Re: /usr/doc/copyright/package - /usr/doc/package/copyright ?

1996-08-10 Thread Ian Jackson
Erick Branderhorst writes (Re: /usr/doc/copyright/package - /usr/doc/package/copyright ?): ... But a /usr/doc/copyright dir should remain. The only contents allowed in there would be generic copyright messages like GPL LGPL BSD and so on. Putting these generic files in /usr/doc/base/{GPL

Re: /usr/doc/copyright/package - /usr/doc/package/copyright ?

1996-08-09 Thread Lars Wirzenius
Ian Jackson: We then end up with two files per package, and it then makes even more sense to move the copyright file. $ ls /usr/doc | wc 101 101 703 $ ls /usr/doc/copyright | wc 243 2431804 $ On my system, /usr/doc would be almost two and a half times bigger, with all

Re: /usr/doc/copyright/package - /usr/doc/package/copyright ?

1996-08-09 Thread Yves Arrouye
Ian Jackson writes: I do, however, think we should move the examples directory. I've always thought the distinction between /usr/doc/package and /usr/doc/examples/package was arbitrary. It usually leads to the obtuse arrangement where the example is in one directory and its

Re: /usr/doc/copyright/package - /usr/doc/package/copyright ?

1996-08-09 Thread Erick Branderhorst
What is the feeling on this ? Since the new source format mandates the existence of the changelog and specifies that it must be in one of a small number (currently 1) of formats I'm inclined to say that we should mandate its inclusion - gzipped. We then end up with two files per

Re: /usr/doc/copyright/package - /usr/doc/package/copyright ?

1996-08-08 Thread Ian Jackson
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes (Re: /usr/doc/copyright/package - /usr/doc/package/copyright ?): [Ian Jackson:] Should we move the copyright file (and the examples directory) into the per-package directory in /usr/doc ? Good idea. Can we also recommend/impose to include the Changelog [1] file

Re: /usr/doc/copyright/package - /usr/doc/package/copyright ?

1996-08-08 Thread Ian Jackson
Erick Branderhorst writes (Re: /usr/doc/copyright/package - /usr/doc/package/copyright ?): ... No, the /usr/doc/package dir is a dir which normally comes with all stuff in it gzipped and I think we should keep it like that. We can not gzip copyright files (this has been decided/mandated long

Re: /usr/doc/copyright/package - /usr/doc/package/copyright ?

1996-08-08 Thread Ian Jackson
Guy Maor writes (Re: /usr/doc/copyright/package - /usr/doc/package/copyright ?): ... I don't think we should move the copyright file. Most people don't ever need to look at them, so it's simpler if they're out of the way. What about the changelog ? In general I'm not convinced that keeping

Re: /usr/doc/copyright/package - /usr/doc/package/copyright ?

1996-08-02 Thread Lars Wirzenius
Guy Maor: I don't think we should move the copyright file. Most people don't ever need to look at them, so it's simpler if they're out of the way. aolI agree, because of this, and because there are packages that only have and need a copyright file, but not their own directory below

Re: /usr/doc/copyright/package - /usr/doc/package/copyright ?

1996-08-01 Thread Guy Maor
On Thu, 1 Aug 1996, Ian Jackson wrote: Should we move the copyright file (and the examples directory) into the per-package directory in /usr/doc ? I don't think we should move the copyright file. Most people don't ever need to look at them, so it's simpler if they're out of the way. We

Re: /usr/doc/copyright/package - /usr/doc/package/copyright ?

1996-08-01 Thread Erick Branderhorst
It's nice to have all these files in the same directory, but people are starting to do things like having /usr/doc/foo/REAMDE be a link to /usr/doc/copyright/foo or vice versa, and splitting the documentation for a package up across several directories doesn't seem to work very well. This