On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 05:08:28PM +0200, GOMBAS Gabor wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:49:13AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:

> > 3 does not sound so bad to me; it's arguably user error anyway to replace a
> > package-provided directory with a symlink in this manner

> If you consider this an user error, then what is the officially blessed
> way of relocating a package-prodived directory to a different (already
> mounted) file system?

currently, that would be bind mounts.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to