On 2012-07-14 22:59:35 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Due to those drawbacks, I've wondered why people don't just disable
NetworkManager on their system instead of bothering with workarounds
like the above or dpkg -P --force-depends and similar.
Sorry for being late in the discussion. I also
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:18:12PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2012-07-14 22:59:35 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Due to those drawbacks, I've wondered why people don't just disable
NetworkManager on their system instead of bothering with workarounds
like the above or dpkg -P
On 2012-07-18 15:01:43 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:18:12PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Sorry for being late in the discussion. I also think that having
NetworkManager disabled for those who do not want to use it is
a good solution. But I think that if other
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 03:01:43PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
wicd is used only on machines that use wifi, this excludes most desktops.
wicd can also be used to manage different Ethernet configurations.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 03:31:37PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Still, the check would be useful on laptops where wicd is installed
and enabled (the user could have a default ifupdown config and wicd
enabled).
What happens if neither wicd nor network-manager are installed, and then both
are
On Mi, 18 iul 12, 15:01:43, Adam Borowski wrote:
A different idea would be to have NM configured by default to do what it can
do well (wifi) and stay away from all other interfaces, but because it has
thorough assumptions that it controls all of networking in the system, this
is not a change
+++ Andrei POPESCU [2012-07-18 20:56 +0300]:
On Mi, 18 iul 12, 15:01:43, Adam Borowski wrote:
A different idea would be to have NM configured by default to do what it can
do well (wifi) and stay away from all other interfaces, but because it has
thorough assumptions that it controls all
On 2012-07-18 21:32:31 +0100, Wookey wrote:
+++ Andrei POPESCU [2012-07-18 20:56 +0300]:
One of the reasons I'm using network-manager instead of wicd or even
plain ifupdown is the possibility to switch (more or less) seamlessly
between wired and wifi.
wicd does this just fine too. Tell
On Mi, 18 iul 12, 21:32:31, Wookey wrote:
One of the reasons I'm using network-manager instead of wicd or even
plain ifupdown is the possibility to switch (more or less) seamlessly
between wired and wifi.
wicd does this just fine too.
In the past I've had problems with wicd in this
9 matches
Mail list logo
