Hi,
On Mon, 06 May 2013, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Nah, the webinterface just should end up like the DAM webinterface: You
do whatever you need, then click a button - and voila, there is
everything ready to copy/paste into a MUA. Send with sig, done.
Why? This is just a band-aid and not what I
On Mon, 06 May 2013, Helmut Grohne wrote:
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 04:08:07PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
1) IMHO, services/daemons (e.g. apache, ejabberd, etc.) that listen per
default on the network (unless loopback only) shouldn't be started per
default, after being installed.
On 05/07/2013 12:23 PM, Adrian Alves wrote:
Why I vote NO for ppa in Debian,
Something that everybody loves about debian is you have everything in
one repo for stable testing or development, the use of PPA it couse
things like happens in ubuntu when u need something important you need
to
On Tue, May 7, 2013 02:55, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 14:59 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
1) We should try to educate users not to use mod_php.
If Best Practices such as this were documented such as on the Debian
wiki then it would go a long way to making this easy for
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
provided as a hook. You also might want to look at the
policyrcd-script-zg2 package.
Except for chroots that do not run the boot-time scripts, this mechanism
is mostly useless. /etc/init.d/rc doesn't know about policy-rc.d and thus
you can't use it
On 7 May 2013 17:03, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Now, if I had PPA, then I could follow upstream release cycles. Every 6
months, I would destroy the PPA for OpenStack stable -2, and create a
new stable PPA. I could put all the backport software I need in there.
No need to worry
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ronny Wegener wegener.ro...@gmail.com
* Package name: hakuneko
Version : 1.0.3
Upstream Author : Ronny Wegener wegener.ro...@gmail.com
* URL : http://hakuneko.googlecode.com
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C++
On Wednesday, May 01, 2013 09:28:10 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
Would there be any hard objection to a source package format based on
git-bundle?
Hi Daniel,
while I'm a big fan of Git, I don't see that much gain in a git based source
package format. I also assume that it would be a lot of work to
On 13204 March 1977, Adrian Alves wrote:
Why I vote NO for ppa in Debian,
Unless someone runs a GR, its not a vote.
Im happy for changes/improvements, but it will come, so a no isn't the way.
Something that everybody loves about debian is you have everything in one
repo for stable testing or
On 06-05-13 14:49, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
now might be the right time to start a discussion about release goals
for jessie. Here are some points that come into my mind right now (and
some were already discussed very recently):
* multiarch compatible binNMUs
* discarding maintainer
]] Brian May
On 7 May 2013 17:03, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Now, if I had PPA, then I could follow upstream release cycles. Every 6
months, I would destroy the PPA for OpenStack stable -2, and create a
new stable PPA. I could put all the backport software I need in there.
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 10:06:34 +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584865
discusses a prototype that I internally use. It hooks to policy-rc.d to
prevent services from starting during package installation and to dpkg
post-invoke to detect new
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
now might be the right time to start a discussion about release goals
for jessie. Here are some points that come into my mind right now (and
some were already discussed very recently):
* multiarch compatible binNMUs
On 04 May 21:08, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
* Package name: libtest-tabledriven-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Jonathan Rockway jrockway AT cpan.org
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexandre Rossi alexandre.ro...@gmail.com
* Package name: libhtmlcleaner-java
Version : 2.2
Upstream Author : Vladimir Nikic vni...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL : http://htmlcleaner.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Hi!
To finish up the install-info split from dpkg[0], I'd like to finally
remove the temporary wrapper from dpkg. This means the remaining tail
of packages still calling it directly from maintainer scripts need to
be dealt with [1]. Most might just need a rebuild if using debhelper
and not
Hi,
On Mon, 06 May 2013 14:49:57 +0200
Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
now might be the right time to start a discussion about release goals
for jessie.
* xz for default package compression (as I said in last summer :)
* handling release goal/target/task via BTS to clear what is
Hi Wookey,
On Tue, 7 May 2013 03:04:50 +0100, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
(just a decision to leave arch-independent headers in /usr/include and
move arch-dependent headers to /usr/include/triplet).
Doesn't this limit us to cross-compiling only across Debian architectures? If
we go for a
Hi,
On Mon, 06 May 2013 14:49:57 +0200, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
now might be the right time to start a discussion about release goals
for jessie. Here are some points that come into my mind right now (and
some were already discussed very recently):
On 05/07/2013 03:11 PM, Brian May wrote:
On 7 May 2013 17:03, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org
mailto:z...@debian.org wrote:
Now, if I had PPA, then I could follow upstream release cycles.
Every 6
months, I would destroy the PPA for OpenStack stable -2, and create a
new stable
Andreas Beckmann anbe at debian.org writes:
now might be the right time to start a discussion about release goals
for jessie. Here are some points that come into my mind right now (and
* Resolve that /bin/sh issue (see the open RC bugs against dash which
just got ignored for a stable release
Paul Wise pabs at debian.org writes:
I think you may have misunderstood the Debian PPA proposal. It will
not be like the Ubuntu PPA system where anyone can upload a package to
Call it DPA then?
Debianprojectmember Personal Archive
bye,
//mirabilos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Debian backports offers me *one* repository. I need 3 of them:
I don't see why. The combination of suites we have now should be
enough. Here is what I would do...
- stable -1 (currently OpenStack Folsom)
Ignore, is there any reason why
Am 07.05.2013 10:10, schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
I would like to see the elimination of ENABLE-style variables in
/etc/default snippets, to enable or disable initscripts, as a jessie
release goal.
These things are ugly, annoying hacks that try to work around the fact
that we can't ship
On May 07, Thorsten Glaser t...@debian.org wrote:
My stated goal here is, indeed, to be able to run at least some useful
configurations of a Debian installation without *both* bash and dash
installed.
What is the point?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
I'm planning to upload a new version of libselinux in unstable
soon. This new version is dropping the /selinux directory that was used
in the past as the selinuxfs mountpoint.
Since Wheezy, the library is mounting selinuxfs under /sys/fs/selinux,
and falling back to /selinux if the former
Hi Laurent,
Am 07.05.2013 16:51, schrieb Laurent Bigonville:
I'm intentionally not forcing the migration to the new mountpoint nor
forcing the deletion of the directory on upgrade as, in my mind, if a
Wheezy machine is still using the old mountpoint that might be for
perfectly valid reasons
Hello,
As Guillem asked me in a bug report (#695620), I'm bringing this to
debian-devel.
The latest version of libselinux is now using libpcre3 instead of the
regex functions from the glibc. This is improving the performances
quite substantially when relabeling the filesystem.
The version of
What about merging / and /usr ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CALL-Q8zwv5QtT05VA+cQg+OF=paijrt606x2shdte+b4qv2...@mail.gmail.com
On May 07, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote:
I think I mentioned that before: imho it would be nice to clean up
/selinux on upgrades automatically *if* /selinux is not in use, ie. no
selinuxfs mounted there.
Agreed.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 07:31:36PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
What about merging / and /usr ?
No please. We are good about making sure they each mean something
important, and there's no good reason.
We also support setups that might need this split due to low storage,
such as arm devices.
Let's
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:25:29PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
The decision when to make GCC 4.8 the default for other architectures
is left to the Debian port maintainers.
This makes using C++11 and other features only in 4.8 rather difficult.
Explicit build-deps on specific compilers are not
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 07:39:50PM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
As long as _MySQL_ maintainers are able (and want) to continue
MySQL (or
It's my understanding a lot of them jumped ship.
Meh. +1 to kill MySQL for MariaDB. It's got a much better future. I
see it more like a libc
On 2013-04-22 19:40:01 EDT, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 18:21 -0400, Barry Fishman wrote:
Is anyone else seeing a boot hangup on wheezy with the linux/3.2.41-2 kernel
on systems with multiple display controllers?
I filed the bug report on April 5, and it got filed with normal
On May 07, Игорь Пашев pashev.i...@gmail.com wrote:
What about merging / and /usr ?
An ambitious plan.
I strongly support the everything in /usr scheme, but let's first
consolidate support for standalone /usr must be mounted by the
initramfs.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description:
On May 07, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
No please. We are good about making sure they each mean something
important, and there's no good reason.
Not really nowadays: more and more things needed at boot time are in
/usr and there are no plans to fix them.
We also support setups
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 04:57:51PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 07.05.2013 16:51, schrieb Laurent Bigonville:
I'm intentionally not forcing the migration to the new mountpoint nor
forcing the deletion of the directory on upgrade as, in my mind, if a
Wheezy machine is still using the old
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:36:41PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 07, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
No please. We are good about making sure they each mean something
important, and there's no good reason.
Not really nowadays: more and more things needed at boot time are in
2013/5/7 Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org:
Not when you have a 500 meg internal storage that the firmware boots off
of, and using a multi-gig CF card to store the mega-awesome-app you're
using it for.
Similar to Live CDs where /usr used to be compressed on a CD?
On 05/07/2013 03:25 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
...
== binutils ==
binutils 2.23.2 will be uploaded to unstable after GCC 4.8 as the
default on x86 reaches testing. Later updates will introduce binutils
trunk leading to 2.24, later this year.
fyi, this change will introduce a couple new
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:25:29PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Up to today jessie did see updates for the kernel headers, eglibc, and
GCC.
What a wonderful coordination with the release team. Quoting the last
mail from them on the mailing list:
| As for Squeeze, we'd ask that you co-ordinate
2013/5/7 Laurent Bigonville bi...@debian.org:
Hello,
As Guillem asked me in a bug report (#695620), I'm bringing this to
debian-devel.
The latest version of libselinux is now using libpcre3 instead of the
regex functions from the glibc. This is improving the performances
quite
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 706987 gnome-shell
Bug #706987 [general] general: Gnome freezes after some minutes of starting
session
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'gnome-shell'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #706987 to the same values
On 05/07/2013 04:11 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
This doesn't make any sense. What is installed is a package, not
a service. There are packages, like rsync, that provide more than
a service, e.g. a client and a daemon. What if the user wants the
client but not the corresponding service (at any
On 05/07/2013 04:00 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
This can be fine for some daemons/servers. For instance, for a web
server, displaying a default web page is harmless. But what about a
mail server? Any default config would probably lead to loss of mail
if things like virtual alias domains are
On May 07, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Laurent,
Hi Michael,
Am 07.05.2013 16:51, schrieb Laurent Bigonville:
I'm intentionally not forcing the migration to the new mountpoint
nor forcing the deletion of the directory on upgrade as, in my
mind, if a Wheezy machine is still
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:35:11PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 07, Игорь Пашев pashev.i...@gmail.com wrote:
What about merging / and /usr ?
An ambitious plan.
I strongly support the everything in /usr scheme, but let's first
consolidate support for standalone /usr must be mounted by
On May 07, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
everything in /usr actually means that supporting these devices is
much easier.
Not when you have a 500 meg internal storage that the firmware boots off
of, and using a multi-gig CF card to store the mega-awesome-app you're
using it
Hi Paul,
This has been discussed many times on -devel, including before you became a DD.
Many people, including Roger and Marco, have spent a *lot* of time thinking
about this and working on proofs of concepts, etc. already. Please take some
time to read up on the previous threads before
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 04:56:04PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
That said, I'm not in support of moving things to /usr; it's completely
backward.
…
If we do this, I'd prefer to make /usr a symlink to / on new installs
I've always thought that myself, but it seems most folks who are pro
merge tend
Quoting Jonathan Dowland (2013-05-07 18:15:46)
This has been discussed many times on -devel, including before you became a
DD.
Please don't assume that only DDs read debian-devel. I would think that
most aspiring DDs were following it long before even applying in NM.
signature.asc
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:03:58AM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:48:52PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Even if I have to admit I currently don't have a lot of time, it would
have been nice to keep the other people in the team in the loop about
such an upload.
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 02:38:07PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Hi Wookey,
On Tue, 7 May 2013 03:04:50 +0100, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
(just a decision to leave arch-independent headers in /usr/include and
move arch-dependent headers to /usr/include/triplet).
Doesn't this limit us
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:48:52PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Even if I have to admit I currently don't have a lot of time, it would
have been nice to keep the other people in the team in the loop about
such an upload.
You'd been fairly inactive of late, and I felt I'd take some initiative
On 2013-05-07 08:34, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 07:39:50PM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
As long as _MySQL_ maintainers are able (and want) to continue
MySQL (or
It's my understanding a lot of them jumped ship.
Meh. +1 to kill MySQL for MariaDB. It's got a much better
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:34:20AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 07:31:36PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
What about merging / and /usr ?
No please. We are good about making sure they each mean something
important,
No, we're actually terrible at it.
And upstream is
On 07/05/13 15:34, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Debian backports offers me *one* repository. I need 3 of them:
- stable -1 (currently OpenStack Folsom)
Ignore, is there any reason why an old version is interesting?
Because Debian testing has it
On 07/05/13 17:17, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 04:56:04PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
If we do this, I'd prefer to make /usr a symlink to / on new installs
I've always thought that myself, but it seems most folks who are pro
merge tend to propose going the other way.
After
On May 07, Jonathan Dowland j...@debian.org wrote:
If we do this, I'd prefer to make /usr a symlink to / on new installs
I've always thought that myself, but it seems most folks who are pro
merge tend to propose going the other way. I've never understood why.
I was trying to not start a new
On 7 May 2013, at 17:26, Simon Chopin chopin.si...@gmail.com wrote:
Please don't assume that only DDs read debian-devel.
Don't worry, I haven't: I just don't know of a more accurate heuristic for
determining when somebody started to get involved.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On May 07, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
blocked in sid until eglibc is fixed on kfreebsd.
I see a simple solution to two problems here... :-)
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:14:23AM -0400, Barry Fishman wrote:
On 2013-04-22 19:40:01 EDT, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 18:21 -0400, Barry Fishman wrote:
Is anyone else seeing a boot hangup on wheezy with the linux/3.2.41-2
kernel
on systems with multiple display
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:57:19PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Please don't assume that only DDs read debian-devel.
Don't worry, I haven't: I just don't know of a more accurate heuristic
for determining when somebody started to get involved.
I don't see why, in this context, that's a
Am 07.05.2013 17:55, schrieb Laurent Bigonville:
The directory should already be automatically removed by dpkg during
the upgrade as it was shipped by the package and not created by the
postinstall script. I'm not sure this was clear enough.
This was indeed not clear to me, so thanks for the
On 05/08/2013 12:40 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:34:20AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 07:31:36PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
What about merging / and /usr ?
No please. We are good about making sure they each mean something
important,
No, we're
On Tue, 7 May 2013 16:46:46 +0200, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
On May 07, Thorsten Glaser t...@debian.org wrote:
My stated goal here is, indeed, to be able to run at least some useful
configurations of a Debian installation without *both* bash and dash
installed.
What is the point?
A
On Tue, 7 May 2013 19:31:36 +0400, ? ? pashev.i...@gmail.com
wrote:
What about merging / and /usr ?
So we really want to explicitly not offer an upgade path from wheezy
to jessie?
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de
* Package name: node-resolve
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : James Halliday m...@substack.net
* URL : https://github.com/substack/node-resolve
* License : MIT
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de
* Package name: node-yajsml
Version : 1.1.5
Upstream Author : Chad Weider cwei...@oofn.net
* URL : https://github.com/cweider/yajsml
* License : MIT
Programming Lang:
Currently /var/lib contains data for system utilities (dpkg, apt,
aptitute) and for user application like databases.
What about moving default location for applications to /export ?
Think about modern fs like btrfs and zfs:
One may want to create a snapshot of the entire system, user data
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 07:21:26PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I don't see why, in this context, that's a useful heuristic to have. If
you want to debunk someone's argument,
I'm not sure I'd characterize what I tried to get across as debunking someone's
argument. More so, questioning
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 06:57:12PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 07:21:26PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I don't see why, in this context, that's a useful heuristic to have. If
you want to debunk someone's argument,
I'm not sure I'd characterize what I tried to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Martínez Moreno en...@debian.org
* Package name: moocng
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Rooter Analysis S.L. i...@openmooc.org
* URL : http://www.openmooc.org/
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: Python, JS
Hi!
To be able to fix dpkg bug #671711, we should first reduce or completely
eliminate the possibilty for triggered packages needing its configured
dependencies, not ending up being in triggers-awaited status awaiting on
them.
For packages installing triggers for things that are not necessary
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:43:03AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 05/08/2013 12:40 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:34:20AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 07:31:36PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
What about merging / and /usr ?
No please. We are
Hi, I think I know one more issue related to this, correct me if it is not.
This might be a problem for systemd, but I will talk about SMF [1] and
concrete example - dbus.
1. dbus package includes SMF manifest
2. for dbus service to appear, its manifest should be imported
3. importing manifests
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:23:37 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
(please direct replies to debian-devel only)
Ever since dpkg started using liblzma directly (dpkg 1.16.4), the xz
command is no longer needed in a minimal Debian system. Based on its
On 2013-05-07 13:20:02 EDT, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:14:23AM -0400, Barry Fishman wrote:
1) This bug is a month old and due to a Debian patch which was rejected
by the upstream kernel team.
Perhaps you should tell us which that is, then.
You told me. The fbcon
Am 2013-05-07 21:09, schrieb Игорь Пашев:
This might be a problem for systemd, but I will talk about SMF [1] and
concrete example - dbus.
1. dbus package includes SMF manifest
2. for dbus service to appear, its manifest should be imported
3. importing manifests if done via triggers (AFAIK like
2013/5/7 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org:
We don't use dpkg triggers to start (systemd) services.
Hm?
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-systemd/systemd.git;a=blob;f=debian/systemd.triggers;h=f6c3c0ce0da08815f366868d3b3a3f9e5907875f;hb=refs/heads/debian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Am 2013-05-07 21:40, schrieb Игорь Пашев:
2013/5/7 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org:
We don't use dpkg triggers to start (systemd) services.
Hm?
Hi!
As mentioned some months ago [0], I'm planning to switch dpkg-deb default
compressor from gzip to xz, as there seemed to be consensus that was
the way to go, and given the amount of already manually switched
packages, or packaging helpers. :/
[0]
2013/5/7 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org:
If you actually looked at the package, you would have noticed that it has
nothing to do with starting services.
Maybe, systemctl enable does not start the service?
Main question is: can triggers be activated before package is
configured (namely
On Lunes, 6 de mayo de 2013 13:49:57 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
now might be the right time to start a discussion about release goals
for jessie. Here are some points that come into my mind right now (and
some were already discussed very recently):
* multiarch compatible binNMUs
*
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de
* Package name: node-socket.io
Version : 0.9.14
Upstream Author : Guillermo Rauch guille...@learnboost.com
* URL : https://github.com/learnboost/socket.io
* License : MIT
+++ Stephen Kitt [2013-05-07 14:38 +0200]:
Hi Wookey,
On Tue, 7 May 2013 03:04:50 +0100, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
(just a decision to leave arch-independent headers in /usr/include and
move arch-dependent headers to /usr/include/triplet).
Doesn't this limit us to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de
* Package name: node-base64id
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Kristian Faeldt faeldt_krist...@cyberagent.co.jp
* URL : https://github.com/faeldt/base64id
* License : MIT
On Martes, 7 de mayo de 2013 17:26:09 Simon Chopin wrote:
Quoting Jonathan Dowland (2013-05-07 18:15:46)
This has been discussed many times on -devel, including before you became
a DD.
Please don't assume that only DDs read debian-devel. I would think that
most aspiring DDs were
Hello world,
I've grepped the d-d list, but didn't find any threads regarding
fixing epochs in package versions.
First, is there a consensus or quorum that believes that unnecessary
epochs is undesirable?
If so, could we add a field to debian/control such as
Supersede-Epoch. If set to 'yes',
On Martes, 7 de mayo de 2013 22:55:39 Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
Hello world,
I've grepped the d-d list, but didn't find any threads regarding
fixing epochs in package versions.
First, is there a consensus or quorum that believes that unnecessary
epochs is undesirable?
If so, could we add
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de
* Package name: node-policyfile
Version : 0.0.5
Upstream Author : Arnout Kazemier, 3rd-Eden.com
* URL : https://github.com/3rd-Eden/FlashPolicyFileServer
* License : MIT
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Noel David Torres Taño
env...@rolamasao.org wrote:
On Martes, 7 de mayo de 2013 22:55:39 Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
If so, could we add a field to debian/control such as
Supersede-Epoch. If set to 'yes', then dpkg considers this package
to have an epoch of infinity
Matt Zagrabelny mzagrabe at d.umn.edu writes:
First, is there a consensus or quorum that believes that unnecessary
epochs is undesirable?
No.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Matt Zagrabelny mzagrabe at d.umn.edu writes:
Use the mechanism of really:
That is *much* *much* *much* *much* *much* *much* *much* *much* *much*
*much* *much* *much* *much* *much* *much* *much* more ugly than epochs
and actually a prime example of why we *want* them.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
To
[Matt Zagrabelny]
I've grepped the d-d list, but didn't find any threads regarding
fixing epochs in package versions.
This does come up occasionally.
If so, could we add a field to debian/control such as
Supersede-Epoch. If set to 'yes', then dpkg considers this package
to have an epoch of
Игорь Пашев pashev.igor at gmail.com writes:
What about moving default location for applications to /export ?
*NO*!
/sys was already bad. /run is a catastrophe, although an understandable
one. I always rm -rf /media after a fresh install, where T F did that
come from. As a BSD person, seeing
[Igor Pashev]
Currently /var/lib contains data for system utilities (dpkg, apt,
aptitute) and for user application like databases.
What about moving default location for applications to /export ?
Wrong list, please bring this up instead on fhs-discuss. (If that
still exists - it looks a
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Thorsten Glaser t...@debian.org wrote:
Matt Zagrabelny mzagrabe at d.umn.edu writes:
Use the mechanism of really:
That is *much* *much* *much* *much* *much* *much* *much* *much* *much*
*much* *much* *much* *much* *much* *much* *much* more ugly than epochs
and
Wookey wookey at wookware.org writes:
And you can still use a sysroot and non-multiarch ways of filling it
if you prefer. I haven't really experimented with mulitarch and
sysroot at the same time but SFAIK it should work.
I can confirm Multi-Arch doesn’t break traditional cross compilers
as
Matt Zagrabelny mzagrabe at d.umn.edu writes:
epochs never go away - AIUI. They detract from meaningful information
in the version string.
So do changelogs. But it’s not that hard to mentally strip away a
leading [0-9]+: in a version string. Especially when we have
monstrosities like
1 - 100 of 288 matches
Mail list logo
