Re: debian can be better

2010-11-01 Thread Matthias Klumpp
D, I said I’d be worried about compiz. Ah, okay... Why? (I haven't done anything with Compiz or Mutter/Clutter yet, so I really can't say which one is actually better.) >> To the overall topic ("debian can be better"): I see Ubuntu as some kind >> of playground for

Re: debian can be better

2010-11-01 Thread Josselin Mouette
on the “designed for netbooks” part. > They say if a hardware does not meet the 3D-requirements, they will have a > fallback to the exiting GNOME-panel, which is the same as GNOME-Shell will > do, so I don't see much difference here. I’m not worried about 3D, I said I’d be worried abou

Re: debian can be better

2010-11-01 Thread Matthias Klumpp
will have a fallback to the exiting GNOME-panel, which is the same as GNOME-Shell will do, so I don't see much difference here. To the overall topic ("debian can be better"): I see Ubuntu as some kind of playground for new technologies. Debian should look at Ubuntu, and they already

Re: debian can be better

2010-10-31 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 31 octobre 2010 à 22:41 +0100, Matthias Klumpp a écrit : > Also, they use Banshee and Tomboy, which results in including Mono to > their default install. (Okay, this is a disk-space problem, but also > "crazy") We do also for Tomboy, and this “space problem” is of similar scale as the

Re: debian can be better

2010-10-31 Thread Miles Bader
Michael Banck writes: >> Just out of curiosity, what changed with that version...? > > Miles, you can lookup their release notes if you like, but this question > is really unappropriate for this list. If such information is deemed too inflammatory, an off-list reply would be cool too... Thanks,

Re: debian can be better

2010-10-31 Thread Matthias Klumpp
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 05:44:27 +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > Mark Allums writes: >> In my opinion, and at risk of starting a fruitless spiral into the >> flames, I think Ubuntu have jumped on the crazy train with 10.10 >> Maverick Meerkat. > > Just out of curiosity, what changed with that version...

Re: debian can be better

2010-10-31 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 05:44:27AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > Mark Allums writes: > > In my opinion, and at risk of starting a fruitless spiral into the > > flames, I think Ubuntu have jumped on the crazy train with 10.10 > > Maverick Meerkat. > > Just out of curiosity, what changed with that ve

Re: debian can be better

2010-10-31 Thread Miles Bader
Mark Allums writes: > In my opinion, and at risk of starting a fruitless spiral into the > flames, I think Ubuntu have jumped on the crazy train with 10.10 > Maverick Meerkat. Just out of curiosity, what changed with that version...? -Miles -- Dictionary, n. A malevolent literary device for c

Re: debian can be better

2010-10-28 Thread Mark Allums
Am 27.10.2010 23:32, schrieb Russell Coker: Speaking for myself I'm more than happy for people who want Debian with non- free software to use Ubuntu. I think that they are doing a great job of making a Debian-derived distribution that supports non-free software and is easy to use. In my opinio

Re: debian can be better

2010-10-28 Thread Christian PERRIER
> > Debian should improve translation linguas.Quando used for > > other help topics were all in English! Despite the selected language is > > Portuguese from Brazil! > > Christian PERRIER > > It seems that you are well qualified to help with that. Christian seems to > be > one of the leaders

Re: debian can be better

2010-10-27 Thread Ivan Jager
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Patrick Matth??i wrote: Am 27.10.2010 23:32, schrieb Russell Coker: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Pedro Paulo Argolo wrote: needs better support video cards from Nvidia and ATI video boards Intel. I had configuration problems because of that, and for a typical user is a very embar

Re: debian can be better

2010-10-27 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Patrick Matthäi may or may not have written... > Am 27.10.2010 23:32, schrieb Russell Coker: >> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Pedro Paulo Argolo wrote: >>> needs better support video cards from Nvidia and ATI video boards >>> Intel. I had configuration problems because of that, and for a typ

Re: debian can be better

2010-10-27 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 28.10.2010 00:05, schrieb Vincent Bernat: > OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du mercredi 27 octobre > 2010, vers 23:48, Patrick Matthäi disait : > >> Most desktop users also want to have some 2D/3D performance, or special >> features like tv out, xvideo acceleration etc etc. >

Re: debian can be better

2010-10-27 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du mercredi 27 octobre 2010, vers 23:48, Patrick Matthäi disait : > Most desktop users also want to have some 2D/3D performance, or special > features like tv out, xvideo acceleration etc etc. > nouveau is a good replacement for nv, but still far

Re: debian can be better

2010-10-27 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 27.10.2010 23:32, schrieb Russell Coker: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Pedro Paulo Argolo wrote: >> needs better support video cards from Nvidia and ATI video boards >> Intel. I had configuration problems because of that, and for a typical >> user is a very embarrassing situation. ~: ( > > The chang

Re: debian can be better

2010-10-27 Thread Jesús M. Navarro
Hi, Pedro Paolo: On Wednesday 27 October 2010 14:46:08 Pedro Paulo Argolo wrote: > Debian > needs better support video cards from Nvidia and ATI video boards > Intel. I had configuration problems because of that, and for a typical > user is a very embarrassing situation. ~: ( You should ask for

debian can be better

2010-10-27 Thread Pedro Paulo Argolo
Debian needs better support video cards from Nvidia and ATI video boards Intel. I had configuration problems because of that, and for a typical user is a very embarrassing situation. ~: ( In this case I think Debian should look a little closer to Ubuntu, referring to usability. You can mainta