Brian M. Carlson writes (Re: Mass bug filing: failure to use invoke-rc.d when
required):
But seriously, if violating Debian Policy has no consequences, then it
probably won't be followed. As it stands now, Policy is useless because
the worst that can happen is an important bug, which can
On 15 May 2006, Bastian Blank told this:
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 06:10:52AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
I propose to file bugs against the packages before the end of this
week, and, after a couple of weeks, for packages that haven't been
fixed already, start making NMUs (via DELAYED/7, since
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:53:39AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
ti, 2006-05-16 kello 09:53 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw kirjoitti:
Lars wrote:
The usage is mendantory (aka a must clause) but the bugs are not
RC? This does not fit.
It violates policy, but not in a way enumerated on
On Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:59 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:53:39AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
ti, 2006-05-16 kello 09:53 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw kirjoitti:
[...]
AFAIK, vilolating policy always waarent a serious bug:
[...]
This is not what Steve
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 09:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:59 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:53:39AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
ti, 2006-05-16 kello 09:53 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw kirjoitti:
[...]
AFAIK, vilolating
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:37:56PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
Then when are we removing the debian-policy package from the archive?
But seriously, if violating Debian Policy has no consequences, then it
probably won't be followed. As it stands now, Policy is useless because
the worst that
Hi Lars!
You wrote:
The usage is mendantory (aka a must clause) but the bugs are not RC?
This does not fit.
It violates policy, but not in a way enumerated on
http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt, which means that it isn't
release critical, unless I've misunderstood something.
ti, 2006-05-16 kello 09:53 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw kirjoitti:
Hi Lars!
You wrote:
The usage is mendantory (aka a must clause) but the bugs are not RC?
This does not fit.
It violates policy, but not in a way enumerated on
http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt, which means
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 06:10:52AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
I propose to file bugs against the packages before the end of this week,
and, after a couple of weeks, for packages that haven't been fixed
already, start making NMUs (via DELAYED/7, since they're not RC) to get
the packages
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 06:10:52AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
The latest version of the Debian Policy Manual has made the use of
invoke-rc.d mandatory, if that command exists. Directly calling an
(...)
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nessus-core
Fixed packages
ma, 2006-05-15 kello 08:55 +0200, Bastian Blank kirjoitti:
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 06:10:52AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
I propose to file bugs against the packages before the end of this week,
and, after a couple of weeks, for packages that haven't been fixed
already, start making NMUs
The latest version of the Debian Policy Manual has made the use of
invoke-rc.d mandatory, if that command exists. Directly calling an
/etc/init.d script in maintainer scripts is no longer allowed, unless
invoke-rc.d doesn't exist on the system. See section 9.3.3.2.[1]
[1]
12 matches
Mail list logo
