On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:34:42PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Francesco P. Lovergine: > > >> I intended to write the opposite: file locks are a per-process > >> resource in NPTL, so NPTL probably has the problems, and LinuxThreads > >> doesn't. > > > > A question: why using file locking instead of thread mutexes (which > > is the proper answer to syncronization issues in a thread-safe > > architecture)? > > SQLite databases (and Subversion repositories) are intended to be > opened concurrently by multiple processes. >
That's obvious, Florian pointed a limit on a per-thread locking, not a per-thread one. So what? -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
