Re: User and groups justification (was Re: group nvram)

2009-03-20 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Jon Dowland jon+debian-de...@alcopop.org wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:34:44AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Luca Capello l...@pca.it wrote: I would prefer any new information to be added there instead, since the files

Re: Architecture usertags

2009-03-25 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote: Wouter Verhelst wrote: Hi, Hi I thought I'd sent out this mail, but apparently I did that when I had just reinstalled my laptop and the mailsetup wasn't working yet. Sorry about that. Now almost a month ago, I asked Don

Re: deprecating /usr as a standalone filesystem?

2009-05-05 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote: I have been told by upstream maintainers of one of my packages and by prominent developers of other distributions that supporting a standalone /usr is too much work and no other distribution worth mentioning does it (not Ubuntu,

Re: deprecating /usr as a standalone filesystem?

2009-05-05 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote: On May 05, Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: - NFS This is not detailed. /usr NFS shared. Scientific grid use this stuff and it is real world. But may be it is too big for debian ;) - for my wifi box (ie

How to check why a package is in contrib

2009-07-30 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Hi, I was trying to check why a package was in contrib (jabref), and I could not find a means to do that automatically. Could we add an automatic mechanism based on package description, for getting the reason, like for instance, why-contrib: reason It will ease the move to main in case of

Bug#508585: Please provide an easy and official way to get debug symbols for all arch

2008-12-12 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Package: general Severity: normal hello, In case of bug on rare arch it is quite difficult for the maintener to get debug trace. A generic stuff like http://debug.debian.net/ will help to solve hard diagnose bug like the #508443 and avoid to create -dbg package like in #508582: apt-cache

Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

2008-12-16 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote: Luca wrote: 2008/12/16 Luca Niccoli lultimou...@gmail.com: I can't really see what I'm doing wrong... Maybe I have a clue: ++file_filter(const struct dirent *dir) ++{ ++ return (DT_REG == (DT_REG dir-d_type)) || ++

Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

2008-12-16 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote: Luca wrote: 2008/12/16 Luca Niccoli lultimou...@gmail.com: I can't really see what I'm doing wrong... Maybe I have a clue

Re: Bug#509063: ITP: libproxy -- automatic proxy configuration management library

2008-12-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Bjørn Mork bm...@dod.no wrote: Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de writes: I would very much like this library to become the *only* WPAD implementation anywhere. Hopefully eventually with some ability to define local policies, where the default Debian policy

Re: Bug#509063: ITP: libproxy -- automatic proxy configuration management library

2008-12-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:51:34PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Bjørn Mork bm...@dod.no wrote: Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de writes: I would very much like this library to become

Help needed for #377468

2008-12-20 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Hi! I would like to ask for some help for the bug #377468, if possible, please. Particularly from a mozilla-plugin wizard. The problem is that djvulibre in upstream is not linked against a particular libXt in order to adapt against different libXt version depending of the browser used. The

Re: Bug#509063: ITP: libproxy -- automatic proxy configuration management library

2008-12-21 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hi Florian, Thanks for your concerns. I appreciate it. Florian Weimer wrote: Not enabling WPAD with DNS devolution goes a long way towards dealing with this mess. Would you be fine if libproxy disabled WPAD by

[libmagick9] Help needed defoma

2008-12-23 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Tags: help Hi, Imagemagick does use a static list of police. This could lead to problem and user have already send bug report. Could be possible to help us implementing a defoma script for imagemagick? Regards Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Bug#509063: ITP: libproxy -- automatic proxy configuration management library

2009-01-08 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hi Florian, and sorry for the long delay. Florian Weimer wrote: Well, it's not my package, so you don't have to listen to me. I'm also not speaking for the security team. Oh, should you have said that before,

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote: Hello, If you feel something is missing, should be fixed or enhanced, let us[4] know; of course, patches are welcome ;) (git repo at [5]). I really useful stuff will be to use user tag in order to crossref another distrib

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org wrote: Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (roucaries.bast...@gmail.com): On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote: Hello, If you feel something is missing, should be fixed or enhanced, let us[4] know

Re: Tracing bugs between distro's bugtrackers - Was: Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Olivier Berger olivier.ber...@it-sudparis.eu wrote: Hi. Le dimanche 18 janvier 2009 à 19:54 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote: Hello, If you feel something is missing, should be fixed

Re: Tracing bugs between distro's bugtrackers - Was: Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Olivier Berger olivier.ber...@it-sudparis.eu wrote: Le lundi 19 janvier 2009 à 07:12 +0100, Christian Perrier a écrit : Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (roucaries.bast...@gmail.com): I really useful stuff will be to use user tag in order to crossref another

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: ll need I suppose cooperation from BTS itself but in a second time. We need only two user tags by foreign distrib: bts-link-foreign-xref-$distrib set to the foregin bugzilla entry bts-link-foreign-status

Bug#512916: ITP: [auto07p] -- a software for continuation and bifurcation problems in ordinary differential equations

2009-01-24 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Package name: auto07p Version: 0.6 Upstream Author: Eusebius Doedel URL: http://indy.cs.concordia.ca/auto/ License: BSD with some part GPL Description: AUTO is a software for

Re: -dbg packages; are they actually useful?

2009-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, 03 Mar 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote: I've got to wondering: are the large -dbg packages actually really useful to anybody? Thoughts? See #508585 and http://debug.debian.net/ It will be really nice to have this

Re: -dbg packages; are they actually useful?

2009-03-04 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org wrote: Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org): symbols.  If there's a will to get that done in Debian now, I will definitely be happy to ditch the samba-dbg package for one. I support my co-maintainer on that..:-)

Re: -dbg packages; are they actually useful?

2009-03-04 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:17 AM, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 10:25:06PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: I'm looking at my local mirror (slowly) update at the moment, and I've got to wondering: are the large -dbg packages actually really useful to anybody? I

Re: group nvram

2009-03-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote: On Mar 18, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote: A peek at the source says it uses /proc/acpi/ibm/light. Other people told me that they believe that nowadays all modern thinkpads use a kernel driver. This is the complete

Re: group nvram

2009-03-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote: On Mar 18, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote: A peek at the source says it uses /proc/acpi/ibm/light. Other people told me that they believe that nowadays all modern thinkpads use a kernel driver. This is the complete

Re: group nvram

2009-03-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote: On Mar 18, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote: A peek at the source says it uses /proc/acpi/ibm/light. Other people told me

Re: group nvram

2009-03-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote: On Mar 18, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote

Re: User and groups justification (was Re: group nvram)

2009-03-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Luca Capello l...@pca.it wrote: Hi there! On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:16:05 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: BTW instead of arguing about group and something like this could we

Re: group nvram

2009-03-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote: On Mar 19, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote: Once was thrown the idea to prefix all system groups with ???Debian-???. One of the most stupid ideas which have ever been inflicted on the project. This solves this

Re: group nvram

2009-03-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote: On Mar 19, Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: It is the same probleme with floppy, tty and disk group. No, it's not. They should add this group to their ldap database. At least it should This would

Re: group nvram

2009-03-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Henning Glawe gla...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 07:13:22PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: This is the complete list of groups which I'd rather stop using:     rdma (infiniband devices) is there any alternative way to restrict access to infiniband

MIA Ryuichi arafune?

2007-11-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
It seems Ryuichi is MIA. See for instance http://www.webservertalk.com/archive97-2007-1-1765203.html Ryuichi are you reading this? What's your status regarding Debian? Particularly what is your status regarding bug 432185 (gnuplot-mode)? Thank you very much, -- ROUCARIES Bastien

Re: ITP: yade -- Platform for discrete element modeling.

2011-01-02 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com * Package name    : yade  Version         : 0.60  Upstream Author : Yade developers yade-...@lists.launchpad.net * URL             :

Re: Safe File Update (atomic)

2011-01-06 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Ted Ts'o ty...@mit.edu wrote: On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:57:07AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: Ted Ts'o writes (Re: Safe File Update (atomic)): Then I invite you to implement it, and

Qt3 removal rational

2011-02-08 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
I comaintain upstream qucs a simulator of electronics circuit and the only free one able to simulate radio frequency circuit. In the scientific field a lot of software depend of qt3. And a lot of uptream lack ressource to port to qt4. At my workplace (university) we are using a lot this kind of

Need jquery.fancybox

2011-02-14 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
tags 611125 + help thanks Hi, As a developper of imagemagick, i am correcting bug #611125, and i need to package jquery.fancybox However I have no experience in javascript and I need some help. Please package jquery.fancybox Thanks Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#613525: ITP: [PACKAGE] -- metakit

2011-02-15 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Package name: metakit Version: 2.4.9.7 Upstream Author: Jean-Claude Wippler j...@equi4.com URL: http://equi4.com/metakit/index.html License: MIT Description: Metakit is an efficient embedded database library with a

Adopt a removed package: how to ?

2011-02-15 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Hi, I plan to adopt a removed from archive package (see #183373). How can I do ? I have marked myself as ITA of 183373. It is the right way ? I plan to download previous debian package, the new source and to do some adaptation. Should I use the process of a new package or an adopted package

Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-02 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
hi, More and more packages depend on avahi aka zeroconf. I have found some information on http://wiki.debian.org/ZeroConf Because I work in a untrusted work place and home network (public networks, wifi...) I whish to purge zeroconf functionnality. however a lot of package depends (or

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 23:09 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Because I work in a untrusted work place and home network (public networks, wifi...) I whish to purge

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Klaus Ethgen kl...@ethgen.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Mi den  2. Mär 2011 um 18:25 schrieb Bastien ROUCARIES: More and more packages depend on avahi aka zeroconf. I have found some information on http://wiki.debian.org

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote: Le mercredi 02 mars 2011 à 18:25 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : And more specifically from an administrator point of view does avahi could library could be made purgeable and no more than suggest dependencies (I am

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Klaus Ethgen kl...@ethgen.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Am Do den  3. Mär 2011 um  3:35 schrieb Chow Loong Jin: A system has not to listen for any unused and unneeded services ever. A firewall is to control services you

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no wrote: ]] Klaus Ethgen Hi, | The thoughts of that makes me shiver! Trusting untreatable sources on a | network for configuring local stuff is worse ever. Then just don't use it?  Nobody is forcing you to. | I think those two

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi wrote: On to, 2011-03-03 at 11:54 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote: Am Do den  3. Mär 2011 um 11:25 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen: Then just don't use it?  Nobody is forcing you to. [...] | And even if you not care about, then that

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Sujit Karatparambil sujit.kmadha...@gmail.com wrote: However, could we please end the FUDfest? This thread seems to be quite unconstructive, with unspecific claims of security problems, unwarranted slurs on users based on their operating system, and accusations

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi wrote: On to, 2011-03-03 at 12:47 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: some package announce their existance to the world without any admin decision

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote: On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 01:43:19PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi wrote

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen s...@debian.org wrote: Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com writes: some package announce their existance to the world without any admin decision It should be a site policy. And set to no by default or a least well documented

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-04 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Le vendredi 4 mars 2011 10:31:30, Wouter Verhelst a écrit : On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:02:47AM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote: Hi, And even worse, debian is often used on server platforms where you never ever want to have any such magically configured services. Since avahi isn't a dependency

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-04 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Le vendredi 4 mars 2011 13:23:32, Ben Hutchings a écrit : On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 08:15 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: ]] Ben Hutchings Hi, | On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 05:20:37PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | To the extent this is a bug, it's a bug in the resolver that it does |

Bug#617339: ITP: [PACKAGE] -- xfstests torture test for xfs and other filesystem

2011-03-08 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Package name: xfstests Version: git20110223 Upstream Author: Alex Elder x...@oss.sgi.com URL: GPL Description: xfstests is a torture test suite for filesystem bugs. It is useful in order to debug problem on linux

-Wl,--no-allow-shlib-undefined fail with undefined reference to `_dl_argv@GLIBC_PRIVATE'

2011-03-09 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Trying to paackage cernlib I get on amd64 gfortran -shared .libs/aintgb.o .libs/alosb.o .libs/andb.o .libs/andntb.o .libs/binvec.o .libs/cntob.o .libs/cntzb.o .libs/copyb.o .libs/cprsb.o .libs/dalosb.o .libs/dcopyb.o .libs/ddotb.o .libs/dgthrb.o .libs/dmod3b.o \ .libs/dotb.o .libs/drangb.o

Re: Bug#619393: ITP: paw -- Physics Analysis Workstation

2011-03-24 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:57 AM, Lifeng Sun lifong...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Mika Pflüger deb...@mikapflueger.de wrote: It seems that PAW is upstream dead (last activity on the website was in 2006, the last release of PAW was in 2002, the cernlib site states in

Re: Moving bash from essential/required to important?

2011-04-05 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 05:59:51PM +, Clint Adams wrote: On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 06:04:20PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: What do others think of moving bash to important (required and important are part of the base

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Karl Goetz k...@kgoetz.id.au wrote: On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:32:42 +0100 Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:38:03PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: Following the discussion yesterday, I'd like to propose doing something like the

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:44:08AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Karl Goetz k...@kgoetz.id.au wrote: On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:32:42 +0100 Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:44:08AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Karl Goetz k...@kgoetz.id.au wrote

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-15 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
New text, which is hopefully clear enough: RAMLOCK  Make  /run/lock/ available as a ram file system (tmpfs).  Set to  'yes' to enable, to 'no' to disable (defaults to yes).  The size  of the tmpfs can be controlled using TMPFS_SIZE and LOCK_SIZE in  /etc/default/tmpfs.  Note  that  

Re: some suggestions towards a Debian .desktop policy [Was: Warm up discussion about desktop files]

2011-04-22 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org wrote: Some suggestions for a Debian .desktop policy[1]: Could we add also a lintian check in order to check if mime type and desktop file are the same ? And add some emphasys about mime type in destop policy Bastien -- To

Re: How to add quilt to an existing package?

2011-04-22 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Hi, If you use git gitpkg with hook is really nice. Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTim9MFf1d0=xvgmebsvbsj5bkyr...@mail.gmail.com

Crypto consolidation in debian ?

2011-04-26 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Dear dd, I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ? Moreover a lot of keyring solution are available for the desktop but are not directly compatible between them, and is near a nightmare (for instance mozilla is

Re: Crypto consolidation in debian ?

2011-04-26 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Philipp Kern tr...@philkern.de wrote: On 2011-04-26, Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ? Is there any progress

Re: Crypto consolidation in debian ?

2011-04-26 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote: On Apr 26, Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ? While I believe

Re: Crypto consolidation in debian ?

2011-04-27 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com writes: I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ? Patches to WebAuth to support NSS

Re: Crypto consolidation in debian ?

2011-04-27 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Patches to WebAuth to support NSS are welcome, but I'm sure not going to bother.  Seems like a waste of time to me.  If I were going to port to any other crypto library, I'd port to gcrypto, not NSS. See also that suse consider to port to nss http://old-en.opensuse.org/SharedCertStore Bastien

Re: Crypto consolidation in debian ?

2011-04-27 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:40:14AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: Patches to WebAuth to support NSS are welcome, but I'm sure not going to bother

Re: Crypto consolidation in debian ?

2011-04-28 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:30:05AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com writes: Patches to WebAuth to support NSS are welcome, but I'm sure not going to bother.  Seems like a waste

Re: Crypto consolidation in debian ?

2011-05-01 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes: libgcrypt has some horrendous bugs which upstream refuse to fix, for example the broken behaviour relating to

Re: Qt3 looking for adopters

2011-05-04 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
You miss qucs for instance. I suppose qt3 is near bug free ? Could help to maintain but in team Bastien On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote: Hi, kdelibs3 was removed recently from the archive and the last tiny bit of KDE 3 remaining, aRts, will be removed

Re: Qt3 looking for adopters

2011-05-04 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
was EOL'ed in July 2007 [2], so if you decide to adopt Qt 3 you won't have any support by upstream. Also, if you adopt the package, please coordinate with the KDE team so we can push some final changes. On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 01:29:39PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: You miss qucs for instance

Re: a few packages for adoption

2011-05-10 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Jay Berkenbilt q...@debian.org wrote: ** Please reply to me directly (or CC me on replies) as I am not currently subscribed to debian-devel. ** I recently became a father of twins and, as such, have less time to work on packages than I used to.  

Cmap file are now free: List of package to move to main

2009-09-24 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Hi, According to Paul Wise: The Adobe CMap resources are now free software and licensed under the BSD license. More information about this can be found here: http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/ http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2009/09/msg00039.html The following

Bug#548195: Move cmap and cmap depend package to main

2009-09-24 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Package: general Severity: wishlist The Adobe CMap resources are now free software and licensed under the BSD license. More information about this can be found here: http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/ http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2009/09/msg00039.html This a

Re: Cmap file are now free: List of package to move to main

2009-09-25 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Le jeudi 24 septembre 2009 11:46:54, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : Hi, According to Paul Wise: The Adobe CMap resources are now free software and licensed under the BSD license. More information about this can be found here: http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed

Re: Orphaning my packages...

2009-09-29 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Le mardi 29 septembre 2009 03:04:25, Kevin B. McCarty a écrit : Hi all, I unfortunately don't have the free time at the moment to do much for the Debian Project, so I'm orphaning my packages. If anyone wants to stake a claim to any of the following, please go ahead and say so, otherwise

Re: RFC: RelaxNG and XML schema schemes packaged for Debian

2009-11-12 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 14:18:51, Daniel Leidert a écrit : Am Mittwoch, den 11.11.2009, 22:57 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault: Daniel Leidert, le Wed 11 Nov 2009 17:36:05 +0100, a écrit : A question: I'm currently working with relaxNG and found, that we (Debian) AFAIK don't have the

Re: Cmap file are now free: List of package to move to main

2010-01-04 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, According to Paul Wise: The Adobe CMap resources are now free software and licensed under the BSD license. More information about this can be found here: http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe

Re: Bug#565675: ITP: pthsem -- pth replacement with semaphore support

2010-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote: Martin Koegler, le Tue 19 Jan 2010 09:27:07 +0100, a écrit : Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote: Marc Leeman, le Sun 17 Jan 2010 22:16:17 +0100, a écrit : * Package name    : pthsem [..] The problem is

Re: Cmap file are now free: List of package to move to main

2010-03-01 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Remainder: On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: The Adobe CMap resources are now free software and licensed under the BSD license. More information about this can be found here: http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/ http

Re: Bug#545782: imagemagick-dbg: missing README.Debian to explain how programs are used

2010-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Any progress on this bug ? On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@debian.org wrote: Hi! On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net wrote: Repoening, this doesn't address the original bug report titled missing README.Debian to explain how programs

RE : Re: Cmap file are now free: List of package to move to main

2010-03-06 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
the bug report are already made. Le 6 mars 2010 12:06, Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org a écrit : On lun., 2010-03-01 at 10:19 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: I have send this mail two months a... Maybe you just need to report bugs against concerned packages so the maintainer changes

Re: Suggestions to fix #433462 (add free space info to reportbug)

2010-03-16 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote: Hi all, in bug #433462 there is a request to add free space information in reportbug standard info appended to bug report. It's a valid request, that I want to fulfill, but there are some aspects I'd like to discuss.

Re: Suggestions to fix #433462 (add free space info to reportbug)

2010-03-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org wrote: On mer., 2010-03-17 at 17:26 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: On the other hand including free space information will be difficult to handle properly and possibly expose information the user considers private. But

Re: Naming policy for Perl modules (mass bug filing)

2010-03-23 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
2010/3/23 Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org: Hi, the Debian Perl Policy asks for packages for the Foo::Bar module to be named libfoo-bar-perl [1].  Some packages do not adhere to this scheme:  opalmod               → libopal-perl  gnuift-perl           → libgnuift-perl  perl-mapscript      

Re: Libreadline6 is GPLv3: incompatible with GPLv2-only software

2010-04-29 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:09 PM, James Y Knight f...@fuhm.net wrote: On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:32 AM, James Y Knight wrote: After checking a scattering of random packages, I happened across one example of this already in Debian testing: socat. It is GPLv2-only, and is linked against GPLv3

Re: UPG and the default umask

2010-05-17 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer cales...@scientia.net wrote: On Sun, 16 May 2010 18:18:14 -0400, Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a reason to support non-UPG systems? Not to force users to use anything that they don't want? btw: While I stopped at

Re: UPG and the default umask

2010-05-17 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Harald Braumann ha...@unheit.net wrote: On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:48:19AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: Will be done in base-files 5.4. I think that this change was done prematurely. There is still the issue of a Debian system running in a non-UPG

Re: UPG and the default umask

2010-05-17 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Santiago Vila sanv...@unex.es wrote: On Mon, 17 May 2010, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: Santiago Vila sanv...@unex.es writes: In either case, if we plan to set default umask in /etc/login.defs or /etc/login.defs is not read when I login to openssh server and

Re: UPG and the default umask

2010-05-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Marvin Renich m...@renich.org wrote: * Reinhard Tartler siret...@debian.org [100517 08:56]: Let's have a look at the source. Note that options-usergroups is set iff the option usergroups is used. ,[modules/pam_umask/pam_umask.c] | /* Set the process nice,

Re: UPG and the default umask

2010-05-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Harald Braumann ha...@unheit.net wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:08:17AM +, Philipp Kern wrote: On 2010-05-18, Christoph Anton Mitterer cales...@scientia.net wrote: Not to speak about, that UPG is anyway a questionable abuse of the user/group concept.

Re: UPG and the default umask

2010-05-20 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
reopen 315089 thanks On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Marvin Renich m...@renich.org wrote: * Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com [100517 13:05]: On 05/17/2010 10:49 AM, Harald Braumann wrote: from pam_umask's description of the usergroups option: If the user is not root, and the user

Re: UPG and the default umask

2010-05-20 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Harald Braumann ha...@unheit.net wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 03:40:06PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Harald Braumann ha...@unheit.net wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:08:17AM +, Philipp Kern wrote: On 2010-05-18

Re: How to make Debian more attractive for users, was: Re: The number of popcon.debian.org-submissions is falling

2010-07-22 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Steffen Möller steffen_moel...@gmx.de wrote: This should probably then move to Debian-Project? On 07/21/2010 11:31 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 05:34:27PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: I think that what we need is Debian Blends that

Re: How to make Debian more attractive for users, was: Re: The number of popcon.debian.org-submissions is falling

2010-07-22 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote: Le jeudi 22 juillet 2010 à 11:08 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : Support of debian is excellent but we are less user friendly than ubuntu. For isntance the bug sytem could be made simplier for joe simpler user, using

Re: How to make Debian more attractive for users, was: Re: The number of popcon.debian.org-submissions is falling

2010-07-22 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com writes: Support of debian is excellent but we are less user friendly than ubuntu. For isntance the bug sytem could be made simplier for joe simpler user, using an http interface

Re: How to make Debian more attractive for users, was: Re: The number of popcon.debian.org-submissions is falling

2010-07-22 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: In Launchpad, for anything in universe, the typical experience is that your bug goes into a black hole until a month or two later someone sends you some form

Re: teaching users how to submit good bug reports

2010-07-22 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote: Stefano Zacchiroli writes (teaching users how to submit good bug reports):    So, point 2: are we *advertising* reportbug enough to our users?    In particular, I'm thinking about advertising in push mode rather

Re: teaching users how to submit good bug reports

2010-07-22 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 04:05:17PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:    So, point 2: are we *advertising* reportbug enough to our users?    In particular, I'm thinking about advertising in push mode rather    then in pull

Re: teaching users how to submit good bug reports

2010-07-22 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote: On Do, 22 Jul 2010, Bjørn Mork wrote: If you are still unable to find and use reportbug, then I doubt that you are able to identify a bug and much less provide the information required to actually fix it. Agreed upon

  1   2   3   4   >