Le lundi 31 juillet 2006 à 14:53 +0200, Benjamin Drieu a écrit :
Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Est-ce que quelqu'un comptait rajouter une entrée .fr sur:
http://wiki.debian.org/Debian13th ?
Je me suis permis de rajouter une entrée après en avoir discuté sur
l'IRC :
#include hallo.h
* John Goerzen [Tue, Aug 01 2006, 04:47:13PM]:
I do use darcs to track patches against upstream. I really don't
understand the whole cdbs/dpatch/whatever thing -- why use a hack to
manage your patches when you could use a real VC tool that does it
better?
Because you can
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 03:31:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Pierre Machard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1501 +0100]:
snapshot.debian.net (still not-official but very usefull)
This is very interesting, especially in the light of version control
for packaging -- which
Yesterday, a last round of bugs has been filled against packages that
may need an upgrade to comply with the recent python policy[1].
Some developpers have raised concerns directly to me about the 0-day NMU
policy warning in that report.
This § has been added because /usr/bin/python beeing
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 23:47, John Goerzen wrote:
I do use darcs to track patches against upstream. I really don't
understand the whole cdbs/dpatch/whatever thing -- why use a hack to
manage your patches when you could use a real VC tool that does it
better?
Is there a common best
Le mercredi 02 août 2006 à 10:21 +0200, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
Yesterday, a last round of bugs has been filled against packages that
may need an upgrade to comply with the recent python policy[1].
Please also note that some of these bugs are invalid. For example, if
the package ships some
Le mardi 01 août 2006 à 23:39 +0100, martin f krafft a écrit :
also sprach John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.2247 +0100]:
I do use darcs to track patches against upstream. I really don't
understand the whole cdbs/dpatch/whatever thing -- why use a hack to
manage your patches when
Hello!
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 22:34:41 +0200, John Goerzen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:06:19PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
John, are you actually using the workflow you describe for
maintenance of Debian packages? Single or team maintenance? Could
you elaborate a bit?
I do use darcs
Hello!
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:17:57 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 23:47, John Goerzen wrote:
I do use darcs to track patches against upstream. I really don't
understand the whole cdbs/dpatch/whatever thing -- why use a hack
to manage your patches when you could use a
also sprach Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.02.1004 +0100]:
I agree, dpatch co seem to be more accessible: they are files
you can touch; they're not an abstract concept (branch)
which you can work with, but which is not tangible.
This is another possible reason for SVN's
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 20:57 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
I'm using it when porting security fixes to sarge. If the maintainer has
fixed a security bug in sid, I download that version and the version
before and can see right away what exactly he changed to fix the bug.
This shouldn't need
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 16:47 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
I do use darcs to track patches against upstream. I really don't
understand the whole cdbs/dpatch/whatever thing -- why use a hack to
manage your patches when you could use a real VC tool that does it
better?
A patch system can be very
also sprach Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.02.1020 +0100]:
This shouldn't need snapshot.debian.net, right?
If the bug is claimed to be fixed in the changelog of 2.0-5 and the
current sid version is 2.0-7, I don't know another way to see the diff
between 2.0-4 and 2.0-5, since
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Yesterday, a last round of bugs has been filled against packages that
may need an upgrade to comply with the recent python policy[1].
That's great! We all want python to be python2.4 in etch, thanks for
your work.
We already discussed together
Le mer 2 août 2006 11:23, Loïc Minier a écrit :
- status of the transition Wiki page: a summary of steps which are
in progress (pointer to python transition pseudo-bug, pointers to
the list of bugs to be fixed in the mass bug filing, description of
the step)
that could have been
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
that could have been more clear, but I do have such tools to follow the
transition, I use[1]. The two rounds of mass bug have been package that
build public modules and extensions, and then all the other ones (+
some missed one at the first
Hi,Package zeroc-icee-translators lists an outstanding bug #369605 filed 63 days ago. I don't know how to properly handle this situation since:- It was actually a bug report against package zeroc-ice. zeroc-icee-translators depends on any version of the binary icecpp package, from zeroc-ice
close 369605
thanks
Francisco Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package zeroc-icee-translators lists an outstanding bug #369605 filed
63 days ago. I don't know how to properly handle this situation
since:
- It was actually a bug report against package zeroc-ice.
No, it wasn't. it was against
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 12:23, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 16:47 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
I do use darcs to track patches against upstream. I really don't
understand the whole cdbs/dpatch/whatever thing -- why use a hack to
manage your patches when you could use a
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 09:41:02AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* John Goerzen [Tue, Aug 01 2006, 04:47:13PM]:
I do use darcs to track patches against upstream. I really don't
understand the whole cdbs/dpatch/whatever thing -- why use a hack to
manage your patches when
On August 1, 2006 at 1:04PM +0100,
ian (at davenant.greenend.org.uk) wrote:
Tatsuya Kinoshita writes (Re: virtual packages `pinentry' and
`pinentry-x11'):
Hmm, I have not yet understand the policy 3.6:
| All packages should use virtual package names where appropriate, and
|
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 10:17:57AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 23:47, John Goerzen wrote:
I do use darcs to track patches against upstream. I really don't
understand the whole cdbs/dpatch/whatever thing -- why use a hack to
manage your patches when you could use
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:23:31AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 16:47 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
I do use darcs to track patches against upstream. I really don't
understand the whole cdbs/dpatch/whatever thing -- why use a hack to
manage your patches when you could
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 09:47:10AM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 07:06:06PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Falk Hueffner wrote:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:58:23AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
long is not appropriate to
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 16:34, John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:23:31AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 16:47 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
I do use darcs to track patches against upstream. I really don't
understand the whole cdbs/dpatch/whatever thing
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 05:20:26PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
Actually, I disagree with that. I always hate having to work with a
package that uses a patch management system, because then I have to
learn the system before I can do any work on the package. And there are
several systems.
Hello!
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:32:13 +0200, John Goerzen wrote:
If upstream uses darcs or git, you could use their repo directly.
If they use CVS or SVN, you could use tailor to track it. If they
use Arch, you can use arch2darcs to track it.
For a tailor mini-HowTo, please give a look at [1].
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should better _read_ the GPL and try to understand it.
Good plan.
Did you have some time to make your plan reality meanwhile?
GPL §2 defines what the work is and requres to publish the whole
work under the GPL in case that that work
Hello!
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:49:06 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
The first time I generated the darcs -upstream repository, I didn't
include the CVS folders (because anyway it's a lintian error if
^^^
they're present in
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 17:31, John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 05:20:26PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
Actually, I disagree with that. I always hate having to work with a
package that uses a patch management system, because then I have to
learn the system before I can do
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: José L. Redrejo Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: recordmydesktop
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : John Varouhakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://recordmydesktop.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:01:27PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
How is that not true if one knows a given patch system and does know
about your VCS and needs to work on one of your packages. Do they have
They just apt-get source, hack away, and send me a diff.
Also true for any debian
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 18:35, John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:01:27PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
How is that not true if one knows a given patch system and does know
about your VCS and needs to work on one of your packages. Do they
have
They just apt-get
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:01:27PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
How is that not true if one knows a given patch system and does know
about your VCS and needs to work on one of your packages. Do they have
They just apt-get source, hack away, and
George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you lose debian specific patches to be clearly separated from the
upstrem source (digging diff.gz for that is not fun), unless one knows
where to find
First, what is a Debian-specific patch? Isn't everything in diff.gz
that?
Right, but you
One of the us mirrors is not working properly. It's been faulty for
at least a week.
The mirror is: 204.152.191.7 (mirrors1.kernel.org)
To whoever might be in charge of this, it should be removed from the
rotation of both http.us.debian.org and ftp.us.debian.org, and
notified that it's having
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: autofw
Version : 0.3.3
Upstream Author : Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://baruch.ev-en.org/proj/autofw/
* License : GPLv2
Description : Automatic firewall
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you lose debian specific patches to be clearly separated from the
upstrem source (digging diff.gz for that is not fun), unless one knows
where to find
First, what is a Debian-specific patch? Isn't
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 20:11, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you lose debian specific patches to be clearly separated from the
upstrem source (digging diff.gz for that is not fun), unless one
knows where to
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you lose debian specific patches to be clearly separated from the
upstrem source (digging diff.gz for that is not fun), unless one knows
where to find
First,
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:47:01PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
to learn how we deal with this all.
This is fine, but (again) you forget about your 'apt-get source' users, which
NO. They need not care. They can just hack and send me diffs. My
debian/changelog will already document what
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 21:01, John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:47:01PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
to learn how we deal with this all.
Ok, third time. Please do not do that:
To: George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Sending to
On Monday 31 July 2006 08:18, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I
believe there are a large percentage of machines without
popularity-contest installed for all the architectures, and that this
do not skew the result significantly for any of the architecture.
I'd be prepared to believe *some* bias
Hi folks,
I just uploaded a security fix to unstable, with high urgency. However, I got
this response:
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 12:02, you wrote:
Warning: high (security) is not a valid urgency; it will be treated as low
by testing.
Accepted:
cheesetracker_0.9.9-6.diff.gz
to
#include hallo.h
* John Goerzen [Wed, Aug 02 2006, 08:27:32AM]:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 09:41:02AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* John Goerzen [Tue, Aug 01 2006, 04:47:13PM]:
I do use darcs to track patches against upstream. I really don't
understand the whole
#include hallo.h
* John Goerzen [Wed, Aug 02 2006, 01:01:51PM]:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:47:01PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
to learn how we deal with this all.
This is fine, but (again) you forget about your 'apt-get source' users,
which
NO. They need not care. They can just
* Otavio Salvador [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:43:56 -0300]:
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then each developer can prepare a set of changes offline, do all the
branching, merging, commiting and uncommiting (gotta love that) that
they want, and when they're done, do e.g.:
% bzr push
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Otavio Salvador [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:43:56 -0300]:
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then each developer can prepare a set of changes offline, do all the
branching, merging, commiting and uncommiting (gotta love that) that
they want, and
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 21:44, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Otavio Salvador [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:43:56 -0300]:
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then each developer can prepare a set of changes offline, do all
the branching, merging,
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 09:09:12PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 21:01, John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:47:01PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
to learn how we deal with this all.
Ok, third time. Please do not do that:
To: George Danchev [EMAIL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: reniced
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Christian Garbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.cgarbs.de/stuff.en.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description
Adeodato Simó, 2006-08-02 21:20:09 +0200 :
% bzr push sftp://costa.debian.org/bzr/pkg-xiph/vorbis-tools
[...]
Ask in #alioth. Note, however, that TTBOMK still does not offer HTTP
access, so if you want that, better stick to htdocs for a while.
I hope to be able to bribe buxy to provide
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 21:28:16 +0200
Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Bart,
* Package name: reniced
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Christian Garbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
On 8/3/06, Margarita Manterola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the us mirrors is not working properly. It's been faulty for
at least a week.
The mirror is: 204.152.191.7 (mirrors1.kernel.org)
To whoever might be in charge of this, it should be removed from the
rotation of both
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:36:18PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
NO. They need not care. They can just hack and send me diffs. My
debian/changelog will already document what has been going on anyway.
Heh. So they need two copies, one where they do modifications, then diff
those and send
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 23:04 +0200, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 21:28:16 +0200
Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Bart,
* Package name: reniced
Version : 1.5
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:31:29PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Really, I think that getting patches in darcs from people that are using
darcs send is not only easier for me as a maintainer, but also easier
Much easier as storing the mail attachment under debian/patches? I doubt.
Yes, indeed
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 03:08:06PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Aug 01, David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, pbuilder and debootstrap are considered absolutely critical for
serious work.
That's a bold statement.
--
ciao,
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 12:44:19PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.0005 +0100]:
Subversion, in conjunction with alioth, has risen dramatically in
Debian to accomodate team-based maintainance. There are of course
plenty of challengers,
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:04:53AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
I agree, dpatch co seem to be more accessible: they are files you
can touch; they're not an abstract concept (branch) which you
can work with, but which is not tangible.
This is another possible reason for SVN's success:
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 15:15, Bart Martens wrote:
Instead of editing the scripts in /etc/init.d to give daemons the
nicelevel you want (and get prompted at every package update because
these files are conffiles) you can just run reniced once a day.
Wow, that sounds like an annoying bug
* David Nusinow [Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:37:23 +]:
(I'm seriously
interested in setting up git.debian.org for XSF work, for example*),
* If anyone else is interested in this, contact me and we'll talk
There is _something_ in costa:/srv/git.debian.org/git already.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:56:44PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* David Nusinow [Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:37:23 +]:
(I'm seriously
interested in setting up git.debian.org for XSF work, for example*),
* If anyone else is interested in this, contact me and we'll talk
There is _something_
Le mercredi 02 août 2006 à 23:15 +0200, Bart Martens a écrit :
Instead of editing the scripts in /etc/init.d to give daemons the
nicelevel you want (and get prompted at every package update because
these files are conffiles) you can just run reniced once a day.
Out of curiosity, what
Le mercredi 02 août 2006 à 15:34 -0500, John Goerzen a écrit :
Ok, third time. Please do not do that:
To: George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Then SET YOUR HEADERS to reflect that, like everyone else does.
Which headers?
(If you are talking about
also sprach Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.02.2308 +0100]:
Out of curiosity, what real-life uses does this tool have? Daemons don't
need to be reniced, so there must be something else.
reniced /(g(cc|++)|c(c|++))/ 15
or whatever the syntax is. I often wanted to have such a feature
On Thursday 03 August 2006 00:11, Josselin Mouette took the opportunity to
say:
Le mercredi 02 août 2006 à 15:34 -0500, John Goerzen a écrit :
Ok, third time. Please do not do that:
To: George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Then SET YOUR HEADERS to
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:01:27PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 17:31, John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 05:20:26PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
debian/patches/ as separate file, how do I know how to update/remove/etc
There would be no
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:31:18PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think people that are NMUing packages rarely care about this.
When NMU'ing a package, I'd really appreciate to know which changes have
which purpose and which specificity. In particular
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:54:51PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 18:35, John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:01:27PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
How is that not true if one knows a given patch system and does know
about your VCS and needs to work
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:47:01PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 20:11, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you lose debian specific patches to be clearly separated from the
upstrem
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:36:18PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* John Goerzen [Wed, Aug 02 2006, 01:01:51PM]:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:47:01PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
to learn how we deal with this all.
This is fine, but (again) you forget about your 'apt-get
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 22:29 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
That's in fact an issue that made me feel sceptical about bzr, darcs
and
mercury. All of them require a shell account or some scripting through
a
special mail address to commit changes. And it's not only the recent
kernel
On Thursday 03 August 2006 00:45, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:47:01PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 20:11, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you lose debian
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: dpkg-view
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://dpkg-view.alioth.debian.org
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 04:32:58PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should better _read_ the GPL and try to understand it.
Good plan.
Did you have some time to make your plan reality meanwhile?
I can quote major parts of it by heart since a
also sprach Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.02.2248 +0100]:
* Package name: dpkg-view
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://dpkg-view.alioth.debian.org
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 12:28:35AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Thursday 03 August 2006 00:11, Josselin Mouette took the opportunity to
say:
Le mercredi 02 août 2006 à 15:34 -0500, John Goerzen a écrit :
Ok, third time. Please do not do that:
To: George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
also sprach Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.02.2248 +0100]:
* Package name: dpkg-view
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://dpkg-view.alioth.debian.org
* License
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:08:00AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Thursday 03 August 2006 00:45, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:47:01PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 20:11, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So upgraded systems don't get the benefits of certain changes to the
installer's
defaults, or defaults in programs used by the installer.
I first thought of this when I noticed the change in the default tuning for
ext2 partitions created by mke2fs. Notably, dir_index and filetype are turned
on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 13:53:00 +0200
Source: linux-libertine
Binary: linux-libertine
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 09:33:10 -0600
Source: avarice
Binary: avarice
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:34:10 +0200
Source: kflickr
Binary: kflickr
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 23:03:09 -0700
Source: dstat
Binary: dstat
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.6.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 03:02:07 +0200
Source: squid
Binary: squid squid-cgi squidclient squid-common
Architecture: source sparc all
Version: 2.6.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Luigi Gangitano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:11:42 +0200
Source: curator
Binary: curator
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:42:52 -0700
Source: id3
Binary: id3
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Robert Woodcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert Woodcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:11:24 +0200
Source: amphetamine
Binary: amphetamine
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.10-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Games Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sam Hocevar (Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 21:21:19 -0400
Source: ikiwiki
Binary: ikiwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:23:40 -0700
Source: aptitude
Binary: aptitude-doc-cs aptitude-doc-fr aptitude-doc-fi aptitude-doc-en aptitude
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:44:26 +0200
Source: fetchmail
Binary: fetchmailconf fetchmail
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 6.3.4-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Fetchmail Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 11:46:51 +0300
Source: libnet-ping-external-perl
Binary: libnet-ping-external-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eugene Krivdyuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:09:23 -0400
Source: tictactoe
Binary: tictactoe
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ernesto Nadir Crespo Avila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ernesto Nadir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 22:50:57 -0400
Source: pythoncard
Binary: pythoncard-doc pythoncard-tools pythoncard python-pythoncard
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.1-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ernesto Nadir Crespo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:59:15 +1000
Source: libggiwmh
Binary: libggiwmh0-dev libggiwmh0-target-x libggiwmh0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:59:33 +0200
Source: glibc
Binary: libc0.1-prof libc6-dev-amd64 locales-all libc6-i686 libc6-dev-ppc64
libc0.3-pic glibc-doc libc0.3 libc0.1-i686 libc6.1-dev libc6-s390x
libnss-files-udeb libc6-dev-sparc64
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:27:41 +0200
Source: gjots2
Binary: gjots2
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.3.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Khalid El Fathi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Khalid El Fathi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 07:54:16 +0100
Source: boo
Binary: boo
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.7.6.2237-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:10:12 +0200
Source: kbfx
Binary: kbfx
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.4.9.1+20060611cvs-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian KDE Extras Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Fathi Boudra
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
