[Russ Allbery]
> The problem is that the software is called wallet, both the software
> itself and the primary client binary that users invoke. And, of
> course, we have a bunch of documentation and automation at Stanford
> that assumes that name.
That actually seems like a reasonable name to me
On 2012-09-07 21:11:51 -0500 (-0500), Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> That is what tab completion is for.
Granted, but you still have to remember what you're tab-completing,
and tab completion is a bit of a moving target as you add other
packages which install things with somewhat similar names in your
p
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:33 PM, The Fungi wrote:
> On 2012-09-07 16:40:07 -0700 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote:
> [...]
>> The problem is that the software is called wallet, both the
>> software itself and the primary client binary that users invoke.
>> [...] I don't think there's another UNIX/Linux
On 2012-09-07 16:40:07 -0700 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote:
[...]
> The problem is that the software is called wallet, both the
> software itself and the primary client binary that users invoke.
> [...] I don't think there's another UNIX/Linux binary of that
> name. But, of course, it's still not a
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On Fri 07 Sep 2012 21:45:54 Russ Allbery escribió:
> > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer writes:
> > > If you go for changing the name, kerberos-wallet or krb-wallet seems
> > > quite right.
> >
> > It's a reasonable idea for the
On Fri 07 Sep 2012 21:45:54 Russ Allbery escribió:
> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer writes:
> > If you go for changing the name, kerberos-wallet or krb-wallet seems
> > quite right.
>
> It's a reasonable idea for the current implementation, but I'd rather not
> use that either because the pr
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer writes:
> If you go for changing the name, kerberos-wallet or krb-wallet seems quite
> right.
It's a reasonable idea for the current implementation, but I'd rather not
use that either because the protocol was designed to not require Kerberos.
It currently is
On Fri 07 Sep 2012 20:40:07 Russ Allbery escribió:
[snip]
> The second question is: if I should rename it, what should I call it?
> Does anyone have any suggestions that are more unique but that still
> preserve the property of being a reasonably easy-to-remember command-line
> tool for unsophistic
Hello all,
Given that this has been keeping me from packaging for Debian some
software I developed at Stanford, and I'm getting more requests for
packages, I will try to get past my mixed feelings of obstinance and guilt
and just ask for advice or help. :)
In 2007, to replace our legacy Kerberos
9 matches
Mail list logo
