Hi,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:50:26AM +, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
http://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureSpecificsMemo
Some suggestions for improving this table:
1. About half of the table is taken up with sizeof information, some
of which could be expressed more concisely. (Are all
http://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureSpecificsMemo
Some suggestions for improving this table:
1. About half of the table is taken up with sizeof information, some
of which could be expressed more concisely. (Are all Debian
architectures ILP32 or LP64? Any rare exceptions could be described
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
of which could be expressed more concisely. (Are all Debian
architectures ILP32 or LP64? Any rare exceptions could be described in
I think so. Probably even all Linux architectures?
4. I'd like to see some information about va_list added as
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:50:26 +, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
http://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureSpecificsMemo
Some suggestions for improving this table:
1. About half of the table is taken up with sizeof information, some
of which could be expressed more concisely. (Are all Debian
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 12:29 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Cyril Brulebois:
I'm wondering whether the ArchitectureSpecificsMemo[1] wiki page is
(well-)known, and whether its content got reviewed, esp. by porters of
each architecture, who could fix obvious errors or typos, or eventually
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 00:15 -0400, Zack Weinberg wrote:
I looked at the page: this seems like an appropriate moment to mention
something that should be a lot more widely known than it is:
sizeof(char) == 1
sizeof(signed char) == 1
sizeof(unsigned char) == 1
Those three
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
sizeof(char) == 1
I just removed them for this reason.
Maybe we need to specify CHAR_BITS instead?
Gruss
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 20:21 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
sizeof(char) == 1
I just removed them for this reason.
Maybe we need to specify CHAR_BITS instead?
Maybe some day Debian will run on an architecture where CHAR_BITS != 8,
but I doubt it;
* Bernd Eckenfels:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
sizeof(char) == 1
I just removed them for this reason.
Maybe we need to specify CHAR_BITS instead?
Too much Java programming? 8-)
POSIX requires CHAR_BITS to be 8 these days.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm wondering whether the ArchitectureSpecificsMemo[1] wiki page is
(well-)known, and whether its content got reviewed, esp. by porters of
each architecture, who could fix obvious errors or typos, or eventually
add special-cases, exceptions, and the like.
1. http://wiki.debian.org
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 08:12:58AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering whether the ArchitectureSpecificsMemo[1] wiki page is
(well-)known, and whether its content got reviewed, esp. by porters of
each architecture, who could fix obvious errors or typos, or eventually
add special
[Cyril Brulebois]
Hi,
I'm wondering whether the ArchitectureSpecificsMemo[1] wiki page is
(well-)known, and whether its content got reviewed, esp. by porters of
each architecture, who could fix obvious errors or typos, or eventually
add special-cases, exceptions, and the like.
1. http
I looked at the page: this seems like an appropriate moment to mention
something that should be a lot more widely known than it is:
sizeof(char) == 1
sizeof(signed char) == 1
sizeof(unsigned char) == 1
Those three equalities are not part of any ABI. They are written into
the C
13 matches
Mail list logo
