Re: Pronouns (was Re: Proposed Constitution)

1998-04-30 Thread Jules Bean
--On Thu, Apr 30, 1998 1:03 pm +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I´m did a little research and nobody here at my university I ask (not > too many people, and not represantive, but FWIW) did know this use > of "they". > > I would really appreciate a list of word explanations, as reading > english

Re: Pronouns (was Re: Proposed Constitution)

1998-04-30 Thread Marcus . Brinkmann
I´m did a little research and nobody here at my university I ask (not too many people, and not represantive, but FWIW) did know this use of "they". I would really appreciate a list of word explanations, as reading english legal texts is hard. I´m willing to learn new stuff, but I hope that Ian ca

Re: Pronouns (was Re: Proposed Constitution)

1998-04-30 Thread Raul Miller
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hope you are well aware of the fact that a lot of people will not > understand it, and probably will ask you about it. I can tell you that most > german readers may be confused. I don't know about other countries, but I > assume the situation is not v

Re: Pronouns (was Re: Proposed Constitution)

1998-04-29 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Apr 28, 1998 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > This discussion is ridiculous. > > In my view singular `they' is perfectly correct. If I can use it in > my PhD thesis (with a footnote[1] and supporting references, and > without any complaint from the examiners) then we can use it h

Pronouns (was Re: Proposed Constitution)

1998-04-28 Thread Ian Jackson
This discussion is ridiculous. In my view singular `they' is perfectly correct. If I can use it in my PhD thesis (with a footnote[1] and supporting references, and without any complaint from the examiners) then we can use it here. Furthermore, language is defined by use, not by prescription (try