On 2008-05-03, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the MIA status of its only maintainer. On the contrary you have been
> speculating on the future (in)ability of someone to maintain gpg.
> Anyhow, my post has probably been too rude and I'm sorry for that, but I
> really don't think tha
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:29:35AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> >> Yes. But after I have seen Laszlo Boszormenyi bughandling in sqlite3, I
> >> think I actually would prefer current maintainance of gnupg.
> > Whatever it might have happened on those 2 bug reports, which I haven't
> > read, I find r
On 2008-05-02, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 07:36:25PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> Yes. But after I have see
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 07:36:25PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Yes. But after I have seen Laszlo Boszormenyi bughandling in sqlite3, I
> think I actually would prefer current maintainance of gnupg.
>
> 478980 and 478337
Whatever it might have happened on those 2 bug reports, which I haven't
read
On 2008-04-19, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --=-DjuXQ9s0AhDVtNsDjVrA
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Le samedi 19 avril 2008 =E0 07:06 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi a =E9crit :
>> I in
also sprach Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.19.2109 +0100]:
> I just claimed (and I still do) that there is a process for
> (possible) MIA maintainers, which doesn't involve the
> debian-release list.
There are better ways to let people know that this is what you
think. This "debian-rel
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 01:00:38 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> >> Various people can't reach him[2]. On the other hand, he seems to be
> >> active on Ubuntu[3], he joined to Launchpad security this january at
> >> least. Moritz Muehlenhoff noted[4] that it should be hijacked and get in
> >> shape for
Hi,
>> Various people can't reach him[2]. On the other hand, he seems to be
>> active on Ubuntu[3], he joined to Launchpad security this january at
>> least. Moritz Muehlenhoff noted[4] that it should be hijacked and get in
>> shape for Lenny. Thus I have created a preliminary package[5] which
>>
Le samedi 19 avril 2008 à 07:06 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi a écrit :
> I intend to hijack GnuPG[1]
It would be very nice to see GnuPG more actively maintained indeed.
If you prepare an upload of the latest upstream version, it would be
nice to synchronize with someone from the GNOME team so t
* Daniel Leidert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080419 17:51]:
> x-post, fup2 debian-devel if possible
> Am Samstag, den 19.04.2008, 09:57 +0200 schrieb Andreas Barth:
> > * Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080419 07:42]:
> > > I intend to hijack GnuPG[1], but as it builds an
* Clint Adams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080419 19:00]:
> [moving to -devel to make Christian happy]
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 09:57:44AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > And, BTW, most of us (including me) have a paid dayjob, and are of
> > course active on that one for the contracted time - for obvio
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:37:57PM +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> gnupg is important package. PTS says:
> "The package is of priority standard or higher, you should really find some
> co-maintainers."
> Suggestion: Can we replace 'should' with 'must'?
Wrong problem - we don't need more maintaine
On Saturday 19 April 2008 22:25:31 Clint Adams wrote:
> > And, BTW, most of us (including me) have a paid dayjob, and are of
> > course active on that one for the contracted time - for obvious
> > reasons. Telling that I would neglect Debian because I'm spending more
> > time on my dayjob than Debi
[moving to -devel to make Christian happy]
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 09:57:44AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> And, BTW, most of us (including me) have a paid dayjob, and are of
> course active on that one for the contracted time - for obvious reasons.
> Telling that I would neglect Debian because I'
x-post, fup2 debian-devel if possible
Am Samstag, den 19.04.2008, 09:57 +0200 schrieb Andreas Barth:
> * Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080419 07:42]:
> > I intend to hijack GnuPG[1], but as it builds an udeb and has priority
> > important, I ask if the Release Team allow
(moving to -devel as -release is not meant to be a discussion
list Please note this is not directed at your post, which was
appropriate for -release but my comments are IMHO not. CC'ing you in
case you're not subscribed to -devel)
Quoting Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Various peop
16 matches
Mail list logo
