Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update
==
An up-to-date version is at http://people.debian.org/~joey/3.0r6/.
I am preparing the (most probably) last revision ever of the current
stable Debian distribution (woody) and will
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:05:01PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
Il y a fort à parier que vous n'y etes pas. Le message auquel vous répondez
est un spam d'un groupe néo-nazi allemand qui s'amuse depuis une semaine ou
deux à usurper l'adresse de cette liste pour envoyer les pires horreurs
comme
From: Martin Quinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-devel-french@lists.debian.org,Sophie Luc Briand
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Paranoider Deutschenmoerder kommt in Psychiatrie
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 14:05:01 +0200
Il y a fort à parier que vous n'y etes pas. Le message auquel vous répondez
Yes, I'm aware that if it's possible to revoke the GPL, it fails
the Tentacles of Evil test, and GPL software would be completely
unsuitable for any serious deployment.
[Roberto C. Sanchez]
But it can't be done, period.
Reference: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
That I am
Peter Samuelson wrote:
Yes, I'm aware that if it's possible to revoke the GPL, it fails
the Tentacles of Evil test, and GPL software would be completely
unsuitable for any serious deployment.
[Roberto C. Sanchez]
But it can't be done, period.
Reference:
Hey man, stop throwing away your money
http://www.prumie.net/ss/
Wanna be more man? Check this dude
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
there are a number of packages in main that contain the actual source
code for their binaries in the package itself. Instead those packages
rely on other packages to supply source or prebuild binaries. The
handling of those packages is inconsisten across the various packages
and, every now
On Wednesday 18 of May 2005 17:23, sean finney wrote:
- people often symlink the mysql datadir (/var/lib/mysql) and logdir
(/var/log/mysql) to somewhere else, such as /usr/local
- because these two directories are in the files.list of woody's
mysql server, upgrading to packages in sarge
* Bernd Eckenfels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050517 03:35]:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
2. change the /etc/apt/sources.list to point to stable
I wish all documentation is using the distribution names not the symbolic
names. If you put stable in a file this will cause major trouble a
On 20050519T153811+1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Adeodato Simó wrote:
As you probably know, entries in the Packages file only have a Source
field if the name of the source package is different from the name of
the binary package being described. This is an inconsistency that makes
it a
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le jeudi 12 mai 2005 à 18:32 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
You said it: there is a cache. After the first access, the directory
will be in the cache. Making all of this a purely imaginary problem.
The whole directory is in the cache? I
Hi Sean,
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:23:35AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
the following upgrade paths work:
mysql-server/woody - mysql-server/sarge
mysql-server/woody - mysql-server/sarge - mysql-server-4.1/sarge
but this does not:
mysql-server/woody - mysql-server-4.1/sarge
so at this
Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 13 May 2005 06:30, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 02:20:02PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/waste/waste/license.cpp?rev=1.1v
iew=auto
Has it ever occured to you that this might
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 14 May 2005 22:06:42 +0200, Martin Mewes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
So I need to ask here whether it would be a better idea to move
mailing lists away from obviously broken, unmaintained and
unsupported
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
Adeodato Simó wrote:
As you probably know, entries in the Packages file only have a Source
field if the name of the source package is different from the name of
the binary package being described. This is an inconsistency that makes
it a
If it where used I would suggest replacing it with
#include /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL (or a file inside the source)
and patch to make it use plain text instead of crypted data.
Yep in fact it was used as it said, by using the -L switch for both wastesrv
and the admin command
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
As you probably know, entries in the Packages file only have a Source
field if the name of the source package is different from the name of
the binary package being described.
Why not add a patch to grep-dctrl instead?
What patch would that be?
Something equivalent
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
The detection of binary NMUs is currently, among others, using the
debian version of a package and guessing from its form. What is a
binary NMU and what not is not aparent from the Packages file. It has
been suggested to insert Source: entries pointing to the original
On 20050519T205101+1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Something equivalent to:
cat /var/lib/dpkg/available |
awk '/^Package:/ {P=$2;V=}
/^Version:/ {if (V==) { V=$2; } }
/^Source: .* (.*)/ {V=substr($3,2,length($3)-2)}
/^Source:/ {P=$2}
/^$/ { print
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
The detection of binary NMUs is currently, among others, using the
debian version of a package and guessing from its form. What is a
binary NMU and what not is not aparent from the Packages file. It has
been suggested
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 11:47:31AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[snip]
But the problem remains that you have to look at each dire entry in
unhashed ext2/3, fat or minix.
Ehrm, I don't think having /usr/lib on a fat FS is an option anyway,
considering its lacking file ownership/permission
Hello
On 2005-05-19 Steve Langasek wrote:
...
so we've come up with three options, none of which are great:
1 the most recenty woody security update caused problems for some
people, and there's a package already waiting to go in to fix this
problem. we could put a fix into the
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-04 22:29]:
Brent Fulgham has decided to give some packages away (mostly Erlang
and Dylan related packages but also some others); the following
mail is forwarded with permission from debian-private:
anyone interested?
2. Erlang -- Concurrent
* Igor Stroh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-06 22:10]:
From what I can tell, cantus3 doesn't actually provide all of the
functionality originally present in cantus.
And it won't either -- the upstream is unresponsive and seems to
have no interest neither in incorporating bug fixes nor in adding
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-03 14:54]:
I intend to ask for removal of the following packages in the next
few days unless someone is willing to step up as maintainer. All of
these packages have been orphaned for over 60 days and have never
been part of a stable release; none
[David Weinehall]
Ehrm, I don't think having /usr/lib on a fat FS is an option anyway,
considering its lacking file ownership/permission support and its
filename munging...
I should think the lack of symlink support is the real problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Thursday 19 May 2005 13:24, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
anyone interested?
2. Erlang -- Concurrent programming language
3. erlang-doc-html -- HTML documentation for Erlang.
4. erlang-manpages -- Manpages for Erlang.
These are taken by François-Denis Gonthier.
5. wings3d --
Hello
Tue, 17 May 2005 13:11:51 -0700
David Schleef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does not appear to be available under a DFSG-compatible license. ;)
Even though the Song That Shall Not Be Named seems ancient, it's
really only about 50 years old and still under copyright.
Tabs are not
Hi there sweety. This is Hottie July, from the online personlals place. I have
been checking out all about you and I just wanted to say hi! I want you to look
at my pics and read about me at my website. I can't wait to talk to you baby.
Cya soon,
J-girl
www.zgeqij.ucanttouchfist.com/ju29/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Moratti Claudio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: keurocalc
Version : 0.9.1
Upstream Author : Éric Bischoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Melchior Franz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bas Willems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:49:13AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
3 does not sound so bad to me; it's arguably user error anyway to replace a
package-provided directory with a symlink in this manner
If you consider this an user error, then what is the officially blessed
way of relocating a
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 05:08:28PM +0200, GOMBAS Gabor wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:49:13AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
3 does not sound so bad to me; it's arguably user error anyway to replace a
package-provided directory with a symlink in this manner
If you consider this an user
* Anthony Towns [Thu, 19 May 2005 15:38:11 +1000]:
Adeodato Simó wrote:
As you probably know, entries in the Packages file only have a Source
field if the name of the source package is different from the name of
the binary package being described. This is an inconsistency that makes
Re: Martin Michlmayr in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have therefore decided to stop the weekly WNPP summaries to d-d-a
and instead do the following:
- send the weekly posting to debian-wnpp instead of d-d-a
- only include new entries
I always read the announcements to look for O or RFAs of
* Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-19 18:40]:
How about posting the announcements to -devel (instead of -d-a)? If
only new entries are included, it wouldn't hurt much for those who
are not interested.
I agree that this might be a good idea. debian-wnpp is quite
cluttered with all the
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 18:40 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
I always read the announcements to look for O or RFAs of packages I
use, hence I appreciate the only new entries change.
Same here.
However, from
browsing the debian-wnpp archives, there's a lot more stuff there than
I'm willing to
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:18:55PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
The detection of binary NMUs is currently, among others, using the
debian version of a package and guessing from its form. What is a
binary NMU and what not is not aparent from the Packages file. It has
been suggested to
Ignasi.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Make Yahoo! your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 02:47, Steve Langasek wrote:
Is there a difference in packages removed if you run aptitude install
aptitude instead of aptitude install aptitude dpkg? I don't see any
reason why dpkg needs to be upgraded first, unlike aptitude.
No, makes no real difference. I still
Hello
[1st RC issue - dpkg removes symlinks when upgrading from 3.23]
As discussed before in some corner cases we can do nothing except
for showing the user an explanation what happened which has been
done in 4.1.11a-2 and 4.0.24-10.
[2nd RC issue - statically linked db3]
The new bug
Hi,
On Thursday 19 May 2005 18:43, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
What do other people think of this? Do you want a shorter WNPP
posting with only new entries on -devel?
less frequent, maybe every four weeks ? i've got wnpp-alert in my cron for
weekly mails - if people reaaally care, they can put
On 5/18/05, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Point taken. However, the GPL clearly states the conditions in
section 6:
6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the
Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the
original licensor to
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 17:43 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-19 18:40]:
How about posting the announcements to -devel (instead of -d-a)? If
only new entries are included, it wouldn't hurt much for those who
are not interested.
I agree that this
On 5/19/05, Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/19/05, Michael K. Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The GPL is anomalous in that the drafter has published a widely
believed, but patently false, set of claims about its legal basis in
the FSF FAQ.
For the record, I disagree that this
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 05:28:50PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) is an important part of
our infrastructure used to discuss packages to be added to the archive
and, in particular, to look for new or additional maintainers for
existing packages.
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Anthony Towns [Thu, 19 May 2005 15:38:11 +1000]:
Adeodato Simó wrote:
As you probably know, entries in the Packages file only have a Source
field if the name of the source package is different from the name of
the binary package being
* Ben Armstrong
| How about posting the announcements to -devel (instead of -d-a)? If
| only new entries are included, it wouldn't hurt much for those who are
| not interested.
|
| I'd like to see them continue on -d-a. There are times when I just
| can't handle -devel and unsub completely.
Thank you for your comments!
Brian Hewitt
The Golf Channel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/19/05, Michael K. Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The GPL is anomalous in that the drafter has published a widely
believed, but patently false, set of claims about its legal basis in
the FSF FAQ.
For the record, I disagree that this faq is patently false.
It is, in places, a bit
On Thu, 19 May 2005 11:58:47 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did the move change anything?
No:
|From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 22:09:04 +
|
|This
On 5/19/05, Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the record, I disagree that this faq is patently false.
It is, in places, a bit simplistic, but I wouldn't advise anyone
delve into those fine points of law unless they've retained
the services of a lawyer (at which point the FAQ
Michael K. Edwards wrote:
not. Does anyone happen to have a six-month-old copy of the FSF FAQ?
From 11-2004:
http://web.archive.org/web/20041130014304/http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20041105024302/http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
-Roberto
--
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Igor Stroh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-06 22:10]:
From what I can tell, cantus3 doesn't actually provide all of the
functionality originally present in cantus.
And it won't either -- the upstream is unresponsive and seems to
have no interest neither in incorporating bug
* Igor Stroh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-20 01:18]:
Has there been any agreement about what to do with cantus and cantus3?
Since you're the maintainer of cantus3 and you suggest it's removal,
can you go ahead and file a bug report on ftp.d.o?
I don't like the idea of removing cantus3 right
For the record, I disagree that this faq is patently false.
It is, in places, a bit simplistic, but I wouldn't advise anyone
delve into those fine points of law unless they've retained
the services of a lawyer (at which point the FAQ is merely
an interesting commentary -- it has less
On 5/19/05, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://web.archive.org/web/20041130014304/http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20041105024302/http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
Thanks, Roberto. The (moderately) explicit bit I had in mind is in
On 5/19/05, Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip Raul's honest and polite response]
I've been objecting to the nature of the generalizations you've been
making. In other words, I see you asserting that things which are
sometimes true must always be true.
In the case of the contract
Hi Martin,
On Thursday 19 May 2005 10:28, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) is an important part of
our infrastructure used to discuss packages to be added to the archive
and, in particular, to look for new or additional maintainers for
existing packages.
[
I am looking for someone to sign my gpg key. I have contacted
the three people listed as offering to sign keys in Ohio [0],
but I have received no response after a few days. Anibal
suggested I ask on d-d. So, if anyone is able to sign my gpg
key so I can get recognized by the front desk, I
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:34:46PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:18:55PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
The detection of binary NMUs is currently, among others, using the
debian version of a package and guessing from its form. What is a
binary NMU and
On 5/19/05, Michael K. Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps that is indeed what you would do. I don't consider lawyers to
be the only persons capable of reading the law for themselves. They
are the only ones authorized to offer certain forms of legal advice
and legal representation, but
Thomas == Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas sbin is for things that should be in root's path. The
Thomas executables in question are ones that shouldn't be in
Thomas anyone's path. (The standard example is programs started
Thomas only by inetd.)
Why not put
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William J Beksi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: skim
~ Version : 1.2.2
~ Upstream Author : liuspider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.scim-im.org/
* License : GPL
~
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
/bin/mount foo:whatever /bin
I was considering commenting on this, I think if you want to start
going down this track it would be simpler to write/adapt a script that
automatically creates an initramfs.
Yes, this is surely true. When I had the need
Michael K. Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The FAQ is not merely an interesting commentary -- it is the
published stance of the FSF, to which its General Counsel refers all
inquiries. Although I am not legally qualified to judge, I believe
that he can have no reasonable basis under the law
Michael K. Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An action for copyright
infringement, or any similar proceeding under droit d'auteur for
instance, will look at the GPL (like any other license agreement) only
through the lens of contract law. IANAL, TINLA. I don't believe you
have succeeded in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: xfce4-quicklauncher-plugin
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Masse Nicolas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : GPL
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: xfce4-genmon-plugin
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Roger Seguin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://xfce-goodies.berlios.de
* License : LGPL
Description :
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:34:46PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:18:55PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
The detection of binary NMUs is currently, among others, using the
debian version of a package and guessing
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: xfce4-cpugraph-plugin
Version : 0.2.2
Upstream Author : Alexander Nordfelth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://xfce-goodies.berlios.de/
* License : BSD
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: xfce4-fsguard-plugin
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Andre Lerche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://xfce-goodies.berlios.de/
* License : BSD
Description :
Hi,
on the weekend, dpatch 2.0.12 has been uploaded to experimental. It
introduces some great new features and some fixes that are
inappropriate for unstable at this stage of the release[1].
Please try out the package from experimental to find bugs before it is
uploaded to unstable.
Greetings
On 5/19/05, Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael K. Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An action for copyright
infringement, or any similar proceeding under droit d'auteur for
instance, will look at the GPL (like any other license agreement) only
through the lens of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 09:08:54 +0200
Source: flyspray
Binary: flyspray
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.7-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 10:08:09 +0200
Source: nvidia-cg-toolkit
Binary: nvidia-cg-toolkit
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.0501.0700-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Federico Di Gregorio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 09:36:22 +0100
Source: mountfloppy
Binary: mountfloppy
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Colin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 10:32:50 +0200
Source: synaptic
Binary: synaptic
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.55+cvs20050503-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Vogt [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 23:48:47 +0200
Source: sig2dot
Binary: sig2dot
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.34-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 13:36:54 +0200
Source: muse
Binary: muse
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 13:06:42 +0200
Source: noflushd
Binary: noflushd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.7.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Kobras [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 14:48:47 +0900
Source: kernel-source-2.4.27
Binary: kernel-tree-2.4.27 kernel-source-2.4.27 kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27
kernel-doc-2.4.27
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.4.27-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 14:48:26 +0900
Source: kernel-image-2.4.27-i386
Binary: kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-k6 kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.27-2-k7
kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.27-2-686 kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-686-smp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 19:30:02 +0900
Source: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27
Binary: kernel-patch-2.4.27-powerpc kernel-build-2.4.27-nubus
kernel-image-2.4.27-nubus kernel-headers-2.4.27-powerpc
kernel-image-2.4.27-powerpc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 12:19:25 +0200
Source: dictionaries-common
Binary: dictionaries-common-dev dictionaries-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.25.12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Agustin Martin Domingo [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 16:51:34 +0900
Source: kernel-source-2.6.8
Binary: kernel-source-2.6.8 kernel-doc-2.6.8 kernel-tree-2.6.8
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.8
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.6.8-16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 14:41:12 +0200
Source: autossh
Binary: autossh
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2g-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Filippo Giunchedi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Filippo Giunchedi [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 23:14:03 +0200
Source: ifrench
Binary: ifrench myspell-fr
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.4-20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nicolas Sabouret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Nicolas Sabouret
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 22:51:48 +0200
Source: ifrench-gut
Binary: ifrench-gut myspell-fr-gut
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:1.0-18
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nicolas Sabouret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 15:54:18 +0200
Source: fai
Binary: fai
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.8.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Thomas Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Thomas Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 05:41:28 -0400
Source: tiff
Binary: libtiff-opengl libtiffxx0 libtiff4 libtiff-tools libtiff4-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.7.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Jay Berkenbilt [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 16:54:18 +0200
Source: kino
Binary: kino
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.76-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 10:56:04 -0500
Source: libapache-configfile-perl
Binary: libapache-configfile-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.18-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 16:48:43 +0200
Source: synaptic
Binary: synaptic
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.55+cvs20050503-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Vogt [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 18:45:13 +0200
Source: ocaml-tools
Binary: ocaml-tools
Architecture: source all
Version: 2005.29.04-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 17:28:33 +0100
Source: apt-proxy
Binary: apt-proxy
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9.30
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Chris Halls [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 19:03:38 +0200
Source: watchdog
Binary: watchdog
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.2.4-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Meskes [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 17:18:25 +0100
Source: libsdl-erlang
Binary: libsdl-erlang
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.94.1025-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 14:28:11 +0200
Source: dnstop
Binary: dnstop
Architecture: source i386
Version: 20050405-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adriaan Peeters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adriaan Peeters [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 17:52:29 +0100
Source: wings3d
Binary: wings3d
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.98.29b-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 18:44:06 +0200
Source: bridge-utils
Binary: bridge-utils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Santiago García Mantiñán [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Santiago
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
