On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 22:37:15 +0200
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926892
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926891
Great! :)
I hope it'll reach to buster/stretch.
--
Hideki Yamane
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 10:32:54 +0100
Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> unicode-data in Buster is currently at 11.0.0; there being a major
> release upstream 12.0.0 just after Buster freeze.
>
> I've uploaded 12.0.0 to unstable; 12.1 is not officially released yet.
> unicode-data itself is small and e
On Apr 13, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> TL;DR: see https://trends.debian.net and
Nice.
I suggest to add a graph detailing:
- packages with at least one init script
- packages with at least one systemd unit
- packages with at least one init script and one systemd unit
Also, did I miss the memo about
On Saturday, April 13, 2019 10:03:23 PM Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 4/12/19 7:31 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Friday, April 12, 2019 01:08:26 PM Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
> >> Package: wnpp
> >> Owner: Mark A. Hershberger
> >> Severity: wishlist
> >>
> >> Package name: python3-git-archi
On 4/12/19 7:31 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, April 12, 2019 01:08:26 PM Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
>> Package: wnpp
>> Owner: Mark A. Hershberger
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>> Package name: python3-git-archive-all
>> Version : 1.19.4
>> Upstream Author : Ilya Kulakov
>> U
On 4/8/19 7:16 PM, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>> from PPA (source+binary-based).
>
> If people just want a PPA which supports Debian, please just take a
> look at OBS[1].
>
> I've seen many upstreams provide packages with OBS, and most
> distributions are supported.
> Not only deb, but also rpm, from D
I wanted to submit my song "Lonely". The response I've gotten thus far has
been so absolutely humbling. I can't even believe it. I've heard from
several people who were ready to take their lives that somehow,
this song came on, and gave them strength to keep moving forward.
Absolutely blows my mind
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 11:29:47AM +0400, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> on my box I put special access for _apt. Now I would like to create some
> pbuilder ball.
> But the creation process is getting stick because _apt is set with an
> arbitrary UID.
> What is the best way, if we can, to set this arbitr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jongmin Kim
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: golang-github-jesseduffield-pty
Version : 1.1.3+git20181218.02db52c-1
Upstream Author : Jesse Duffield
* URL : https://github.co
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jongmin Kim
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: golang-github-jesseduffield-termbox-go
Version : 0.0~git20180919.1e272ff-1
Upstream Author : Jesse Duffield
* URL : https://gith
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jongmin Kim
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: golang-github-jesseduffield-gocui
Version : 0.3.0+git20190409.1b91467-1
Upstream Author : Jesse Duffield
* URL : https://github.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 09:54:18PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> FWIW, golang-1.12 was removed from buster, because the RT think
> there're too many golang for buster[1].
> At first we have golang-1.{10,11,12} in testing.
>
> [1] https://tracker.debian.org/news/1024215/golang-112-removed-from-testi
Hello!
Just as a heads-up: Sending mail to debian-ports@l.d.o ends up sending
the mail to debian-alpha@, debian-hppa@, debian-ia64@, ... simultaneously,
so it would be better to avoid using this address in the discussion.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Develo
On 15371 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
How is the move to debian-ports supposed to happen? I won't have the
time to do anything about it within the 2 weeks.
The process to inject all packages to debian-ports is to get all the
deb, udeb and buildinfo files from the archives (main and debug
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 8:12 PM Toni Mueller wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I just figured that Buster is, from the current POV, going to ship with
> Golang 1.11. While I am new to Go, I figured that we should probably
> have a newer version of Golang in Buster, as they are now doing
> versioned dependen
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 10:20:53 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> TL;DR: see https://trends.debian.net and
> https://trends.debian.net/#smells
Very nice, thank you.
> [4] https://trends.debian.net/smells-dd-list.txt
This list is slightly unhelpful (for my case / the Debian Perl Group)
as it reports
On 13.04.19 15:07, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 12:59:19PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
I see no point whatsoever in 3.0 (native).
What's the point/advantage of native packages?
No need to make a separate orig tarball.
Can't agree more, there are places where 3.0 (quilt|git
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 12:59:19PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > I see no point whatsoever in 3.0 (native).
> > The main advantage of 3.0 (native) is that it makes it explicit that
> > the package is deliberately native [...]
>
> ok, sorry, I ment to say: I see no point whatsoever in native pa
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 01:48:01PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 at 10:04:10 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > I see no point whatsoever in 3.0 (native).
> The main advantage of 3.0 (native) is that it makes it explicit that
> the package is deliberately native [...]
ok, sorry,
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 at 10:04:10 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I see no point whatsoever in 3.0 (native).
The main advantage of 3.0 (native) is that it makes it explicit that
the package is deliberately native, whereas a 1.0 native package is
indistinguishable from a package that was intended to be
Hello,
I just figured that Buster is, from the current POV, going to ship with
Golang 1.11. While I am new to Go, I figured that we should probably
have a newer version of Golang in Buster, as they are now doing
versioned dependencies, but only starting with 1.12 or 1.13 (not quite
sure about th
On 2019-04-13 13:07, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 4/13/2019 12:49 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > The process to inject all packages to debian-ports is to get all the
> > deb, udeb and buildinfo files from the archives (main and debug) and
> > associate them with the .changes files that are hosted on coc
On 4/13/2019 12:49 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The process to inject all packages to debian-ports is to get all the
> deb, udeb and buildinfo files from the archives (main and debug) and
> associate them with the .changes files that are hosted on coccia. We'll
> also need to fetch all the associate
Carsten Schoenert, le sam. 13 avril 2019 12:41:25 +0200, a ecrit:
> Am 13.04.19 um 12:06 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> >> Both architectures haven't seen any major development in the past years
> >
> > They have.
>
> O.k. need to be more specific, so the same as you mentioned further
> down, ..."in
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 10:20:53AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> https://trends.debian.net/#smells
there are two minor issues with the smells *graph*: not using salsa
should only be graphed since salsa exists (and not since 2005), same for
compat < 9.
--
tschau,
Holger
---
On 2019-04-12 23:01, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Joerg Jaspert, le ven. 12 avril 2019 22:48:42 +0200, a ecrit:
> > back in August 2018 we discussed architecture inclusion into
> > unstable/experimental.
> >
> > Today we had our regular FTPMaster meeting and discussed hurd and both
> > kfr
Svante Signell, le sam. 13 avril 2019 12:36:54 +0200, a ecrit:
> On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 12:18 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > He rightfully means he does not want patches, but patches getting
> > submitted upstream, so he does not have to maintain them. A Debian
> > package maintainer is not suppo
Samuel,
Am 13.04.19 um 12:06 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
>> I can't follow that style of discussion.
>
> Please don't, Svante is only trolling here, please don't feed him.
yes, this is true. As you've answered in your other email, such emails
bringing no real gain or progress.
>> I haven't seen a
On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 12:18 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> He rightfully means he does not want patches, but patches getting
> submitted upstream, so he does not have to maintain them. A Debian
> package maintainer is not supposed to maintain patches long-term.
Then the question of which respo
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 4:21 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> TL;DR: see https://trends.debian.net and
> https://trends.debian.net/#smells
>
These graphs look ambiguous... Shouldn't the x-axis be year?
--
Shengjing Zhu
Svante Signell, le sam. 13 avril 2019 12:13:41 +0200, a ecrit:
> On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 11:51 +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> > So I disagree on "One person is enough" as long this one person can
> > not keep track on all the required main and corner cases so other
> > maintainers get to do the wo
Holger Levsen, le sam. 13 avril 2019 09:50:25 +, a ecrit:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 09:31:46AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault, le sam. 13 avril 2019 00:11:15 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > Joerg Jaspert, le ven. 12 avril 2019 23:30:31 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > > It seems to exist there, s
On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 11:51 +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Am 13.04.19 um 11:15 schrieb Svante Signell:
>
> > Please give up on Debian. They clearly have no interest in anything
> > non-linux or non-systemd, that is fully clear. Let's make a joint
> > effort to make a Guix release of Hurd (and
Carsten Schoenert, le sam. 13 avril 2019 11:51:51 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Please give up on Debian. They clearly have no interest in anything
> > non-linux or non-systemd, that is fully clear. Let's make a joint
> > effort to make a Guix release of Hurd (and kFreeBSD) happen. Or, if you
> > still want
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 11:42:38AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Well you could switch to 3.0 (native).
I see no point whatsoever in 3.0 (native).
IMO 3.0 (quilt) is sensible and 1.0 too, whether native or not. *If*
native package in todays world are still sensible...
> > But you don't conside
Samuel Thibault, le sam. 13 avril 2019 11:57:20 +0200, a ecrit:
> That kind of mail is useless.
I actually meant: it is also harmful.
Samuel
That kind of mail is useless.
Samuel
Am 13.04.19 um 11:15 schrieb Svante Signell:
> Please give up on Debian. They clearly have no interest in anything
> non-linux or non-systemd, that is fully clear. Let's make a joint
> effort to make a Guix release of Hurd (and kFreeBSD) happen. Or, if you
> still want to continue using apt-style
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 09:31:46AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le sam. 13 avril 2019 00:11:15 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Joerg Jaspert, le ven. 12 avril 2019 23:30:31 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > It seems to exist there, so probably someone who can upload there and
> > > is interested in hur
On 13/04/19 at 09:28 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 10:20:53AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > TL;DR: see https://trends.debian.net and
> > https://trends.debian.net/#smells
>
> that's beautiful! thank you!
>
> > [4] https://trends.debian.net/smells-dd-list.
Hi Lucas,
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 10:20:53AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> TL;DR: see https://trends.debian.net and
> https://trends.debian.net/#smells
that's beautiful! thank you!
> [4] https://trends.debian.net/smells-dd-list.txt
for me there are two smelly packages, src:tuxtype should use s
On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 10:58 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert, le sam. 13 avril 2019 10:24:53 +0200, a ecrit:
> > On 15371 March 1977, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >
>
> Well, it's very odd that a team decision is suddenly made with a
> two-week effect without asking whether the schedule
Joerg Jaspert, le sam. 13 avril 2019 10:24:53 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 15371 March 1977, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > > > It seems to exist there, so probably someone who can upload there and
> > > > is interested in hurd-i386 goes and uploads stuff.
> > > Within a two-week timeframe only?
> > (while
On 13/04/19 at 10:24 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 4/13/19 10:20 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Additionally (and much more controversially I guess :-) ) I also added
> > an analysis of "package smells"[3], such as "not using dh", "not using a
> > recent debhelper compat level", "not usin
(Belatedly changing the subject line, sorry for the digression...)
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 at 09:34:54 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I expected the Flatpak /app directory to also be entirely read-only,
> are there parts of /app that are not read-only?
/app is also (separately) read-only, and points into
On 4/13/19 10:20 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Additionally (and much more controversially I guess :-) ) I also added
> an analysis of "package smells"[3], such as "not using dh", "not using a
> recent debhelper compat level", "not using a 3.0 source format", etc. I
> understand that in some cases th
On 15371 March 1977, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> It seems to exist there, so probably someone who can upload there and
> is interested in hurd-i386 goes and uploads stuff.
Within a two-week timeframe only?
(while everybody is supposed to be busy fixing RC bugs)
I just jumped over old threads - i
TL;DR: see https://trends.debian.net and
https://trends.debian.net/#smells
Hi,
Following this blog post[1] I did some work on setting up a proper
framework to graph historical trends about Debian packaging practices.
The result is now available at [2], and I'm confident that I will be
able to upd
Hello,
on my box I put special access for _apt. Now I would like to create some
pbuilder ball.
But the creation process is getting stick because _apt is set with an arbitrary
UID.
What is the best way, if we can, to set this arbitrary UID for _apt to the one
used in my firewall ?
Thanks in adv
Samuel Thibault, le sam. 13 avril 2019 00:11:15 +0200, a ecrit:
> Joerg Jaspert, le ven. 12 avril 2019 23:30:31 +0200, a ecrit:
> > It seems to exist there, so probably someone who can upload there and
> > is interested in hurd-i386 goes and uploads stuff.
>
> Within a two-week timeframe only?
(w
50 matches
Mail list logo
