s.
Either package is up to the first bidder. I'm sure you'll all figure it
out - I'm busy with a few quick summer credits before I transfer.
Take care everyone! =)
- --
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This sentence no verb.
my computer was o
and won't
have a chance to coordinate testing with anyone else till I get back.
Also removing the call to autogen.sh in the rules file will workaround the
libtool issue for now.
Beyond that, see everyone in a couple weeks, or maybe sooner!
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The
e rest of the kernel (consistency,
> > what's that?)
>
> In American English usage, "disk" is standard for all usages *except*
> for CDs, which are always "compact discs"
Yeah, but Americans can't spel
gs at
bootup since you only see the devices you've actually got in the
filesystem. If someday a Debian installation uses 2.4+ kernels only,
Debian should be using devfs by default. Won't happen till then because
Herbert Xu would sooner cut his wrists than apply a patch to Debian'
ering to plugin code or a JDK.
> plugin != JDK.
I downloaded JDK, I got a plugin. JDK includes plugin, therefore JDK has
dependencies on old libstdc++.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>What're you looking at?
I'm starting to think the gene pool could use a l
6.1-1.so.2
:
I know it doesn't work because I didn't have the thing when I first tried
to set up the JDK. I'll be needing it for school, so I'm watching the
discussion of a free JDK environment setup package thingy kinda closely.
I'm not a fan of things whic
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 11:49:03PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> >>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joseph> Sun's JDK.
>
> I know for a fact there's no use of dynamic C++ libraries in any JDK
> prio
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 02:54:03PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> >>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joseph> Well there's the proprietary JDK, but it already uses a
> Joseph> -compat package library.
>
>
a -compat package
library.
*shrug*
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Don't feed the sigs
xhost +localhost should only be done by people who would
paint their hostname and root password on an interstate
overpass.
pgpVkJEjPhr4Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ready packaged in Debian as xfonts-jmk. If Jim has
TTF fonts I don't know about, I'd absolutely love to package them. The
same goes for a utf-8 version of his existing fonts, which his website's
been promising for a couple years now. ;)
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
bout as far as my
vision. (For those not in the know, that's "not very"..)
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Available in cherry and grape
`You have been unsubscribed from the high energy personal
protection devices mailing list'
I dont remember
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:16:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > this is the New Overfiend, preacher of Love and Tolerance
>
> I see your irony detector is as non-functional as ever... :)
Oh it works just fine. It just _had_ to be said, sooner or later
--
Joseph Carter <[
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 07:25:31PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > *Evil* twin? You mean one of us isn't?
> >
> > He's bck.
>
> I didn't go anywhere. Nowhere in my platform did I claim I wasn't evil.
> ;-)
this is the New Overfiend,
e able to do it if he really tries to think about it first.
> Xdm doesn't work, but that's the only breakage I've run into.
... and this comes as a surprise? Xdm is evil.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I swallowed your goldfish
heh thats a lost cause
the document was not
taken down when 4.1 packages were ready, everything in it still applies
today to 4.2..)
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Here we go again
I should probably reboot...
ok brb
So, what apart form avoiding virii, memory leaks, and rampant
c
o the public,
but it _can_ play them, certainly.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Certified free software nut
"What are we going to do tonight, Bill?"
"Same thing we do every night Steve, try to take over the world!"
pgpbTBKpQOcRP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
st solution is SDL 1.2.4
with the distclean and ALSA 0.9 patches you've applied to 1.2.5cvs is what
I should upload, and probably targetted for woody to fix the build from
source bug. It may take me a couple of days to do this since I need to
test the hell out of it all between now and then.
--
ch as ejecting a medium in use.
A standard ISA-mapped floppy controller's drive can be ejected in the
middle of a write. You can't deal with that in any meaningful way.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Now I'll take over the world
dunham: You know how real numbers
romises that SDL 1.2.4 will actually get into woody either way - I'm
building it in a woody chroot to make sure it _can_ go into woody, but I
am targetting it for a woody release. Whether it gets in or not depends
on the rest of the release process and whether or not major bugs are found
in the
50 takes several hours. If you're lucky.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>What're you looking at?
this is the New Overfiend, preacher of Love and Tolerance
pgpYH1WTtp9Hg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
actually use the package. A few exceptions exist, but I suspect not many.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>This thing is an AI
* joeyh_ wonders if linux is supposed to lock up when you ask 100
processes to cat the entire cd drive
pgpZvKWHR5Wb9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
an they absolutely need to be changed.
I wouldn't mind seeing the Debian Free Content Guidelines change, just to
put this issue to bed for the forseeable future, but I do think that's a
silly thing to spend a long voting process on. =p
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
his
> > trial. Or you could just write an E-Mail to BTS or write your
> > own super duper bug reporting tool.
>
> Stop talking about one's time. I won't repeat myself.
He's talking about doing the right thing for users. Novel concept I do
realize, but an imp
nd dput are (though dput was not when I first tried it - weird
problems that have resolved themselves with a few more revisions..) We'll
see about linda.
If you think you can make a better tool than one that exists, make it. I
don't care what you write it in as long as it works well.
more direct.
That would be a massive PITA given that so far such changes seem to
require a supermajority GR vote. I think it's probably a good idea,
personally.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sooner or later, BOOM!
Knghtbrd: We have lots of whatev
t;
> So is the Bible "software"? We ship it in a package, after all.
I believe the Copyright has expired on that one, so it's a moot point. It
is in the public domain. Modifications to it are legal - in most courts
at least. Modify at your own risk software? =p
--
Josep
e. Neither are conffiles, icons, etc. So,
> if we're to be true to our creed, here's what we have to do:
Ahh, but icons which fail the DFSG have been declared non-free in the
past. So we have (still more) precedent for applying the DFSG to
non-software.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL P
n just because it's a GNU license. Either the license is a
mistake (as I believe) or our method of determining a thing's freeness
needs to be relaxed. I don't intend to support relaxing our definition of
free very much.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
al Contract/DFSG document was made.
(Personally, I think that was a very unwise precedent to set.. Who has
the authority to change it? Does Manoj, as the current secretary?)
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You're entitled to my opinion
those apparently-bacteria-like mult
ch
no consensus was ever reached that the license is free.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> glDisable (DX8_CRAP);
you don't have to be insane to work hereoh wait, yes you do!
:)
pgpUN5zjhhOpm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
fallout of a conclusion
against the FDL, and no attempt to revise the DFSG has ever succeeded.
I expect the issue will eventually be dropped (again) without resolution
and either Debian will continue to cover its ears and hum real loud,
unless someone is foolish enough to believe that they can gat
ter and click on "Introduction to KDE".
>
> We should also move binutils and gcc to non-free because the manpages
> are under the GNU FDL.
So the FDL is a free license because it's inconvenient for it to be not?
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> If
> The FDL is not DFSG-compliant, but that doesn't make it non-free.
By the definitions we have given "non-free", it is exactly that.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sooner or later, BOOM!
knightbrd: from knightbrd.brain import * :)
Oh go
t; in your view?
I would certainly be less eager to argue over the 1.2 version if the FDL
when it's released since it applies a sanity check to section 3 and
clarifies a little the named sections which may deserve special treatment.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Have chai
that be have decided to close this bug, apparently without
reading that the FDL isn't the only problem. Do as you like with it.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> My opinions are always right
lilo: well then, you are probably a responsible thinker.
Welcome
out this?
Why put a blatantly non-free license in the common licenses directory?
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> glDisable (DX8_CRAP);
cat /dev/random | perl ?
doogie: it is also a valid sendmail.cf
:)
* knghtbrd hands doogie a senseless-use-of-cat award
* shaleh wan
atly!) and don't happen to
have a copy of Uplink yet. Those damned living expenses getting in the
way of the really important things like games, you understand. =)
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Certified free software nut
you should be afraid to use KDE because RMS m
The last I've heard from
guys at Matrox was that they too will likely go with a non-Mesa OpenGL,
and possibly ATI will as well. I'm not sure about 3DLabs, but they're not
much of a player in the consumer hardware market and probably don't even
know we exist.
--
Joseph Carter &l
hose mistakes.
But this isn't a technical hurdle. It's a political one designed to help
maintain the facade that the stuff in non-free is not in fact part of
Debian.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Don't feed the sigs
The purpose of having mailing lists rat
"vi" user, so you WANT
> those features.
Actually, vim does install as an alternative for vi. At less priority
than nvi obviously since nvi is more pure. It used to install itself as
like priority 100 for both that and /usr/bin/editor. Neither of those
were terribly good things, and
the QF packages, about 3 months ago as I remember it. It's at my apt
> repo, alongside the (~1 month old) QF packages that depend on it.
I'll look at these. Thanks to the flu - er, I mean ANTHRAX(!) - the only
holiday I'm taking is a trip to the store for Theraflu and chicken soup,
t'd put the engines in
main.
I can actually do the necessary work to get the shareware thing done next
weekend (I'm going on holiday for a few days and won't have much time for
code..) As for the registered game installer, I've got something written
in perl for that already,
sary as I had permission to
distribute the glibc2 binaries which were made for Quake: The Offering for
Linux. I could also fix up SDLQuake for SDL 1.2, OpenGL, and QW support
if need be. That at least I can apply -sharedir and -gamename switches
to so that nasty symlink trees are not needed.
-
; > compiled for MSVC versions 4 and 6.
>
> Yes, but using mingw for the port is out of the question IMHO. If you
> tried that, you'd end up re-implementing Cygwin...
That's not a problem if what resulted was not as buggy and otherwise
broken as cygwin tends
ped.
I think getting the current driver in the kernels is the best bet. Once
that happens and the tools are better documented, I think you'll see a bit
more interest in making better tools for the SBLive.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Free software developer
I am
up yet. It took me all night on a DSL line, so I pity anyone with
just a modem.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Free software developer
The less you know about computers the more you want Microsoft!
-- Microsoft ad campaign, circa 1996
(Proof th
aries Gtk-- and Gnome-- entirely.
Never should you generate source code with Glade. The result is ugly and
not very good anyway. There is libglade for this purpose.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Free software developer
Exactly how much of a PITA is this in C?
It&
lynx is GPLed, surely we shouldn't be linking it to OpenSSL at
> all? :( (Unless there's an exception I'm not aware of ...)
AFAIK, there isn't. =(
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Free software developer
come on
it's a pico clone
it's *meant* to be annoying
pgpAb0KsrKeln.pgp
Description: PGP signature
trange request.
I don't know where in Debian to find dueling banjos, but I know where to
find dueling licenses.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Free software developer
dhd: R you part of the secret debian overstructure?
no. there is no secret debian overstructu
ity to fix dpkg's broken database with a text editor.
>
> if your talking about a different database then nevermind.
Berkeley DB to text and back is pretty easy.
Also, I was speaking of binary indices which are even easier to regenerate
if corrupted.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL
ell
of a lot nicer to people's CPUs and memory. Whether or not that requires
a re-implemenetation of dpkg or not isn't for me to say since I haven't
looked at dpkg's code in 3 years.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux
iltered before it ever gets to the requester. Needless
to say, I have considered taking drastic action regarding this stupidity.
For the record, I'm talking about the GGI Project's ggi-develop list,
which I used to follow.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuP
package has likely been
abandoned upstream but am not sure. I don't want to take the package for
that reason (I think eog could become a better replacement for it in time.)
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian
7;s
> log in screen?
I'll give you a hint.. gnome-session tries to start x-window-manager.
What if that's gnome-session? What if that's startkde? In either case,
that could be really messy really fast.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuP
s, he's an idiot. Christian, please don't waste
time on this "problem". Eray's opinion of the severity of this problem is,
as often, quite lucid.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.or
have a look at the regulations or something? IIRC the
policies were up for review in four months, but it's been longer than that
by quite some measure.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261
email software) cause me
to question his qualifications as a Debian developer. He certainly seems
like he would not make much of a positive influence in or reflection on
the project as a whole.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http:
hort of the
impossible (which has now happened..)
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/) 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
how bout
teous and pure. IMO, this makes him as dangerous
as Eric Raymond. (But then, my opinions of RMS as a "leader" aren't
terribly popular around here... I do freely admit my own ego is too large
to make me any better, so I am essentially throwing stones outside my
glass ho
gt; hideous bugs, but it's not going anyplace, either.
You might be right with all of the talk of epic4 1.0 ...
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project
To sum up, your particular problem is not with DNS, it's with some fool
> arbitrarily blocking either you in particular, or some larger network which
> includes you.
I don't have such a problem. As you have agreed, any such requirement
would be unreasonable, so why are we arguing?
-
to coding and Debian to get back to packaging. Show's over,
nothing to see here, move along.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quak
he DUL, so far as I know. A couple of
hosts seem to reject 24.* or something, but I'm not overly worried about
them. I _AM_ worried about people who want to make it worse by adding
additional arbitrary requirements before they accept mail related to
Debian.
It's somewhat amusing
se name is actually the machine in question.
How this would combat spam, I have no idea, but if you found such a system
it would indeed be very broken.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F1
s is world-renown at this point. So let's not even start there,
because I'm going to be very upset when people start suggesting I need a
couple thousand a month for a decent T1 connection in order to be
considered a good net citizen. You can't even get ISDN here.
--
Joseph Carter <
ose from whom they reject legitimate
mail find another way to deliver mail to them, however.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/)
ard? Until then, you have
absolutely no right to tell someone what ISP they should use.
For some, the option of getting another ISP is unaffordable or even
impossible in some regions of the world. This is sometimes true even in
the US, especially if you require more than a modem connection.
-
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 09:07:23AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Anyone checked the temperature in Hell lately?
> Do you intend to go there?
By the sounds of it, it's time to plan a ski trip ...
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9D
in main for
> Woody, right?
Yes.
Anyone checked the temperature in Hell lately?
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/) 44F9 8FF7
sue is .de (and
the rest of the world) mirrors.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/) 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
ok guys .. so whens t
hey want more bleeding edge stuff durring freezes and for releases.
Just a suggestion.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/) 44F9
just don't understand. It defies the
conventional structured thinking I apply to the way I write my code.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (h
s a fact of life. New software is more likely to
have unknown bugs that affect more people. What makes the Helix packages
so nice is the turnaround time for fixes. I don't know how they do it,
but they do.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
De
ars the likes of which
I couldn't even place on a CDR in compressed format. All of that isn't
going away overnight. So what we really have is a single step. A big and
important one - but still a step.
So do we prance around gloating over our "victory" or do we take the next
> I was wondering if there was some long flame war on debian-private
> that I was missing.
No flamewar on -private (at the moment), and the archive people wouldn't
just delete it. Most likely you're seeing mirroring delays.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 04:55:51PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> > Who is going to ITP kde ?
>
> I guess RevKrusty may want to put his packages into Debian?
He already uploaded kdelibs, I didn't see if it was installed.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t; think most people feel the same way.
Yes, that is essential. Making information available is the single most
important thing the website is there for. Nice web pages are good for
Debian's image, but if the information isn't there the fluff isn't worth
it. That
oup users or whatever. I see other uses for a users group as some web
CGI scripts have files that need to be world writable and you can only
maintain security that way if you make the files you.users 646 or 642.
Obviously, no default is going to be acceptable to everyone, that's why
it
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 10:07:04AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > want. Shall we make something like 700 default? It would break some
> > things like "UserDir public_html" in Apache, etc. In my school server
>
> You could make it 711.
751 seems more reasonable IMO
ee
is hot! By reading this sentance, you agree that it in fact is a sentance
and also that it is funny. Hukt awn foniks wurks fer mea! Do not look
into laser with remaining eye. Do not adjust your TV set. This paragraph
makes no sense except that about five people who read it will be slightly
am
On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 07:51:14PM +0400, Michael Sobolev wrote:
> > Previously Michael Sobolev wrote:
> > > Is it possible to access this for non-developers?
> >
> > No.
> Hmm.. And what's the reason of that?
Nobody has bothered to set it up yet, most
hat does (from non-US/*) would
> go in the following, probably.
[..]
Seconded.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/) 44F
hat reason. Not necessary. I might use such a thing
to write a kernel driver for handling I/O for the wearable I've been
planning to build at some point, however.)
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 2
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 01:30:29PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> I intend to package up the gopher suite from UMN, together with my
> patches to it.
>
> Note: they have informed me it will be GPL'd shortly.
And so the madness begins...
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
ing to the C. I never
became clear on that. Sometimes that C alternative is only useful for
porting the asm to a new language because the C would run too slowly for
acceptable results. (quake for example..)
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian G
ure...
May not be worth the development time and effort, but it SOUNDS like one
hell of a cool hack to me (at least at 2am..)
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForg
port either. This caused the
proposal to be rejected.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/) 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
Be warned, I h
Those patches and improvements found in pgcc
get added to egcs as soon as they are known not to do stupid things anyway
so it's worthwhile simply to stick with egcs and use the optimizations it
provides.
In almost all cases you will not be seeing any noticable difference in
execution speed.
--
nd once
only to reach you via the lists. I will not attempt to do so in the
future. Mail me from an ISP with a clue in the future if you'd like a
reply.
Regarding your problem, epic4 pre2.507 (uploaded today) should fix it.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key
s you can provide me with an RFC number which
deprecates running a mail server on a static IP address with an
identifyable host name.
I will not reply to the rest of the flamebait in the original message.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debia
d they're usually not
cheap.
Third: The difference in cost between my DSL service and any other
broadband service (even with lest bandwidth!) is almost exponentially more
expensive. You've not offered to pay the difference. (Nor do I suspect
that you could afford it..)
--
Joseph Carter
ke Debian use all the
blacklists you want. You'll find users and developers dropping like
flies.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforg
ld get another. There are an awful
lot of people out there who simply CAN'T DO THAT. Expecting them to is
even more of an example of just how wrong the DUL is from its beginning.
RSS and RBL at least are measures taken to combat known spammer friendly
sites. DUL discriminates on what ki
d mail through one smarthost which
sends through another which sends through another.
It's all for a good cause. The holy land must be purged. Remember that.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/)
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:38:54PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Package: epic4 (debian/main).
> Maintainer: Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 58508 Epic pre2.503 has bugs which 2.505 has not
The bugs mentioned in this report do not affect everybody. 505 fixed a
few bu
le even had
a choice! Can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs right? That
sort of uncaring attitude shows exactly how unethical that view (and IMO
the people who hold it) are.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Lin
fically for the purposes of tracking who was trying
to use the relay...
ie, one rabid anti-spam group blacklisted another because their methods
happened to conflict. It's rather amusing to say the least.
Unfortunately, it demonstrates that ORBS is a little more indiscriminant
than perha
7;ve heard to the contrary, I'm not sure I believe
that. I've also been told that there are cases where their tests produce
false positives.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F
ist.
ORBS has a tendancy to not take the time to make sure their messages go to
the right places and then they are very slow to take sites off the list
after problems are fixed.
ie, to them making sure spam never happens is more important than what
damage they cause in hte process. I rate
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 09:51:50PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hey people ! I posted this mail in order to have some input ... it would
> be great if some of you gave their opinion about this proposition I posted
> a while ago :
[..]
I'd have to bookmark myself. ;>
--
Jose
1 - 100 of 400 matches
Mail list logo
