Testing scripts are dead since some time.
okay, so no package will make it to testing in the mean time???
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than
t i can find
nothing on why wuzzah is "Too young, only 0 of 10 days old". it's 17 days old!
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing
~/.devscripts) in your crontab.
nice! still doesn't explain why the bug wasn't reported, does it?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better thing
bowl #1 Thu Nov 28 09:36:25
CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-15
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than f
x27;s "Too young, only 0 of 10 days old".
i uploaded it to unstable on 17 Nov! What's going on?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fi
speaks for itself. i didn't notice in months...
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=arm&pkg=gradm&ver=1.5a-1
http://bugs.debian.org/gradm
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`
please check
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=arm&pkg=gradm&ver=1.5a-1
bison is in build-depends, and at least on i386, it provides
bison.yacc, which yacc is linked to via alternatives.
so what's the deal on ARM?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PR
s and such. we'll have to wait...
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
NOTE: The public PGP keyservers are broken!
Get my
I just think I'd guard my laptop with
> my mail signing key on it about the same no matter which agent I had
> running.
Right.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you
reveals your passphrase on stdout. bad.
from what i understood. gpg-agent hooks into gpg like ssh-agent into
ssh and you can't get at the passphrase. correct me if this is wrong.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, a
s a horrible security threat. i am not going to give my GPG
passphrase to that thing! i've heard that gpg-agent can do better...
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you hav
where can i find gpg-agent? is it packaged for debian? if not, then
i'll file an ITP unless someone has valid things to say against that.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - wh
on this system installed a news user.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
pgpPujNiX0Eod.pgp
Description: PGP signature
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.11.25.2159 +0100]:
> my fresh woody system now has two news aliases:
maybe relevant: i did purge the original exim install and replace it
with postfix. after all, the file starts out with:
# It was originally generated by `e
'aliases' or 'news' revealed no
information. how did it get there? a bug should be filed...
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gjay
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Chuck Groom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gjay.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : an automatic and learning DJ for xmms
Dear Branden,
in the spirit of a recent email reminding us of this: Thank you.
i am myself a recipient of a lot of "hate mail" and questions on why
woody "sucks" simply because i've converted a *very large* number of
people to debian. thanks you for writing to slashdot and for the email
you just
also sprach Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.15.1952 +0200]:
> Imagine that scene aus TS2, where Woody is riding on the horse through
> the black-white countryside... Now imagine him riding trough
> (black-white) terminal room, ie. on the table in front of keyboards.
> Behind him, everythi
also sprach Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.15.0056 +0200]:
> Perhaps we can ask the people at Pixar if they want to give back to
> community and render us a small movie starring woody. After all, they
> use Linux for the render farm, no?
if you're serious about this, i even have a coup
also sprach Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.09.0112 +0200]:
> | really? are you aware how buggy it is?
>
> No. According to the stuff I've seen it gives problems on non-UNIX
> platforms, but that shouldn't be a concern to us.
okay, well then i'm misinformed. good for us. PreservePer
also sprach Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.08.1943 +0200]:
> | we're talking about the PreservePermissions configuration option,
> | which is something different. i should have been more clear.
>
> Uhm, that is actually just not enabled. I might enable it post-woody.
really? are yo
also sprach Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.07.1306 +0200]:
> It does not disable anything. If you had read the info file it states
> pretty clearly:
>
>All `,v' files are created read-only, and you should not change the
> permission of those files. The directories inside the r
also sprach Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.04.0135 +0200]:
> > this problem is understood by the developers of proftpd
>
> Wichert said that nobody has explained why the current fix on s.d.o
> doesn't work. If the problem is understood, why hasn't someone
> explained this? That's al
also sprach Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.04.0211 +0200]:
> > because it will prevent s.d.o from serving a buggy package. it's not
> > fixed perfectly, but at least it's not subject to a known exploit.
>
> Could you be a little more careful with your terms? A DOS is not an
> exploit,
also sprach Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.03.0732 +0200]:
> > well, i am calm, but i disagree. sure, it boils down to the question
> > who debian's audience are, but for all i am concerned, debian's
> > reputation _used_ to include "security", and the reason why i'd (as in
> > "would
also sprach Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.03.1805 +0200]:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:54:25AM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> > I think Wichert's position
>
> ... reflects appropriate discipline, given the (relatively modest)
> severity of the problem.
i also have to agree with you
also sprach Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.03.1754 +0200]:
> There are several good reasons:
>
> - If a band-aid fix is allowed, there is less incentive to find
> the correct fix.
true. doesn't mean that we have to fall into that hole.
> - If the problem isn't understood, th
also sprach Juan Cespedes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.02.2056 +0200]:
> The HTP queuing discipline has been added to the latest Debian iproute
> package, to be installed in "unstable" in a few hours.
you rock!
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\ echo mailto: !
dear list,
look, i am really not here to start a flame war and heck no, i don't
want one. please excuse if my behaviour has been leading you onto this
belief (or maybe not). i am simply failing to grasp the arguments laid
out by wichert. that is, i don't disagree with him per se, but i have
the fe
also sprach Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.02.1250 +0200]:
> I does, and in fact it's a very good approach: make sure you study
> what the real problem is instead of trying to fix things with bandaid.
wrong. fix things with bandaid to give you more time to find the real
problem. i a
also sprach Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.03.31.2009 +0200]:
> Because it might impact other packages as well.
sure, but the upload won't.
> I'ld rather make sure we don't have a bug in multiple packages then
> a reasonably harmless semi-bug in a single package.
that's a purist appr
hallo supamann,
also sprach Anton Feldmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.15.1356 +0100]:
> Sehr geehrte Programm bereitsteller,
^
wunderschoen. beautiful word. available-maker. tztztz
> mein Name ist Anton Feldmann. Ich hätte gerne von ihnen gewust wann
> woody
also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.15.1301 +0100]:
> The original plan said that base-files would still contain it. Otherwise
> we're in the situation where upgrades from potato will have /usr/doc but
> new installs of woody won't,
which is exactly what i deem the current situat
also sprach Lauri Tischler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.15.1240 +0100]:
> pcmcia-modules for kernels 2.19 and 2.20 dont exist.
> Whats up duck ?
are you talking to me?
pcmcia-modules have, AFAIK, been discontinued. these days, you have to
get pcmcia-source and kernel-source, and co
also sprach Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.15.0413 +0100]:
> I just upgraded my unstable system today. In the process, my /usr/doc
> -> /usr/share/doc symlink disappeared. I didn't notice till
> afterwards, but I'm pretty sure that's what did it. (It was there
> yesterday, and it's u
also sprach Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.15.0305 +0100]:
> I vote yes for the Debconfy bit. I chroot it by hand, and I find it
> insanely nifty, even though bind9 isn't plagued by the same security
> problems bind is. Helps me sleep better at night, or something.
okay. what's your st
remember:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200109/msg01393.html
well, i have just installed a couple of bind9, and i am *tired* of
chrooting them by hand. can we please have a final vote on whether
chrooting bind should be a debconf option of the bind9 package, or
whether i c
also sprach Will Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.13.2037 +0100]:
> > Is there any deb available for it?
>
> Not currently. If there's a lot of demand I'll package it, but it
> seemed silly to bloat the Packages file further by making a .deb
> containing 139 lines of perl.
this runs from my cro
also sprach Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.11.0351 +0100]:
> The time for this maintenance is scheduled for Friday, January 11, at
> 9pm UTC. This is 3pm local time, for murphy.
cool! finally a better reason to stop writing debian list mail than work
;)
--
martin; (greeting
also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.11.0253
+0100]:
> > the php.ini setting works perfectly, *unless* you try to override it, in
> > which case it will *always* and *automatically*, without warning, and
> > without futher ado, turn itself off by the time that the f
i know that this should probably go upstream or to the apache mailing
list(s), but spare me the time and trouble, i consider it more important
to report it at least somewhere... and maybe this is just
debian-related...
i upgraded to squirrelmail 1.2.2 with the .deb package from the
webpage[1] (had
merge 125674 125866
merge 127574 128226
thanks
after hours of messing with squirrelmail last night, i think i have
reason to do this.
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kill ugly radio
also sprach Dominik Kubla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.08.1042 +0100]:
> I simply see no need to have them both installed at the same time.
> Make them conflict. (smtpd is intended to isolate sendmail on firewalls.
> Postfix does not need this since it already is modular...)
valid point, but i wan
also sprach Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.08.0309 +0100]:
> > how does kdebase fix this? by providing x-session-manager?
> the kdm binary package is part of the kdebase source package...
> kdebase already provides x-session-manager
exactly. so how does kdebase want to fix this
also sprach Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.08.0214 +0100]:
> No, because a kdebase upload will be made today to fix it. :)
how does kdebase fix this? by providing x-session-manager?
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> m
also sprach Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.08.0105 +0100]:
> I think kdm should depend on:
>
> kdebase | x-session-manager | x-window-manager
file bug should i?
bug should i file?
should file i bug?
bug file i should?
file should i bug?
okay, that suffices.
--
martin;
also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.08.0005 +0100]:
> My objection is simply that while there is a need for an available
> SMTP server, there is no need for it to be local. I'm going to look
> into some alternatives and post a recommendation.
i don't think mutt comes with S
also sprach Christian Banik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.2157 +0100]:
> So it isn't possible to support the (original Linux) GNU Debian
> project by buying a CD package? I'm a Student and have not so much
> money but if it would help You I would buy one!
sehr gut! at the risk of being flamed or
also sprach Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.1859 +0100]:
> That would be completely inconsistent with all other Postfix
> installations out there and rather non-obvious when you try and look it
> up in the common case where only Postfix is installed.
[also answering dominik's post]
oka
piper:~# apt-get install kdm
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
gnome-core gnome-panel gnome-panel-data gnome-session
libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2 libpanel-applet0 libscrollkeeper0 scrollkeeper
The following NEW packages will
also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.1705
+0100]:
> smtpd in postfix is a private executable, so it has far less precedence than
> the one in smtpd. On the other hand, the postfix manpages are crucial to
> figure out what the hell a config option really does, so
hi folks,
should i file this bug against both packages, or which one should get
precedence? i feel like postfix will be losing out...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/smtpd_2.0-4_i386.deb
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man8/smtpd.8.gz', which is also in
package postfix-tls
co
also sprach Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.06.2034 +0100]:
> > if i package spambouncer so that a configurable cronjob obtains updates
> > on the anti-spam rules and databases from the spambouncer website, then
> > the files can't remain in /usr, right?
>
> Are you sure you want to do
also sprach Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.06.2013 +0100]:
> The changing things go in /var/lib/spambouncer or something... If
> there are executables, these should go into /usr/bin or /usr/sbin or
> something.
the entire package consists of procmail recipes, which are changing.
there are
if i package spambouncer so that a configurable cronjob obtains updates
on the anti-spam rules and databases from the spambouncer website, then
the files can't remain in /usr, right?
the primary candidate for installation of spambouncer is
/usr/share/spambouncer, but /usr/lib/spambouncer might be
reopen 126856
severity 126856 serious
thanks
[cc'ing to debian-devel for comments.]
[please refer to bug 126856 for background info.]
also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.06.1016 +0100]:
> Wrong. Read the documentation on the Flavours before using
> it. This is the rea
also sprach David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.04.1811 +0100]:
> Well, what you're suggesting isn't really feasible ;)
why not? it would be a horrible debugging cycle, but you can totally
replace an operating system with an RPM...
> But it would be feasible to package up a Debian chroot
also sprach Valentijn Sessink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.04.1255 +0100]:
> A friend of mine runs RedHat and told me "but I configure it with vi".
> I told him - jokingly - that I prefered Debian and joe. He answered
> "Hmm, Debian, what's that for a package? Maybe there's an .rpm of it".
>
> Ma
also sprach Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.04.0101 +0100]:
> 75337cc8ad3a21e3eb46e31fa24d5393 1000617 crafty_18.12-4.diff.gz
> fb8740eea8c993d911521da4e3585edf 1000616 crafty_18.12-4.diff.gz
>^^^
>
> Anyone understands this ?
they have
also sprach Tommi Virtanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.29.2035 +0100]:
> IMHO the right solution is to slowly replace sysvinit's init.d
> with something that can monitor whether the children are still
> alive. For _everything_.
ntpdate??? for instance...
surely not everything,
also sprach Alex Pennace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.29.1212 +0100]:
> As far as this proposal applies to free software, how does this serve
> the interests of the free software community? (See section 4 of the
> Debian Social Contract.) My opinion is this policy is an
> unneeded hurdle that needs
also sprach Guy Geens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.28.1648 +0100]:
> This was a bug in kernel-package, but it should be fixed now.
>
> (kernel-package 7.75)
okay, i got 7.76 yesterday because of the failure to build
kernel-source. nevertheless, it isn't fixed:
[abridged...]
piper% dpkg -l ke
hi folks,
i am using a separate machine to compile kernels and module packages.
the arguments to make-kpkg are --revision with an increasing revision
number, and --flavour, where i specify the machine name. the result is
e.g. a kernel-image-2.4.17+fishbowl package.
now, i am also compiling pcmcia-
also sprach Robert van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.26.1922 +0100]:
> > > "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a
> > > fever."
> > where's that from?
> 'dead flag blues', by Godspeed you black emperor!
i knew that, you joker :)
just needed a refreshment...
(ma
also sprach Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.26.1822 +0100]:
> You'd also need a method for handling systems on dialup connections.
sure. /etc/ppp/ip-up.d in that case...
as in: if dialup, the cron job would simply drop a file in there
every week, which would delete itself after a successfu
also sprach Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.26.1724 +0100]:
> Maybe the answer is obvious to experienced package developers, but what
> is the "easy way" you plan to handle SpamBouncer's frequent updates?
i was simply thinking of a cronjob that received ftp updates and
installs them...
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-12-26
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: spambouncer
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Catherine A. Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.spambouncer.org
* License : GPL
Description : a powerful user-based a
also sprach Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.23.1822 +0100]:
> > fishbowl:..b/pantsfullofunix.net> print -l *
> > adequacy.org_hacker.html
> > index.html
> > mirror/
> > ms_white/
> > www.unix-vs-nt.org/
> > fishbowl:..b/pantsfullofunix.net>
>
> You mean like ls -1 ?
pretty much ;)
--
m
also sprach Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.23.1755 +0100]:
> > print -l *
>
> What should this do in your opinion? For me, print is something
> quite different:
it's a shell built-in of zsh, and -l prints the arguments as newlines
instead of separated by spaces.
fishbowl:..b/pa
also sprach Duncan Findlay (on Wed, 26 Sep 2001 08:54:40PM -0400):
> But, putting my own radical beliefs aside, I think that English should
> definitely be an alias for en_GB, seeing how "American" really isn't "English"
> per se.
agreed!
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.
also sprach bart bunting (on Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:32:52AM +1000):
> I have a long standing open ITP for squirrelmail. For various reasons
> I am unable to finish the package to my satisfaction and have been
> looking for someone to take it on. I have a mostly finished package
> with a couple of sm
also sprach Christian Kurz (on Tue, 25 Sep 2001 10:11:07AM +0200):
> But having a link from either the config-files in /etc/bind to $CHROOT
> or in the other direction, could be in my opinion a security risk. In my
> opinion there should be absolutely no link from $CHROOT to any file
> outside the
also sprach Junichi Uekawa (on Wed, 26 Sep 2001 09:23:32PM +0900):
> By the way, are we talking about running bind as non-root
> inside a chroot, or
> are we talking about running bind as root inside a chroot?
is that a serious question? just *why* would you ever run bind9 as
root?
martin;
also sprach Tollef Fog Heen (on Wed, 26 Sep 2001 10:25:15AM +0200):
> The right way is, imho, the way postfix deals with it. It took quite
> some time before I discovered it chrooted itself.
i disagree stronlgy mainly because of things like tripwire, which i
think should be scanning *everything*
also sprach Wichert Akkerman (on Tue, 25 Sep 2001 03:57:49AM +0200):
> > And scratch the second-most important feature of Debian (the first one being
> > the DFSG)? Do Not Move Config Files Out Of /etc. Ever. If you need it
> > elsewhere, at least leave a symbolic link in place.
>
> bind mounts.
also sprach Christian Kurz (on Mon, 24 Sep 2001 10:59:13PM +0200):
> Hm, that doesn't make much sense too me. I think the best thing would be
> to have /etc/bind inside $CHROOT and having no symlink.
except if you want to enable the usual /etc/bind/ editing of
conf-files, which would make adminis
could we temporarily unsubscribe this dude until he clears out his
mailbox? please!
- Forwarded message from Tomek Zubilew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: 24 Sep 2001 14:42:30 GMT
From: "Tomek Zubilew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Martin F Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
also sprach Christian Kurz (on Mon, 24 Sep 2001 10:31:54AM +0200):
> So you want to force everyone who is interested in running this chroot
> to use a kernel 2.4.x at least? That's in my opinion a not acceptable
> solution, since the decision which kernel is used, should never be
> depending on a c
also sprach Itai Zukerman (on Sun, 23 Sep 2001 01:24:30PM -0400):
> Why? My exim uses cyrdeliver to get mail to cyrus. I believe this
> means they both need to be in the same chroot.
then that's bad programming. you should well be able to make them
communicate via TCP or a local socket. and espe
also sprach Marco d'Itri (on Sun, 23 Sep 2001 11:47:33AM +0200):
> There are no packaging changes needed.
> To chroot bind you just have to fix $OPTS in /etc/init.d/bind9 and
> create the two mount binds I described earlier.
marco is right, following his advice, i just chrooted my bind in the
most
also sprach Bryan Andersen (on Sat, 22 Sep 2001 05:42:23PM -0500):
> For even better security, just make the standard install chrooted
> if it is of wise security reasons to. I've long questioned why
> this hasn't been done for many daemons already. I know some people
> may feel that because it
also sprach Richard Atterer (on Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:03:55PM +0200):
> What alternative possibilities for implementing this do you see? The
> package will have to contain the necessary chrooting script somewhere,
> and the admin will have to perform some action to trigger its
> execution. After he h
also sprach Bdale Garbee (on Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:06:37PM -0600):
> Eee. Diversions are so, well, messy. I think the obvious right
> way to handle this is to add debconf support to the bind9 package
> asking whether to run in a chroot or not, and if the answer is yes,
> just do it. As has bee
also sprach Richard Atterer (on Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:28:21PM +0200):
> One idea: In a configuration file, the user lists those daemons he
> wants to run chrooted. init.d scripts that support it read this
> information and act on it, copying the required files to a chroot
> before starting the daemon
madison seems to be what the debian.org webpage sports as the package
search over distributions. is it packaged? do you need someone to
package it?
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
if god had meant fo
also sprach Bdale Garbee (on Thu, 20 Sep 2001 06:00:59PM -0600):
> > bind9-chroot -- convert a bind9 installation to a chroot'd one
>
> What does this package do? I have offered numerous times to accept a patch
> for the bind9 package to optionally implement chroot installation and nobody
> ha
hi guys,
i am not yet an official maintainer, but i do already have an advocate
and sponsor (Colin - what's the status?)
however, in the mean time i am happily packaging along and submitting
ITP's to bugs.debian.org the proper way. However, not once has one of
these ITPs reached the debian-devel l
also sprach Jeremy Zawodny (on Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:29:15PM -0700):
> > > The Policy Editor, OTOH, is quite nice.
> >
> > sure, but there are better. i forgot the name of the one i have in
> > mind, i'll post it tomorrow from the office.
>
> Please don't. It's already off-topic.
well, the one i
woops. that went to -user... sorry...
- Forwarded message from Martin F Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
also sprach Robert Waldner (on Mon, 17 Sep 2001 12:01:26AM +0200):
> Not to give NT any honour, but that´s probably FW-1. It runs reasonably
> (for commercial-firewall-softw
also sprach Adam McKenna (on Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:17:37AM -0700):
> Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person
> into thinking Branden actually signed this.
oooh. this is ugly. reported it to bugtraq? if not bugtraq, then at
least michael elkins should know...
mar
whatever the call is on how we should proceed in terms of Debian
apache package task force, i have created a mailing list, webpage, and
cvs repository for the crew.
you can subscribe at
https://lists.madduck.net/mailman/listinfo/debian-apache
you can post with
debian-apache at pantsfullof
also sprach Ardo van Rangelrooij (on Fri, 14 Sep 2001 07:06:52PM -0500):
> Please do. Something like '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' or so? I'm still gonna
> file against lists.debian.org. Once that is created we can move over. Do you
> also support archiving? That would be really great.
alright. doing s
also sprach Ardo van Rangelrooij (on Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:33:39PM -0500):
> - filing a request for the mailing list
i'll set one up. filing against lists.debian.org takes too long.
> - putting together a web page similar to that of the X Strike Force
>with a link to the packages and their bu
also sprach Brandon L. Griffith (on Thu, 13 Sep 2007 06:03:10PM -0400):
> It was just recently posted here: Oohara Yuuma wrote a short, but
> decent HOWTO on doing this. You can find it at
> http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/apt-gettable/apt-gettable/index.html
i know this much and made it work
assuming that i have a local mirror of the entire debian and
debian-non-US trees, how can i rebuild the Packages.gz files myself?
reason that my link is slow, and keeping the mirror up to date takes
time and causes differences between Packages.gz and packages present.
so i figure i'll just make the
also sprach Ardo van Rangelrooij (on Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:42:44AM)
> I would like to propose to form an Apache (web server) task force to
> maintain the Apache packages currently maintained by Johnie Ingram
> (netgod) (and potentially related packages if the need arises).
count me in.
> I also pro
first of all, is this the right way to do ITP's? i just simply sent a
mail...
second, and mainly, i would like to package WebReport for debian. it
may be found at http://www.inter7.com/webreport/ and i could not find
it in the current dist, and wnpp system seems down on debian.org.
anyway, web re
801 - 897 of 897 matches
Mail list logo
