On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:22:12PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> We're still waitinf for the lufthansa machines to set it up :/
>
That remembers me that having some bits about that would be nice.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
or you quick help!
>
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422717
As you can see, it does not help: proftpd-ldap is (was starting from
next upload, thanks God) an all-type fake package with a ${source:Version}
dependency in place. That strict dep was probably supefluous in the
, no program in Debian actually uses this code, it's just
> inherited from upstream libraries.
>
> Are there any objections?
>
Just check that they _CONTAIN_ implementation, not just are able to link
some external library which implements IDEA. Just for precision and
unu
well, but it seems
> only honest to admit that as a project, we don't care about 486 enough to
> even get 486-specific problems marked as RC in time to do anything about
> them for a release.
>
That could be fixed in R1, isn't it? I see no major problems on those
regard
out debpool and debarchiver, involving
> Joel, Ola and several users/code writers. If you are interested, I can
> send you the discussion.
>
Pointers? Debpool is a nice tiny tool, but lacks some major useful
features and has a few annoying bugs. It could be improved. It's a pity
it stale
packaging this as a dependancy of secondlife-client
>
Just I wonder if/how it's better than Jasper for jpeg2k. Any hints about
that?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
automatically as
> Maitnainer/Uploader, the fact that the package is well maintained may
> hide that a particular DD do nothing at all, and is in fact MIA.
>
That would be avoided by removing entry on the basis of the changelog
containts. People who do not touch the package for +365 days
t
> i be allowed to become the new maintainer of this package.
>
> any help is appreciated.
>
Better contacting [EMAIL PROTECTED] in order to track the thing
properly.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ot the same issue with ftp.it and
solved
twice as pointed by henrique. Installing debian-archive-keyring in the
pbuilder chroot (with the new recent key) just before updating solved the
issue this time and in the previous case also.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
O adding people to do that is the
only way to go, but for removing auditing (which is not acceptable).
This is the same reason why none can sponsor dozen of packages
without lowering reviewing quality.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
t; cruft that needs to be addressed. There are absolutely no acceptable
> exceptions to either this rule (stopping a stopped service is okay) nor to
> its counterpart (starting an already started service is okay), as far as I
> know.
>
Absolutely ack.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
ted.
>
Unfortunately sometimes the daemon does not stop for an error in the
maintainer script and that prevents upgrading for ever, even when
the package has been corrected. BTW, it seems a lack in the policy
to specify how the maintainers scripts should work on stop (i.e. what
returning as exit co
es, I know that aptitude is the sane choice for dist-upgrading :)
so I'm not too worried about.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 03:49:07PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Currently I am starting a new project and want to know, if someone
> know the existence if an imapclient library for C programing?
>
libc-client with some limitations...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
>
> Maybe the fftw3 maintainer could be interested in maintainace of fftw2 too...
Oh well he, filled the ITA about that on December...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AFAIK.
Maybe the fftw3 maintainer could be interested in maintainace of fftw2 too...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DD's corner contents should be discussed on d-www, eventually.
It already links official and unofficial urls and it seems reasonable
for listing those kinds of things.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I came back, it no longer seems to work correctly:
> >
The script used in debian-gis repo (pkg-grass) works like a charm.
Feel free to use it... I also looked around a bit to have a working program
after alioth upgrade.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
ackage).dsc: Illegal PORT command.
> at /usr/bin/dupload line 508
>
> Yet dput works fine.
>
> Any suggestions what's wrong? Has anyone else been having htis problem?
> --
Did you try passive ftp? It works here.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
; dependancies (with their installed-sizes) that adding the plugin in
> question to a binary package would pull in. I am interested on the total
> effect to an end-user, for each plugin.
Mmm, if plugins used dlopen() ldd would not help in that respect.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UN
d.
> The driver for USB mice is usbhid.
>
It is (was?) not loaded anyway, keeping off my usb logitech mouse.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d be BSD-like but claims to be
from Berkeley instead. AFAIK they should adapt a PHP-like license
or any better.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
does not require preregistering users,
monitoring to remove spam, maintaining a black list of terms ?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
atching already implemented? Maybe apt-fu could
> be used for that task, but it's apparently discontinued.
>
apt-src ?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ept comments in the source code).
>
I don't think so, there is a lots of software which does not use
a separate license for doc, man pages and so on.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:33:32PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Francesco P. Lovergine:
>
> >> I've looked at the SQLite code and it does this. At the same time, it
> >> has to implement recursive locks (which can be entered multiple times
> >> by the sa
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 11:35:50AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Francesco P. Lovergine:
>
> >> SQLite databases (and Subversion repositories) are intended to be
> >> opened concurrently by multiple processes.
>
> > To be more clear: programs which use ordina
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:34:42PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Francesco P. Lovergine:
>
> >> I intended to write the opposite: file locks are a per-process
> >> resource in NPTL, so NPTL probably has the problems, and LinuxThreads
> >> doesn't.
>
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:42:54PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:34:42PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Francesco P. Lovergine:
> >
> > >> I intended to write the opposite: file locks are a per-process
> > >> res
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:34:42PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Francesco P. Lovergine:
>
> >> I intended to write the opposite: file locks are a per-process
> >> resource in NPTL, so NPTL probably has the problems, and LinuxThreads
> >> doesn't.
>
instead of thread mutexes (which is the
proper
answer to syncronization issues in a thread-safe architecture)?
"It's more easy" is not a decent answer, of course.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ry? Once it becomes multi-threaded CPU usage
> could become an issue, especially if we upgrade to spamassassin 3.
What's wrong with using native perl threads and mutexes ?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe&
tion for their regular job. Well done.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 04:50:40PM +0200, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> that are not bugs so i wonder if package maintainers where pleased if i
> reportbug those lines as wishlist.
>
Why not? a patch is a patch.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
with CVS,
> arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of the things that Florian
> Weimer lists on http://www.enyo.de/fw/software/arch/design-issues.html
>
Comparing svn and arch is like comparing apples and tomatos. They have
completely different purposes (i.e. centralized vs di
ed all but distribution/copy
it could be fine for non-free AFAIK. But that one poses too many limitations.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
have the same role of lintian/linda by this point of
view. Filling BTS reports could be not so appropriate.
Disclosure: I do not know piuparts at all :)
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
able to discriminate what's a spurious bug and what's not.
That could be useful to create a priority list for QA team jobs, but
I wonder if it's better than the proposed popcon approach.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Will the slides be available in a central repository too? Having both
videos and slides would be nice for who missed the event, like me :'(
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sed policy is already followed in case of ABI
changes. And any sane program would not compile when ever a library
change its _API_ in a way not back-compatible.
If not, well that's an upstream issue, not a debian one :)
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
nts looks not so good. For instance I used happily this resource:
XTerm*Font: -monotype-andale mono-medium-r-normal--15-0-0-0-c-0-iso8859-15
and the visual quality of that font is now less good.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &qu
pilation of ancient code. When I asked for revoming due
to an old grave bug, people answered almost the same: it's yet useful.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 08:38:17PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> see shy jo, who argued for 4.0 at the appropriate time to discuss the
> version number to use
:-) right
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
eady present buildd project at
https://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools/
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 09:13:32AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Quite difficult if the function is the same. In both cases it uses stderr.
>
> Oh good grief. Add an argument to the function s
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 07:38:08AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Francesco P. Lovergine writes:
> > It depends on programs, sometimes the same usage function is used for
> > either --help or invalid options.
>
> Sure, but the output should still be directed correctly.
Q
FYI: new mysql FLOSS includes OpenSSL license, so many packages could
migrate to current libmysqlclient starting from no starting from now..
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are all awating for
new-alioth in place.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d root root 02755 /sbin/halt
>
> Note that making random programs like "halt" setuid root might
> be a serious security hole.
>
I find ctrl-alt-del quite nice in these cases, changing a bit
/etc/inittab and using acpi/apm to powerdown. Any decent login
manager allo
n to not simply bugging the maintainer via BTS
about that and helping debugging the problems. Also upstream and
maintainer generally work together to improve quality and
identify problems, both in upstream and packaged versions. Posting in
d-d is at least inappropriate.
--
Francesco P. Lovergi
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 08:52:07AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
>
> I guess this is the modern version of "real men just upload their
> important stuff on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it."
>
RMS used to have no password at MIT times, indeed :)
How times cha
t see why this is changed)
>
> I'm afraid I forgot why this was added (it's been roughly three months).
> Judging from the code it looks like some left over test code and can be
> removed.
>
> Cheers,
> Moritz
I'm looking into the package now. Stay tuned.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
'm thinking
to the pre-1.0 version of mozilla in woody: upgrading to a sane 1.0
version in stable by volatile could be considered, solving many
functional problems and being a sane (and safe) possibility.
Other major upgrades (e.g. mozilla-current) are backports.org concerns.
We have currently a few software of large use in those conditions, e.g.
firefox/thunderbird (but note that those programs are really in better
conditions in respect with the old woody mozilla)
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Indeed currently iptables rules need to be loaded with pre-up scripting
in /etc/network/interfaces. Old init.d scripts are deprecated and not
installed at all.
> There are a lot of ways to setup a firewall in Debian [1] I rather not have
> yet another package to do this.
>
Agree.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
>
I had -m2 and each child canibalized up 20M of VM in just a few minutes.
With 128M that makes difference. I'm now quite happily using razor
with only very few false positives and a very high success rate in
filtering spam.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
s a program which just
> can't run on that machine.
>
Just for your information SA3 was almost unusable on my P4 1.4Ghz with 128MB.
It's not a dedicated box, but it's adequate for my workstation use with
wmaker.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
rs is a non-sense, plain and clear. The volatile archive
is having more and more sense.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
problems. It is really a memory
and cpu hog. I doubt it is usable as is on any box without
a good deal of horsepower and memory. I would add at least
a big warning in its NEWS file about this, until its problems will be
not solved.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
ed
in respect with security.d.o is all in this pov.
Incidentally, volatile could also be used to upgrade stable for interactive use,
which is probably the major reason of obsolescence for stable, but that's
questionable.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
the benefit that it
> doesn't require that often administrator action (and perhaps an staging
> area where the newest things are in, and that is moved to stable once
> everything is done).
>
Yep, that was the idea behind the need of a policy and a RM.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:33:05AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
>
> > b. They are already kept off testing (if there is a regression),
> >so what's the problem?
> The problem is that other packages which might dep
uto-build it first and, if no upstream/package faults, we let it in,
> > we
> > get less RC bugs.
> Exactly this was the idea. I'm unsure whether experimental could serve as
> this kind of staging area.
>
A FTBFS for a new package is not a RC error. Only regressions are RC.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
re is a regression),
so what's the problem?
c. Very few packages are seriuosly broken on some archs. Their problems are
generally due either to compiler/binutils problems or upstream
coding. In both cases removing them on some archs could be a
profitable solution for rele
, doesn't it?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
PROTECTED] is ok now.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
probably xtradius.
System password checking is present for portability with non-linux
platform essentially, and for historical reasons, too. A lots of those
servers are derived from the original livingston's implementation, but all
add alternatives forms of authentication and accounting. It's an admin's
choice.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
ct place to
start this kind of flame wars :) In the meantime I'm afraid there is not
another list, but for d-d, where discussion on this kind of things can
be accepted.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
We are going into mainstream
towards sarge releasing, so you couldn't have sufficient time for
usual release-test cycle of a new upstream release.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-07
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: jot
Version : 9.0
Upstream Author : John Kunze, Office of Comp. Affairs, UCB
* URL :
http://www.mit.edu/afs/athena/system/rhlinux/athena-9.0/free/SRPMS/athena-jot-9.0-3.src.rpm
*
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 04:58:50PM +0200, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
> >>>>> "fpl" == Francesco P Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> fpl> I wonder if that classic package can stay in our archives
> fpl> (also non-free). Did you check
e...
http://www.cs.bath.ac.uk/pub/dream/Copyrights
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
nefits of having them in a modern distro as sarge,
whenever it will be available. In these days, zlib's maintainer already
dropped libc5 support. I have a grave bug in libc5 linker which is
currently unable to manage properly also a silly program.
Those kinds of problems will (probably) become quite constant in the future,
'cause of aging of those libs.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 05:33:28PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
>
> On Thursday, Jun 19, 2003, at 06:57 US/Eastern, Francesco P. Lovergine
> wrote:
>
> >And surely Debian DOES NOT support
> >non-free (in DFSG sense) software,
>
> No, but we do support our us
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 09:43:23PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
>
> You, and rest of the minority who use libc5 program, can dual-boot
> an older distribution of Debian (say potato) where the programs still
> work. Yes, it can be a hassle, but it works.
>
Also woody...
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:59:46AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > IMO it's a good moment to drop all the following i386-specific packages
> > which are libc5 related:
>
> I agree, with the proviso that we make sure anyone who really need
ople have accumulated a lot
> on their HDDs in twenty years.
>
... and they are also completely uninterested in storing docs in a way
that will allow them to read their own data in the future...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
, 19 Jun 2003, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:56:32AM +1200, Philip Charles wrote:
> > > xpm4.7 is needed for WordPerfect 8. I have a mass of wp5.1 and wp8
> > > documents.
> > >
> >
> > That's exactly one of the
(another dead product) will have problems.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 08:55:02AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 04:17:43PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > zlib1
>
> The ocaml bindings to zlib still build depend on zlib1g-dev.
> Which is the newer alternative to this package?
>
E
zlib1
ldso
libg++27-altdev
libregex0-altdev
svgalib1-altdev
xlib6-altdev
xpm4.7
xaw3d
netscape-base-4-libc5
svgalib1
svgalib-dummy1
termcap-compat
and others, partially.
This could impact potentially very old (commercial mostly) binaries,
Comments, ideas, complaints?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
per use, see some old flames about similar
cases. And it generally causes confusion in bug submitters' mind:
how many of them knows the difference between a fixed and a closed bug?
A brief note about NMU changes incorporation in changelog
and closing those bugs in BTS by hand is more correct IMO.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
modifications
without author's permission. OpenMosix is fully GPL, instead.
I'm simply proposing the complete removing of mosix from archive, if none
could adopt it and manage properly its moving in non-free.
Ciao
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
pgpi5sg3X0F01.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi debfolks
I'm using this command:
debmirror /users/debian --nosource -h -d woody
in order to have a local copy of i386 stuff for our net.
What is the damn reason why it copies potato distribution instead?
I'm missing something?
Thanks
PS: please cc me...
--
Francesco P.
ot;It's newer" is not a good reason :) We could
discover new problems in linking qt2 with png3 we had not before.
Anyway, it's done. Maybe something about these bad practices
is already present in the Policy Manual. If not something should be
obviuosly proposed.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Please, have a look at #127948 (should merge #128195)
which should be grave bugs IMHO.
Is this solved also now? I removed KDE at all in my sid.
To reinstall it, kpackage issue needs to be solved.
This is a PIV 1400Mhz, maybe I could help :)
Thanks for your efforts.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
; developer.
>
Broken, you could search in BTS for wnpp bugs in the meantime.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
NMU.
>
> If you want to make it clear that the upload is sponsored an entry in the
> changelog should be the right solution. Before I became a maintainer I
> added to the changelog entry of every package that was sponsored for me a
> line
>
> * Upload sponsored by Tony Manci
st seen more than 1 year ago at people.d.o.
Maybe a proposal of adoption could be done...
He mntns that pkg only.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
too much maintainers are not really active
and too much pkgs are built up without a RFP. Some packages are
built starting from beta-quality sw, and this is not a good practice.
Burocracy cannot solve these problems. Maintainers intelligence could.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
e the developers some time to actually do something about it.
> And _then_ _consider_ filing bugs (by discussing it here again).
>
> --
> Martin Michlmayr
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I agree. As for yardradius, the bug could be in fact secondary - programs
works anyway.
Severity level should be evaluated in every single case.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
lain with my upstream tomorrow
morning for this, when I'll see him... in the bath, in front to the mirror :(
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
but
4:2.2.0.20010822-1 is to be installed
Depends: artsbuilder but it is not going to be installed
Depends: noatun but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libarts-mpeglib (>= 4:2.2.1-1) but it is not going to be
installed
E: Sorry, broken packages
Maybe, I'm missing somethings...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
998. Latest NMU is in Nov 2000.
I'll check if this package can be adopted. In this case I could close
this ITP.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:08:30PM +0200, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 04:48:12PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> >
> > It could be nice if all you send me a collection of ebooks you think
> > is a must for a developer. Only HT
case HTML is preferred. But so many books are only available
in PDF format - which can be printed in non-letter formats easily.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 03:05:09PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 02:30:54PM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
> > "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Some e-books are available also under Open Publica
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 02:30:54PM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
> "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Some e-books are available also under Open Publication License.
> > What do you think of a pseudo package `ebooks-dev' which collec
t including OPL under /usr/share/common-licenses ?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
alias contains things like:
>
What if the gdm pkg cut off `plain' english?
Maybe a choice among english_british and english_american could
me more correct.
What about english_italian also :) ? We speak brooklino instead of
plain english, generally ...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
for task-tcltk-dev
W: duplicate task info for task-tex
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Couldn't find package task-debug
It seems really outdated in unstable. I do not know for testing.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
101 - 200 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
