Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-10 Thread Norbert Veber
On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 12:49:44PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There's a typo in README.samba, though: it says > "flag=RESUSE" when it should say "flags=REUSE". I'll test this further > just to be sure. flags is the correct keyword according to the xinet.conf man page, this will be fixed in

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-10 Thread peloy
Hi again, Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Great, I didnt have time to install smaba yet, this saves me some work :) > > Did you try the fix posted in this list (same thread)? I got your new xinetd package from Incoming, installed it and started testing. With the fix provided in READ

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-10 Thread peloy
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was the maintainer for awhile. The torch has now been passed on. I had > moved it to non-free because of a bug report(which has been closed for > awhile now, and already purged from the database). I was in irc with the > new maintainer recently and I di

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-10 Thread peloy
Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Great, I didnt have time to install smaba yet, this saves me some work :) > > Did you try the fix posted in this list (same thread)? Do you mean adding "flags = REUSE" to the nmbd service in xinetd.conf? Yesterday I was trying it from home (we no luck)

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-10 Thread Norbert Veber
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 10:16:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The bug report pretty much says: > > xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok) > > > > What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just a user configura

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-10 Thread Adam Heath
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Remco Blaakmeer wrote: > According to the bug tracking system, he still is the maintainer. > /usr/doc/xinetd/changelog.Debian.gz says that xinetd was moved to non-free > at version 2.2.1-3. This was done on "Sat, 14 Mar 1998 03:31:50 -0500". I > think it is a bad thing that t

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-09 Thread peloy
Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The bug report pretty much says: > xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok) > > What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just a user configuration > problem. I personally do not have/use samba, but I know of at least 2 p

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-09 Thread peloy
Remco Blaakmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, I did wonder why you stopped answering my messages. Sorry about that Remco, my apologies :-( I guess I got kind of busy + was afraid of dealing with xinetd, something I have never touched before :-) >> Today I e-mailed Jeremy Allison (from the Sa

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-09 Thread Norbert Veber
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 12:30:50PM -0400, Eloy A. Paris wrote: > Hi, > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > The bug report pretty much says: > > xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok) > > > > What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just a user con

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-09 Thread Norbert Veber
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 03:55:58PM +0200, Mirek Kwasniak wrote: > On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 02:56:44PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote: > > The bug report pretty much says: > > xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok) > > > > What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-09 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Eloy A. Paris wrote: > Hi, > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > The bug report pretty much says: > > xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok) > > > > What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just a user configuration > > proble

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-09 Thread Eloy A. Paris
Hi, In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > The bug report pretty much says: > xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok) > > What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just a user configuration > problem. I personally do not have/use samba, but I know of at lea

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-09 Thread Mirek Kwasniak
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 02:56:44PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote: > The bug report pretty much says: > xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok) > > What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just a user configuration > problem. I personally do not have/use samba, but I

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-08 Thread Norbert Veber
> I can send you all e-mail messages I have sent and received about this > bug, if you wish. Right now I don't have much time to re-investigate the > bug. Sure, that would be usefull, thanks. pgpsFjS2YWP1P.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-08 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Norbert Veber wrote: > The bug report pretty much says: > xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok) > > What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just a user configuration > problem. I personally do not have/use samba, but I know of at least 2 p

Xinetd bug #20705

1998-06-08 Thread Norbert Veber
The bug report pretty much says: xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok) What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just a user configuration problem. I personally do not have/use samba, but I know of at least 2 people that use it successfully with xinetd. If some