Je me posais la question de la criticité d'un tel bug. J'aurais tendance
à penser que c'est critique : serveur qui s'arrête sans raison.
Non, sûrement pas critical:
critical
makes unrelated software on the system (or the whole system)
break, or causes serious data
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:59:29PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Please note that year 2005 has come to an end and
the year 2005 is now - even in my mail address!
Does the new address bring with it a more constructive attitude towards
volunteers who have contributed countless hours over
Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:59:29PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Does the new address bring with it a more constructive attitude towards
volunteers who have contributed countless hours over the years to keeping
this project running, or should I plan to
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 18:04:37 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 08:08:47PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Ken Bloom wrote:
http://wiki.debian.net/?RunDinstallHourly (part of the
ReleaseProposals topic on wiki.debian.net) discusses the concept of
speeding up the release process
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:39:23AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Does the new address bring with it a more constructive attitude towards
volunteers who have contributed countless hours over the years to keeping
this project running, or should I plan to killfile this one as well?
So you
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 07:30:32AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:59:29PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Please note that year 2005 has come to an end and
the year 2005 is now - even in my mail address!
Does the new address bring with it a more constructive
On Friday 24 December 2004 11.01, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:21:08PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
I was trying to think of a word for news you need to know now and will
not be of much use to you in the far future.
debian-devel? :-P
No, that's news you don't
On Thursday 30 December 2004 10.07, Maciej Dems wrote:
please notify, that many ITPs
are done by non-DDs. In this case the main reason for their inactivity is
the lack of a sponsor.
IMHO for such ITPs, the RFS should be cc:ed to the bug, so anybody reviewing
the ITP would see that it's not
hoi :)
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 09:13:54AM -0200, Eduardo Marcel Macan wrote:
I know the basics of XML and don't really have any experience using
XML libraries myself, I'm packaging it because zynaddsubfx uses it
to implement an xml-like instrument definition, and zyn is one of my
main
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:06:53AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Please note that year 2005 has come to an end and
the year 2005 is now - even in my mail address!
Does the new address bring with it a more constructive attitude towards
volunteers who have contributed countless
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 06:54:51PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:25:29PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
We've spent most of the past year thinking a release might be just round
the corner. We can only cry wolf so many times before the world stops
believing us and
hi,
what is the apt-get package i can install for the entire developer environment ?
I am building some DBD packages, but findthe stdinclude files, etc missing.
-Sukhdeep
Sukhdeep Johar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what is the apt-get package i can install for the entire developer
environment ?
I am building some DBD packages, but find the std include files, etc
missing.
Have a look at build-essential, which is documented in Debian Policy
section 4.2.
Cheers,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:16:44PM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 18:04:37 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Twice daily seems more reasonable to me than hourly;
Why? If you run it only twice daily, then the developers who are awake at
one run will probably be asleep at the next, so
Would you like inexpensive Pain Killers?
http://attn.neata.com
Hi,
what about an RFS tag for ITPs or and RFS bug report for
wnpp. So debian developers who like to sponsor a package
don't have to read debian-mentors.
I think it would be a good idea.
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF ,'`.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: chmsee
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : wa chung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://linuxfire.dhis.org/~zhong/
* License : GPL
Description : A chm file viewer, support Chinese better
chmsee is a viewer
* Matthew Garrett
| You have argued that drivers don't really depend on firmware, but
| instead depend on the hardware expressing the correct interface. As an
| example, we can compare maria-vis, which depends on the graphviz
| package. maria-vis is in contrib, because it depends on graphviz,
On Wednesday, January 05, 2005 8:42 AM, Ingo Juergensmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding James Troup...
[...]
I still believe that it would be better for the project when he would
retire from
some of his many positions, because he's too loaded with them.
I'm assuming you haven't spotted
On Jan 04, Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It shouldn't be forgotten that the biggest blocker after these things is
probably a general failure to actually care all that much. How many
people are actually behaving as if a release is just around the corner?
A very simple way would be to
* Ingo Juergensmann
| Unless you're a FPAV fan, please don't Cc: me.
|
| I just press g to reply to list mails. Other people (like Steve)
| are capable of configuring their MUAs in that way that they don't
| get CCs. Maybe you doing something wrong then? Please ask those
| people how you can
* Ingo Juergensmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050105 07:35]:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:59:29PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Please note that year 2005 has come to an end and
the year 2005 is now - even in my mail address!
Does the new address bring with it a more constructive attitude
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:42:00AM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wednesday, January 05, 2005 8:42 AM, Ingo Juergensmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding James Troup...
[...]
I still believe that it would be better for the project when he would
retire from
some of his many
On Wednesday, January 05, 2005 10:05 AM, Ingo Juergensmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
When Joerg Jaspert is already doing the dirty daily work, why does
James still needs in place then? (Except he just stays in that
position for a transitional period until Joerg is taking over that
task
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:59:31AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
I don't understand why you try to make as many developers opposed to you
as possible.
I don't try it, it's not my intention, but I say what I mean and think. Of
course this is sometimes not the same with what the audience might
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 11:02 schrieb Takuo KITAME:
mozilla (2:1.7.5-1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* New upstream release (closes: Bug#288047,Bug#288044,Bug#287111,
Bug#277515)
ARGS. Two of those bugs at least are *NOT* new upstream release type bugs.
Is it really to hard to
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Otto Wyss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stopping releasing might be a good idea but there should be a better
way. IMO the problem is the stable release isn't updated on a regulare
basis. It might be a better idea to divide Debian into subsystems which
could be released
hoi :)
my package tspc could not be build on mips and I don't know why:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot open output file ../../bin/tspc: Permission denied
The package builds correctly on all other architectures.
Any ideas?
--
Martin Waitz
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
[...]
[0] Besides learning that there is still people in this world who seem
to think that feminism is actually a solution to something. I am
still amazed by that one.
Thankyou for reminding us all, by demonstration, that the problems
feminism tries to solve
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:40:14AM +0100, Martin Waitz wrote:
my package tspc could not be build on mips and I don't know why:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot open output file ../../bin/tspc: Permission denied
The package builds correctly on all other architectures.
Any ideas?
mips* do not use fakeroot
Hi!
Rene Engelhard [2005-01-05 11:26 +0100]:
mozilla (2:1.7.5-1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* New upstream release (closes: Bug#288047,Bug#288044,Bug#287111,
Bug#277515)
ARGS. Two of those bugs at least are *NOT* new upstream release type bugs.
Is it really to hard to write
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:42:52AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:06:53AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
The us versus them pitting of volunteer contributions against each other
appears to be your game alone, and is precisely the sort of thing that led
me to
Jan Niehusmann wrote:
Unfortunately, testing does not guarantee security updates.
Of course given the security+woody tagged RC bugs #237422, #246443,
#274225, #278625, #278942, #284031, #192732, #196590, #198567, #199351,
#202244, #223456, #244810, #244811, #250106, #260508, #260838, #268783,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:13:11PM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote:
Also, what is involved with putting a package back into the Needs-Build
state (i.e. requeueing it)?
The buildd maintainer replying to a log or running 'wanna-build'
manually.
With complaints about the lack of response/response
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 09:50, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
what about an RFS tag for ITPs or and RFS bug report for
wnpp. So debian developers who like to sponsor a package
don't have to read debian-mentors.
I think it would be a good idea.
As a person looking for sponsors from time to time,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 08:42:07PM +0100, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
Hi,
First of all I am not a debian developer, so I always need a sponsor
to upload it, and I think that the package is not yet perfect. Maybe
an expert person can handle it better.
The first role of a sponsor is to check the
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:15:43PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Ohno, it's not my game, trust me. I've better things to do than playing such
a game. Maybe I'm the one who complains most loudly, but there are DDs that
agree with me in some (sometimes most or all) points,
Yes, there are
Steve Langasek wrote:
Twice daily seems more reasonable to me than hourly; for release purposes,
another factor is how often britney runs, since that's what triggers changes
in the testing suite. Doubling the frequency of britney runs seems
reasonable to me, but hourly would surely be
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:06:49PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:15:43PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I've tried to defend you for some time, because I thought your past help
to the m68k port should not have gone unnoticed. I stopped doing so when
I realised
Paul van der Vlis([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-01-04 14:40:
Hello,
One of the biggest disadvantages of Debian for me is the long time it
takes for a new stable version.
I guess one man's meat is another man's poison.
Since I administer a large number of distant computers I view the long
time
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 07:12:34AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
All of the benefits I've thought of from running dinstall more often
really only apply to unstable package churn issues. Running britney more
often sounds relatively orthagonal actually, though it does sound useful
for those annoying
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:11:49PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
And now you joined the other side? Attacking instead of defending? Does that
help the m68k port better? I doubt that seriously.
I'm not attacking anyone.
Usually this is what attackers believe. The attacked party feels
Hi,
I've so far maintained the package pinfo, an alternative info-file
viewer. The last release has been some time ago and there are also some
open bug reports. I've talked with the author about the package and he
decided that he has no longer time to work on this package. Therefor the
program
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 04:16:49AM -0800, Stephen Birch wrote:
Perhaps a date based release mechanism could be built using a new
distribution, call it prestable.
Packages qualify to be enter prestable after residing in testing for
ten days and having NO RC BUGS. The idea is to keep prestable
Hi Christian!
You wrote:
I've so far maintained the package pinfo, an alternative info-file
viewer. The last release has been some time ago and there are also some
open bug reports. I've talked with the author about the package and he
decided that he has no longer time to work on this
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 08:28:59AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
Unless you're a FPAV fan, please don't Cc: me.
I just press g to reply to list mails. Other people (like Steve) are
capable of configuring their MUAs in that way that they don't get CCs. Maybe
you doing something wrong then?
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:34:33AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Ingo Juergensmann
| I just press g to reply to list mails. Other people (like Steve)
| are capable of configuring their MUAs in that way that they don't
| get CCs. Maybe you doing something wrong then? Please ask those
|
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 10:45 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jan 04, Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It shouldn't be forgotten that the biggest blocker after these things is
probably a general failure to actually care all that much. How many
people are actually behaving as if a
Wouter Verhelst([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-01-05 13:46:
That's how testing started off. We stopped doing this because
a) it at one point stalled glibc; as a result, nothing moved to
testing
anymore, and when it finally did, the changes were so dramatic
that
testing was broken for quite
* Joey Hess:
I think we've taken this security bugs arn't fixed in testing as well
as in stable thing as gospel a little too long without verifying it
lately. I've been checking and if testing is lagging stable at all, it's
doing so by a much smaller amount than we've traditionally thought.
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:12:57AM -0800, Stephen Birch wrote:
Wouter Verhelst([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-01-05 13:46:
That's how testing started off. We stopped doing this because
a) it at one point stalled glibc; as a result, nothing moved to
testing
anymore, and when it finally did,
Hi Stephen!
You wrote:
ahh .. I take your point. What about the idea of identifying a list of
release essential (RE) packages?
I like that idea. We could even have a system to automagically throw
buggy non-RE packages out of testing.
--
Kind regards,
I have built this package for alpha and it does indeed work. I have
bundled it up in a tgz making it easier to D/L. But all the files are
there as well for individual inspection. Along with the md5sums
http://www.gregfolkert.net/experimental/
not an archive by any means, but available at your
The mail has an attachment not with in the Security policy CONTENT FILTER,
Filter Type: Advanced Content Filter
Event:
at CanonKZN-Attachment-Warning.txt:CONTENT , message.zip violated
Action on Attachment: STRIP
,has taken the following action against the message: Delete.
Wouter Verhelst([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-01-05 14:22:
You should ask the release managers about that.
Wow!! You mean the decision process is not made public? I would have
thought it would be out in the open for all to see.
Mind you, Debian seems to be a hotbed of emotion at times so perhaps a
Bas Zoetekouw([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-01-05 14:31:
I like that idea. We could even have a system to automagically throw
buggy non-RE packages out of testing.
That wouldn't be a bad idea at all. In the recent DPL interview:
http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=04/12/23/2023223
Martin
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:31:58AM +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
Sorry for the delayed response, but here is a possible answer to the
second part of the question from a semiotic perspective. Although the
question was what the swirl /tries/ to symbolize, it may be of some
interest what it
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 08:55 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
I have built this package for alpha and it does indeed work. I have
bundled it up in a tgz making it easier to D/L. But all the files are
there as well for individual inspection. Along with the md5sums
Le mercredi 05 janvier 2005 07:39 -0500, Glenn Maynard a crit :
While you're correct--Ingo should be using list-reply, not group-reply--it's
also somewhat dubious to complain about receiving CC's on list mail when you
havn't set up your MFT header to say you don't want them, list policy or no.
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 08:11:44AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
OK, exactly what are YOU NOT DOING, now? Come on, I know you CAN'T be
that busy. You only maintain a few trivial packages... come on you could
NMU the kernel-source-2.[4|6] fixing all th issues.
No need to MMU. The debian-kernel
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:07:41AM -0800, Stephen Birch wrote:
Wouter Verhelst([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-01-05 14:22:
You should ask the release managers about that.
Wow!! You mean the decision process is not made public? I would have
thought it would be out in the open for all to see.
* Nico Golde [Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:50:42 +0100]:
From: Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^
is there a reason for this? breaks mutt's 'L'ist-reply...
Hi,
what about an RFS tag for ITPs or and RFS bug report for
wnpp. So debian developers who
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 08:02:25PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 02-Jan-05, 15:54 (CST), Stephan Niemz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, is there a guide somewhere telling how to switch an
unstable system from 2.4 to 2.6?
apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.whatever
Also
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:12:14PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 05 janvier 2005 à 07:39 -0500, Glenn Maynard a écrit :
While you're correct--Ingo should be using list-reply, not group-reply--it's
also somewhat dubious to complain about receiving CC's on list mail when you
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cedilla
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Juliusz Chroboczek
* URL : http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/cedilla/
* License : GPL
Description : ascii to postscript renderer with unicode support
An ascii
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 05:58 pm, Neil McGovern wrote:
Recently, I did have a box rooted. This was due to a user running phpbb
on the system, without me knowing, despite the policy of no software
without clearance from me.
My I ask, how did the attacker get root? Did the user have root
hi,
* Frederik Dannemare [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-01-05 12:43]:
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 09:50, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
what about an RFS tag for ITPs or and RFS bug report for
wnpp. So debian developers who like to sponsor a package
don't have to read debian-mentors.
I think it would
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 04:16:49 -0800, Stephen Birch wrote:
Paul van der Vlis([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-01-04 14:40:
Hello,
One of the biggest disadvantages of Debian for me is the long time it
takes for a new stable version.
I guess one man's meat is another man's poison.
Since I
hi,
* Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-01-05 18:02]:
* Nico Golde [Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:50:42 +0100]:
From: Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^
is there a reason for this? breaks mutt's 'L'ist-reply...
Hi,
what about an RFS tag for
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:16:25AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
However, if somebody writes a graphviz-client which just pushes the
dot file over the network to graphviz.example.com on some port and
gets a postscript file back, it can go into main. No matter what
software said server is
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
That makes me wonder. I know that there are tools like cron-apt that
will perform apt-related tasks through cron jobs. Is there a way to
make it (or another tool) download the changelogs and email you any
new ones?
I just filed a wishlist on cron-apt about that same thing
Raul Miller writes:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:16:25AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
However, if somebody writes a graphviz-client which just pushes the
dot file over the network to graphviz.example.com on some port and
gets a postscript file back, it can go into main. No matter what
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 02:05 am, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
When Joerg Jaspert is already doing the dirty daily work, why does James
still needs in place then? (Except he just stays in that position for a
transitional period until Joerg is taking over that task and job
completely. I would
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:30:52PM -0500, Marc Sherman wrote:
That makes me wonder. I know that there are tools like cron-apt that
will perform apt-related tasks through cron jobs. Is there a way to
make it (or another tool) download the changelogs and email you any
new ones?
I just filed
Quoting Robert Lemmen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:30:52PM -0500, Marc Sherman wrote:
That makes me wonder. I know that there are tools like cron-apt that
will perform apt-related tasks through cron jobs. Is there a way to
make it (or another tool) download the
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:30:21PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
hi,
* Frederik Dannemare [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-01-05 12:43]:
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 09:50, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
what about an RFS tag for ITPs or and RFS bug report for
wnpp. So debian developers who like to sponsor
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:16:44PM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 18:04:37 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 08:08:47PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Ken Bloom wrote:
http://wiki.debian.net/?RunDinstallHourly (part of the
ReleaseProposals topic on
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 03:31:38PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was just following your line of reasoning:
You cannot justify the bad things that happen as a result of your
actions by saying that your goals cannot be reached without such
Joel Aelwyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The worst case costs of well-implemented graylisting should be
something like a short delay in an email message; the worst case of a
false positive rejection can be much much worse indeed.
The worst case for graylisting is the same as a false
Kevin Mark dijo [Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:08:49AM -0500]:
Hi Folks,
I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
appreciated!
Very nice! I expect to use it at some conferences (BTW: Looks like a
nice addition to Debian Eyecatcher[1], I'll add it :) )
I'd suggest
Florian Weimer wrote:
I think that's because of the pending release, in particular frozen
base packages, and not representative for the whole release cycle.
There's some truth to that, but of course many of our worst dependency
knots do not involve base packages.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Steve Langasek wrote:
And it's not like users want more frequent updates, either. Once a day is
plenty often to be fiddling with apt-get; many sid users don't update nearly
that often, after all.
But we still get good coverage of each set of changes distriuted amoung
our users even if most of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: nntpswitch
Version : 0.11-1
Upstream Author : Tommy van Leeuwen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.nntpswitch.org/
* License : http://www.nntpswitch.org/manual/license.html
Description : Load Balancing
On January 5, 2005 03:38 pm, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Debian Eyecatcher [1]
[1] http://alioth.debian.org/projects/eyecatcher/
At least I presume this is what you meant to include.
Stephen
--
Debian the choice of a GNU generation.
GPG Public Key: http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/scormier/publickey.asc
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:07:41AM -0800, Stephen Birch wrote:
Wouter Verhelst([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-01-05 14:22:
You should ask the release managers about that.
Wow!! You mean the decision process is not made public? I would have
thought it would be out in the open for all to see.
Hmm,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 02:18:37PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Joey Hess:
I think we've taken this security bugs arn't fixed in testing as well
as in stable thing as gospel a little too long without verifying it
lately. I've been checking and if testing is lagging stable at all, it's
Hello,
I'm learning making debian packages.
I choosed to learn on a very simple software: minimalist.
Installing it from source is just about copying a single file
(minimalist.pl) into /usr/bin and then copying its conf file
into /etc/minimalist.conf
I get the error message you can see at the
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 04:43:05PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
* Package name: cedilla
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Juliusz Chroboczek
* URL : http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/cedilla/
* License : GPL
Description :
Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
I'm learning making debian packages.
I think debian-mentors@ would be more approriate.
I get the error message you can see at the bottom of this post.
I dont understand it. Would you help me?
Especially where to tell the package builder not to use
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:45:12PM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:36:11 +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:16:27AM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote:
http://wiki.debian.net/?RunDinstallHourly (part of the ReleaseProposals
topic on wiki.debian.net) discusses the
El mi, 05-01-2005 a las 04:16 -0800, Stephen Birch escribi:
Paul van der Vlis([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-01-04 14:40:
Hello,
One of the biggest disadvantages of Debian for me is the long time it
takes for a new stable version.
I guess one man's meat is another man's poison.
Since I
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:27:50AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 08:55 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
I have built this package for alpha and it does indeed work. I have
bundled it up in a tgz making it easier to D/L. But all the files are
there as well for individual
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-01-05 15:12]:
Be careful: in general, you should *not* sign changes files for
packages that are not intended to be included in the Debian archive.
Once the changes file is signed, anyone can upload your package to
the Debian archive whether that was
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with you on this. People using stable can not cope with
upgrades each 6 months or so.
The issue isn't the frequency of new stable releases - the issue is how
long a given stable release will be supported for. Releasing every 6
months
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: phptal
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : Laurent Bedubourg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://phptal.sf.net
* License : GPL
Description : phptal is an implementation of Zope Page Templates (ZPT)
for PHP.
Scripsit Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-01-05 15:12]:
Be careful: in general, you should *not* sign changes files for
packages that are not intended to be included in the Debian archive.
Once the changes file is signed, anyone can upload your
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:47:57PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-01-05 15:12]:
Be careful: in general, you should *not* sign changes files for
packages that are not intended to be included in the Debian
Hi Kevin!
* Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050103 07:08]:
I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
appreciated!
What is the target group of your diagramm? Since I don't think people
without deeper knowledge of Debian will find your diagram easy to
understand
El mi, 05-01-2005 a las 23:13 +, Matthew Garrett escribi:
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with you on this. People using stable can not cope with
upgrades each 6 months or so.
The issue isn't the frequency of new stable releases - the issue is how
long a
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:18:21AM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wednesday, January 05, 2005 10:05 AM, Ingo Juergensmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
When Joerg Jaspert is already doing the dirty daily work, why does
James still needs in place then? (Except he just stays in that
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
