On 05/07/2013 10:34 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Debian backports offers me *one* repository. I need 3 of them:
I don't see why. The combination of suites we have now should be
enough. Here is what I would do...
- stable -1 (currently OpenStack
On 05/07/2013 04:12 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Providing backports doesn't free you from the burden of making sure
upgrades work. Thomas is facing a very large chunk of work to make sure
upgrades from the no-longer-supported E release to whatever might be in
jessie, since upstream breaks APIs
On 2013-05-09 15:58:02 +0800 (+0800), Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 05/07/2013 10:34 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
Also, the rules in backports is that packages should be
already migrated to testing. The point is, if I had PPAs, I
wouldn't
On 05/07/2013 03:34 PM, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
While there are certainly use cases that will stay in a PPA forever
(Thomas described one)
And I seriously wished it wasn't the case, and
that upstream understood better what the
distribution requirements are.
This should be considered as the last
On 2013-05-09 22:55:33 +0800 (+0800), Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
And I seriously wished it wasn't the case, and that upstream
understood better what the distribution requirements are.
[...]
Actually, in this case (OpenStack) from what I've seen the upstream
community understands the
On 05/07/2013 12:23 PM, Adrian Alves wrote:
Why I vote NO for ppa in Debian,
Something that everybody loves about debian is you have everything in
one repo for stable testing or development, the use of PPA it couse
things like happens in ubuntu when u need something important you need
to
On 7 May 2013 17:03, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Now, if I had PPA, then I could follow upstream release cycles. Every 6
months, I would destroy the PPA for OpenStack stable -2, and create a
new stable PPA. I could put all the backport software I need in there.
No need to worry
On 13204 March 1977, Adrian Alves wrote:
Why I vote NO for ppa in Debian,
Unless someone runs a GR, its not a vote.
Im happy for changes/improvements, but it will come, so a no isn't the way.
Something that everybody loves about debian is you have everything in one
repo for stable testing or
]] Brian May
On 7 May 2013 17:03, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Now, if I had PPA, then I could follow upstream release cycles. Every 6
months, I would destroy the PPA for OpenStack stable -2, and create a
new stable PPA. I could put all the backport software I need in there.
On 05/07/2013 03:11 PM, Brian May wrote:
On 7 May 2013 17:03, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org
mailto:z...@debian.org wrote:
Now, if I had PPA, then I could follow upstream release cycles.
Every 6
months, I would destroy the PPA for OpenStack stable -2, and create a
new stable
Paul Wise pabs at debian.org writes:
I think you may have misunderstood the Debian PPA proposal. It will
not be like the Ubuntu PPA system where anyone can upload a package to
Call it DPA then?
Debianprojectmember Personal Archive
bye,
//mirabilos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Debian backports offers me *one* repository. I need 3 of them:
I don't see why. The combination of suites we have now should be
enough. Here is what I would do...
- stable -1 (currently OpenStack Folsom)
Ignore, is there any reason why
On 07/05/13 15:34, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Debian backports offers me *one* repository. I need 3 of them:
- stable -1 (currently OpenStack Folsom)
Ignore, is there any reason why an old version is interesting?
Because Debian testing has it
Why I vote NO for ppa in Debian,
Something that everybody loves about debian is you have everything in one
repo for stable testing or development, the use of PPA it couse things like
happens in ubuntu when u need something important you need to install it
from a PPA because is not in the repo
On 7 May 2013 14:23, Adrian Alves aal...@gmail.com wrote:
am not saying PPA is bad just worried about not to lose the magic of
debian who has everything in one place.
This is already the case. Not everything I package deserves to go into
Debian main. e.g. because it is specific to a problem I
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.auwrote:
On 7 May 2013 14:23, Adrian Alves aal...@gmail.com wrote:
am not saying PPA is bad just worried about not to lose the magic of
debian who has everything in one place.
This is already the case. Not everything I
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Adrian Alves wrote:
well as u explain it has logic but whats happens if that never happens on
that way? and packages that deserve to be in Debian repos never reach it
because it never be pushed into? or how you gonna look into all the PPA's
looking for
17 matches
Mail list logo
