On 10/21/2014 01:34 AM, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
I mean, when I read that infamous guy, Poettering, talking about things
like this:
http://0pointer.net/blog/revisiting-how-we-put-together-linux-systems.html
Actually, while the rest of your post isn't helpful (or even an
annoyance), I'm happy
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
So, dear fellow DDs, I'm asking you: each time you see that an upstream
author is breaking an ABI on a package you maintain, write an email to
him/her, and explain how much this is bad and shouldn't happen. If the
Unix community starts to realize how
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:12:20 +0200
Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de wrote:
So, dear fellow DDs, I'm asking you: each time you see that an
upstream author is breaking an ABI on a package you maintain, write
an email to him/her, and explain how much this is bad and shouldn't
happen. If the
Hi,
Thorsten Glaser:
OpenBSD’s libc.so major number is 50 or something like that right now,
because they – correctly – increment it on every incompatible change.
Glibc has versioned symbols instead …
This is not a problem because, you know, we have Open Source, so we
can always just
Guys,
I really do NOT want to start a flame war, I know that you guys are tired
about this init subject appearing over and over... But, my turn...:-P
*First things first: Why I'm with Debian / Ubuntu?*
A.: Because *I like the work of Debian Maintainers* (you guys and gals,
sirs and
Hi,
Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com writes:
I really do NOT want to start a flame war
This statement is evidently false or misguided.
I'd love to leave it at that (see?), but:
Linux Kernel Developers Fed Up With Ridiculous Bugs In Systemd:
Sorry man... English isn't my native language, is hard for me to express
myself in another language... But yes, those sources aren't the best but,
there are more, you know. :-P
Best!
Thiago
On 20 October 2014 15:55, Axel Wagner m...@merovius.de wrote:
Hi,
Martinx - ジェームズ
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014, at 19:34, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
I really do NOT want to start a flame war, I know that you
guys are tired about this init subject appearing over and
over...
No, you wanted to add more oil on existing flamewars and you
know it. If you don't want to start the flamewars,
But I need to act (at least, say something) to preserve our distro and I
cannot remain in silence. Sorry... This isn't intended to be fun.
Cheers!
Thiago
On 20 October 2014 16:57, Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014, at 19:34, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
I really do NOT want
If you have the unresistible urge to act, then go fix a bug. Or
help with triaging the bugs - finding reproducible test case
also helps. Turn that urge into something productive. Flaming
in the mailing list isn't helpful, it's exactly the oposite.
Cheers,
Ondrej
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014, at
Okay, I agree with you. I just find two bugs when with systemd, I'll fill
the bug reports. Those problems I'm seeing are reproducible.
Please, forgive me, I don't want to make things worse, I just want to *express
my concerns* about this systemd-situation...
I'm with Debian because *it is
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org wrote:
No, please don't. It's neither useful, productive nor funny.
Actually your message is even worse. It isn't useful or productive. And
it certainly isn't funny.
But it is definitely censorious, which I, and I suspect many
Please do not use HTML mail on Debian lists.
Please do not flame on Debian lists.
https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
tried it without success, lots of bugs popped everywhere when
Hey Paul,
I really appreciate your feedback. Glad to see that at least, systemd in
Debian have some boundaries. Whew! Tks!
I'll try to disable html messages for all Debian Lists at my GMail account
right now, sorry about that.
Nevertheless, I'm not flaming (not my intention, really), I care
14 matches
Mail list logo
