Hi,
I looked into latest policy, but did not find anything about systemd
support. I'm surprised that this is now a release critical bug, and the
package marked for removal. What's the justification?
This package hooks into /etc/inittab, does systemd not automatically
manage services from
Hi,
On 07/04/2014 11:08, Gerrit Pape wrote:
I looked into latest policy, but did not find anything about systemd
support. I'm surprised that this is now a release critical bug, and the
package marked for removal. What's the justification?
Ask the submitter?
This package hooks into
]] Gerrit Pape
I looked into latest policy, but did not find anything about systemd
support. I'm surprised that this is now a release critical bug, and the
package marked for removal. What's the justification?
This package hooks into /etc/inittab, does systemd not automatically
manage
Gerrit,
it's up to you to lower the severity of the bug to important (I guess
since it will break with default init system).
You should have done that instead of ccing debian-devel in the
current situation.
Please do not abuse debian-devel to questions that could be politely
and calmly
Gerrit Pape p...@dbnbgs.smarden.org writes:
I looked into latest policy, but did not find anything about systemd
support. I'm surprised that this is now a release critical bug, and the
package marked for removal. What's the justification?
I'm very dubious about this being release-critical.
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 03:37:20AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Gerrit Pape p...@dbnbgs.smarden.org writes:
I looked into latest policy, but did not find anything about systemd
support. I'm surprised that this is now a release critical bug, and the
package marked for removal. What's the
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 12:01:13PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Could we please not have another systemd thread on -devel@? The last
one is not even cold yet... Thanks!
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 12:06:41PM +0200, Ond??ej Surￜ wrote:
Please do not abuse debian-devel to questions that could be
Hi,
Gerrit Pape:
I'm very dubious about this being release-critical.
I think it is. The package will not work as expected without the
inittab interface.
It's rather trivial to write an init script, and/or a systemd unit file,
which starts daemontools. Hooking into inittab isn't going to
Hi,
Gerrit Pape:
This is about a package I maintain with a RC bug that'll cause it to be
removed from the next Debian release. I'm with Debian more than 12
years, I'm pretty sure debian-devel@l.d.o is the right place to ask
fellows for advice.
I agree.
Switching to systemd is a big
Hi Gerrit,
Am 04.07.2014 13:50, schrieb Gerrit Pape:
I hereby ask for help to add systemd support to these packages.
We (pkg-systemd team) can help you with that.
Let's follow up on the pkg-systemd mailing list.
In most cases adding a .service file is pretty simple.
If it's only about
Gerrit Pape p...@dbnbgs.smarden.org writes:
Important thing to know is: init scripts don't work out for this. The
service management concept of daemontools and runit is, amongst other
things, a process tree with guaranteed process state, including
envrionment. init scripts don't provide
Am 04.07.2014 14:34, schrieb Michael Biebl:
Hi Gerrit,
Am 04.07.2014 13:50, schrieb Gerrit Pape:
I hereby ask for help to add systemd support to these packages.
We (pkg-systemd team) can help you with that.
Let's follow up on the pkg-systemd mailing list.
I want to add, that this is a
Am 04.07.2014 14:38, schrieb Michael Biebl:
pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
mailing list and we will try to help you as best as we can.
or join #debian-systemd on OFTC.
Regards,
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are
On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 14:34, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 04.07.2014 13:50, schrieb Gerrit Pape:
I hereby ask for help to add systemd support to these packages.
We (pkg-systemd team) can help you with that.
Let's follow up on the pkg-systemd mailing list.
In most cases adding a .service
Hi Milan,
Am 04.07.2014 15:22, schrieb Milan P. Stanic:
And for runit:
Thanks for sharing.
cat /etc/systemd/system/runit.service
[Unit]
Description=runit svscan
After=syslog.target
The After=syslog.target is no longer necessary and not recommended
anymore. Lintian will actually complain
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 12:06:41PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
it's up to you to lower the severity of the bug to important (I guess
since it will break with default init system).
I'd call it wishlist at most. The package is still perfectly working with
sysvinit (including openrc).
If you can't
On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 15:55, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 04.07.2014 15:22, schrieb Milan P. Stanic:
And for runit:
Thanks for sharing.
cat /etc/systemd/system/runit.service
[Unit]
Description=runit svscan
After=syslog.target
The After=syslog.target is no longer necessary and not
]] Adam Borowski
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 12:06:41PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
it's up to you to lower the severity of the bug to important (I guess
since it will break with default init system).
I'd call it wishlist at most. The package is still perfectly working with
sysvinit
18 matches
Mail list logo
