-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 05:02:42 +0100
Source: libbsd
Binary: libbsd-dev libbsd0 libbsd0-udeb libbsd0-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Changed
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Going on with my intention to try to match my continued dissatisfaction
with the project with my dedication to it, I've just orphaned the fbset
package.
This package has a lethargic upstream, and needs to be synced from time
to time with the latest Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:54:35 +0100
Source: fbset
Binary: fbset fbset-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.1-28
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 05:50:27 +0100
Source: posixtestsuite
Binary: posixtestsuite
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.5.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover
Hi!
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 13:54:17 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Guillem writes, on the bug but not on debian-devel:
Part of the definition of what's and what's not a native package is
the version scheme, and I've never considered that a Debian specific
thing specified by its policy. The fact
Hi!
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 16:57:01 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
This made me consider the point of supporting data.tar.bz2 too, because
it's either slower or takes more memory or space than with none, gzip
or xz. So was wondering if maybe we should consider deprecating it in
Debian (via
Hi!
In #735377, Peter Green makes a good case of why ignoring (at least)
object files is not a good default for source packages, mentioning:
* inconsitency between 1.0 and = 2.0 formats, creating surprise.
* if they need to be shipped, they are silently ignored, which makes
their absence
Hi!
While adding support for control.tar.xz and control.tar to dpkg-deb in
dpkg 1.17.6, I pondered about adding support too for control.tar.bz2,
but ended up not doing so, because it does not seem to bring in any
benefit that none, gzip or xz compression do, and because it could
always be added
inetutils-tools
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2:1.9.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
inetutils-ftp - File Transfer Protocol client
inetutils-ftpd - File Transfer Protocol server
Hi!
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 16:40:16 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 03:37:26PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
dpkg 1.17.2 will setup DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_PACKAGE_REFCOUNT to make this
easier to handle. The aforementioned thread contains recipes on how to
do proper ref-counting
...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
dpkg - Debian package management system
dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools
dselect- Debian package management front-end
libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library
libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 12:35:05 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Guillem Jover writes (Re: Registering a media type for Debian binary
packages ?):
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 10:42:09 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Magic number(s):
Files usually start with the following string:
!arch
symlink to debsign binary name in the phase 1, real
name dpkg-sign or whatever), to try and avoid further complicating the
debian package development universe.
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 11:03:04AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
IMO having debsign become a thiner wrapper around this new tool would
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 19:40:54 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org, 2014-01-03, 13:13:
Given that you (at least) seemed to show opposition to the field
(AFAIR), and that you've done an independent implementation of the
runner; does 692704 mean that you changed mind
Hi Charles!
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 10:42:09 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 02:23:00AM +0100, Guillem Jover a écrit :
This sounds great in theory, but I'm worried that in practice this
might just make the situation worse, by making applications having
to support not two
Hi Jakub!
On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 17:35:28 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 17:41:26 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
the use of autopkgtest as documented in DEP 8 is taking momentum.
How about allowing a Testsuite field to replace the XS-Testsuite field?
Last time this came
Hi!
On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 09:24:55 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:27:29PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
* signing would get rafactored into a new program so that users do
not need to manually mangle the .changes file, rebuild or require
devscripts
Hi!
[ CCing debian-devel to get input from possibly afftected users. ]
On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 15:14:22 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Package: dpkg-dev
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/dpkg-buildpackage
X-Debbugs-CC: Arno Töll a...@debian.org
Please disable signing by default. Generally the
Hi!
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 03:52:51 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
I'd like to switch the default dpkg-source compressor to xz for V2+
(not for V1) source formats, as suggested by Ansgar Burchardt in [0].
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg00377.html
After having switched
Hi!
On Sat, 2013-11-23 at 11:28:09 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
reading the Launchpad bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1022824,
asking to add application/x-deb to /etc/mime.types, and giving the link to
another bug where it is mentionned that application/x-debian-package is still
in
Hi!
On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 17:41:26 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
the use of autopkgtest as documented in DEP 8 is taking momentum.
How about allowing a Testsuite field to replace the XS-Testsuite field?
Last time this came up here, it didn't look like we got consensus on
whether the field was
inetutils-tools
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2:1.9.1.363-bbc1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
inetutils-ftp - File Transfer Protocol client
inetutils-ftpd - File Transfer Protocol server
...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
dpkg - Debian package management system
dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools
dselect- Debian package management front-end
libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library
libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl
...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
dpkg - Debian package management system
dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools
dselect- Debian package management front-end
libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library
libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl
...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
dpkg - Debian package management system
dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools
dselect- Debian package management front-end
libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library
libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl
...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
dpkg - Debian package management system
dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools
dselect- Debian package management front-end
libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library
libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl
Hi!
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 14:34:11 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
I noticed a problem with several packages when they were migrated to
multiarch, and I’m afraid we have a pattern here.
This was reported on this list some time ago:
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 12:16:04 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Package: tech-ctte
Severity: normal
In response to the recent threads, I'd like to ask the tech-ctte to
please vote on and decide on the default init system for Debian.
*Siiigh*, this is a decision that has project-wide
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 11:07:09 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
• On a VM, I might want to run very low-consuming software only, to lower
the cost of separating things into VMs of their own. (I’ll be writing a
syslog dæmon some day because sysklogd (three processes, c’mon!) is now
removed
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
freebsd-quota - management of file system quota for UFS
Changes:
freebsd-quota (8.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Team upload.
* Update copyright years.
* Remove myself from Uploaders.
Checksums-Sha1
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
freebsd-sendpr - FreeBSD fork of send-pr (from GNU GNATS)
Changes:
freebsd-sendpr (3.113+9.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Team upload.
* New upstream release.
* Refactor source and tar name into SOURCE and TARNAME in debian/rules
Hi!
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 17:32:37 +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
xy may only use a tiny bit, but the combination of apt-get, dpkg and
xy seems to cause problems. Its not just BeagleBones, there are x86
machines with just 64MB still on sale.
Ok, I went through the dpkg code, and have reduced
Hi!
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 10:11:58 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, 02 Oct 2013, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Iceweasel users who want to mitigate the annoyance can put this
snippet into their ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/chrome/userContent.css file:
Hi!
On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 11:09:26 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I have seen these two breakages (so far):
libgd2: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724841
This uses -Werror in AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, don't do that.
gyrus: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724917
Hi!
On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 23:26:22 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
we (the debian X Strike Force) are thinking of removing the following
packages from the archive, unless somebody steps up (soon) to take care
of them.
I assume here you mean maintaining them in Debian (or perhaps upstream
too?).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0200
Source: blt
Binary: blt blt-dev blt-demo
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.4z-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover
On Sat, 2013-08-24 at 17:40:00 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Did you know that dpkg-source doesn't notice if sensible-editor exits
nonzero ?
Nope, thanks I've just fixed this locally now, will be included in
dpkg 1.17.2.
Thanks,
Guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi!
I've been using this locally for some time, and been meaning to publish
it here, but was prompted to do it now, due to some recent bugs filed
against dpkg to support multilib style cross-toolchains.
Mutlilib is IMO a hack that should just disappear in Debian at least at
the packaging level,
Hi!
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 15:16:49 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Joey Hess jo...@debian.org writes:
Also it could save the whole log to someplace when minimizing the
console output, to refer back to. Perhaps ../$package_$version.buildlog
(which gets a step closer to including that in the dsc
Hi!
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 22:08:34 +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
At DebConf, Enrico came up with this idea: When the package is building
with the display going to the console, something could intercept the
stdout and convert \n to \r. Let stderr through untouched. The result
would be a build that
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 11:12:16 +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 03:52:51AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
I'd like to switch the default dpkg-source compressor to xz for V2+
(not for V1) source formats, as suggested by Ansgar Burchardt in [0].
[0] http://lists.debian.org
Hi!
I'd like to switch the default dpkg-source compressor to xz for V2+
(not for V1) source formats, as suggested by Ansgar Burchardt in [0].
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg00377.html
After having switched the default dpkg-deb compressor to xz in 1.17.0,
it only makes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 21:36:42 +0200
Source: device3dfx
Binary: device3dfx-source
Architecture: source all
Version: 2013.08.08-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover
Hi!
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 23:25:30 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 04:09:20AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
The other side of the support I've been pondering about is extending
dpkg-deb so that .deb files can be modified in conformant ways, stuff
like inserting _-style
Hi!
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 14:52:33 +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
I noted[1] that some derivatives have introduced SHA512 into their
Release files (and probably Packages/etc).
This will increase those files (Packages, Sources, etc) by quite a bit,
at least 128 bytes per entry. Is that something we
Hi!
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 16:40:51 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 06:24:32PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
[...] in preparation to add non-gzip compression support for control.tar
May I ask why would you want that?
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2012/11/msg2
Hi!
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 09:38:35 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 18:24:32 +0200
Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote:
Due to bug 718295, and in preparation to add non-gzip compression
support for control.tar, I've tried to get an accurate view of the
current deb(5
Hi!
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 22:16:02 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org wrote:
Can you expand on the planned remedy and in how soon it might arrive?
That I would be interested in as well.
I know that everyone dreams about a
Hi!
Due to bug 718295, and in preparation to add non-gzip compression
support for control.tar, I've tried to get an accurate view of the
current deb(5) format support in software present in Debian. The
resulting table looks pretty bad:
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/DebSupport
Please
...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
dpkg - Debian package management system
dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools
dselect- Debian package management front-end
libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library
libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl modules
...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
dpkg - Debian package management system
dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools
dselect- Debian package management front-end
libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library
libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl modules
Urgency: low
Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers debian-...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
libalias-dev - Development files for libalias
libalias7 - FreeBSD packet aliasing library
libcam-dev - Development files for libcam
libcam6- FreeBSD CAM
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 19:15:42 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf, le Wed 17 Jul 2013 22:38:51 +0530, a écrit :
I see a sudden surge of build failures against my latest upload of
packages[1]. From the build logs, it looks like all warnings are treated
as errors now.
If
On Sat, 2013-07-13 at 15:32:15 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 02:33:57PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hmm, do you have a reference? I've looked in the gnupg git master and
stable-2.0 branches and I don't see any obvious mention of this on the
NEWS file, or commit
-...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
libbsd-dev - utility functions from BSD systems - development files
libbsd0- utility functions from BSD systems - shared library
libbsd0-dbg - utility functions from BSD systems - debugging symbols
libbsd0-udeb - utility
Hi!
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 22:30:49 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 03:33:21PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
GPG=/usr/bin/gpg
if [ $ENCRYPT = yes ] [ -x $GPG ]; then
POPCONGPG=$POPCON.gpg
rm -f $POPCONGPG
$GPG --no-default-keyring --keyring $KEYRING
inetutils-tools
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2:1.9.1.306-0a482-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
inetutils-ftp - File Transfer Protocol client
inetutils-ftpd - File Transfer Protocol server
-...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
kfreebsd-kernel-headers - kFreeBSD headers for development
Closes: 684330 705407
Changes:
kfreebsd-kernel-headers (0.84) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Robert Millan ]
* Strip __FBSDID() from all headers using
-...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
libbsd-dev - utility functions from BSD systems - development files
libbsd0- utility functions from BSD systems - shared library
libbsd0-dbg - utility functions from BSD systems - debugging symbols
libbsd0-udeb - utility
-...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
libbsd-dev - utility functions from BSD systems - development files
libbsd0- utility functions from BSD systems - shared library
libbsd0-dbg - utility functions from BSD systems - debugging symbols
libbsd0-udeb - utility
-...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
libbsd-dev - utility functions from BSD systems - development files
libbsd0- utility functions from BSD systems - shared library
libbsd0-dbg - utility functions from BSD systems - debugging symbols
libbsd0-udeb - utility
Hi!
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 09:15:03 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 05/21/2013 10:53 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
- Neither systemd nor upstart are likely to be ported to kfreebsd soon,
as they both rely on many Linux-specific features and interfaces.
What about launchd? Wouldn't
Hi!
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 01:47:42 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
On 22 May 2013 01:16, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote:
Am 22.05.2013 02:00, schrieb Dmitrijs Ledkovs:
On 21 May 2013 21:53, Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org wrote:
On 20/05/13 at 18:19 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 22:16:46 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 04:09:33 AM Guillem Jover wrote:
...
... But then I'm not interested in assigning my copyright to a for-profit
company that is not employing me ...
...
It may be a distinction without difference
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 16:50:38 +0200
Source: glide
Binary: glide2-bin libglide2 libglide2-dev libglide3 libglide3-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2002.04.10ds1-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
freebsd-quota - management of file system quota for UFS
Changes:
freebsd-quota (8.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Add missing freebsd-buildutils to Build-Depends.
* Replace portmap Suggests with rpcbind.
* Now using Standards-Version
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 08:50:39 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 13/05/2013 15:51, Paul Wise a écrit :
[...] as long
as there is a way to build-depend on the build-dependencies for a
source package, that should be fine. As a bonus we can
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 14:15:56 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
The “dpkg (= 1.15.4) | install-info” dependency can also be dropped
from packages providing an info file, because all info-browsers are
now guaranteed (due to the release) to Depend on install-info. I'll
file a bug on debhelper
Hi!
[ Just saw while drafting this, that you filed the bug on policy, so
sending a copy there too, let's continue the discussion there then. ]
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 09:51:23 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org writes:
On 2013-05-15 09:58, Ondřej Surý wrote:
The '2'
Hi!
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 17:35:10 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
I have a C shared library that takes a pointer to an opaque struct as the
first argument to most of its API calls. The internal layout of that
opaque struct is changing (to add new members). The only way to create
the opaque
Hi!
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 18:15:37 +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I have a package[1] that will not transition to testing due to failed
compilation on powerpc. The problem is that the actual package requires
a fairly complete C++11 support in order to compile. I have tried to
signify this by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 21:00:28 +0200
Source: fbset
Binary: fbset fbset-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.1-27
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil
at 03:16:57PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
dpkg supports --control-show and --control-list (already in wheezy), which
can be used for stuff like:
$ dpkg-query --control-show dpkg changelog
for installed packages, for example. Or:
$ dpkg-deb --info foo.deb changelog
Maybe someone
Hi!
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 22:34:36 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Two things has happened with GD Library:
1. I have dropped the {xpm,noxpm} dichotomy and there's only
libgd2-dev now. There are transitional packages which are ment
to help with the move to libgd2-dev, so you don't have to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 08:00:34 +0200
Source: glide
Binary: glide2-bin libglide2 libglide2-dev libglide3 libglide3-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2002.04.10ds1-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil
Hi!
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 11:14:07 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
There have been previous discussions how to fix this[2]. The dpkg
maintainers would like to treat changelogs and copyright files as
metadata and move them out of /usr/share/doc[3].
[2]
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 14:12:14 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Isn't the reason this was on hold the wheezy release and now that is
out work on this can continue?
The main reason to not deploy any actual solution at the time was that
it would imply possible unexpected breakage on extractors
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 17:04:51 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
The real problem is that these changelog files are primarily intended
for human beings. They should live in /usr/share/doc, and their
location should be transparent.
The fact that parts of it might be mostly consumable by human beings,
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 18:04:58 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Montag, 13. Mai 2013, Guillem Jover wrote:
The only thing the metadata solution would need now, is changing
packaging helper, all packages not using a helper, and changelog and
copyright extractors to look first in the new place
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 17:10:32 +0200
Source: fbset
Binary: fbset fbset-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.1-26
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil
inetutils-tools
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2:1.9.1.282-e8541-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Description:
inetutils-ftp - File Transfer Protocol client
inetutils-ftpd - File Transfer Protocol server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 05:01:06 +0200
Source: arj
Binary: arj
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.10.22-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Hi!
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 12:03:13 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
On 05/07/2013 21:49, Guillem Jover wrote:
As mentioned some months ago [0], I'm planning to switch dpkg-deb default
compressor from gzip to xz, as there seemed
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 12:38:47 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:49:03PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
If there's people who are still worried about that, I'd ask them to
file bugs on the base packages to make them pass -Zgz explicitly to
dpkg-deb (I'll do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 18:56:19 +0200
Source: libaio
Binary: libaio1 libaio1-udeb libaio1-dbg libaio-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.3.109-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Changed
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 10:06:34 +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584865
discusses a prototype that I internally use. It hooks to policy-rc.d to
prevent services from starting during package installation and to dpkg
post-invoke to detect new
Hi!
To finish up the install-info split from dpkg[0], I'd like to finally
remove the temporary wrapper from dpkg. This means the remaining tail
of packages still calling it directly from maintainer scripts need to
be dealt with [1]. Most might just need a rebuild if using debhelper
and not
Hi!
To be able to fix dpkg bug #671711, we should first reduce or completely
eliminate the possibilty for triggered packages needing its configured
dependencies, not ending up being in triggers-awaited status awaiting on
them.
For packages installing triggers for things that are not necessary
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:23:37 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
(please direct replies to debian-devel only)
Ever since dpkg started using liblzma directly (dpkg 1.16.4), the xz
command is no longer needed in a minimal Debian system. Based on its
Hi!
As mentioned some months ago [0], I'm planning to switch dpkg-deb default
compressor from gzip to xz, as there seemed to be consensus that was
the way to go, and given the amount of already manually switched
packages, or packaging helpers. :/
[0]
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 06:36:31 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 19.04.2013 00:33, schrieb Guillem Jover:
I think the full-multiarch support for python in
experimental should really be reverted.
No. This is backward, and the wrong way to go forward.
Sorry, but the way to go forward
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 13:09:51 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Guillem Jover writes (Epoch usage conventions (was Re: R 3.0.0 and required
rebuilds of all reverse Depends: of R)):
Well, I strongly disagree that in general using epochs for packaging
mistakes is a good practice (and I've thought so
Hi!
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 09:38:14 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Adam Borowski kilobyte at angband.pl writes:
It can be done
Well yes, but if you do even small things such as generate the
package manually instead of using debhelper, prepare to be shouted
at by the British Cabal with
Hi!
On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 11:05:29 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
[...]. IMO this is why upstream packaging should be
embraced and enhanced rather than focusing on dpkg.
I'm not sure if you refer to the tool here, or to the packaging work,
doesn't change much anyway.
I once worked on the 'pkgme'
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 16:06:05 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 07:31:54AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
I guess a way to detect those could be piuparts runs that install
multiple instances of Multi-Arch:same packages, purge just one of
them, and compare that the packages
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 19:06:52 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 22.04.2013 17:24, schrieb Guillem Jover:
Other problems might be when maintainer scripts use the running dpkg
architecture instead of the package architecture (DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_ARCH)
to decide when to do stuff, for example
Hi!
[ Seems I lost track of this issue... trying to correct it now. ]
While dealing with #682365, Jonathan noticed that several packages [P]
were handling non-dpkg tracked files incorrectly on purge.
[P] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682365#29
The problem is that they might
Hi!
[ I had pending warning about this on debian-devel before the release,
so this is a good way to do that. :) ]
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 16:41:35 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
There are maybe not many use cases where you do want to install an interpreter
like python or perl for a foreign
On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 11:50:35 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Jon Dowland wrote:
Hi Laurent, thanks for the clarification â?? to ask a related
question. What's the worth of FPM on Debian? Especially given the
issues that Wouter has raised in the bug¹
¹
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 23:07:04 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
gen-author-list:
git log --format='%aN %aE' | awk '{arr[$$0]++} END{for (i in
arr){print arr[i], i;}}' | sort -rn | cut -d' ' -f2-
A better way to write the above could be:
gen-author-list:
git shortlog -nes | tr -s '
701 - 800 of 1679 matches
Mail list logo
