Re: New fvwm95 into unstable

1998-04-15 Thread Daniel Martin at cush
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SNIP Personally, I am inclined to think that if your release fixed bugs, and introduced not too many new features, it should go into frozen. SNIP And now it's just done that - 2.0.43b-4 is in incoming heading for frozen, but you probably saw

Re: New fvwm95 into unstable

1998-04-14 Thread Anthony Fok
On Mon, Apr 13, 1998 at 03:54:37PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Personally, I am inclined to think that if your release fixed bugs, and introduced not too many new features, it should go into frozen. Secondly, new maintainers do not have a corner on errors and bugs; and I

Re: New fvwm95 into unstable

1998-04-13 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Daniel == Daniel Martin at cush [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Daniel I'd also recommend that people upgrading directly from bo Daniel upgrade to this package instead of the one in frozen, as this Daniel package's preinst cleans up the old bo config. files (the name Daniel of the config. files

Re: New fvwm95 into unstable

1998-04-13 Thread Daniel Martin at cush
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, Daniel == Daniel Martin at cush [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Daniel I'd also recommend that people upgrading directly from bo Daniel upgrade to this package instead of the one in frozen, as this Daniel package's preinst cleans up the old bo

Re: New fvwm95 into unstable

1998-04-13 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Personally, I am inclined to think that if your release fixed bugs, and introduced not too many new features, it should go into frozen. Secondly, new maintainers do not have a corner on errors and bugs; and I am of the opinion we treat people no different that what their