Your message dated Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:07:19 +0200
with message-id <20200830100718.7sgwhjxrup4q2...@percival.namespace.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#854793: general: debian jessie kde shutdown problem
gui/acpi
has caused the Debian Bug report #854793,
regarding general: debian jessie kde sh
Package: general
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
i installed a completely fresh debian 64 bit with kde as desktop environment.
nearly everythink worked fine, but sometimes the poweroff/shutdown does not. To
be exact, if i run as root poweroff -h, it works without porblems, but if i
want to
Paul Seelig wrote:
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 11:29:37AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Fri 08 Sep 2000, Paul Seelig wrote:
RMS should IMHO publically apologize with the KDE people for this
condescending part of his otherwise correct article. He should be
So now _you_ are telling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Stallman) writes:
Meanwhile, you don't seem to be concerned about the mob of people
who are attacking me.
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 06:06:53PM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
I may now be even more concerned that you seem to consider the authors
of free KDE software a
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 11:20:01PM -0600, Richard Stallman wrote:
I think you ought to apologize, for supporting this mob. I have
no reason to apologize for being its victim.
I, on behalf of everyone involved in the GPL KDE fiasco, humbly apologize to
everyone else for the actions, comitted by
You are picking at little details of my words, reading into them a
hostility which is not there. Meanwhile, you don't seem to be
concerned about the mob of people who are attacking me.
To me that says injustice and double standard. Injustice, because
you blame me for meanings that others
to Debian now
to join Qt in main. Unfortunately, not by any action of KDE. Troll Tech
made the decision. KDE and Debian both benefit. I can speak for a
sizable portion of Debian when I say regardless of how the resolution came
about, we're happy with it (and in fact, most of us are absolutely
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 05:52:04PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
Fortunately, my part of it is done - KDE is being uploaded to Debian
now to join Qt in main. Unfortunately, not by any action of KDE. Troll
Tech made the decision. KDE and Debian both benefit. I can speak
for a sizable portion
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 05:52:04PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
Richard's comment was apparently on the order of It's about time, which
apparently managed to peeve the KDE people who felt they needed to flame
him publicly over it.. *sigh*
It was not the harmless about time part those people
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 11:01:37AM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 05:52:04PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
Richard's comment was apparently on the order of It's about time,
which apparently managed to peeve the KDE people who felt they
needed to flame him publicly over
On Fri 08 Sep 2000, Paul Seelig wrote:
about. They IMHO righfully complained about RMS' forgiving talk
which is more like religious speech from a church or something.
If the catholic pope would utter such words it could be silently
ignored, though it would be appropriate speech in his
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 11:29:37AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Fri 08 Sep 2000, Paul Seelig wrote:
RMS should IMHO publically apologize with the KDE people for this
condescending part of his otherwise correct article. He should be
So now _you_ are telling someone to ask for
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 08:24:30PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
[ just more of the same ]
because of the long and bitter public debates, RMS had to say something
and he had to make a public statement that it was now OK for KDE to use
any FSF owned code. if he had just ignored the fact that the
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 11:01:37AM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
Richard's comment was apparently on the order of It's about time, which
apparently managed to peeve the KDE people who felt they needed to flame
him publicly over it.. *sigh*
It was not the harmless about time part those
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 11:56:06AM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
Without being a KDE/Qt user myself, this is what makes me understand
the anger of the KDE developers.
The problem with that is that the KDE developers have chosen to assume
that because Richard has been an ass to them (and quite
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But RMS speaking like *this* is rather unappropriate and IMHO quite
insulting. I wonder if the author of ncftp who was hurting the GPL by
using readline and who subsequently put ncftp under GPL as consequence
of complaints was asked to beg for being
At 10:14 AM 9/8/00 -0400, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But RMS speaking like *this* is rather unappropriate and IMHO quite
insulting. I wonder if the author of ncftp who was hurting the GPL by
using readline and who subsequently put ncftp under GPL as
On Thu, 07 Sep 2000, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
as Maintainer of KDE for Debian I'd like to chime in. kdelibs, kdesupport,
and kdoc all are sitting in incoming. We had to wait till yesterday for qt2.2
to come out so that I could build it, then compile kde against it since
the GPL'd status
I would be happy to take over korganizer again for starters (from the status
information of the package on the tdyc site I believe that no-one else has
more interest in it than me).
Ivan, if you're managing the KDE Debianizing stuff then perhaps you could
assign 2 or 3 other significant KDE
From the article I have read about debian Stand On KDE, which said that
debian would like to help kde get there license issues resolved so kde could
be put into debian. Perhaps, that was not the case, and debian just wanted
to kick kde because you guys don't like it and the license issue was just
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:51:23PM -0300, Ben Woodhead [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
If I was wrong, I would have expected to see some news on the homepage
saying Yeah, KDEs is completely GPLed and will be included in debian, or
at least something like that. After all the reading I did
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:51:23PM -0300, Ben Woodhead wrote:
From the article I have read about debian Stand On KDE, which said that
debian would like to help kde get there license issues resolved so kde could
be put into debian. Perhaps, that was not the case, and debian just wanted
to kick
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:51:23PM -0300, Ben Woodhead wrote:
If I was wrong, I would have expected to see some news on the homepage
saying Yeah, KDEs is completely GPLed and will be included in debian, or
at least something like that. After all the reading I did where debian was
saying that
Hello everybody
First I would like to give my appologies, I was not aware of the incomming
directory and I have been told that kde will be included. I would also like
to say that I personally do not use kde nor am a developer for them, my
consern was with the conflicts between linux. Competition
Hi,
as Maintainer of KDE for Debian I'd like to chime in. kdelibs, kdesupport,
and kdoc all are sitting in incoming. We had to wait till yesterday for qt2.2
to come out so that I could build it, then compile kde against it since
the GPL'd status doesn't mean squat if you build against
Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
as Maintainer of KDE for Debian I'd like to chime in.
[clip]
I was interviewed by a few online
magswhether any of that went anywhere is not my problem.
http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/opinions/2281/1/
Editor's
26 matches
Mail list logo
