-
Cordialement
MGA (GIL ANTOLI Michel)
L'experience s'acquiert juste après que l'on en a eu besoin
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 02:59:45PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
I do not know enough about what X resource files are supposed to look
like to identify this bug for sure. However, I notice that the
/etc/X11/xdm/Xresources file from Daniel's experimental X4.3.0 debs
appears to have had all its
The difference between proposals A and C wasn't clear to me at
first, so at Manoj's request, I am sharing it with everyone. If you
read carefully, you won't need this, I guess.
Proposal A: Clarifies status of non-technical documents. Creates
Foundation Documents class which requires 3:1
Andreas Rottmann wrote:
Btw, sysutils is taken, so I take gsysutils. Does someone prefer
gnu-sysutils?
I would, as I associate gsomething with a Gnome-frontend for something
(e.g gsudo), but I don't claim that is common conception.
Well, I can back that up. A Gnome association swept
Hi!
The package postgresql needs to use 'adduser' and 'addgroup' in its
preinst script to properly save the current database before upgrading
(cf. Bug #180199). Therefore it should pre-depend on 'adduser'.
Pre-Dependencies are supposed to be discussed at d-devel which I want
to do now. If
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) a tapoté :
Andreas Rottmann wrote:
Btw, sysutils is taken, so I take gsysutils. Does someone prefer
gnu-sysutils?
I would, as I associate gsomething with a Gnome-frontend for something
(e.g gsudo), but I don't claim that is common conception.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:00:47AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Pre-Dependencies are supposed to be discussed at d-devel which I want
to do now. If anybody objects I will just do it.
Doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of discussing these sorts of things?
As it stands, I don't see a problem
Hi!
On 2003-10-16 19:24 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:00:47AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Pre-Dependencies are supposed to be discussed at d-devel which I want
to do now. If anybody objects I will just do it.
Doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of discussing
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:24:21PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:00:47AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Pre-Dependencies are supposed to be discussed at d-devel which I
want to do now. If anybody objects I will just do it.
Doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:00, Martin Pitt wrote:
The package postgresql needs to use 'adduser' and 'addgroup' in its
preinst script to properly save the current database before upgrading
(cf. Bug #180199). Therefore it should pre-depend on 'adduser'.
Why would there be an issue on depending on a
Hi Russell and all others,
On 2003-10-16 21:39 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:00, Martin Pitt wrote:
The package postgresql needs to use 'adduser' and 'addgroup' in its
preinst script to properly save the current database before upgrading
(cf. Bug #180199). Therefore it
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003, Sam Hocevar wrote:
* Package name: etw
Eat The Whistle is an arcade soccer game similar to famous Amiga titles such
as Kick Off or Sensible Soccer. It features several game modes where you can
play either as the whole team or as a single player, and you can also
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
Hi Russell and all others,
On 2003-10-16 21:39 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:00, Martin Pitt wrote:
The package postgresql needs to use 'adduser' and 'addgroup' in its
preinst script to properly save the current database
http://zzren.cn)1015
http://zzren.cn)
1015
1015
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:51:33PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
adduser is neither essential nor required, thus does not need to be
installed when installing postgres. I'm not quite sure what you mean,
could you please explain this?
Thanks in
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:51:33PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Hum, instead of adduser, useradd should be used by the posgresql
package.
useradd is included in the package passwd, which is required package
from the base section.
Please ignore this dangerous moron.
--
.''`. ** Debian
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:51:33PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
adduser is neither essential nor required, thus does not need to be
installed when installing postgres. I'm not quite sure what you mean,
Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On 2003-10-16 21:39 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:00, Martin Pitt wrote:
The package postgresql needs to use 'adduser' and 'addgroup' in its
preinst script to properly save the current
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:27:42PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:51:33PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Hum, instead of adduser, useradd should be used by the posgresql
package.
useradd is included in the package passwd,
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:27:42PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:51:33PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Hum, instead of adduser, useradd should be used by the posgresql
package.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ I'm including the debian-devel list in CC since I appreciate the
opinion of others developpers ]
James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This package is dubiously small enough as it is without being split
into two. There's no need to separate the
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 23:01, Martin Pitt wrote:
Why would there be an issue on depending on a more important package?
Having an optional/misc package pre-depend on an important/base package
seems like a non-issue to me.
adduser is neither essential nor required, thus does not need to be
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 04:54:07PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I just got the following messages replacing syslog by syslog-ng from dselect
(Woody).
Should this be reported as a bug? Against which package (syslog, syslog-ng,
apt)?
Definitely not apt.
The problems are:
- - messages regarding
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:45:53PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
It's amazing how problem solving here is equated with actively
waiting for problems to go away.
I wanted to improve Debian, but apparently there is no interest.
Herbert gets to pollute the kernel-source all he wants because
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:25:17PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
QUOTE
Debian and Democracy
Posted 7 Oct 2003 by exa (Master)
Ha. Hahahaa. Ha, ha, ha...
--
- mdz
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 09:30:06PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.10.10.0223 +0200]:
...and the freeswan patch is not in the Linux kernel (and as I understand
it, it never will be).
The IPsec patch is not in the 2.4 kernel either. I don't
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:04:38PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
Note that the testing scripts themselves do not examine Build-Depends
today; such problems are only identified through manually filed RC bug
reports. Which is not to say that we shouldn't be tracking such
problems -- just that
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:43:37PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Eventually I found aptitude's Dselect theme, which helped some.
I guess aptitude could be made the recommended default package manager,
but I would hope that:
1. Something more closely approximating the Dselect theme is used
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 04:39:49AM +1000, Kim Lester wrote:
Some of the ideas I have implemented include a pkg info file in each
package
containing the
pathname
uid, gid (numeric)
md5sum,
size (useful to humans)
mode
symlink target (for symlinks)
a
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:40:27AM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
I would be glad to change it if there were a fair number of
developers who think that suggesting contrib software is fine.
Suggesting contrib software is fine.
--
- mdz
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 12:38:57PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
/*
You might ignore this comment...
Looking at the list of RC bugs the packages seems to fall in two
categories. Packages I don't use and packages I don't feel comfortable
in touching (glibc being an example of the
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 03:13:23AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
I still need to get KDE 3.1.4 into sid and stablized. I hope for it to
be ready to migrate into sarge by Oct 20 (including the 10 day wait
time). From what Colin Watson mentioned to me earlier today there are
some other packages
On 16-Oct-03, 10:50 (CDT), Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ I'm including the debian-devel list in CC since I appreciate the
opinion of others developpers ]
Okay, since you ask:
James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This package is dubiously small enough as it is without being
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ I'm including the debian-devel list in CC since I appreciate the
opinion of others developpers ]
James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This package is dubiously small enough as it is without being split
into two. There's no need to separate the 2k
also sprach Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.10.10.2333 +0200]:
It is in 2.5 and 2.6. It is in Linux henceforth. FreeSWAN, on top of its
other issues, is not, has never been, and never will be, part of the
official kernel.
Is that clearer?
Doesn't explain why the IPsec patch should
also sprach Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.10.11.0554 +0200]:
People care more about some things than others. Given a choice between
IPsec in Debian kernels by default and being able to apply grsecurity to
Debian kernel source, I'd take IPsec anyday.
Well, I would do it the other way.
http://www.567com.com
660
10309
1320
2800
3
http://www.567com.com
500
http://www.567com.com
http://www.567com.com
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 02:07:38PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 03:13:23AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
I still need to get KDE 3.1.4 into sid and stablized. I hope for it to
be ready to migrate into sarge by Oct 20 (including the 10 day wait
time). From what Colin
For the news: :)
The local Debian User Group in São Paulo is organizing a one-day
Debian Workshop to happen on Oct 25. The presentations were selected
by a group which reviewed the proposals collected after a Call
For Papers was issued last month.
The english version of the press release is
I demand that David B Harris may or may not have written...
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:02:47 -0400
Joe Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David B Harris wrote:
As much as you may dislike it, people care about toolkit. I don't
understand the witch-hunt to remove references to such things.
Short
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:04:27PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.10.10.2333 +0200]:
It is in 2.5 and 2.6. It is in Linux henceforth. FreeSWAN, on top of
its other issues, is not, has never been, and never will be, part of the
official
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:05:56PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.10.11.0554 +0200]:
People care more about some things than others. Given a choice between
IPsec in Debian kernels by default and being able to apply grsecurity to
Debian
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 16-Oct-03, 10:50 (CDT), Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ I'm including the debian-devel list in CC since I appreciate the
opinion of others developpers ]
Okay, since you ask:
Perfect :-)
James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ I'm including the debian-devel list in CC since I appreciate the
opinion of others developpers ]
James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This package is dubiously small enough as it is without being split
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And no one is obliged to do all like James think. The package follow
the policy and doesn't have any point in policy talking about size
requeriments.
Policy is not everything that counts. Just because policy doesnt say
something it means it is good to
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Social Contract say: The focus is the user. So, to enduser is more
easy provide two packages and he can choice what to do.
I disagree. Forcing the user to spend to much time micromanage which
stuff he wants is not to the bennefit of the user.
Jump start your love life.
With millions of members, there's somebody for
everyone - and that means you!
Click below to join for free:
http://alwaysfeelgreat1.com/romance/
To update your list options: alwaysfeelgreat1.com/re/
Do you think the company would be willing to lower
On 16-Oct-03, 13:11 (CDT), Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes but to my sense is really better to enduser have this packages
splited since the search-citeseer can work (without problems) without
the -el part and I want provide this option for our users.
My sense is exactly the
Just wanted to mention another approach that avoids guessing at which
files need to be touched and in what order. This is what I use in
debian/rules when I need to modify automake source files:
# Suppress accidental execution of the auto-* tools; see
#
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And no one is obliged to do all like James think. The package follow
the policy and doesn't have any point in policy talking about size
requeriments.
Policy is not everything that counts. Just because policy
Peter Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Social Contract say: The focus is the user. So, to enduser is more
easy provide two packages and he can choice what to do.
I disagree. Forcing the user to spend to much time micromanage which
stuff he
I have the chance to tag along on a (company) trip to one of our colo
centers tomorrow (located at 25 Broadway, New York NY 10004-1010). Are
any developers available tomorrow to sign keys in that general area?
There don't appear to be any developers close to where I live (upstate
ny/albany
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I disagree. Forcing the user to spend to much time micromanage which
stuff he wants is not to the bennefit of the user. Neither for the
unexperienced user nor the power user.
More or less. One search show both packages and user can read what
each
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
More or less. Doesn't make sense include a depends of Emacs in
search-citeseer and the -el part depends of this. The better option is
split in two package each with your depends and needs.
No.
The sugestion of James is not right to include emacs
Hi!
Please don't get me wrong, I don't insist of using adduser. IMHO
Mathieu's solution of checking whether adduser is available is
acceptable, if adduser is not installed then I can't break any admin
preferences anyway. In addition, user postgres has uid 31, thus
base-passwd should have given
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:09:10PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
However, at least lm-sensors and i2c need attention soon.
The i2c bugs are due to some major upstream breakage. I don't see how we're
really going to handle that stuff, the situation is just plain old ugly.
(FWIW I still haven't
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:27:59PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:25:17PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
QUOTE
Debian and Democracy
Posted 7 Oct 2003 by exa (Master)
Ha. Hahahaa. Ha, ha, ha...
You don't think he's a Master?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:32:11PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And no one is obliged to do all like James think. The package follow
the policy and doesn't have any point in policy talking about size
Recipient of the attachment: SEXCHANGE, RADIANT\RII,
StellaHsieh()/
Subject of the message: Re: That movie
No action was taken on the attachment.
Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons:
Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 16-Oct-03, 13:11 (CDT), Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes but to my sense is really better to enduser have this packages
splited since the search-citeseer can work (without problems) without
the -el part and I want provide this option
Peter Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I disagree. Forcing the user to spend to much time micromanage which
stuff he wants is not to the bennefit of the user. Neither for the
unexperienced user nor the power user.
More or less. One search show
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course but I think if the developper did something is because he
think this is better and this should be respected (if doesn't broke
the policy)
You've had about 8 people tell you that what you did was a bad idea, along
with some pretty reasoned
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:27:59PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:25:17PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
QUOTE
Debian and Democracy
Posted 7 Oct 2003 by exa (Master)
Ha. Hahahaa. Ha,
Searching for a general consensus here...
These days Debian's nethack packages contain default nethackrcs which
enable number_pad style controls (instead of hjkl keys) by default, due
to a bug filed on the packages a long time ago. Of course, there are some
who like it and some who don't. It's
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:36:04PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Please don't get me wrong, I don't insist of using adduser. IMHO
Mathieu's solution of checking whether adduser is available is
acceptable, if adduser is not installed then I can't break any admin
preferences anyway. In addition,
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ I'm including the debian-devel list in CC since I appreciate the
opinion of others developpers ]
James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This package is dubiously small enough as it is without being split
into two. There's no need to separate
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:30:26PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
Which is better? I like the default keys because you learn how to use
nvi very efficiently knowing the hjkl-style keys :) I'm searching for as
many opinions as possible so please speak up!
number_pad is your friend. It's far easier
I find difficult to play nethack using the default keys - not because of
the standard hjkl vi keys, but because I can't get used to the yubn diagonals.
And number_pad leaves k for kicking stuff :)
Anyway, I'd guess anyone playing nethack is geek enough to figure out
how to change the keys.
--
Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which is better? I like the default keys because you learn how to use
nvi very efficiently knowing the hjkl-style keys :) I'm searching for as
many opinions as possible so please speak up!
Real men use hjkl.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! (
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:30:26PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
Searching for a general consensus here...
These days Debian's nethack packages contain default nethackrcs which
enable number_pad style controls (instead of hjkl keys) by default, due
to a bug filed on the packages a long time ago.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:12:26AM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
If we want to introduce a new init system into debian, we should prepare
a generic init framework (like many distributions already have in place)
that allows for
- silent/verbose boot and output redirection
- fancy display of
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 07:36, Martin Pitt wrote:
If you have an optional package depend on a package that is
important or required then again it would be a bug for any other
package to have a dependency that results in a circle leading back
to your package.
This confuses me. If a package
Joshua Kwan writes:
Which is better?
The default keys are fine with me, but it would be nice to not have the @
white when in a black on white xterm.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:03:15 -0700
Source: nethack
Binary: nethack-gnome nethack-x11 nethack nethack-qt nethack-console nethack-common
nethack-lisp
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 3.4.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:15:46 +1000
Source: gcm
Binary: libgcm-dev gcm libgcm0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1.0+20031016.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrew Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andrew Lau
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:00:49 +0200
Source: ara
Binary: ara
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.20030813-1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Thomas Schoepf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:17:40 +
Source: ipsvd
Binary: ipsvd
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.6.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gerrit Pape [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gerrit Pape [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thurs, 16 Oct 2003 10:21:56 +
Source: dsniff
Binary: dsniff
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4b1-3.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 00:20:36 +0200
Source: linkchecker
Binary: linkchecker
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.9.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:05:19 +0200
Source: module-assistant
Binary: module-assistant
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thursday, 16 October 2003 14:31:36 +
Source: gnump3d
Binary: gnump3d
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:39:38 +0200
Source: pango1.0
Binary: libpango1.0-0 libpango1.0-dbg libpango1.0-dev libpango1.0-common
libpango1.0-udeb libpango1.0-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.2.5-1.1
Distribution: unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 16:37:58 +0200
Source: icewm
Binary: icewm-gnome-support icewm icewm-lite icewm-gnome icewm-common
icewm-experimental
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.13-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:17:00 +1000
Source: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Binary: kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
Architecture: source all
Version: 2003.10.03-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:48:41 +
Source: runit-run
Binary: runit-run
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gerrit Pape [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gerrit Pape [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 16:52:39 +0200
Source: scapy
Binary: scapy
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:57:12 -0400
Source: devmapper
Binary: libdevmapper-dev dmsetup libdevmapper1.00 kernel-patch-device-mapper
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2:1.00.05-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andres
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:27:48 -0400
Source: lvm2
Binary: lvm2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.00.07-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:50:22 +
Source: valgrind
Binary: valgrind
Architecture: source i386
Version: 20031012-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrés Roldán [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andrés Roldán [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:06:19 +
Source: lprfax
Binary: lprfax
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6-25
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 16:08:32 +0200
Source: pytone
Binary: pytone
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alexander Wirt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Alexander Wirt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:23:05 +0200
Source: mozilla-bonobo
Binary: mozilla-bonobo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrew Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:43:36 +0200
Source: liberror-perl
Binary: liberror-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.15-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:36:29 +0200
Source: ghex
Binary: libgtkhex0-dev libgtkhex0 ghex
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.5.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sebastien
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:44:06 +0200
Source: mlview
Binary: mlview
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2003 16:21:31 +0200
Source: bitlbee
Binary: bitlbee
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.81a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wilmer van der Gaast [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wilmer van der Gaast [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 16:31:32 +0200
Source: openssl
Binary: libssl0.9.7 libssl-dev openssl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.7c-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 01:16:40 +1000
Source: tth
Binary: tth
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.41-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ian Maclaine-cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ian Maclaine-cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:15:11 +0200
Source: ara
Binary: ara
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.20030813-1.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thomas Schoepf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:08:06 +0100
Source: gprolog
Binary: gprolog-doc gprolog
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.2.18-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Salvador Abreu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Salvador Abreu
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
