On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:41:37AM +1100, dave b wrote:
So what's kind of why i asked about how you were trying to find the bug.
Don't tell me to search through lots of C code point it out!
I don't have time for that and you seemed to know more!
Please calm down and don't shout at me. I'm not
Salvo Tomaselli tipos...@tiscali.it wrote:
Well, to me, it does indeed appear to be a GDM bug: I can not reproduce
this permanent VT allocation with either KDM, XDM or startx. The issue
It happens to me with kdm.
Before or after you logged in to a session?
Is it reproducible for you by just
On 18 November 2010 23:14, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
mario.ho...@tu-ilmenau.de wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:41:37AM +1100, dave b wrote:
So what's kind of why i asked about how you were trying to find the bug.
Don't tell me to search through lots of C code point it out!
I don't have time
reassign 603767 general
thanks
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 13:47 +1100, david b a écrit :
After upgrading from lenny to squeeze, gdm starts on vt8 always (even
after restarting it). It should start on vt7 as this is the expected
behaviour.
I noticed this happens often to me too, and I can
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 603767 general
Bug #603767 [gdm] gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7
Bug reassigned from package 'gdm' to 'general'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
603767:
I noticed this happens often to me too, and I can assure you it’s not a
GDM bug. The Linux VT interface wrongly reports vt7 as being in use,
before gdm is even started. It does not happen on all systems, so it
might be related to KMS - for example it happens with my radeon-based
system.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:36:14AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 13:47 +1100, david b a écrit :
After upgrading from lenny to squeeze, gdm starts on vt8 always (even
after restarting it). It should start on vt7 as this is the expected
I noticed this happens
Well, to me, it does indeed appear to be a GDM bug: I can not reproduce
this permanent VT allocation with either KDM, XDM or startx. The issue
does only show up with GDM. And it does never show up when starting GDM
the first time after boot, GDM needs to be stopped and started again for
the
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 17:15 +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe a
écrit :
Well, to me, it does indeed appear to be a GDM bug: I can not reproduce
this permanent VT allocation with either KDM, XDM or startx. The issue
does only show up with GDM. And it does never show up when starting GDM
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:01:53PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 17:15 +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe a
écrit :
Well, to me, it does indeed appear to be a GDM bug: I can not reproduce
this permanent VT allocation with either KDM, XDM or startx. The issue
So what's kind of why i asked about how you were trying to find the bug.
Don't tell me to search through lots of C code point it out!
I don't have time for that and you seemed to know more!
We so then the question is what happens if it is 'busy' and we attempt
to use it anyways ;) ?
--
To
This appears to be a duplicate of 596700.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
12 matches
Mail list logo
