Re: RFC: Kernel-package: Please add the '.config' file in the binary package

1997-05-21 Thread jwalther
On Tue, 20 May 1997, Mike Orr wrote: It should be copied, and not symlinked. /boot must not have any symlinks into /usr, in case /usr is trashed and you're trying to recover. If the symlink went the other way, from /usr/src/linux/.config into /boot/.config, then make config would be

Re: RFC: Kernel-package: Please add the '.config' file in the binary package

1997-05-21 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, SirDibos == [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SirDibos On Tue, 20 May 1997, Mike Orr wrote: SirDibos You are right. However, what solution do you suggest in my SirDibos case, where I have 6 different kernels cluttering up my / ? SirDibos I use all of em, 1 is a backup, some implement different

Re: RFC: Kernel-package: Please add the '.config' file in the binary package

1997-05-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, jwalther == jwalther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are there any objections to moving the file into /boot? jwalther Is there really any reason to take us farther away from the jwalther standard that everyone else uses? Its just one more gotcha jwalther that'll tick a newbie off when they

Re: RFC: Kernel-package: Please add the '.config' file in the binary package

1997-05-20 Thread jwalther
On 19 May 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Less blather this time. Yes, ther reason is that /boot contains other useful information about the kernels ensconced there, (like System.map, and psdatabase) but is missing one piece: exactly what is configured into the kernel (which can be

Re: RFC: Kernel-package: Please add the '.config' file in the binary package

1997-05-20 Thread Jean Pierre LeJacq
On Mon, 19 May 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 19 May 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Less blather this time. Yes, ther reason is that /boot contains other useful information about the kernels ensconced there, (like System.map, and psdatabase) but is missing one piece: exactly

Re: RFC: Kernel-package: Please add the '.config' file in the binary package

1997-05-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Jean == Jean Pierre LeJacq [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jean I agree with the basic concept but shouldn't this be placed in Jean /etc instead of /boot. /etc defines the configuration for the Jean host after all. The config file, which shall reside in the kernel-image package, is

RFC: Kernel-package: Please add the '.config' file in the binary package

1997-05-19 Thread Vincent Renardias
I initialy reported this problem as a RFE for the kernel-package, but Manoj (and I tend to agree) thinks it should be discussed here first. My point was the kernel package should also install the .config file used to build the kernel for further reference (as getting the exact config

Re: RFC: Kernel-package: Please add the '.config' file in the binary package

1997-05-19 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, My 2 cents: I think I agree with Vincent Renardias ; the kernel configuration file really belongs in /boot. However, I do not feel comfortable taking unilateral decisions about something as touchy as /boot (some people require thin root partitions). Are there any