tag,
enforced by the convention that tags with *no* justification provided
can be summarily removed by anyone.
Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In other words, if a tag indicates a special case, that special case
should be justified with a specific explanation.
I would like to see such justification expected for every such tag,
enforced by the convention that tags
Le October 19, 2008 04:04:58 am Thomas Viehmann, vous avez écrit :
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
It is, but the first team that should approve a Linux upgrade in lenny
is the kernel team. After that the d-i team would be contacted.
Could you just stop handing out bad advice on the development
On ven, 2008-10-17 at 21:39 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
For kernel-related discussions, ask on debian-kernel.
And for lenny-related discussions, isn't the release team concerned? :)
It is, but the first team that should approve a Linux upgrade in lenny
is the kernel team. After
For kernel-related discussions, ask on debian-kernel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
there are currently 122 RC bugs remaining that affect both testing and
unstable. We need to fix them NOW.
However, in the permanent BSP state that has lasted for quite some time,
people seem to lose focus on this urgent need for the release. So the
idea is:
122 developers × 5 days
So, what's the final status of this thread?
Should I continue working on the package? Should I drop it?
I wouldn't want to drop it -- if there's no consensus or, at least, someone
wanting it -- and wanting to *sponsor* it, or someone that will actually
*use* it, I believe I'll put that on my
So, DKMS is being run after the installation of a kernel. Am I right?
Yes.
Btw, is all this documented anywhere?
I guess it isn't.
Kindly,
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is achieved through the installation of a script in:
/etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/
/etc/kernel/prerm.d/
A quick search with apt-file didn't return any result.
Is this approach supported by Debian?
/etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/ isn't supported.
I remember grub
So there's some positive response. Where is a good place to pursue this
further? Is this a debian policy change?
I think there's no need for a Debian policy change to start.
You should start by finding a proper way to put the recommendation and
suggestion explanations in package control
I was in favour at first sight, but not anymore. I agree with Adeodato
that in general, the second integer of a software version is more
meaningful that a stable update means. Also, as he wrote, it used to
mean something entirely different in Debian itself, less than 4 years ago.
But at least
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
