On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 02:06:25AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Also if udeb:s are going to be using xz then it makes even more sense to use
it for everything.
µdebs won't use the xz default, though. (The compression for them will be
handled in debhelper.)
With the compression scheme I posted
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:13:05AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2012, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote:
Being forced to upgrade to a new major version by a stable security support
is nothing we should force our users to. Debian stable is known for
(usually) painfree updates
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 09:27:26AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 02:06:25AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Also if udeb:s are going to be using xz then it makes even more sense to use
it for everything.
µdebs won't use the xz default, though. (The compression for them
* Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) [120512 23:06]:
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
Unless we expect that two different binary packages that can be
co-installed will distribute the same directory under different
ownership or permissions for a good reason, why not simply let dpkg
Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:13:05AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2012, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote:
Being forced to upgrade to a new major version by a stable security support
is nothing we should force our users to. Debian stable is known for
(usually)
On Sun, 13 May 2012, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
Yes, it's difficult to work out. I'd also be worried by the
(potential?) set of users who may just use Wordpress because it's
already packaged and who therefore assume that it's likely to be a
safe option. Without that, they may just
Hi,
I'm going to reintroduce unversioned libnspr4 and libnss3 for various
reasons. These packages used to exist in the Debian archive, but the
last time they were seen was in sarge. The first release *not* including
them was etch. This is quite some time ago.
The versions they had by then had an
Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
The versions they had by then had an epoch. Supposedly, to make the new
versions greater than these, I have to add an epoch. But do I really
need to care about making the new versions greater than these packages
last seen 4 years ago?
On 12-05-13 at 11:16am, Mike Hommey wrote:
I'm going to reintroduce unversioned libnspr4 and libnss3 for various
reasons. These packages used to exist in the Debian archive, but the
last time they were seen was in sarge. The first release *not*
including them was etch. This is quite some
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:16:13AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to reintroduce unversioned libnspr4 and libnss3 for various
reasons. These packages used to exist in the Debian archive, but the
last time they were seen was in sarge. The first release *not* including
them was etch.
* Andreas Barth [2012-05-13 11:06 +0200]:
* Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) [120512 23:06]:
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
Unless we expect that two different binary packages that can be
co-installed will distribute the same directory under different
ownership or permissions
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 09:55 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:13:05AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2012, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote:
Being forced to upgrade to a new major version by a stable security
support
is nothing we should force our users
On 12-05-13 at 11:49am, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
The versions they had by then had an epoch. Supposedly, to make the
new versions greater than these, I have to add an epoch. But do I
really need to care about making the new versions
On 12-05-13 at 12:16pm, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:16:13AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
I'm going to reintroduce unversioned libnspr4 and libnss3 for
various reasons. These packages used to exist in the Debian archive,
but the last time they were seen was in sarge. The
On 2012-05-13 11:49 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
The versions they had by then had an epoch. Supposedly, to make the new
versions greater than these, I have to add an epoch. But do I really
need to care about making the new versions
On 05/13/2012 11:32 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2012, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
Yes, it's difficult to work out. I'd also be worried by the
(potential?) set of users who may just use Wordpress because it's
already packaged and who therefore assume that it's likely to
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:40:14 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2012-05-13 11:49 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
The versions they had by then had an epoch. Supposedly, to make the new
versions greater than these, I have to add an
Hi,
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:26:26AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
The value is the same as for most packages: it's easy to install and
easy to upgrade (I assume; I don't use Wordpress). Yes, the expected
if someone in Debian would want to make that effort, I'd say that
Wordpress and the
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:40:14PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2012-05-13 11:49 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
The versions they had by then had an epoch. Supposedly, to make the new
versions greater than these, I have to add an
On sam., 2012-05-12 at 23:45 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Being forced to upgrade to a new major version by a stable security support is
nothing we should force our users to. Debian stable is known for (usually)
painfree updates and bugfixes only, not for shipping completely new versions
with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as they
have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be found in
the attached dd-list. The bugs that put them on this list can be found
in the removals.txt file (also
Le Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:16:13AM +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit :
Hi,
I'm going to reintroduce unversioned libnspr4 and libnss3 for various
reasons. These packages used to exist in the Debian archive, but the
last time they were seen was in sarge. The first release *not* including
them was
I can get #651620 (rocksndiamonds)
I fixed this some time ago for Slackware.
2012/5/13 Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as they
have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 02:23:38PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Sounds like it would be safer to go with an epoch.
You could vary the package name slightly instead, but I don't have a suggestion
as to how, and you have to live with either.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
[I'm not subscribed to debian-devel at the moment, so please cc me on
responses in the unlikely event that there need to be any.]
I've uploaded new versions of libtiff4-dev and libtiff-dev (now the name
for libtiff5-dev, with libtiff5-dev as a virtual package). libtiff-dev
now provides both
Hi,
On 12/05/12 12:23, Peter Palfrader wrote:
This may not be entirely trivial to solve. find | xargs constructs at best
mitigate this to a race. While chown does have a --no-derefence flag, this
does not protect us in the case of hardlinks. chmod has no such flag, and
it'd
useful only
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 10:35:48 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
[I'm not subscribed to debian-devel at the moment, so please cc me on
responses in the unlikely event that there need to be any.]
I've uploaded new versions of libtiff4-dev and libtiff-dev (now the name
for libtiff5-dev, with
Le vendredi 11 mai 2012 à 11:37 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
I have /lib/systemd/system/foo.service and want to change something in
it, I then create /etc/systemd/system/foo.service with a copy of the
/lib one plus whatever changes I want.
The version in /lib is then updated. How is the
On Sunday, May 13, 2012 06:28:03, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-05-13 at 11:49am, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
The versions they had by then had an epoch. Supposedly, to make the
new versions greater than these, I have to add an epoch.
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 16:43:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
Please don't do that. libtiff-dev needs to point to libtiff4 until
after the wheezy release.
The files have been moved out of the upload queue for now.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stig Sandbeck Mathisen s...@debian.org
* Package name: grok
Version : 1.20110708.1
Upstream Author : Jordan Sissel
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/semicomplete/wiki/Grok
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Hi,
Is there anybody familar with Solaris IPS manifests [1]?
They are terrible and unflexible, but allow describing users, permissions
etc.
I thinks post/pre/install/remove scripts are create advantage, cause
they allow do dirty things *iff* needed.
[1]
On Sun, 13 May 2012, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
Hi,
On 12/05/12 12:23, Peter Palfrader wrote:
This may not be entirely trivial to solve. find | xargs constructs at best
mitigate this to a race. While chown does have a --no-derefence flag, this
does not protect us in the case of
Adam Borowski wrote:
Except that busybox has xz support, and is loaded from an udeb way before
any regular debs are seen. Ie, there is no reason to stop core packages
from using decent compression.
Yes there is. busybox is used on a variety of systems, which are
unlikely to have xz installed.
Carsten Hey cars...@debian.org writes:
* Andreas Barth [2012-05-13 11:06 +0200]:
* Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) [120512 23:06]:
Usually because the UID is dynamically assigned and the user is
created in the postinst, so there's no way for dpkg do do this at
unpack.
You would need to
Jon Dowland j...@debian.org writes:
If we can't provide stable packages then I don't see what value we add
by packaging it at all. I wonder what the ratio of wordpress+debian
users is who use the package versus those that hand-install anyway, and
whether that is something that could ever be
Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org writes:
I'm going to reintroduce unversioned libnspr4 and libnss3 for various
reasons. These packages used to exist in the Debian archive, but the
last time they were seen was in sarge. The first release *not* including
them was etch. This is quite some time ago.
On Sunday, May 13, 2012 12:42:46, Joey Hess wrote:
Adam Borowski wrote:
Except that busybox has xz support, and is loaded from an udeb way before
any regular debs are seen. Ie, there is no reason to stop core
packages from using decent compression.
Yes there is. busybox is used on a
Le vendredi 11 mai 2012 à 11:25 +0200, Gergely Nagy a écrit :
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org writes:
The fact that these files are in /lib and shouldn't be touched by the admin
doesn't make them less configuration files. They still match the above
definition from Wikipedia.
Can I point
* Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) [120513 18:52]:
Carsten Hey cars...@debian.org writes:
* Andreas Barth [2012-05-13 11:06 +0200]:
and let dpkg handle all of that?
This doesn't look like a task that should be done by dpkg itself;
instead debhelper or dpkg-maintscript-helper could be
On 12-05-13 at 10:51am, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Sunday, May 13, 2012 06:28:03, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-05-13 at 11:49am, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
The versions they had by then had an epoch. Supposedly, to make
the new
2012/5/13 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org:
kFreeBSD Specific
-
* Kernel updated to version 8.3.
* Option to use new 9.0 kernel during install.
* Detect LVM devices.
LVM detection is still not complete, we still need to figure out where
to put the command to load LVM
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Le vendredi 11 mai 2012 à 11:25 +0200, Gergely Nagy a écrit :
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org writes:
The fact that these files are in /lib and shouldn't be touched by the admin
doesn't make them less configuration files. They still match the above
On 05/13/2012 08:12 PM, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:26:26AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
The value is the same as for most packages: it's easy to install and
easy to upgrade (I assume; I don't use Wordpress). Yes, the expected
if someone in Debian would want
On 05/13/2012 05:32 PM, Russell Coker wrote:
There are lots of people who choose Wordpress because it seems to provide a
lot of features that other systems don't provide, which includes a
significant
set of free themes and plugins which are available from Wordpress.org (not in
Debian).
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sjoerd Simons sjo...@debian.org
* Package name: webrtc-audio-processing
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Google Inc
* URL :
http://freedesktop.org/software/pulseaudio/webrtc-audio-processing/
* License : BSD
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Kluyver tho...@kluyver.me.uk
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-notify2
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Thomas Kluyver tho...@kluyver.me.uk
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/notify2
*
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Kluyver tho...@kluyver.me.uk
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name : python-notify2
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Thomas Kluyver tho...@kluyver.me.uk
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/notify2
*
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:59:11PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Sunday, May 13, 2012 12:42:46, Joey Hess wrote:
Many arm systems have 64 mb of ram or less.
The NSLU2 boxes that were common to install a port of Debian onto are one
such
example, although I'm not sure how realistic a
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:42:46PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Adam Borowski wrote:
Except that busybox has xz support, and is loaded from an udeb way before
any regular debs are seen. Ie, there is no reason to stop core packages
from using decent compression.
Yes there is. busybox is used
On Sunday, May 13, 2012 13:41:13, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-05-13 at 10:51am, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Sunday, May 13, 2012 06:28:03, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-05-13 at 11:49am, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
The versions they
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 21:35:16 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
That's why busybox includes xz :)
Not all relevant busybox builds do, which is the point.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 02:54:40PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On sam., 2012-05-12 at 23:45 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Being forced to upgrade to a new major version by a stable security support
is
nothing we should force our users to. Debian stable is known for (usually)
painfree
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 09:49:19PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 21:35:16 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
That's why busybox includes xz :)
Not all relevant busybox builds do, which is the point.
Could you please mention which ones do not? And if so, how are they
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller steffen_moel...@gmx.de
* Package name: poclbm
* URL :
* License : public domain
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python OpenCL BitCoin Miner
BitCoins are a digital currency, exchanged freely against
Le samedi 12 mai 2012 22:56:39, Russ Allbery a écrit :
Thomas Preud'homme robo...@celest.fr writes:
Are you referring to [1]? Because the full paragraph is about Program's
source code.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2000/11/msg00260.html
1. You may copy and distribute
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 01:41:32PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On a related note...
While we might criticise rpm for its bad conffile handling, dpkg is
itself fairly woeful, and if we change one thing for wheezy+1, it
should be sane conffile handling. dpkg should never forget about
conffiles;
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hey folks,
Remembering the fun that we had during the Squeeze release with trying
to make single-CD installations work well, it's time to consider what
we're going to *claim* to support in Wheezy. We've had a history of
supporting the
Adam Borowski wrote:
Could you please mention which ones do not? And if so, how are they
relevant/are they fixable?
As one of the maintainers of debootstrap, I am perhaps more aware than
some how broadly it's used. Ok..
They use it on Android (41,600 hits including
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Russ Allbery:
So, I think [0] is the most astute message in that thread.
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2000/11/msg00251.html
I thought that too when I first read it, but later in the thread are very
cogent arguments for why it's wrong and
The package is already functional at
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-escience/poclbm
but I am not feeling like maintaining the package for the
distribution. If you read this and feel like maintaining
it, even as a newbie to Debian, you may contact me as a
mentor/sponsor.
So why
Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com writes:
Hmmm, I really meant that I found point 1 to be quite astute. I agree,
the conclusion is quite off. The copyright file is very important in
binary packages, and should have full-text licenses.
The important aspect of point 1 is the
On Sun, 13 May 2012 18:36:09 -0400
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hey folks,
Remembering the fun that we had during the Squeeze release with trying
to make single-CD installations work well, it's time to consider what
Thomas Preud'homme robo...@celest.fr writes:
Back to the redistribution. In the section 4 (Conveying Verbatim
Copies), what is discussed is the redistribution of the Program as
source code form. Every word is part of the same sentence, whose
structure is: You may convey verbatim copies (…)
Link Hero - Quality High Page Rank Publishers
Is this email not displaying correctly?
[1]View it in your browser.
Links:
1.
http://us4.campaign-archive2.com/?u=1e08ee3aba4b4cdcf69915a62id=0512af8103e=59da05a0a5
Special not offered on our website
All Links Posted are Permanent
Neil Williams wrote:
supporting only the smaller/lighter desktop environments is exactly
what comes out of accepting that the first two options just won't be
acceptable. Changing compression is only putting off the inevitable.
There's *no* reason to think that GNOME or KDE are going to get
On May 14, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
I'd support XFCE4 as the default Graphical Desktop Environment and
possibly putting GNOME (and KDE) as alternative options.
What is the point of providing a default which is not what people
usually want?
Just document that a normal desktop
Dmitry,
Pylucene is an incredibly useful package. The very best thing is for me to
no longer be involved as a maintainer for pylucene. But in the short term,
if you want or need me to sponsor an upload, I can do so as early as
tomorrow. Let me know.
On Dom 13 May 2012 21:40:10 Marco d'Itri escribió:
[snip]
Does anybody actually know that people routinely try to install desktop
systems with only a CD and no networking, and why?
What is the use case for this? Cheap DVD readers have been around for
over 10 years now.
Actually, I was going
Excelent work!!!
2012/5/13 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the first alpha
release of the installer for Debian Wheezy.
Improvements in this release of the installer
=
Network configuration
Hello,
Joey Hess, le Sun 13 May 2012 20:39:20 -0400, a écrit :
Neil Williams wrote:
supporting only the smaller/lighter desktop environments is exactly
what comes out of accepting that the first two options just won't be
acceptable. Changing compression is only putting off the inevitable.
Dear all,
is the BTS and QA page undergoing some changes? I am asking because
some things behave strange:
* bug 670494 filed against ptex-bin, which is currently maintained
by debian-tex-maint mailing list, but the bug report was sent
(long after take over) to the old maintainer, so we
On 12-05-13 at 10:26pm, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
On Dom 13 May 2012 21:40:10 Marco d'Itri escribió:
[snip]
Does anybody actually know that people routinely try to install desktop
systems with only a CD and no networking, and why?
What is the use case for this? Cheap DVD
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Guimard x.guim...@free.fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libapache-session-browseable-perl
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Xavier Guimard x.guim...@free.fr
* URL :
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 06:19:25PM -0700, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
Dmitry,
Pylucene is an incredibly useful package. The very best thing is for me to
no longer be involved as a maintainer for pylucene. But in the short term,
if you want or need me to sponsor an upload, I can do so as early as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 15:02:31 +0900
Source: hiki
Binary: hiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.8.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Taku YASUI t...@debian.org
Changed-By: Taku YASUI t...@debian.org
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 07:42:13 +0200
Source: mod-mono
Binary: libapache2-mod-mono
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.10-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Mono Group pkg-mono-gr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 06:25:09 +
Source: grdesktop
Binary: grdesktop
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.23+d040330-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bart Martens ba...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bart Martens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 15:23:55 +0900
Source: kumofs
Binary: kumofs
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.4.13-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Taku YASUI t...@debian.org
Changed-By: Taku YASUI t...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 10:24:15 +0200
Source: mbr
Binary: mbr mbr-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.1.11-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Santiago Garcia Mantinan ma...@debian.org
Changed-By: Santiago Garcia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 09:31:43 +0200
Source: xnee
Binary: xnee libxnee0 libxnee-dev libxnee-dbg xnee-doc cnee gnee
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 3.13-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Vincent Bernat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 10:48:43 +0200
Source: fatrat
Binary: fatrat fatrat-data fatrat-dev
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.1.3-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Cristian Greco crist...@debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 15:19:28 +0200
Source: gegl
Binary: gegl libgegl-0.2-0 libgegl-dev libgegl-doc libgegl-0.2-0-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.2.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matteo F. Vescovi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 08:33:04 +
Source: libcgic
Binary: libcgic2 libcgic-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.05-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bart Martens ba...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bart Martens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 10:47:37 +0200
Source: httpcomponents-core
Binary: libhttpcore-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.1.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Paleino da...@debian.org
Changed-By: David Paleino
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:26:50 +0100
Source: lugaru
Binary: lugaru
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0~20110520.1+hge4354+dfsg-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Games Team pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 17:59:48 -0700
Source: dbus-c++
Binary: libdbus-c++-1-0 libdbus-c++-dev libdbus-c++-bin libdbus-c++-doc
libdbus-c++-dbg
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.9.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 17:36:50 +1000
Source: digikam
Binary: digikam showfoto digikam-dbg digikam-data digikam-doc kipi-plugins
kipi-plugins-common
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 4:2.6.0~rc-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 10:28:42 +0200
Source: gimp
Binary: libgimp2.0 gimp gimp-data libgimp2.0-dev libgimp2.0-doc gimp-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.8.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ari Pollak
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 11:27:49 +0200
Source: haskell-http
Binary: libghc-http-dev libghc-http-prof libghc-http-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1:4000.2.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 11:31:48 +0200
Source: haskell-network
Binary: libghc-network-dev libghc-network-prof libghc-network-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.3.0.13-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 11:38:16 +0200
Source: haskell-platform
Binary: haskell-platform haskell-platform-prof haskell-platform-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 2012.1.0.0~debian2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 11:33:54 +0200
Source: haskell-stm
Binary: libghc-stm-dev libghc-stm-prof libghc-stm-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 11:35:51 +0200
Source: haskell-syb
Binary: libghc-syb-dev libghc-syb-prof libghc-syb-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.3.6.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 11:50:38 +0200
Source: haskell-text
Binary: libghc-text-dev libghc-text-prof libghc-text-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.11.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 12:52:58 +0300
Source: libical
Binary: libical-dev libical0 libical-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.48-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Fathi Boudra f...@debian.org
Changed-By: Fathi Boudra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 12:24:37 +0300
Source: qtwebkit
Binary: libqtwebkit-dev libqtwebkit4 libqtwebkit-qmlwebkitplugin
libqtwebkit4-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.2.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 19:12:10 +0200
Source: sludge
Binary: sludge-engine sludge-devkit sludge-compiler sludge-doc
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Games Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 11:33:27 +0200
Source: xserver-xorg-video-mga
Binary: xserver-xorg-video-mga
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:1.5.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 20:02:22 +0200
Source: blender
Binary: blender blender-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.63a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
