* Jeff Teunissen [Thu, 07 Oct 2004 03:52:37 -0400]:
What DOES bug me is mindlessly adding
gnustep- to the names of all packages that use it, because most of the
developers of those packages have dick to do with some mythical GNUstep
desktop, which itself does not exist.
but note that
Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Jeff Teunissen [Thu, 07 Oct 2004 03:52:37 -0400]:
What DOES bug me is mindlessly adding gnustep- to the names of all
packages that use it, because most of the developers of those packages
have dick to do with some mythical GNUstep desktop, which itself does
not
* Jeff Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [041008 10:11]:
(b) what can be regarded as most useful for our users (I, at lest,
think it is, and some other people will as well, I hope).
I don't really see how it's useful -- it doesn't matter what libs are used
by an app.
In my
(Note: I'm not subscribed to -devel, only -private and d-d-a, so please Cc
me on replies -- this text is copied from the web archives, which is the
reason the references are gone)
Steve Greenland wrote:
On 06-Oct-04, 06:41 (CDT), Jeff Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And developers writing
Jeff Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So do we. The names for GNUstep-based programs ARE unique -- no other free
software is using (or, to my knowledge, has ever used) those names, and the
names that conflict are named as they are for descriptiveness and for
compatibility (Terminal,
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 09:20, Jeff Teunissen wrote:
On 06-Oct-04, 06:41 (CDT), Jeff Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And developers writing with GNUstep recognize the same thing. The
difference is that we *have* to give enough information about an app
using only two pieces of
Petri Latvala wrote:
[fixing attributions]
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 09:20, Jeff Teunissen wrote:
[Steve Greenland wrote:]
On 06-Oct-04, 06:41 (CDT), Jeff Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And developers writing with GNUstep recognize the same thing. The
difference is that we *have*
Tilo Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 04 October 2004 20:23, Frank Küster wrote:
I must have missed this thread... What is .bundle meant to
indicate?
On NeXT-Step systems the .bundle suffix of a directory indicates a
dynamically linkable module (basically like a shared lib).
On Thursday 07 October 2004 10:09, Frank Küster wrote:
Tilo Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 04 October 2004 20:23, Frank Küster wrote:
I must have missed this thread... What is .bundle meant to
indicate?
On NeXT-Step systems the .bundle suffix of a directory indicates
a
Tilo Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 07 October 2004 10:09, Frank Küster wrote:
Tilo Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 04 October 2004 20:23, Frank Küster wrote:
I must have missed this thread... What is .bundle meant to
indicate?
On NeXT-Step systems the .bundle
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 07:40:06PM -0800, D. Starner wrote:
I just installed the textedit.app package; it pulled in a few GNUstep
libraries, but not a complete desktop environment.
Do the GNUstep libs still start a demon at startup? Last time I
checked, they did, instead of starting them
I am not sure what you mean by startup.
When Linux boots up.
When the libraries were loaded, they started a few daemons, but, I
believe KDE and GNOME libraries do the same thing. Again, how is GNUstep
any different in this regard than the other desktop environments?
At one point in time,
Miles Bader wrote:
Jeff Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For me, I don't want GNUstep in the names of my programs because I am
not connected to GNUstep and don't want to be. It is just a couple of
libraries that I use to write my apps -- you wouldn't put GTK+ in
the name of your apps,
On 06-Oct-04, 06:41 (CDT), Jeff Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And developers writing with GNUstep recognize the same thing. The difference
is that we *have* to give enough information about an app using only two
pieces of information -- the name of the app and its icon.
*Have* to? Why?
On Monday 04 October 2004 20:23, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
could you do me the favor of producing readable mails, i.e. with
empty lines between text and quotes, and sensible line lengths?
Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank,
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0),
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:41:03AM -0400, Jeff Teunissen wrote:
Miles Bader wrote:
Jeff Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For me, I don't want GNUstep in the names of my programs because I am
not connected to GNUstep and don't want to be. It is just a couple of
libraries that I use
Jeff Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Many gnustep apps OTOH, use absurdly generic names, and I can only
conclude that the developers do not think about mixed systems at all.
I disagree in the first case, and you are incorrect in the second.
What can I say? You claim this, but the
Jeff Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
If I'm wrong, I apologize and will not object against cddb.bundle (at
least not because of this. Still the .bundle part is meaningless to
me, but that might be due to my bad english). If I am not wrong, and
GNUstep applications are
Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I said without GNOME installed, I meant without the entire GNOME
desktop environment installed: nautilus, gnome-session, metacity, etc.
No Gnome application I'm aware of requires metacity. I don't believe
that gnome-session will be pulled in except
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 11:00:56AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I said without GNOME installed, I meant without the entire GNOME
desktop environment installed: nautilus, gnome-session, metacity, etc.
No Gnome application I'm aware of requires
Frank Küster wrote:
Jeff Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
If I'm wrong, I apologize and will not object against cddb.bundle (at
least not because of this. Still the .bundle part is meaningless to
me, but that might be due to my bad english). If I am not wrong,
Jeff Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For me, I don't want GNUstep in the names of my programs because I am not
connected to GNUstep and don't want to be. It is just a couple of libraries
that I use to write my apps -- you wouldn't put GTK+ in the name of your
apps, would you?
Most GTK+
I just installed the textedit.app package; it pulled in a few GNUstep
libraries, but not a complete desktop environment.
Do the GNUstep libs still start a demon at startup? Last time I
checked, they did, instead of starting them only if you were running
a GNUstep program, like KDE and GNOME
Frank Küster wrote:
Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 05:27:59PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Seo Sanghyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
For example, camera package name was changed to camera.app to
prevent namespace pollution. Are you saying that it should
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 07:44:12PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 05:27:59PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
I don't mind what it's called as long as I can see by its name that it
is useless without gnustep. In other words: There has
25 matches
Mail list logo
