On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 20:40, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Aug 07, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Do you think any DD reads those? Do DDs care about Bugs with patches?
And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
ppp actually appears to be unmaintained. Many users requested
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:40, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
Face it - no free software project is easy to join (except apparently
KDE...), and there's a reason for that. It's a process that selects
against bad code and bad maintainers. It's also a process that happens
to have false positives probably more
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 04:14, Otto Wyss wrote:
I just upgraded to the current Sarge and also got GCC 3.3. It seems this
version can't compile all the drivers in kernel 2.4.21. Which version
Which drivers and what errors do you get? If you tell us the errors then we
can get them fixed.
--
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:10, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| Also you don't want the main copy of cron to search auto-mounted user
| home directories. If you do that then a failure of the NFS server will
| put cron in D state...
Which is why you mount NFS shares with the intr flag set so that you
can
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 08:25, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 03-Aug-03, 11:37 (CDT), Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(As a user, what I really want is a .crontab file in my home directory,
so I can put it under revision control.)
One potential problem (or issue) I see with this is automounted
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 05:51, Steve Greenland wrote:
Apropos of the recent setuid/setgid thread, and also being prodded by
Stephen Frost, I've changed crontab to be setgid 'cron' rather than
setuid 'root'. Beyond the coding (which is mostly removing setuid()
calls), this involves the following
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:03, Steve Greenland wrote:
It's easy enough to make the directory containing the files be mode 0775
to solve this.
I'll assume you meant 0770? 775 and 771 don't solve the problem, and I
don't see the point of 774 over 770...
Yes, I meant to say 0770.
I don't know
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:58, Brian May wrote:
In answer to your question in the bug report, currently SE-Linux users
install a patched coreutils (as well as shadow (login), cron, ssh,
devfsd, logrotate, fcron, stat, procps, and psmisc) from Russell's
devfsd is not modified. The conflicts for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 13:54:00 +1000
Source: sredird
Binary: sredird
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 11:40:00 +1000
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2003071106-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 00:42, Nenad Antonic wrote:
However, it looks like initrd/cramfs is not yet stable enough, and
building a number of different kernels for different architectures might
be simpler solution for my needs at the moment.
The main problem with the initrd is that it is very
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 17:29:00 +1000
Source: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Binary: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Architecture: source all
Version: 2003.07.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 12:10:00 +1000
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2003040709-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
Description: RFC 2217 compliant Telnet serial port redirector
Sredird is a serial port redirector that is compliant with the RFC 2217
Telnet Com Port Control Option protocol. This protocol lets you share a
serial port through the network.
Copyright GPL v2
NB Apart from kermit there seems to
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 03:55, Adam Heath wrote:
Someone(not me) should write an ld_preload library, that captures opens to
the serial ports, and redirects them.
I'll do it if no-one else does...
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:13:00 +1000
Source: devfsd
Binary: devfsd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.25-15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 23:01:00 +1000
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2003040709-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 22:59:00 +1000
Source: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Binary: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Architecture: source all
Version: 2003.04.07-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 23:05:00 +1000
Source: kernel-patch-2.5-lsm
Binary: kernel-patch-2.5-lsm
Architecture: source all
Version: 2003.04.07-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 23:50, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:13:17PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
If a company wants to make a commercial distribution based on Debian then
providing that they accept certain kernel patches and comply with a
rigorous test program then I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 11:15:00 +1000
Source: devfsd
Binary: devfsd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.25-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 21:06, Antonio Pérez Pérez wrote:
A little question from an user:
What could Debian do to be supported by Oracle?
Is there any way to contact them and become a supported distribution?
I am not aware of what might be necessary for this, but I imagine it to be
similar to the
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
There is no excuse for this. Access to servers that are not in spam
lists is well available to Debian developers. I tunnel my outgoing
mail through a server in Melbourne no matter where I am, this avoids
all issues of spam blocking by IP
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 19:37, Jesus Climent wrote:
account via Debian machines, I guess the reduction in bandwidth usage
by master and murphy is not to be taken lightly.
The bandwidth reduction will only happen if you decide to discard the mail,
since the mail will always be accepted,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:11, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
false positive rate of as high as 2 per day by some estimates, do we
as a body consider it acceptable if some percentage of Debian
developers:
1) Don't receive a mail message from a fellow Debian developer
because they unfortunately
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 16:50:00 +1000
Source: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Binary: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Architecture: source all
Version: 7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Russell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 16:52:00 +1000
Source: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Binary: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Architecture: source all
Version: 2003.04.07-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 14:42:00 +1000
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2003040709-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 00:39:00 +1000
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2003040709-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 11:54, Chris Cheney wrote:
SVG icons are the only decent long term solution once screens go to
200dpi+ those tiny icons will be worthless, of course you can always
double or triple the size of fixed size icons automatically but they
won't look very good. Microsoft is pushing
On Sat, 31 May 2003 16:33, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
You are probably nor running syslogd and/or klodg in the chroot. I'm
not sure is that's possible, though.
klogd in the chroot makes no sense.
syslogd in the chroot is doable. You have to configure things such that no
more than one syslogd
On Sat, 31 May 2003 17:54, Andreas Metzler wrote:
The simplest solution is to use SYSLOGD=-a /path/to/chroot/dev/log
in /etc/init.d/sysklogd to get the main syslogd to grab the messages
from the chroot, too.
You can get the same result on a 2.4.x kernel with the --bind mount option
which also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 15:36:00 +1000
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2003040709-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
On Tue, 27 May 2003 19:04, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Here I suppose the pre-patch is supposed to be applied first, and then
the application of the debian patch would only trigger application of
those dependant patches not provided by the pre-patch.
The order in which the patches are applied
On Mon, 26 May 2003 23:43, Joe Drew wrote:
On Sunday, May 25, 2003, at 08:10 PM, Jonathan Oxer wrote:
Maybe a reasonable compromise would be to have 2 'official' debconfs /
year, as 'Debconf North' and 'Debconf South' (as in Northern and
Southern hemisphere).
I've got no problem with
On Sun, 25 May 2003 15:11, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 06:21:00AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 06:32:26PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
It's not noise at all when it's something that we and others
(desperately!) want to know about.
Then read
On Sun, 25 May 2003 19:33, Herbert Xu wrote:
In the long term, we should have as few binary module packages as
possible. They should either be integrated into our kernel-source
if it is popular enough or made source-only so that the people who
really need them can build them privately. I
On Sat, 24 May 2003 09:51, Alan Shutko wrote:
The citizens of the US have a little more power than the rest of the
world, in that you have a *vote* as to who gets to fuck the rest of the
world.
Well, didn't work that way last time...
They got their second choice.
--
On Sat, 24 May 2003 22:15, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Because in Debian there is a few people with high load in debian,
and many with less load. People with high load are more likely to
burn out and disappear. It is thus better to have more people with
less load.
Of course, the packages
On Sun, 25 May 2003 02:24, Ed Cogburn wrote:
Well, didn't work that way last time...
They got their second choice.
I never chose Little Napolean and he wasn't on my alternate list either.
Something between 49% and 50% of US voters wanted the Shrub as president.
Please stop assuming
On Sun, 25 May 2003 04:18, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 07:55:08PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Some m68k architectures might be a hard, I agree. But having a package
that works on as many machines as possible would be very cool.
well, I there is a shared debian-kernel
On Fri, 23 May 2003 17:04, Martin Schulze wrote:
I wonder if some people (Maybe Manoj and Russell, who are both quite
competent) could help with this effort.
I would love to contribute, however at the moment I am over-committed already.
Progress towards getting SE Linux support in main is
On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote:
You mean the iraq war? What's the point? How is avoiding the
U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel about
the U.S. governments acts or positions?
When tourism goes down the hotel, entertainment, and airline industries
On Fri, 23 May 2003 01:06, Mathieu Roy wrote:
If the US economy stays down long enough then the current government
won't last. Rhetoric about imaginary enemies in Iraq doesn't satisfy
people who lose their jobs because of the economy sucking.
Hm, as could be seen in Iraq, boycotts
On Fri, 23 May 2003 03:20, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
You are taking personal actions inimical to the standard of
living of me and my loved ones in retaliation for actions by my
government (which I have little control over), and you expect me to
roll over and congratulate you all on
On Wed, 21 May 2003 01:45, Martin Pitt wrote:
Is there any particular reason to have /lib/ld-linux.so.* exxecutable?
If it is used only as a proper library, it need not be executable.
The problem is that this breaks the noexec mount option. If /foo is
mounted noexec, then one cannot do
On Mon, 19 May 2003 00:25, Matt Ryan wrote:
Neil McGovern wrote:
These are all valid points, however, I still don't want to read HTML
e-mail in mutt.
You are figting a losing battle. If the MUA that someone uses is set-up to
send HTML (rich test, whatever) email then you are highly
On Mon, 19 May 2003 03:06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
When I first envisaged the kernel source and kernel-patch
system, I always figured there should be a single source package per
version -- the one you get from kernel.org. *EVERY* arch, including
i386, should provided a kernel-patch
On Thu, 15 May 2003 07:17, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hello. My spam protection system is unsure about your message. Since
you're reading this, your email isn't spam ;-) -- please either sign your
emails to me, or send a short confirmation to the address my name-abqux
at domain so that and your
On Thu, 15 May 2003 05:27, Chad Walstrom wrote:
It is a shame that such a simple scuffle on-list has sent you packing.
Someone who gives up so easily would never last.
Everyone gets flamed on occasion, if you can't deal with it you can't survive
on a popular mailing list. The Internet is not
On Thu, 15 May 2003 14:37, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Ahem. Your email wouls have to contain a few highly unlikely phrases to be
classified as uncertain by me. FWIW, yours ends up as
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-42.6 required=5.0
Sorry, if you are only using that when spamassasin records it as a
On Wed, 14 May 2003 14:27, Clay Crouch wrote:
Hmmm An ettiquette lesson before a welcome back and a work
assignemnt, just because you find my anti-spam measures draconian and my
filter bypass info in my sig to be annoying.
When such lessons are needed they should be dealt with first.
And
On Tue, 13 May 2003 21:53, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:59:24PM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
But how can I protect _myself_ from _myself_?
Protection from yourself, especially if you are root are extended Unix
features (like for example immutable and append only files,
On Wed, 14 May 2003 04:21, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 11:10:26PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
Bernd is correct. It's a kernel issue.
SE Linux allows you [...]
SE Linux allows control [...]
Russell, you are such a pimp. ;-)
I was provoked. ;)
Anyway are you
On Wed, 14 May 2003 06:59, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
tcsh as a build-dependency? Seems like a bug in openoffice. That should
be fixed regardless of whether we keep tcsh.
Why is it a bug for the compilation of a program to depend on one of the many
script interpreters in Debian?
If the upstream
On Sat, 26 Apr 2003 17:56, Chris Cheney wrote:
I also find it hard to believe that the majority of our users do not
have or can not purchase a system that is less than 7 years old. Being
that is how old the i686 sub-arch is... I once attempted to install
Debian 2.1 on a Pentium 90, it took
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003 08:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do u know how to send them?
I think you use the command deltree C:\, it may ask you some questions, but
say yes to them all if you really want to send that virus out!
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003 20:09, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
So using a 386 as a router and firewall, which it is perfectly capable
of hardwarewise
Is that really the case?
a) Is anybody actually doing this, today?
b) Do you then have 10MB or 100MB ethernet in that computer?
On Sat, 26 Apr 2003 02:08, Emile van Bergen wrote:
Realistically, are there any C++ apps on the planet that wouldn't choke
an i386 to death anyway?
There's nothing wrong with the performance of C++ apps. Years ago I did
lots of C++ development on a 16MHz 386SX running DOS. The problem is
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:17, Martin Pool wrote:
The conventional way to get in touch with the developers of a free
software project to raise an issue is to write to the -devel list. It's
not surprising that this is what people do with debian.
The conventional way to approach a large group of
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:07, Rüdiger Kuhlmann wrote:
c) the slander on this mailing list, in particular by Steve Langasek,
Russel Cooker and Manoj Srivastava
Unable to spell?
Which statements made by me, Steve, and Manoj do you claim to be false?
Why do you believe that I want to maliciously
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 07:25, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
I wouldn't call it malicious, but I question the use of the word harmful.
It should have been replaced, attributed or removed. I wondered about it
at the time but didn't comment as the article had already been released.
But maybe it can
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 16:08, Hans Reiser wrote:
I find it unspeakably ingrateful to Stallman that some of you begrudge
him his right to express his (discomforting to some) views to all who
use his software, and to ensure that they are not removed by those suits
who are discomforted.
As far as
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 18:25, Hans Reiser wrote:
I want the same visibility of credits for reiserfs that movies give for
their actors.
30 seconds after the movie ends the cinema is 95% empty and the credits are
only just started. Only the first few names get seen, and those are the ones
that
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 21:18, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Why don't we consider the x86-64 as beeing a 64-bits-only architecture
Because we want to run Netscape, commercial games, Frauhofer MP3 en/decoders,
Oracle, and other binary-only i386 software.
If AMD had made a 64bit only CPU and devoted
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 02:44, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 12:25:11 +0400, Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I want the same visibility of credits for reiserfs that movies give
for their actors.
Now imagine if ls or grep wanted the list of contributors to
be scrolled
Is there some equivalent to defoma for other distributions?
How would you describe the defoma data that applications read? Is it just
font configuration files or is there more?
I want to setup appropriate SE Linux policy for applications which defoma
files and want to not have it Debian
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:39, David Nusinow wrote:
How much is broken with 2.5 right now? Could someone who's familiar
with the issues give an approximation as to how much work it would take
to adapt d-i to 2.5?
2.5 has a replacement set of utilities for loading kernel modules. The
installer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 03:14:00 +0100
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2003011510-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 21:21:00 +0100
Source: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Binary: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Architecture: source all
Version: 2003.01.15-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 01:39:00 +0100
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2003011510-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 01:47:00 +0100
Source: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Binary: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Architecture: source all
Version: 2003.01.15-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 00:48:00 +0100
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2003011510-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 22:45:00 +0100
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2003011510-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 00:51:00 +0100
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2003011510-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 00:56:00 +0100
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2003011510-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 20:28:00 +0100
Source: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Binary: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Architecture: source all
Version: 2003.01.15-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 13:23:00 +0100
Source: lilo
Binary: lilo-doc lilo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:22.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 14:14:00 +0100
Source: lilo
Binary: lilo-doc lilo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:22.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 19:09:00 +0100
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2003011510-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 19:57:00 +0100
Source: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Binary: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Architecture: source all
Version: 2003.01.15-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 01:06:00 +0100
Source: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Binary: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Architecture: source all
Version: 5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Russell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 12:38:00 +0100
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2003011510-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 11:41:00 +0100
Source: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Binary: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Architecture: source all
Version: 2003.01.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 07:31:00 +0100
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2002121210-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:28:00 +0100
Source: postal
Binary: postal
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.62
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2002 15:20:00 +0100
Source: bonnie++
Binary: bonnie++
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.03a
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 22:46:00 +0100
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2002121210-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 17:43:00 +0100
Source: kernel-patch-2.4-speedtouch
Binary: kernel-patch-2.4-speedtouch
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.5-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 10:48:00 +0100
Source: kernel-patch-2.5-lsm
Binary: kernel-patch-2.5-lsm
Architecture: source all
Version: 2002.12.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 23:20:00 +0100
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2002121210-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 20:02:00 +0100
Source: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Binary: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Architecture: source all
Version: 2002.12.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
I am getting link errors on compiling SE Linux programs on IA64 with the
following:
cc -I../include
-I/home/etbe/selinux-small-2002102211/debian/lsm/security/selinux/include -O2
-g -L../src avc_enforcing.c -lsecure -o avc_enforcing
../src/libsecure.a(security.o): In function `security':
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 11:56:00 +0100
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2002102211-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
It would be interesting to see an strace of the program and the output of
dmesg.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 16:59:00 +0100
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2002102211-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 16:56:00 +0100
Source: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Binary: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Architecture: source all
Version: 2002.10.22-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 21:44:00 +0100
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2002102211-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
In my debian/rules I need to know the name of the architecture. I need the
name that is used in Debian packages i386 for Intel or arm for ARM.
uname gives i686 and armv4l respectively (and presumably has similar
problems on other platforms).
What do I do to get the generic name for the
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 13:48, Russell Coker wrote:
In my debian/rules I need to know the name of the architecture. I need the
name that is used in Debian packages i386 for Intel or arm for ARM.
uname gives i686 and armv4l respectively (and presumably has similar
problems on other platforms
801 - 900 of 1109 matches
Mail list logo
