Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com
* Package name: promoe
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Thomas Frauendorfer thomas.frauendor...@googlemail.com
* URL : http://wiki.xmms2.xmms.se/wiki/Client:Promoe
* License : GPL v2
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org
* Package name: libkibi
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Benjamin Drung benjamin.dr...@gmail.com
* URL : https://launchpad.net/libkibi
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: C
Description
headers (licensecheck
output).
The Files field contains a space separated files list. What to do if the
file name contains a space? How should this space escaped?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org
* Package name: portsmf
Version : 0.1~svn20101010
Upstream Author : Roger B. Dannenberg
* URL : http://portmedia.sourceforge.net/
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org
* Package name: libsbsms
Version : 1.7.0
Upstream Author : Clayton Otey o...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL : http://sbsms.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C
break and a tested 4.0 in unstable.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
in the short term but are convinced that the longer
term advantages make this worthwhile.
Did you do an archive check with the new lintian and diff'ed it against
a check with previous lintian?
Please do a complete archive check on lintian.debian.org.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu
patches waiting to be reviewed. What can be
done to improve this number?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 00:05 + schrieb Roger Leigh:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:01:12PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
1. ubuntu-dev-tools contains a bunch of scripts. Some of them are useful
only for Ubuntu, but some of them are general usable for packaging.
These scripts
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 16:42 + schrieb Ian Jackson:
Benjamin Drung writes (new scripts and patches for devscripts):
1. ubuntu-dev-tools contains a bunch of scripts. Some of them are useful
only for Ubuntu, but some of them are general usable for packaging.
These scripts
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 12:26 -0500 schrieb James Vega:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 00:05 + schrieb Roger Leigh:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:01:12PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Should these script moved from
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 22:28 + schrieb Ian Jackson:
Benjamin Drung writes (Re: new scripts and patches for devscripts):
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 16:42 + schrieb Ian Jackson:
add-patch
check-symbols
cowbuilder-dist
debian-distro-info
distro-info
edit
with the script proposers.
Can we continue to discuss the language issue on debian-devel or should
we move the discussion somewhere else?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
,
so while they may support their scripts within devscripts, how much does
it really buy for the devscripts package as a whole?
I bough a copy of Learning Perl (translated into my native language).
That's at least a starting point.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Am Donnerstag, den 10.03.2011, 18:32 +0100 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
On 08/03/2011 23:01, Benjamin Drung wrote:
check-symbols
I always hated programs that do sudo (and even more those doing it
*twice*). And, isn't just unpacking the .deb and checking for .so
there enough? You could have
in most cases. A package
should use Vcs-Debian-* if the vcs is only used in Debian. A package
could use Vcs-* if the vcs is used in derived distros too.
What should we do if we have multiple upstream VCSes? For exapmle,
Eclipse has Eclipse and eclipse-build as upstream.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian
Am Mittwoch, den 06.04.2011, 11:39 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 12:28:39PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
We (lindi, liw and me) had just a short discussion in #-devel, that it
would be nice to have some sort of Vcs-Upstream-* in debian/control, to
be able to get
Am Samstag, den 21.05.2011, 21:41 +0200 schrieb Tshepang Lekhonkhobe:
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 00:26 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 12:26 -0500 schrieb James Vega:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011
have a better name for the meta
package? Should something added to or removed from the dependency list?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am Donnerstag, den 26.05.2011, 17:25 -0300 schrieb Fernando Lemos:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
A few days ago, we had a discussion in Ubuntu about a packaging-dev meta
package. The problem is that users have to install a bunch of packages
Am Donnerstag, den 26.05.2011, 16:33 -0400 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 26.05.2011, 17:25 -0300 schrieb Fernando Lemos:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote:
Hi
Am Donnerstag, den 26.05.2011, 22:40 +0200 schrieb gregor herrmann:
On Thu, 26 May 2011 22:05:42 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
As a starting point packaging-dev would depend on
build-essential
quilt
debhelper
cmake
autoconf
cdbs
bzr-builddeb
apt-file
ubuntu-dev-tools (only
.
The current version of the control field I've got sitting here has
build-essential in Depends and the rest in Recommends so people can
slim down at-will.
Can you upload the version of the package into collab-maint on Alioth?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description
Am Mittwoch, den 25.05.2011, 14:49 +0200 schrieb Tshepang Lekhonkhobe:
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 23:51 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Samstag, den 21.05.2011, 21:41 +0200 schrieb Tshepang Lekhonkhobe:
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 00:26 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 12
Am Donnerstag, den 26.05.2011, 17:28 -0400 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Mackenzie Morgan maco...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote:
Recommends or Suggests:
cdbs
patches take the form of
debian/patches/debian-changes-ver.
Obviously this is a pretty poor name for a patch [...]
The file should end with .patch
(debian/patches/debian-changes-ver.patch) so that your favorite text
editor uses the correct highlighting.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 16:09 +0200 schrieb Sandro Tosi:
Ideally, I'd imaging nnn...@b.d.o to reach
- submitter
- maintainers
- subscribers
We already have -quite if we want to not mail people.
Do others feel we should enable emailing the submitter by default?
Yes, please email
Am Sonntag, den 13.09.2009, 23:58 +0100 schrieb Jon Dowland:
Most of the examples given in DEP-5 containing the path
character will not work, either, e.g.
Files: debian/*
Assuming they are passed into a find(1) invocation like so
find . -path 'debian/*'
(note the presence of
be dropped. no or not-yet would indicate that the patch
was not applied yet. If the patch was applied, it could contain the
revision (like r4681) or a link to the VCS commit.
What do you think about my suggestion?
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer
Am Montag, den 23.11.2009, 08:42 +0100 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
Hi,
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Benjamin Drung wrote:
When a new upstream version is released, I have to check all patches
if
they were accepted by upstream or not. I have to check each patch if
I
can drop it. It would make
Am Montag, den 23.11.2009, 09:18 +0100 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com writes:
Hi,
When a new upstream version is released, I have to check all patches if
they were accepted by upstream or not. I have to check each patch if I
can drop it. It would make
Hi,
I got some FTBFS with binutils-gold bug reports. How can I build my
packages using binutils-gold? What do I have to change for that?
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com
* Package name: release
Version : 0.1 (native)
Upstream Author : Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com
* License : GPL v3+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : provides information about
-exec rm {} \;
But also a patch which contains just the names of the files to be removed and
not the whole content would suffice.
Putting 'find . -name *.jar -delete' in you clean rule should do the
same job for you.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer
Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 09:03 +0100 schrieb Frank Lin PIAT:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 00:14 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
* Package name: release
The tool isn't about releasing, but about to querying the release. Also,
it's about distribution release (not package...). May be a name
Am Mittwoch, den 09.12.2009, 09:34 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 09:03 +0100 schrieb Frank Lin PIAT:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 00:14 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
For Debian I need some informations
preferences, suggestions, or objections?
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Am Freitag, den 11.12.2009, 09:17 +0100 schrieb Frank Lin PIAT:
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 00:09 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
To sum up the naming discussion, there are two possible package names:
* distro-release-info
* release-info
The two distro-specific script will be named debian
Am Freitag, den 11.12.2009, 15:57 -0600 schrieb Peter Samuelson:
[Benjamin Drung]
Yes, the name is a bit to generic. Any other suggestions for the name?
On the mailing list I found 'release-info'. On my list are now:
* release-info
* distro-release-info
* distro-releases
I'd go
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com
* Package name: jdownloader
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : JDownloader DEV-Team supp...@jdownloader.org
* URL : http://jdownloader.org/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Java
the
application.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianMozExtTeam
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
, it will enhance icedove and provide
icedove-quotecolors. So are still able to run apt-get install
icedove-quotecolors or apt-get install iceweasel-adblock-plus.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital
Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 15:48 -0500 schrieb James Vega:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Thilo Six t@gmx.de wrote:
Benjamin Drung wrote the following on 01.02.2010 20:34
icedove-quotecolors
2nd question:
In the good old days (when ever these were) someone like a short sighted
2010/2/2 Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org:
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 08:34:31PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Hi,
This mail targets all developers, which maintain Mozilla extensions.
Source package name
===
The source package name for extension should not contain the name
of the PCMCIA
card. xul-plugin- sounds better, but do not fit. The least evil proposal
was to append -browserplugin. Better suggestions are welcome.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter
of the
affected packages' maintainers?
We should gather more opinions, especially from the affected packages'
maintainers.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
that uses its own tools.
You seriously don't want to force dak upon everyone. And there is not
even a package. (And the same is true for wanna-build, sadly.)
Why is there no dak and wanna-build package? Are there plans to create
such packages?
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com
Am Donnerstag, den 25.03.2010, 17:57 +0100 schrieb Julien BLACHE:
Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hi,
Why is there no dak and wanna-build package? Are there plans to create
such packages?
Have you ever tried to install dak?
No.
If you have, then the answer should be obvious
.
That explains why fatsort is gone. Thanks for the info.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
cleaning.
I prefer the removal over the restoring the old files. You remove .o
files on clean, so why not remove the other auto-generated files on
clean?
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital
of
Origin is not dissimilar to what we need here. How about something like
the following?
Thanks for the suggestion, it looks good so I applied it.
Thanks.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital
that no package was really renamed.
What should we do?
I think we should start using the new naming policy to add the
-browserplugin suffix.
There were some votes for -browserplugin and none against it. No better
name was proposed. Therefore I think that it was decided.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu
Am Sonntag, den 25.04.2010, 23:51 +0200 schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez:
On dim., 2010-04-25 at 18:58 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
What should we do?
I think we should start using the new naming policy to add the
-browserplugin suffix.
There were some votes for -browserplugin and none
preference to 1. or 2.).
Opinions?
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 18:49 +0200 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:56:15PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
I'm sure you meant browser-plugin-* here ...
Hm, browserplugin-* would be a new option. Then we would have
1. browser-plugin-*
2. browserplugin
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 20:40 +0200 schrieb Benjamin Drung:
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 18:49 +0200 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:56:15PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
I'm sure you meant browser-plugin-* here ...
Hm, browserplugin-* would be a new option
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 23:58 +0200 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
Hans-J. Ullrich hans.ullr...@loop.de writes:
Am Montag, 26. April 2010 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com writes:
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 11:07 +0200 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
On Mon
Am Dienstag, den 27.04.2010, 10:02 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
Le Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:40:41PM +0200, Benjamin Drung a écrit :
I setup a doodle poll
Dear Benjamin,
I would like to recommend http://selectricity.org/ instead. In contrary to
Doodle, Selectricity is free software
, so please remember to cc me. Thanks.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
with SSE2 instruction
set, what would be the most appropriate architecture name?
The best solution would be autodetection of SSE2 on runtime. That can be
done with a few lines of code.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Hi,
after some days the poll [1] has been a clear result. browser-plugin-*
has won with a huge winning margin.
[1] http://www.doodle.com/guafbbhipwskzr8a
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital
Is it enabled by default without asking the user? (I didn't do an ubuntu
install since warty or hoary so I wouldn't know)
No. You have to enable it in a submenu.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital
-derived distributions and contribute directly to
Debian to avoid work duplication.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Am Montag, den 26.07.2010, 10:30 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
Hi,
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 22.07.2010, 10:20 +0200 schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez:
On 21/07/2010 10:25, Paul Wise wrote:
They also currently have almost 20 times as many popcon
Am Freitag, den 30.07.2010, 14:24 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Benjamin Drung wrote:
I could not find that submenu while installing 10.04. It's quite
possibly only in the alternate installer image nowadays (that is used
for the server edition AFAIK
it was -- maybe it doesn't exist anymore.
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
There you can search the contents of packages.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am Donnerstag, den 30.09.2010, 14:38 -0400 schrieb Michael Hanke:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 08:33:54PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 30.09.2010, 14:31 -0400 schrieb Michael Hanke:
Hi,
I want to determine in what Debian _source_ packages a file with a
particular name
XUL extensions (e.g. adblock-plus) are
packaged.
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/mozilla-devscripts
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com
* Package name: ocs
Version : 2.3n
Upstream Author : Opal Group, TU Berlin
* URL : https://projects.uebb.tu-berlin.de/opal/
* License : GPL, LGPL (will probably change)
Programming Lang
instead of modifying it and figuring out how to rebuild the
pre-generated files, especially when you do security fixes or stable
release updates.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
are great, but the configuration format
(JSON) seems to be too complex for this use case.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
or build-depend on packaging-dev.
[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/packaging-dev.git
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2011, 15:11 +0100 schrieb Neil Williams:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:46:44 +0200
Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote:
A few days ago, we had a discussion about a packaging-dev meta package.
This package is just for packaging, not for developing. So gdb, pylint
.
Beginners are the target, not experienced packagers. That's why Neil's
reasons seems to be stronger for me than Vincent's. Therefore I will
leave the chroot dependency as dependency unless more people are in
favor of moving them to Recommends.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
and then ...!
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
, you could use apt-mirror to
store a complete mirror locally (takes around 30 GB for one
architecture).
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
to be the fashion.
Did we?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
there, and the best case for inclusion, is the MPL 1.1 at
740 packages. The next closest contender would be the CDDL at 219
packages.
Probably many people of the Mozilla extension maintainers team would
love to see the MPL-1.1 in common-licenses.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org
* Package name: lxmms2
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Johannes Heimansberg wejpi...@gmail.com
* URL : http://wejp.k.vu/projects/xmms2/lxmms2
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C
-distro-info is implemented in Haskell (since version 0.3) and has
an Python and Perl library.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
: ISC
File: foo/file_one.bar
License: GPL
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2012, 14:20 -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org writes:
DEP-5 is nice, but how can I specify a license for a file with white
spaces? For example you want to specify that the file foo/file one.bar
is licensed under ISC, but foo/file_one.bar
if you can stand ugliness of such Files fields.
True words.
For example, the eclipse source package has files with spaces in it
using ? instead of spaces does look ugly.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2012, 14:49 -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org writes:
Is it to complex to have a syntax that is similar to what the shell
does? Two solutions pop into my mind. Please let me know, why these are
not use. You can point me to previous
Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2012, 14:56 -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org writes:
Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2012, 14:49 -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
Yeah, both of those were among the other syntax proposals that were
suggested, and I think one of them was in the document
project.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org
* Package name: npapi-vlc
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : VLC media player developers vlc-de...@videolan.org
* URL : http://git.videolan.org/?p=npapi-vlc.git
* License : GPL-2
[10]
change is now imminent. Thanks to Carsten Hey and Gerfried Fuchs for
their help in figuring out the details of the last discussion on the
matter and DSA for their feedback.
[10] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/03/msg8.html
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian
packages using their metadata (similar to grep-dctrl,
but uses a dedicated query language)
* tracker: frontend to multiple monitors
What does ben stand for? Is this just a short name for me? ;)
Would it be useful to have ben in devscripts instead of a separate
package?
--
Benjamin Drung
.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
languages in our mime.types
text/x-perl
text/x-python
text/x-tcl
text/x-sh
text/x-java
text/x-haskell
[...]
Java and Haskell are compiled, but not interpreted languages.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
is
supported for 5, but most people will suggest you follow the LTS upgrade
path, which is very similar to Debian Stable's.
Since Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, the LTS versions are supported for five years on
the desktop, too.
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
of the Debian developer and not just by the
maintainer of packaging-dev or one single bug reporter. Therefore I am
asking you: How popular are bzr-builddeb and dh-make? Should they be
recommended or just suggested by packaging-dev?
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/688572
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu
often, but it
sometimes is useful.
I can't give any hint, because I am just one developer, but I would
probably prefer dh-make for the reason above.
But if I would need to decide, I would probably suggest both and
recommend none of them :-)
Cheers,
Matthias
2012/10/11 Benjamin Drung bdr
Am Donnerstag, den 11.10.2012, 14:38 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
Hi Benjamin,
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:38:08PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
How popular are bzr-builddeb and dh-make in Debian? The current
situation is that packaging-dev recommends bzr-builddeb and suggests
dh-make
Am Freitag, den 12.10.2012, 00:00 +0200 schrieb Vincent Bernat:
❦ 11 octobre 2012 22:33 CEST, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org :
I can confirm the trend for a couple of organisations. The primary
reason that I identified was the retirement of security support for
Lenny and that Lenny
Am Freitag, den 12.10.2012, 10:04 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
A poll is a good idea. Can you recommend a site that allows setting up a
poll?
The Debian secretary was at one point going to setup devotee for this
sort of thing, don't
on Launchpad? bzr is integrated into
Launchpad, but you can use bzr without Launchpad as every other DVCS.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
) one of the above options.
What will I do?
Am Samstag, den 13.10.2012, 00:10 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
Le Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:06:11PM +0200, Benjamin Drung a écrit :
Am Freitag, den 12.10.2012, 10:04 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
https://dudle.inf.tu-dresden.de/Popularity_of_bzr
1 - 100 of 902 matches
Mail list logo
