Re: missing recommends are not RC severity

2018-04-19 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On 04/17/2018 09:21 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: "It is my understanding that is a RC bug for package to recommend a library that has been removed from Testing because recommended packages won't be auto-removed on upgrade." Neither will Suggested: packages, by the way, depending on

Re: missing recommends are not RC severity

2018-04-17 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 09:21:31AM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: > > (not sure this makes sense as the practical impact is a normal bug, but > > Since I was CC'd on this email and I've filed several Serious bugs for >

Re: missing recommends are not RC severity

2018-04-17 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: > (not sure this makes sense as the practical impact is a normal bug, but Since I was CC'd on this email and I've filed several Serious bugs for this issue, here is what I've been using lately: "It is my understanding

Re: missing recommends are not RC severity

2018-04-17 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 01:04:47PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >if your package recommends a package which is not available, this is a > >normal bug, not one with RC severity (and neither an important one). > > Policy 2.2.1 pretty clearly says otherwise. wow, I stand corrected, thanks. (not

Re: missing recommends are not RC severity

2018-04-17 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 01:04:47PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >if your package recommends a package which is not available, this is a > >normal bug, not one with RC severity (and neither an important one). > > Policy 2.2.1 pretty clearly says otherwise. Whlile the release policy says

Re: missing recommends are not RC severity

2018-04-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On April 17, 2018 12:52:32 PM UTC, Holger Levsen wrote: >folks, > >if your package recommends a package which is not available, this is a >normal bug, not one with RC severity (and neither an important one). Policy 2.2.1 pretty clearly says otherwise. Scott K

missing recommends are not RC severity

2018-04-17 Thread Holger Levsen
folks, if your package recommends a package which is not available, this is a normal bug, not one with RC severity (and neither an important one). -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: PGP signature