On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 10:12:01AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote, on Friday, June > 17, 2005 6:37 AM: > > > Below I have included the text rejecting my httperf package. I am > > taking over as maintainer and uploaded a new version that also > >closed a couple of bugs and moved it from non-US to main. If linking > > with libssl is not permissible, should the version that is currently in > > Sarge be slated for removal when 3.1r1 comes out? > > There is no httperf package in sarge, as there is no non-US archive for > sarge, so the question is academic. As http://packages.debian.org/httperf > shows, the package currently only exists in oldstable/non-US. >
Quite right. I should really stay on top of these things :-) -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpFkztbGFah6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
