also sprach Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.06.17.0208 +0200]:
And unless they know about the completely non-standard /etc/umask.conf,
they'll still edit multiple files.
True enough... unless files like /etc/profile include some magic
code for umask (rather than the umask call itself),
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 06:18:06PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
iceme -- A graphical menu editor for IceWM [#227054]
* Orphaned 520 days ago
* Package orphaned 360 days ago.
icepref -- Yet another configuration tool for IceWM [#227077]
* Orphaned 520 days ago
* Package
Filing a bug against login...
(shadow maintainer hat on)
bugger...:-)
I was reading this thread and just told to self: dude, this will end
up in a BR against shadow/login:-)
So, to summarize, the rationale here is: don't set umask in the
default login.defs and leave this to shells and/or
day. Many of the false positives were from the same people, who could
have removed their CBL listing easily. (If they didn't fix the
Hmmm, IIRC I was among these ones and the reasons was the CBL listing
all dynamic and non dynamic addresses from Free, one of the 2-3 major
ISPs for DSL in
also sprach Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.06.17.0658 +0200]:
So, to summarize, the rationale here is: don't set umask in the
default login.defs and leave this to shells and/or pam_umask.
Right?
Yes.
I have to keep some kind of explanation for the default login.defs
file, this is
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 07:41 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Wouter Verhelst:
What's painful about it?
I wouldn't be surprised if it already increases load on
lists.debian.org significantly.
Not nearly as much as people who teergrub us. We can _really_ feel them.
Cheers,
Pasc
--
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 10:45 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's painful about it?
It stops a lot of viruses and spam, with no false positives. What's the
problem?
No false positives seems a bit optimistic.
One problem I've encountered in the
[Santiago Vila]
For example, we could use greylisting. Or we could reject messages that
are known to come directly from trojanized windows machines acting as
open proxies. Or even better, we could do both things.
Or a completely different option. Here at the university the
postmasters
Le Ven 17 Juin 2005 01:42, Wouter Verhelst a crit :
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 03:09:47PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Jeu 16 Juin 2005 14:33, Santiago Vila a crit :
Now that we have released sarge, I would like to ask debian-admin
and the Project Leader to consider seriously doing
gmail.com used to do that to lists.debian.org. We deliver ~300,000
emails to gmail a day. It resulted in some deliveries timing out before
they were even attempted; I'll let you imagine the rest.
Cheers,
Pasc
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 08:35 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Santiago Vila]
For
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:26:36AM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 17:20 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
So, maybe it's time to revisit the weaknesses of the shlibs system,
particularly as they apply to glibc. Scott James Remnant had done some
poking in this area
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 08:07:34AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:26:36AM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 17:20 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
So, maybe it's time to revisit the weaknesses of the shlibs system,
particularly as they apply to
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 208 (new: 24)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 100 (new: 13)
Total number of packages
Hi Eric,
Le jeudi 16 juin 2005 14:45 -0400, Eric Dorland a crit :
I'm not trying to say it's non-free. It is free. What I'm trying to
determine is if we should use the marks within Debian.
If it's free, the project as a whole has already decided to be able to
include it. For the rest, it's up
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 12:15:25AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 08:07:34AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:26:36AM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 17:20 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
So, maybe it's time to revisit
We explained you that your reasoning was ill-advised because DFSG
stands for DF Software G and not DF Trademark G. What can I say
more ?
I think you'd best come up with a better line of argument. The S in
DFSG does not stand for copyright, it stands for software.
Software usually contains
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote, on Friday, June
17, 2005 6:37 AM:
Below I have included the text rejecting my httperf package. I am
taking over as maintainer and uploaded a new version that also
closed a couple of bugs and moved it from non-US to main. If linking
with libssl is
17.06.2005 pisze Peter Samuelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I think you'd best come up with a better line of argument. The S in
DFSG does not stand for copyright, it stands for software.
Software usually contains copyrighted code, and sometimes it also
contains trademarked names or images.
You
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Zope team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: zope2.8
Version : 2.8.0
Upstream Author : Zope Community
* URL : http://www.zope.org/
* License : ZPL 2.0
Description : open source web application server (2.8
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Zope team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: zope2.8
Version : 2.8.0
Upstream Author : Zope Community
* URL : http://www.zope.org/
* License : ZPL 2.0
Description : open source web application server (2.8
On Jun 17, Miles Bader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spamhaus's rather irresponsible behavior in the past[*] hasn't left a
happy impression; have they cleaned up their act lately?
Looks like you are confusing it with some other DNSBL.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
Spamhaus's rather irresponsible behavior in the past[*] hasn't left a
happy impression; have they cleaned up their act lately?
Looks like you are confusing it with some other DNSBL.
Hmmm, looking thought old email I think you're right -- it was spamcop
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 at 11:58 +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Zope team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: zope2.8
Version : 2.8.0
Description : open source web application server (2.8 branch)
Damn, I meant zopex3 and 3.0.0
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 at 11:58 +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Zope team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: zope2.8
Version : 2.8.0
Description : open source web application server
On Friday 17 June 2005 07:04, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 06:18:06PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
iceme -- A graphical menu editor for IceWM [#227054]
* Orphaned 520 days ago
* Package orphaned 360 days ago.
icepref -- Yet another configuration tool for
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 01:51:04PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
regarding prelink
On Thursday 16 June 2005 08:18, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the points of the md5sum verification is to ensure that the
binaries haven't been tampered with. If one can tamper with the
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Sven Mueller wrote:
[2001/03/03 10:05] Markus Schoder has contributed finddupes.cpp, GPL'ed source
code for a C++ based version
...
It's only compilable in its current state with g++-2.95 (regarding
compilers in Debian stable). There is a single error when compiling with
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Hmmm, IIRC I was among these ones and the reasons was the CBL listing
all dynamic and non dynamic addresses from Free, one of the 2-3 major
ISPs for DSL in France.
I think you are confusing CBL with another DNSbl.
CBL only lists addresses that spam thier
On Friday 17 June 2005 13:40, Andreas Tille wrote:
It's only compilable in its current state with g++-2.95 (regarding
compilers in Debian stable). There is a single error when compiling with
g++-3.4 which I am unable to fix (as I don't know the STL at all).
Thanks for investigating this.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 06:18:06PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
There are currently over 200 orphaned packages, many of which have
been on WNPP for quite a long time and some with RC bugs. I intend to
request the removal of a number of packages in three weeks unless a
package has been
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:54:40AM +0200, Miros/law Baran wrote:
17.06.2005 pisze Peter Samuelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I think you'd best come up with a better line of argument. The S in
DFSG does not stand for copyright, it stands for software.
Software usually contains copyrighted
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] scrisse:
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
gkdial -- PPP dial-up configuration and dialing tool [#287992]
* Orphaned 164 days ago
* 1 RC bugs.
Does any graphical ppp frontend exist that can be used instead of
this?
Under gnome you can find gpppkill and gpppon,
I've only been skimming this thread, so I fear this may have been
said. What about:
1) rebrand mozilla-firefox
2) create a permanent transition package with the firefox name
that depends on it
3) use alternatives to provide /usr/bin/firefox
The description of the transition package
On Friday 17 June 2005 12:10, Sam Watkins wrote:
some of these packages are useful and interesting, and I feel they
should not be removed from unstable at least. perhaps they could be
moved to a different section which is not necessarily stabilized for
release.
I use both of these and would like to adopt them. I will upload next
week (via Anibal).
I think they are no longer maintained upstream.
Take a look at http://www.icewm.org/FAQ/IceWM-FAQ-11.html#tools4icewm
for more modern and supported alternatives.
Greetings Ben
--
Please do not sent any
On 17-Jun-05, 01:41 (CDT), Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the delay it creates. [...] but for our @debian.org addresses ...
that sucks, I often rely on the fact that delivery is immediate on
those.
Then you don't understand how the internet and SMTP works. There is
absolutely no
On 15/06/2005 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Unfortunately people that are easily offended will always exist, even by
simple human body parts displayed in a very abstract manner (more abstract
than the pictures in any sexual education book). So we have to do
something about it, because it's a given. I
Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In July 2003, I adopted the package gnat and several other Ada
packages. In November 2003, Matthias Klose sponsored my first few
packages into Debian unstable. After I adopted all the orphaned
packages I could, I created several new packages from
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 08:46:33PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
I recomed using spamhaus SBL-XBL, or at least CBL (which is included in
SBL-XBL).
I dont: http://www.paulgraham.com/spamhausblacklist.html
--
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
Unix
Le Ven 17 Juin 2005 14:13, Steve Greenland a crit :
On 17-Jun-05, 01:41 (CDT), Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
the delay it creates. [...] but for our @debian.org addresses ...
that sucks, I often rely on the fact that delivery is immediate on
those.
Then you don't understand
* Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050617 17:08]:
Le Ven 17 Juin 2005 14:13, Steve Greenland a crit :
On 17-Jun-05, 01:41 (CDT), Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
the delay it creates. [...] but for our @debian.org addresses ...
that sucks, I often rely on the fact that
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Andreas Barth wrote:
Come one. We're speaking on additional 5 minutes on the first
connection. Greylist works quite well for me, and I really hope that we
manage to deploy anti-spam-tools on Debian.
AOLMe too./AOL
See also some interesting tips here for Sendmail:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 09:32 +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 12:15:25AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 08:07:34AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:26:36AM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 17:20
I perfectly understand what SMTP is, and I perfectly *don't*
understand why having a 30 minutes delay or even a 2 or 3 hours
delay in some conditions is tolerable.
Come one. We're speaking on additional 5 minutes on the first
connection. Greylist works quite well for me, and I really hope
* Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050617 17:34]:
I perfectly understand what SMTP is, and I perfectly *don't*
understand why having a 30 minutes delay or even a 2 or 3 hours
delay in some conditions is tolerable.
Come one. We're speaking on additional 5 minutes on the first
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Jesus Climent wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 08:46:33PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
I recomed using spamhaus SBL-XBL, or at least CBL (which is included in
SBL-XBL).
I dont: http://www.paulgraham.com/spamhausblacklist.html
Selected paragraph from the article:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have made the linux-wlan-ng package for 0.2.1 [0]
The modules for 2.6.8 and 2.6.11 is my next step. Can you take a look over it?
I'm not sure if it is
correct.
[0] http://linuxmaniac.homeip.net/debian/
- --
Victor Seva Lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le vendredi 17 juin 2005 14:09 +0100, Andrew Suffield a crit :
You could also, as a courtesy to other readers, lay before us the
stunningly obvious proof that a free software that elects to use
trademarks automagically transmutates into non-free state.
That would be the part where the
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:25:43PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
On 15/06/2005 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Unfortunately people that are easily offended will always exist, even by
simple human body parts displayed in a very abstract manner (more abstract
than the pictures in any sexual education
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 05:53:25PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
In fact, most of the effectiveness of SBL-XBL really comes from the CBL,
as shown by the widely known statistics:
http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/Blacklists_Compared.html
Statistics which list only hits, and not false positives or
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 06:08:36PM +0200, Rapha?l Hertzog wrote:
Le vendredi 17 juin 2005 14:09 +0100, Andrew Suffield a crit :
You could also, as a courtesy to other readers, lay before us the
stunningly obvious proof that a free software that elects to use
trademarks automagically
Luca writes:
Under gnome you can find gpppkill and gpppon, but they can't manage
provider setting.
Gpppon doesn't need to manage settings. It uses the same settings as
pon/poff, which can be managed with pppconfig.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Donald J Bindner writes:
2) create a permanent transition package with the firefox name
that depends on it
3) use alternatives to provide /usr/bin/firefox
Thereby attaching the name Firefox to something which is not pristine
Mozilla code. This is exactly what it is being claimed we may not
On 17/06/2005 Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:25:43PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
On 15/06/2005 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Unfortunately people that are easily offended will always exist, even by
simple human body parts displayed in a very abstract manner (more abstract
On Friday 17 June 2005 17:08, Raphal Hertzog wrote:
The Mozilla Foundation explicitely gave us that right (or at least they
are ready to give us this right because they trust us). Of course the
right is revocable ... but that doesn't matter. When they decide to stop
granting us this right,
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:18:37 +0200, Andreas Barth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Come one. We're speaking on additional 5 minutes on the first
connection. Greylist works quite well for me, and I really hope that we
manage to deploy anti-spam-tools on Debian.
Just for the record: The default MTA in
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 05:53:25PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
In fact, most of the effectiveness of SBL-XBL really comes from the CBL,
as shown by the widely known statistics:
http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/Blacklists_Compared.html
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 06:08:36PM +0200, Rapha?l Hertzog wrote:
Le vendredi 17 juin 2005 14:09 +0100, Andrew Suffield a crit :
You could also, as a courtesy to other readers, lay before us the
stunningly obvious proof that a free software
* Raphal Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Eric,
Le jeudi 16 juin 2005 14:45 -0400, Eric Dorland a crit :
I'm not trying to say it's non-free. It is free. What I'm trying to
determine is if we should use the marks within Debian.
If it's free, the project as a whole has already
On 6/16/05, Michael K. Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/16/05, Ian Murdock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
glibc. Shipping X.org and GNOME 2.10 adds value, since sarge doesn't
ship them. Shipping glibc 2.6.5 vs. glibc 2.6.2 just adds
incompatibilities.
Speaking as someone with no Ubuntu
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:55:57PM -0500, Ian Murdock wrote:
snip
I don't doubt there were changes, even some worthwhile changes,
between the version of libc in sarge and the versions in
hoary/breezy. My question is: Are the changes worth breaking
compatibility? It's a cost/benefit thing.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 08:18:29AM -0500, Donald J Bindner wrote:
1) rebrand mozilla-firefox
2) create a permanent transition package with the firefox name
that depends on it
3) use alternatives to provide /usr/bin/firefox
The description of the transition package should briefly
* Andreas Barth:
First of all, E-Mail is no real time medium. It was never intended so.
My users complain if it's not (soft) real-time, and rightly so For
most users, it's more real-time than a fax transmission because both
parties need not walk to the fax machine. Today, even an MX hop which
* Santiago Vila:
The CBL, in particular, is completely automated, it tries very hard
to not list real mail servers, and you can remove yourself trivially.
In fact, most of the effectiveness of SBL-XBL really comes from the CBL,
as shown by the widely known statistics:
Hmm, so greylist when
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:07:33PM +0200, Jeremie Koenig wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 08:18:29AM -0500, Donald J Bindner wrote:
1) rebrand mozilla-firefox
2) create a permanent transition package with the firefox name
that depends on it
3) use alternatives to provide
On 6/17/05, Ian Murdock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/16/05, Michael K. Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking as someone with no Ubuntu affiliation (and IANADD either), I
think that statement is based on a somewhat shallow analysis of how
glibc is handled. [...]
I don't doubt there
* Daniel Stone:
Breezy (like current sid) is built against 2.3.5.
Current sid on which platform?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 03:58:35AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hoary (like sarge) is built against 2.3.2.
Breezy (like current sid) is built against 2.3.5.
No, 2.3.5 is still in experimental.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Jun 17, Ian Murdock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't doubt there were changes, even some worthwhile changes,
between the version of libc in sarge and the versions in
hoary/breezy. My question is: Are the changes worth breaking
compatibility? It's a cost/benefit thing. And if they're
On 17-Jun-05, 13:11 (CDT), Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:18:37 +0200, Andreas Barth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Come one. We're speaking on additional 5 minutes on the first
connection. Greylist works quite well for me, and I really hope that we
manage to deploy
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:10:34PM +0200, Wouter van Heyst wrote:
4) make the program's branding depend on argv[0].
Do trademarks only apply to binaries, or to source also? A running
firefox will prominently display the trademarked bits in question, but
hey, the source being open for
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt writes:
Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In July 2003, I adopted the package gnat and several other Ada
packages. In November 2003, Matthias Klose sponsored my first few
packages into Debian unstable. After I adopted all the orphaned
packages I could, I
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 07:19:21PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
On 17/06/2005 Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:25:43PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
On 15/06/2005 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Unfortunately people that are easily offended will always exist, even by
simple human
John Hasler wrote:
Alexander Sack writes:
In general the part of the MoFo brand we are talking about is the product
name (e.g. firefox, thunderbird, sunbird). From what I can recall now, it
is used in the help menu, the about box, the package-name and the window
title bar.
I'm not convinced
Eric Dorland wrote:
* Simon Huggins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I was under the impression that downstreams could call the packages
firefox as they had been blessed with official Debian penguin pee as
long as they didn't then change them and it was only when they were
modified that they
Eric Dorland wrote:
But I don't think it's good for our users for Debian to have rights
that the user don't have.
Debian already has rights that their users don't have, the most
prominent among them being to label a Linux distribution as Debian (or
official Debian, or whatever it is you guys
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 03:10:07PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 06:08:36PM +0200, Rapha?l Hertzog wrote:
Le vendredi 17 juin 2005 14:09 +0100, Andrew Suffield a crit :
You could also, as a courtesy to other readers, lay
Rich Walker wrote on 16/06/2005 23:23:
Sven Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Michlmayr wrote on 16/06/2005 19:18:
findimagedupes -- Finds visually similar or duplicate images [#218699]
* Orphaned 590 days ago
* Package orphaned 360 days ago.
Though I probably can't adopt it (due
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:55:57PM -0500, Ian Murdock wrote:
I don't doubt there were changes, even some worthwhile changes,
between the version of libc in sarge and the versions in
hoary/breezy. My question is: Are the changes worth breaking
compatibility? It's a cost/benefit thing. And if
On 6/17/05, Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Hasler wrote:
Alexander Sack writes:
In general the part of the MoFo brand we are talking about is the product
name (e.g. firefox, thunderbird, sunbird). From what I can recall now, it
is used in the help menu, the about box, the
On 6/17/05, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you'll find that porn is the majority industry on the internet.
The Internet is, to zeroth order, useful only for the same four things
that interactive TV is well suited for: video games, gambling,
pornography, and pornographic
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 10:12:01AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote, on Friday, June
17, 2005 6:37 AM:
Below I have included the text rejecting my httperf package. I am
taking over as maintainer and uploaded a new version that also
closed a couple
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Eric Dorland wrote:
Well I don't think DFSG #4 says the rename has to be easy, it just
has to be possible.
Yes. However, the last sentence in DFSG #4 only talks about renaming,
not being forced to change content.
Don Armstrong
--
Build a fire for a man, an he'll be
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 12:57:13PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
On Friday 17 June 2005 07:04, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 06:18:06PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
iceme -- A graphical menu editor for IceWM [#227054]
* Orphaned 520 days ago
* Package orphaned
* Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Eric Dorland wrote:
Well I don't think DFSG #4 says the rename has to be easy, it just
has to be possible.
Yes. However, the last sentence in DFSG #4 only talks about renaming,
not being forced to change content.
Ummm,
Gerv writes:
If I label the car I've built as a Ford (even if it uses a lot of Ford
parts), it infringes Ford's trademark.
Not until you try to sell it. Ford Motor Company does not own the word
'Ford'. They merely have the exclusive right to sell automobiles (and
related parts and services)
Michael writes:
Debian doesn't need such an arrangement, as I argued in a previous
thread six months ago; there's the Coty v. Prestonettes standard and all
that. But IMHO it would be advisable for both sides if such an
arrangement were reached.
Exactly. If Debian doesn't need such an
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
the last sentence in DFSG #4 only talks about renaming, not being
forced to change content.
If I change the name of my program, I also change all references to
that name in program (if for no other reason,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 07:47:43PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
the last sentence in DFSG #4 only talks about renaming, not being
forced to change content.
If I change the name of my program, I also
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 03:10:07PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 06:08:36PM +0200, Rapha?l Hertzog wrote:
Le vendredi 17 juin 2005 14:09 +0100, Andrew Suffield a crit :
* Gervase Markham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Eric Dorland wrote:
* Simon Huggins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I was under the impression that downstreams could call the packages
firefox as they had been blessed with official Debian penguin pee as
long as they didn't then change them and it was
* John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Michael writes:
Debian doesn't need such an arrangement, as I argued in a previous
thread six months ago; there's the Coty v. Prestonettes standard and all
that. But IMHO it would be advisable for both sides if such an
arrangement were reached.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:53:59 -0300
Source: raster3d
Binary: raster3d raster3d-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.7c-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Nelson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:25:11 +0200
Source: xmms-singit
Binary: xmms-singit
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.28-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Ernst [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:17:03 +0900
Source: heartbeat
Binary: libstonith-dev ldirectord libstonith0 heartbeat libpils-dev libpils0
stonith heartbeat-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.2.3-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:57:04 +0200
Source: xcruise
Binary: xcruise
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.30-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:02:03 +0100
Source: mrxvt
Binary: mrxvt mrxvt-common mrxvt-mini mrxvt-cjk
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.4.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Qingning Huo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:03:25 +0100
Source: fribidi
Binary: libfribidi0-udeb libfribidi0 libfribidi-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.10.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:26:26 +0200
Source: i8kutils
Binary: i8kutils i8kutils-smm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.27
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Massimo Dal Zotto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Massimo Dal Zotto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:41:52 +0100
Source: screem
Binary: screem
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.14.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rob Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Rob Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
