Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While I agree that Gnus is the best thing since sliced bread, keep in
mind those in other countries where net access is *much* more
expensive.
I hardly think the duplicate messages represent a significant
percentage of their bandwidth.
For these
On 17 Dec 1997, Guy Maor wrote:
download them is closing the barn door after the horses have eaten the
chickens.
Horses are vegetarians anyway.
Will
--
|
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guy Maor) wrote on 16.12.97 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gonzalo A. Diethelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps you could point out how I could force all of those people
with broken mailers and/or ideas to use one of your great mail
clients, so I won't get four, five, six or
Kai == Kai Henningsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kai Remember there are people that can't stand Emacs.
Bliss. :-)
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
On 18 Dec 1997, Kai Henningsen wrote:
Remember there are people that can't stand Emacs.
Strange... :)
---
Turbo_ /// If there are no Amigas in heaven, send me to HELL!
^\\\/
Unix _IS_ user friendly -
On 18 Dec 1997, Kai Henningsen wrote:
Remember there are people that can't stand Emacs.
Strange... :)
Nothing strange. After a couple of _years_ of struggling in attempts to
learn emacs (I made about 6 attempts total) I found a *great* relief in...
vi (vim actually). I was able to get
Alex Yukhimets [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When doing 'g'roup reply in elm, the e-mail of the person goes into
the To: header and list address (along with all other thread
participant's adresses) to Cc: header.
So, umm, fix elm?
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the
James == James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
James Alex Yukhimets [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When doing 'g'roup reply in elm, the e-mail of the person goes
into the To: header and list address (along with all other
thread participant's adresses) to Cc: header.
James So,
On 17-Dec-1997, James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Yukhimets [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When doing 'g'roup reply in elm, the e-mail of the person goes into
the To: header and list address (along with all other thread
participant's adresses) to Cc: header.
So, umm, fix elm?
This
Quoting Gonzalo A. Diethelm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
You seem to be quite happy with the configuration as it is. Good for
you. Perhaps you could point out how I could force all of those people
with broken mailers and/or ideas to use one of your great mail
clients, so I won't get four, five, six or
Gonzalo A. Diethelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps you could point out how I could force all of those people
with broken mailers and/or ideas to use one of your great mail
clients, so I won't get four, five, six or more duplicates of the
messages sent to the list.
Gnus.
--
TO
On Tue 16 Dec 1997, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
James == James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
James Alex Yukhimets [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When doing 'g'roup reply in elm, the e-mail of the person goes
into the To: header and list address (along with all other
thread
Guy Maor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gnus.
While I agree that Gnus is the best thing since sliced bread, keep in
mind those in other countries where net access is *much* more
expensive. For these people, deleting the duplicates after they
download them is closing the barn door after the horses
Tyson Dowd:
A couple of us discussed this (and other problems with the mailing
list), in the thread Duplicate messages on this list in debian-devel
about a week ago and eventually came to a standstill where most people
in the discussion were happy with the following solution:
Set
Please let noone think that just because that absurd and awful
suggestion was the last thing anyone said that everyone is happy with
it.
Rather, the rest of us have more important things to do than to fight
battles with people with broken mailers and broken ideas about how
mailers ought to
On Tue, 16 Dec 1997, Alex Yukhimets wrote:
Please let noone think that just because that absurd and awful
suggestion was the last thing anyone said that everyone is happy with
it.
Rather, the rest of us have more important things to do than to fight
battles with people with broken
On 16-Dec-1997, Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tyson Dowd:
A couple of us discussed this (and other problems with the mailing
list), in the thread Duplicate messages on this list in debian-devel
about a week ago and eventually came to a standstill where most people
in the discussion
Christian Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please check out http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html . The page
contains several arguments against the use of Reply-To. I fully agree to
what Ian said.
I personally find header-munging of any sort distasteful, however
I think a couple of
On 16-Dec-1997, Christian Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please check out http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html . The page
contains several arguments against the use of Reply-To. I fully agree to
what Ian said.
Please don't quote this URL as if all the issues in this web page
On Dec 16, 1997, at 11:22, Ian Jackson wrote:
Tyson Dowd:
A couple of us discussed this (and other problems with the mailing
list), in the thread Duplicate messages on this list in debian-devel
about a week ago and eventually came to a standstill where most people
in the discussion
--- Start of forwarded message ---
Resent-Date: 16 Dec 1997 22:24:45 -
Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 15:38:16 -0300
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Gonzalo A. Diethelm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Debian developers list
21 matches
Mail list logo
