Report about packages that need work for Apr 27, 2001
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 32
Number of packages offered up for adoption this week: 1
Total number of orphaned packages: 59
Number of packages orphaned this week: 3
The number in parenthesis after each package name is
As you may have noticed a new dpkg release hit the archives today:
after months of work version 1.9.0 is finally ready. This release
has the usual number changes and fixes a nice 90 bug reports in the
bug tracking system. All the details are listed in the changelog
of course, but I have put the
Bug stamp-out list for Apr 27 05:07 (CST)
Total number of release-critical bugs: 305
Number that will disappear after removing packages marked [REMOVE]: 0
--
Package: ace (debian/main)
Maintainer: Ossama Othman [EMAIL
Yes, I have no NFS, I have no NFS today... sung to yes we have no
bannanas ;-)
Ah, the joys of living under an IT department. I hear tales from my son
all the time. He works in development and has to defeat a lot of IT stuff
that keeps finding its way onto his machine every time he docks it at
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:42:16PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IDE causes a bit of a performance hit, I don't think we're talking high
speed file access here though... cheap is the objective.
You'd be suprised at the performance hit. I had 2 drives/channel and
suffered from really bad
Hello,
* Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010426 21:40]:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote:
If I try a ./configure or a make xconfig with a new Kernel, I get this
error-msg:
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined
* Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010426 21:40]:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote:
If I try a ./configure or a make xconfig with a new Kernel, I get this
error-msg:
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:33:19PM -0700, Brandon High wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:42:16PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IDE causes a bit of a performance hit, I don't think we're talking high
speed file access here though... cheap is the objective.
You'd be suprised at the
I recently uploaded a new version of libgmp3 that finally fixed bug number
93661, but I got a typo in the changelog resulting in an attempt to close
bug number 93361 instead, which appears to have succeeded, closing this
bug against the gltron. Can I just reopen that report, or is it going to
be
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:30:41PM -0400, Jason Lunz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
What's wrong with adding an exit 0 to the init.d files?
dpkg will ask me whether I want to keep my changes each time I upgrade,
rather than just overwriting the script.
I believe that dpkg only does that when
Herbert == Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Confusion: Adding 8 (or whatever it is) variations of each
kernel version is going to make it harder to select the
appropriate one. There is some fraction of the target audience
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:20:46PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 02:18:30AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
I could disagree pretty heavily by pointing that this would be shit as
it would add an hour to the install. Why not just provide a stock i386
kernel and let people
Hello,
Open question to maintainer of openldap2: Are there any long term
plans to upload a debian version of libldap2 with ssl and/or kpasswd
support?
Note:
1. I use both myself, although I only have kpasswd for testing...
2. I don't understand why kpasswd support required Kerberos, and can't
Hi Dale!
You wrote:
I recently uploaded a new version of libgmp3 that finally fixed bug number
93661, but I got a typo in the changelog resulting in an attempt to close
bug number 93361 instead, which appears to have succeeded, closing this
bug against the gltron. Can I just reopen that
Á¦¸ñ:debian-devel ´Ô ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä ?
¡¡ ´ç»ç´Â ¹Ì±¹LA¿¡ ¼ÒÀçÇϸç ÀÎÅÍ³Ý ¼îÇθô Àü¹®¾÷ü ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
¹Ì±¹¿¡¼ È®½ÇÈ÷ ÀÎÁ¤ ¹ÞÀº Ç°¸ñÀ¸·Î ¿©·¯ºÐÀ» À§ÇØ Áغñ Çß½À´Ï´Ù.
ÄÚ¸®¾ÆŸ¿î »çÀ̹ö¸ô»õ´ÜÀå ±â³ä
Ưº° ¼¼ÀÏ»óÇ°
¡¡
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
GQ is a GTK-based LDAP client. Features include:
- browse and search modes
- LDAPv3 schema browser
- template editor
- edit and delete entries
- add entries with templates
- export subtree or whole server to LDIF file
- use any number
The RNIB have released the source to their Braille conversion program
Braille-It under the GPL. This is a tool, written in C, which will
take text and convert it into contracted Braille. [For those that
don't appreciate this: grade 1 British Braille spells out words
letter for letter, grade 2 is
* Ond?ej Sur? in wnpp: ITP: gq - gtk ldap client dated 2001/04/27
* 09:48 wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
GQ is a GTK-based LDAP client. Features include:
What's wrong with the current gq package?
$ apt-cache show gq
Package: gq
Priority: optional
Section: net
What's wrong with the current gq package?
Sorry, I hadn't noticed... I will close that bug. I appologies.
--
Ondej Sur [EMAIL PROTECTED] Globe Internet s.r.o. http://globe.cz/
Tel: +420235365000 Fax: +420235365009 Plnikova 1, 162 00 Praha 6
Mob: +420605204544 ICQ:
Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
May I ask why you don't mention that this is a web browser for Gnome?
This information would be helpful for people that look for a lightweight
HTML browser, but don't want to install Gnome. For those people this
browser will not be a alternative,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ondøej Surý) writes:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
GQ is a GTK-based LDAP client. Features include:
- browse and search modes
- LDAPv3 schema browser
- template editor
- edit and delete entries
- add entries with templates
- export
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:40:24PM -0500, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake forth:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote:
If I try a ./configure or a make xconfig with a new Kernel, I get this
error-msg:
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:36:41PM -0400, Jason Lunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake
forth:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It is possible to disable a service simply by removing links in
/etc/rc*.d . So long as you leave at least one (/etc/rc0.d/K*package
would seem to be a good candidate), update-rc.d
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:19:56AM -0700, David Schleef wrote:
It could also be useful as a hardware tester at install time:
Would you like to test your hardware (and get a kernel custom
build for your hardware at the same time)? This process will
potentially take a long time. (Yes, I
TB == Thomas Bushnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
TB The current bug (94684) he said I can do nothing if upstream author
TB changes their API. Well, this has many problems:
TB 1) Upstream author didn't change an API, they changed a direct user
TBissue.
False.
TB 2) He can do
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats fine if you have already booted Linux. However, if you are
reading the installation instructions (as what Steve was saying), then
you probably do not have a Linux system yet.
Whats the point of finding out what the correct kernel is only after
you
Sam Hartman writes (Formal request for review: [Sam Hartman [EMAIL
PROTECTED]] Referring what kernel-images to build to the technical
committee?):
Hi. I posted the following message to debian-devel last night and
have received agreement with the summary and apparently (it was not
explicitly
Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that all of the solutions I discussed involved this complexity.
I was objecting to your implication that setting up module source
packages was as simple as setting up arch-specific kernel image
packages, not saying the complexity was unnecessary.
A
27.04.2001 pisze Christian Marillat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
TB 3) He can report the problem to the gnome maintainers and mark the bug
TBforwarded.
Apparently you don't understand. Read my lips ((c) G. Bush) I'll *never*
change the upstream API, I'll *never* ask the upstream author to
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 02:50:24AM -0700, Mike Markley wrote:
Admittedly, it's sort of buried; I don't see why we couldn't modify
update-rc.d to use one of the unassigned but allowed runlevels to keep track
of this junk. I have no problem with removing all but the K symlinks in
What would be
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 10:59:35PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Paul Martin wrote:
Looks like it would be a good idea to add export LC_ALL=POSIX to the
default dh_make rules file.
Well, we _could_ do that. It would probably have nasty effects if you
expected to be able to build a package and
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 02:50:24AM -0700, Mike Markley wrote:
Admittedly, it's sort of buried; I don't see why we couldn't modify
update-rc.d to use one of the unassigned but allowed runlevels to keep track
of this junk. I have no problem with removing all but the K symlinks in
{0,6}.d to
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 02:08:04PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Dale Scheetz wrote:
Anyone have any ideas?
1. figure out what uses insane amount of memory and apply kill and/or rm
So, this is a common response from a system that
Hello,
* Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010427 07:44]:
* Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010426 21:40]:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote:
If I try a ./configure or a make xconfig with a new Kernel, I get this
error-msg:
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 04:41:54PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
I believe that dpkg only does that when the maintainer has changed the
script in the newer version.
That's been in dpkg for a very long time.
I still wonder why it doesn't work in a lot of cases though. In every
upgrade I get asked
Hi,
The BTS got several of these...
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 08:06:10 +0200
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:08:31PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
TB == Thomas Bushnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TB I'm perfectly happy for him to just do (3). But what he wants to do
TB instead is declare real bugs non-bugs, on the grounds that he can do
TB nothing. If he can't even
Hmm, is this a typo in the domain name?
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 08:09:40 +0200
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery
On Friday 27 April 2001 06:33, Brandon High wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:42:16PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IDE causes a bit of a performance hit, I don't think we're talking high
speed file access here though... cheap is the objective.
You'd be suprised at the performance hit. I
Package: avrprog
Version: 0.1.0
Severity: wishlist
Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrolers that uses PC paralell port to program
the device in serial mode. The device can be programmed in-system.
Comes with a schematic of the hardware required. The hardware was designed to
be efficient and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
From Red Hat,
CGEN (pronounced seejen) is a framework for developing generators of
CPU-related tools such as
assemblers, disassemblers and simulators. It specifies a description language
for describing the architecture and
organization of a CPU without
David Schleef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 26 April 2001 09:05, Andreas Metzler wrote:
_Afair_ it is necessary to run a k6 (or athlon) optimized kernel to
use 3DNow! in applications like xmms or lame. This probably applys to
ISSE, MTTR and MMX, too.
This is not correct.
[snip]
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 08:00:49PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:19:56AM -0700, David Schleef wrote:
It could also be useful as a hardware tester at install time:
Would you like to test your hardware (and get a kernel custom
build for your hardware at the same time)?
On 01-04-27 Jérôme Marant wrote:
Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
May I ask why you don't mention that this is a web browser for Gnome?
This information would be helpful for people that look for a lightweight
HTML browser, but don't want to install Gnome. For those people this
Hi Arthur and discussion round,
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Arthur Korn wrote:
So, basically, since auditd does feature encryption, it does not
have any chance to be the default for log rotation, even if it
was a lot better than logrotate? What giant pile of crap.
But what you could do is a virtual
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 01:54:30PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:08:31PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
TB == Thomas Bushnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TB I'm perfectly happy for him to just do (3). But what he wants to do
TB instead is declare real bugs non-bugs,
On 27 Apr 2001, Christian Marillat wrote:
*You* are a serious problem.
If you don't want to change your configuration each time you did a apt-get
upgrade, then install potato.
testing/unstable is for real men (tm).
In that case, perhaps these packages should be removed from testing. The
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:48:29PM -0300, Alejo Sanchez wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:35:51PM -0300, Alejo Sanchez wrote:
well, your version would do it the dlopen() way.
actually we were going to ask if there was a
restriction on depending on dlopen(), as it could
be possible on
Brian == Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian 1. use xemacs mule latin input mode. It doesn't work for
Brian me, have to try and find out why. Maybe I need to include
Brian something in my .emacs file, or maybe I need to unstable
Brian version of xemacs.
Try using a
Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sarcasm
So come on people, let's install all 6000 packages, because maybe we
could use them once.
/Sarcasm
Listen, I've packaged it in order to make available in debs for
people willing to test it. Now, don't blame me about those gnome
Subject says it all. Do I have to file a bug against ftp.debian.org?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 09:15:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 01:54:30PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:08:31PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
TB == Thomas Bushnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TB I'm perfectly happy for him to just do (3).
Previously Michael Meskes wrote:
Subject says it all. Do I have to file a bug against ftp.debian.org?
Yes, magic wands have not been perfected yet :)
Wichert.
--
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 10:25:46AM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
I mainly focused on low memory consumption, and Encompass meet this
requirement.
Yes, but only when you ignore the bloat from the horrible Gnome
libraries that entangle it. Encompas doesn't take much ram, the ram
is all taken up
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 03:00:33PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Hmm, is this a typo in the domain name?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
unrouteable mail domain nsaledov.com
Typo. He's at nasledov.com.
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Subject says it all. Do I have to file a bug against ftp.debian.org?
Yes.
Ciao
Racke
--
Tech beats design - hold your breath for Bhttp://fuckdotcom.de/B
For projects and other business stuff please refer to COBOLT NetServices
(URL:
Michael Meskes wrote:
Subject says it all. Do I have to file a bug against ftp.debian.org?
Yes.
Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 04:52:58PM +0200 wrote:
Subject says it all. Do I have to file a bug against ftp.debian.org?
yes
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-archive-manip.en.html#s-removing-pkgs
David
P.S. this sort of question can probably be best asked on -mentors.
Michael
--
Package: ghfaxviewer
Version: 0.21.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Licence is GNU General Public License version 2
This program is the GNU HaliFAX project's viewer. It is
able to display fax files output by the HylaFAX(tm) system
as well as any other G3/G4-encoded TIFF fax file.
The range of
Maybe because they're bloated, take huge gobs of memory, and are
designed only to emulate the mistakes and misdesign of a certain OS
from Redmond?
I too agree that Linux window managers and session managers should not
aspire to emulate Microsoft, I'd rather see some newer and better ideas
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:49:13AM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:33:19PM -0700, Brandon High wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:42:16PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IDE causes a bit of a performance hit, I don't think we're talking high
speed file access here
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 05:11:35PM +0200, Thierry Laronde wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 09:15:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 01:54:30PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:08:31PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
TB == Thomas Bushnell [EMAIL
Jules Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Programs shouldn't gratuitously break configurations which worked.
When woody is released, and people upgrade en masse to it, they will
want their configurations to carry on working.
In my experience, GNOME has had this problem since version 1.0; almost
Hello Mike,
* Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010427 11:41]:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:40:24PM -0500, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake
forth:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote:
If I try a ./configure or a make xconfig with a new Kernel, I get this
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 08:09:28AM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
The RNIB have released the source to their Braille conversion program
Braille-It under the GPL. This is a tool, written in C, which will
URL?
--
Paul Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)
[EMAIL
First off I would like to Thank You for taking time to read this
letter. Second of all your e-mail address was pulled from an on-line
source, if this was unsolicited from an unclean source we're very sorry,
but you will not receive any other e-mails from us. This is the only last
CW == Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CW Jules Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Programs shouldn't gratuitously break configurations which worked.
When woody is released, and people upgrade en masse to it, they will
want their configurations to carry on working.
CW In my experience,
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 05:32:31PM -0700, Alvin Oga wrote:
...
- even if you had 2 power supplies...
- most motherboards only has one atx power connector
True. And if you went for redundant PS's and a mobo that
supports them, the cost would go way up.
- are the two power supplies
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 08:32:06AM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
Yes, but only when you ignore the bloat from the horrible Gnome
libraries that entangle it. Encompas doesn't take much ram, the ram
is all taken up by libgnome, libgnomeui, libbonobo, libgnomevfs,
libesd, libaudiofile, libgal,
In fact, most of the options could be auto-detected from
/proc/cpuinfo.
It could also be useful as a hardware tester at install time:
Would you like to test your hardware (and get a kernel custom
build for your hardware at the same time)? This process will
potentially take a long time. (Yes, I
Hi, I'm using the prerelease g++-3.0 for some testing. I've got a weird
compilation problem that I don't understand at all, and I was wondering if
anyone could shed any insight on it.
This program:
// Begin c++ program
#include string
#include iostream.h
class foo {
public:
foo(){}
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 04:46:19PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Please note that did not ITPed it since I'm not sure people except
from me are interested in such a browser. And It does not seem to make
you very happy. Unless people are interested to see it in debian
I won't upload
Previously Dale E Martin wrote:
does not compile with g++-3.0 - I get the following error:
~/test/c++ g++-3.0 simple-problem-g++3.cpp -o simple-problem-g++3
simple-problem-g++3.cpp:9: parse error before `)' token
It doesn't now string, since that is in the std namespace. Either
insert using
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 02:31:12PM -0400, Dale E Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Basically, it doesn't like the declaration string getString()...
g++-2.95.4 doesn't seem to mind this code, and I can't for the life of me
figuer out why it would be broken.
I think this is the
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
+ mpg123 uploaded 125 days ago, out of date by 115 days!
mpg123-alsa is uninstallable (needs alsa-base 0.4, which is no
longer available?)
mpg123 won't work with the newer ALSA, and there seems to be
no real mpg123
g++ 3.0 handled the std namespace incorrectly and let you get away
with this. g++ 3.0 requires that you either declare using std or explicitly
say std::string getString().
Not looking forward to fixing this in all my own code,
I knew it had to be something silly like this, thanks.
Package: libssl096
Version: 0.9.6-1
Severity: normal
In bug report #78410 entitled libssl096 does not provide /usr/lib/lib*.so.0,
Ivan Moore complains that libssl096 fails to provide libcrypo.so.0 etc.
After several email exchanges, Ivan and the maintainer, Christoph Martin, end
up agreeing that
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 09:41:46PM +0300, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
+ mpg123 uploaded 125 days ago, out of date by 115 days!
mpg123-alsa is uninstallable (needs alsa-base 0.4, which is no
longer available?)
mpg123 won't work with
Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TB 1) Upstream author didn't change an API, they changed a direct user
TBissue.
False.
You know, your utter reluctance to do more than write the minimal
possible words causes frequent problems.
Here's how it's a direct user issue. A
Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It doesn't seem very reasonable to expect the Debian packagers to try
to fix upstream bugs like this.
Certainly it might be more work than I could expect Christian to do,
and I don't expect him to try and fix it.
I expect him to forward the bug upstream
On Friday 27 April 2001 20:49, Dale E Martin wrote:
#include iostream.h
nitpick
use
#include iostream
/nitpick
cheers
U
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:48:52PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
See http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/hardware/46g.png for some quick
benchmark results showing the differences between a single IDE drive, two
drives on separate channels, and two drives on the same channel.
Apart from one
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 02:45:57PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Hi,
The BTS got several of these...
FYI, I tried to contact him several times before NMUing commonc++, and got
neither bounce nor response. Other bug report logs against his packages
seem to indicate that he has been MIA for some
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Now I agree that there's lots of bloat in Gnome, but I have to disagree
with you about Glib. Glib provides many handy routines (such as linked
list management, and a threads API) for C programmers. Having Glib provide
these routines is a much better choice than
Rahul Jain wrote:
I had a horrible time upgrading and I ended up removing some packages with
--force-depend, and then apt-get dist-upgrading. Would adding a replaces: to
some packages help? I know that the pgsql-pl and ecpg packages were merged,
so
at least it will help there.
I am
wouldn't it be great if you could just download what has changed
on some package ? for exemple
the maintainer changes something in /etc/init.d/sendmail and you
have to download 1mo .
with rsync you would just download the part that changed ...
well just an idea
from the secret journal of Jean Charles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
wouldn't it be great if you could just download what has changed
on some package ? for exemple
There was a HUGE flameware on this issue a few months ago. Check the
archives and be sure you have something positive to add before you
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 20:51:05 + (UTC),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron Lehmann) said:
them to some extent. I like several of the routines, but
things such as g_malloc() and g_free() are equivilent to
functions in the standard C libary. I am also very suprized
Not at all. Why should we
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Jean Charles wrote:
wouldn't it be great if you could just download what has changed
on some package ? for exemple
the maintainer changes something in /etc/init.d/sendmail and you
have to download 1mo .
with rsync you would just download the part that changed ...
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 06:00:07AM -0500, BugScan reporter wrote:
Package: cvs (debian/main)
Maintainer: Eric Gillespie, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
95263 missing build dependency
The policy says:
A source package may declare a dependency or a conflict
on a binary package.
Then
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 06:00:07AM -0500, BugScan reporter wrote:
Package: cvs (debian/main)
Maintainer: Eric Gillespie, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
95263 missing build dependency
The policy says:
A source package may declare a dependency
Hi,
I'm trying to build ssh-1.2.3-9.3 from a souce package on a Potato
box. (Reasons for using source package are optimization, control over
./configure flags, etc). The box is to be used for server applications,
and does not have X or GNOME libraries, which the build process is
looking for.
On 01-04-27 Jérôme Marant wrote:
Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sarcasm
So come on people, let's install all 6000 packages, because maybe we
could use them once.
/Sarcasm
Listen, I've packaged it in order to make available in debs for
people willing to test it. Now,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 06:13:37AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
The policy says:
A source package may declare a dependency or a conflict
^^^
on a binary package.
[...]
Some 3.x policy version added build
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:48:52PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
See http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/hardware/46g.png for some quick
benchmark results showing the differences between a single IDE
drive, two drives on separate channels, and two drives on the same
channel.
Hm. The server
I still don't understand why the policy (version 3.5.3.0)
doesn't simply say must rather then may.
Debian is a community which exists for the mutual benefit of its members.
Members playing games like 'policy does not say I *HAVE* to do it' do not make
Debian a better place.
let's all
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 12:11:41AM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 06:13:37AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
The policy says:
A source package may declare a dependency or a conflict
^^^
Package: mped
Severity: wishlist
Version: 3.0.98l
Minimum Profit (mp, mped in Debian Systems) is a programmer's text editor.
It features small memory and disk requirements (68kB), syntax highlighting,
context-sensitive help for the source code being edited, multiple
simultaneous file editing,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Like I said before (see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0104/msg01443.html), I intend to
package Wayne Aiken's atheist fortunes available at his site
(http://www4.ncsu.edu/~aiken/). This is the response I've got from him. I'm
waiting for advice
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 03:25:54PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
I still don't understand why the policy (version 3.5.3.0)
doesn't simply say must rather then may.
Debian is a community which exists for the mutual benefit of its members.
Members playing games like 'policy does
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
