On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
buildds
===
Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (l...@lkcl.net) wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
buildds
===
Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the
Hi,
I have a spec sheet to devices for English.
I ask whether this can be distributed.
Please wait.
Nobuhiro
2012/7/21 Dr. David Alan Gilbert d...@treblig.org:
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (l...@lkcl.net) wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote:
+++ Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [2012-07-20 21:27 +0100]:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote:
As I've posted during DebConf(*), Maybe OpenBlocks can solve this problem.
It has 2GB RAM, reliable production use and we can buy it NOW.
*)
[ Please note the cross-post and Reply-To ]
Hi folks,
Here's a summary of what we discussed in the ARM ports BoF [1] last
week (10th July). Thanks to the awesome efforts of the DebConf video
team, the video of the session is already online [2] in case you
missed it. I've also attached the Gobby
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using
development boards as build machines. They work, but they're a PITA
for hosting and
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 20:09 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
[...]
(*1) and if someone _really_ wants a debug build of that particular
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 20:09 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
buildds
===
Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using
development boards as build machines. They work, but they're a
Hi,
2012/7/20 Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp:
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
buildds
===
Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using
development
10 matches
Mail list logo
