Lucas Nussbaum (31/08/2011):
> hurd-i386, kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 are probably too
> experimental to be used on production systems. For kfreebsd, my main
> problem (with my Ruby hat) is the linuxthreads-based thread library, but
> there might be other problems.
http://lists.debian.org/87
Wolodja Wentland (30/08/2011):
> It is my impression that the problems mentioned in my initial mail can
> be solved by changing metapackages (like those mentioned by Cyril in
> his reply) to use Recommends instead of Depends.
>
> I am, however, not entirely sure if there are any good reasons for
Andreas Tille (30/08/2011):
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 04:40:30PM +0100, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
> > is there a specific reason why metapackages depend rather then
> > recommend packages they are meant to pull in?
>
> The statement that metapackages depend from packages is not true in
> general.
Russ Allbery (29/08/2011):
> Does this work now? Previously, setting the architecture list didn't
> do anything useful if the source package built at least one arch: all
> package.
Since arch: all as per-arch (…) now, I guess that limitation is gone.
And yes, arch restrictions have been working
Hi,
Miguel Landaeta (26/08/2011):
> * URL : http://winswitch.org/documentation/protocols/xpra.html
(there's no such thing as X windows, first line of General Information)
> Programming Lang: C, Python
> Description : tool to detach/reattach running X programs
What's the sta
Bastien ROUCARIES (23/08/2011):
> And for middle ages dog (not oldtimer) they are the ssh -X root@localhost
> trick
or: sudo XAUTHORITY=~/.Xauthority wireshark
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Michael Prokop (22/08/2011):
> * Adam D. Barratt [Mon Aug 22, 2011 at 07:11:08PM +0100]:
> > Looking at the procps source package in unstable, it appears to have the
> > same issue. If that's the case, then I'm afraid your question should
> > really have been "what's the proper way to address thi
Cyril Brulebois (22/08/2011):
> Michael Prokop (22/08/2011):
> > 1) What's the proper way to address this issue in squeeze?
> >a) Build a i386 package with broken symlink?
> >b) Build whatever-arch package with working symlink?
>
> Stop using basename o
Michael Prokop (22/08/2011):
> 1) What's the proper way to address this issue in squeeze?
>a) Build a i386 package with broken symlink?
>b) Build whatever-arch package with working symlink?
Stop using basename on what's in /lib, and do that on what's under
debian/tmp.
> 2) How can we ma
Hi all.
(Putting -bsd@ in the loop, since I believe not everyone there reads
-devel@. The (very long) thread starts at:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/07/msg00269.html)
Josselin Mouette (20/07/2011):
> You are both framing the discussion through a fallacy: that the only
> choice
Michael Meskes (19/07/2011):
> could anyone tell me what the difference between scribus and scribus-ng is?
> According to the description scribus-ng is the development branch but scribus
> itself is a later rc than -ng. Besides it appears to me that the package(s)
> could need a little bit of love
Russ Allbery (18/07/2011):
> The upstart maintainers have expressed considerably more willingness
> to date to work with Debian on meeting our project's goals and
> incorporating those changes into the upstream release.
For reference, that would likely be:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/200
Johan Walles (13/07/2011):
> Build log says "Maybe successful":
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?arch=powerpc&pkg=libtasn1-3&ver=2.9-4
>
> What does "maybe" mean in this case? Is it the "Maybe" that's holding
> the package back? What does it take to get from "Maybe successful" to
> "
Hans-J. Ullrich (18/06/2011):
> Yes, it is userspace. Pity I don't have the logs any more (Xorg.log.0), where
> the error was shown. It showed me, that the *_dri.so could not found (so GLX
> could not be started). They originally reside below /usr/lib/dri/, but the
> driver search them below /u
Hans-J. Ullrich (18/06/2011):
> Well, I thought the problem is not related to i915, as this is part of
> the kernel, and I did not change the kernel.
Just to clarify: You mentioned a .so, not a .ko; there are i915 bits in
the kernel, and in userspace; in this case, this is about userspace.
Mraw,
Hi.
Hans-J. Ullrich (18/06/2011):
> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/dri/i915_dri.so
> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/dri/swrast_dri.so
>
> Solution:
> As "apt-file search i386-linux-gnu" did not show any package with this
> content,
> I added the directories manually and created some symlinks to i915_dri.so
Here's a tiny update, and below, the descriptions.
Cyril Brulebois (28/01/2011):
> * Package name: wayland
> Version : git
> Upstream Author : Kristian Høgsberg and others
> * URL : http://wayland.freedesktop.org/
> * License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Cyril Brulebois
A while ago wayland was split into two separate repositories, wayland
and wayland-demos. I'll keep #611400 for the former, and this is the ITP
bug for the latter. I'll post descriptions for #611400 later on.
(http://cgit.freed
Zed Pobre (08/06/2011):
> What's involved in editing wiki.debian.org? My debian.org password
> doesn't seem to apply […]
That's a separate login system, not reserved to DD only. Create an
account, log in, and enjoy.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Philip Ashmore (06/06/2011):
> While trying to build QT 4.8.0 technology preview I had occasion to
> search for openvg.h.
while it would be nice to have a functional packages.debian.org, I
probably should be sharing that (at least in the meanwhile):
# apt-get install apt-file
$ apt-file
Hi,
Raphael Hertzog (29/05/2011):
> from time to time I hear some rumblings about how "3.0 (quilt)"
> mixes badly with VCS. Indeed, one of the primary goals of the format
> was to not require prior knowledge of the patch system to be able to
> modify a package.
thanks for trying to improve the s
Hi,
Roland Mas (23/05/2011):
> We should now be in the phase where we pretend it's done, wait for
> the complaints, and fix the problems as they are reported (or laugh
> them off when they come from the too-common expectation that Alioth
> can be used to run any random stuff by anyone).
sorry,
Hi,
Dominic Hargreaves (17/05/2011):
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Dominic Hargreaves
>
> * Package name: libdevel-dprof-perl
> Version : 20110228.00
> Upstream Author : Florian Ragwitz
> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-DProf/
> * License
Hi again,
Cyril Brulebois (08/05/2011):
> is that a related breakage?
>
> [Can't debootstrap]
>
> Same happens with ftp{.fr,.uk,.de,}.debian.org; with i386 and amd64.
Also, ftp.ch.d.o exhibited the infamous Hash Sum mismatches for the
kfreebsd-i386 sid chroot on io.debi
Hi,
Joerg Jaspert (07/05/2011):
> As we have received no notice of errors and as we also do not see
> anything bad ourself, I just activated the new generator for the
> archive. Starting with the next dinstall run in a few minutes all
> Packages and Sources files[2] will be generated using the ne
Jonathan Nieder (05/05/2011):
> I personally don't think uploading packages to experimental before
> it is time for them to participate in transitions to testing and
> integrate with the rest of the next stable distribution is abuse at
> all. In fact I wish people would do it more often.
Being a
Hi,
(you already know, but let's state that on dd@ too)
Josselin Mouette (04/05/2011):
> during the recent discussions about rolling, a proposal was made in
> a blog comment, and after giving it some quick thoughts, most people
> I’ve talked with seem to think it is a good idea, so it’s time for
Hi,
Mark Johnson (03/05/2011):
> However, I wasn't able to find any info on how to rejoin the
> organization in the standard documents. Do I simply go through the
> New Maintainer application process as I did initially?
might be that it's a bit uncommon, and maybe under-documented; anyway,
I had
Hi,
(not a gcc maintainer)
Charles Plessy (04/05/2011):
> I just got a bug from you explaining some changes (= more FTBFS)
> about 4.6.1. Will there be similar 4.6.x changes in the future ?
my reading of it is that to prevent too many FTBFSes while introducing
4.6 in Debian, some changes were
Bernd Zeimetz (29/04/2011):
> Instead of Martin's project you might want to look into ipcfg by
> Wouter Verhelst, which is in experimental already.
You may want not to. Last I checked (#dd yesterday, but not quoting
without permission), the idea was to scratch everything and start
over.
Mraw,
Ki
Jon Dowland (27/04/2011):
> ~ sorts after ., so "0~110427" will be considered newer than "0.1".
> Therefore, the 0 in 0~YYMMDD is meaningless, and would be no better
> than ~YYMMDD (which would still sort after 0.1, and require an
> epoch).
$ dpkg --compare-versions 0~110427 '<<' 0.1 && echo "Jon
Ben Hutchings (23/04/2011):
> I would like to see policy forbid the use of commit hashes in
> versions. They aren't ordered, and the information about exactly
> which commit the snapshot was can be included in the changelog.
I'll be happy to second any wording you could come up with on that
topi
Hi,
Arnaud Fontaine (22/04/2011):
> * Package name: xml_marshaller
not a valid package name. :)
> Version : 0.9.7
> Upstream Author : Nicolas Delaby
> * URL : http://www.python.org/community/sigs/current/xml-sig/
> * License : Python License (CNRI Python Lic
Ralf Treinen (21/04/2011):
> * Package name: aspcud
> Version : 2011.03.17
> Upstream Author : Roland Kaminski
> * URL : http://www.cs.uni-potsdam.de/wv/aspcud/
> * License : GPL3+
> Programming Lang: C++
> Description : a CUDF solver based on answer se
Luk Claes (04/04/2011):
> The most obvious reason to not degrade bash to Priority: important
> is obviously that one needs to declare a dependency on bash when
> it's used in a package. Which means quite some packages will need to
> be changed.
What is the most obvious reason to degrade bash to P
Hi,
Josselin Mouette (04/04/2011):
> I think squeeze already does a lot better, but there is still work
> to do, especially with the installation process.
>
> On my personal wishlist for wheezy is d-i actually calling NM behind
> the scenes to configure the network, instead of ifupdown. I’ll
> d
Michael Biebl (04/04/2011):
> I might be mistaken, but I think Steve's meant something more along
> the lines of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586082
I guess I could have been more specific, and quoted Steve a bit
further:
| Once that's made its way through the archive, we coul
g
I have no useful idea to share about the practical implementation, but
for the general idea:
Acked-by: Cyril Brulebois
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Dmitry Katsubo (31/03/2011):
> The mentioned symbols are exported from libgomp (a part of gcc-4.4
> package), which is correctly linked to the SO:
>
> # ldd ./src/libosra_java.so | grep gomp
> libgomp.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgomp.so.1 (0xb68df000)
you may want to check through objdump
Samuel Thibault (31/03/2011):
> Michael Biebl, le Thu 31 Mar 2011 14:30:06 +0200, a écrit :
> > As you can see, xserver-xorg still uses hal on kfreebsd, but iirc
> > KiBi did some work in that regard.
>
> AFAIK, it was agreed that hal is needed for now. FreeBSD's devd
> should be a long-term repl
Bernd Zeimetz (29/03/2011):
> And as you have to test-build your packages anyway the only reason I
> see why you wouldn't be able to upload them is a very slow
> connection to the rest of the world.
One can test-build in her own, non-chroot environment, and still be
cautious about what changed in
Thomas Goirand (29/03/2011):
> Description : open source software for building reliable cloud
> infrastructure
Please drop “open source software”, that's what Debian is about, no
need to mention it in package descriptions (both short and long btw).
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digit
Hi,
Steffen Möller (24/03/2011):
> Dear kfreebsd users,
this is -devel@; cc-ing -bsd@…
> amd64 is fine, but i386 does not build the BOINC package. The only other
> platofrm making difficulties is hurd, but this is something very
> different and will most likely be already fixed with the next up
Hi,
just as a reminder:
Roger Leigh (16/03/2011):
> OK. I think this is the only known discrepancy between the two
> resolvers. Given that we now routinely build using minimal clean
> (cloned) chroots, they will behave identically in practice because
AFAICT: only possible on Linux f
Bernd Zeimetz (02/03/2011):
> What about a project which prepares a migration to
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd ?
yay for portability.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi.
sergey (27/02/2011):
> Is it normal that Debian's programs in my system gets dependencies
> from non-Debian libraries?
Phrased otherwise, it's normal to get to look into /usr/local/lib
since that's the linker's configuration, see /etc/ld.so.conf.d/libc.conf
(which has a comment about its bei
Mathieu Malaterre (24/02/2011):
> Is there anything I would be missing ?
[…]
> Reject Reasons:
> paraview_3.8.1-2_amd64.changes file already known to dak
You already uploaded this version, and even if it got removed, you
can't upload it back AFAICT.
> mathieu.malate...@gmail.com may not upload N
Patrick Matthäi (13/02/2011):
> since we have got a stable release with dkms now, I am asking
> myself, if it is still necessary to support module-assistant.
>
> dkms is IMHO the better system and maintaining two different systems
> for kernel modules is a bit bloated.
>
> I think there should b
brian m. carlson (13/02/2011):
> Also, FTBFS bugs are often filed by buildd admins; I'm sure they'd
> like to spend their time doing things other than filing those bugs.
Hell yes.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Stefano Zacchiroli (13/02/2011):
> I hereby propose a mass bug filing, severity minor, requesting
> migration to the proper debian/control field.
That might also be a sign of packages lacking love, maybe some of them
should be orphaned or dropped instead?
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digit
Norbert Preining (12/02/2011):
> I checked:
> - alternatives of: x-www-browser, sensible-browser, www-browser, gnome-browser
> and all of them point to iceweasel
> - checked the "preferred applications" in GNOME and it also shows
> iceweasel
> - checked with
> xdg-settings get default-web
Samuel Thibault (11/02/2011):
> Mmm, I think we've already had users that have even 50% error rate,
> simply because they mispell things.
I like the intended pun!
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Arnout Engelen (05/02/2011):
> Package name: xscope
> Version: 1.3
> Upstream Author: James Peterson, MCC, Keith Packard
> URL: http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/app/
> License: X
might not deserve its own package. I guess it could be shipped in one
of the x11-* bundles.
KiBi.
Ricardo Mones (03/02/2011):
> Description : export web pages to PDF files
>
> Webkit2pdf is a little GTK+ tool designed to fetch web pages and
> export them to numbered PDF files (or to print them).
> .
> Specifying paper size and output directory is also supported.
Hope this helps:
$ a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: debia...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libxkbcommon
Version : git
Upstream Author : Dan Nicholson and others
* URL : http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libxkbcommon/
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C
Descripti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: debia...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: wayland
Version : git
Upstream Author : Kristian Høgsberg and others
* URL : http://wayland.freedesktop.org/
* License : GPL & MIT/X mostly.
Programming Lang: C
Description
Olaf van der Spek (14/01/2011):
> There are lots of packages with old bugs without any comments that
> are not on that list.
Oh, indeed! Crap! I hereby request help for the 167 following
packages:
ccsm
compiz
compizconfig-backend-gconf
compizconfig-backend-kconfig
compizconfi
Ben Hutchings (12/01/2011):
> If a bug is not readily reproducible or isolatable, it may be
> necessary to pass it over to an upstream maintainer who will know
> what further questions to ask. But they need to send those
> questions to the user, not to the Debian maintainer. In the kernel
> team
Mike Hommey (05/01/2011):
> It requires a recent kernel, though. IIRC, Lenny kernels don't
> support readonly bind mounts.
readonly bind mount support appeared in 2.6.26, at least according to
the first point in [1].
1. http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_26
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: D
Cyril Brulebois (04/01/2011):
> [ BS ]
Sorry, zack got it right, I didn't.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Michael Hanke (04/01/2011):
> The likelihood of Debian having a package that actually provides
> matlab seems to be rather low. If it ever happens this package would
> be obsolete and could be removed.
Then there should be no matlab package, at all.
> I assume you want to point to the problem of
Michael Hanke (04/01/2011):
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Michael Hanke
>
> * Package name: matlab
> Version : 0.0.13
> Upstream Author : Michael Hanke
> * URL : http://neuro.debian.net/pkgs/matlab.html
> * License : GPL
> Programming Lang:
Olaf van der Spek (01/01/2011):
> > Doing it in the kernel would be fine (maybe DLM could be used here),
>
> What's DLM?
CONFIG_DLM.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Kurt Roeckx (30/12/2010):
> Do you know about parallel in moreutils? Is there an advantage over
> that one?
The bug log answers the former (yes). The 4 options mentioned in
moreutils's manpage seem to have an equivalent in GNU parallel,
according to the first link under “Documentation”.
KiBi.
Gustavo Franco (11/11/2010):
> It seems there's a huge database dump being generated, but the
> service itself - a pgsql server - isn't externally accessible. Is my
> assumption correct? If yes, are there any plans to wrap it using
> some sort of API for external consumption?
You can haz docs:
Thanks maks,
tiny update from the Xorg side:
maximilian attems (11/11/2010):
> Debian intel xorg driver is missing patch to bail out earlier when
> kms is off so the server will fall back to vesa, instead of erroring
> out.
455f2939 landed upstream, will be cherry-picked:
http://cgit.freedes
(Adding bug & submitter to the loop…)
Marc Haber (02/11/2010):
> Has there been any development in wicd in the last months that
> suggests that packaging new wicd stuff is worth it?
[1] is one click away from [2], and it appears stuff happened in
october.
1. https://code.launchpad.net/~wicd-de
Russ Allbery (27/09/2010):
> The only other proposed solution in the bug was to just require
> build-arch/build-indep, and I think that would be more disruptive.
Do we have numbers here? From another mail, it looks like a while
back, only a minority of packages was affected. Sounds like something
Dmitry E. Oboukhov (25/09/2010):
> It seems that Debian doesn't contain all files which are nessesary
> to install Debian in qemu. Could You give me a link to how to
> install debian/armel(etc) in qemu?
qemu-system-$arch + debian-installer-$version-netboot-$arch?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Desc
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (14/09/2010):
> > packages really ought to build if that package is installed…
> This is true. However you can't install two packages containing this
> file.
Sorry, I should have been more explicit: build *properly*, i.e. do
what's needed to avoid shipping that file in t
Hi,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (14/09/2010):
> So this is to let you know, to remove this package in order to avoid
> further problems :)
packages really ought to build if that package is installed…
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi (25/08/2010):
> How do I obtain a list of packages that have FTBFS bugs filed on
> them and that are currently failing to build on i386 architecture?
https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=i386&suite=unstable
Click “Failed”. Usually, you get a “failing reason”
Ben Hutchings (09/08/2010):
> This information belongs in the release notes. I'm not sure where
> one should look to see the draft release notes for the next release.
Sounds like it?
http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Stephen Powell (13/07/2010):
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Care to share a reference to the bug you reported?
> As Sven Joachim has pointed out, this would be an exercise in
> futility. Upstream deliberately removed support for UMS a while
> ago.
Guess what, I *know*. And I did
Stephen Powell (12/07/2010):
> But I can't get the nouveau driver to use my custom 100 Hz
> Interlaced mode, or even the VESA standard 87 Hz Interlaced mode.
> It insists on running the monitor at 60 Hz non-interlaced. And my
> eyes just won't take that for very long. At 100 Hz interlaced, I
> c
(Dropping -release, which isn't a discussion list.)
William Pitcock (22/05/2010):
> Given that there is no active upstream and that the Debian lilo
> package carries many patches for bug fixes that are alleviated by
> standardizing on grub2, this seems like the best option for Debian.
Speaking o
Since -bsd@ might be interested, Cc-ing them:
Steve Langasek (07/05/2010):
> On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 03:15:25PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 14:57:08 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> > > [Aaron Toponce]
> > > > I thought Upstart was on the list for release in Sqe
Frank Lin PIAT (28/04/2010):
> [Various remarks]
You're missing the important bit here:
Version 2.3.2 was released on 03/13/05.
What about not packaging *that* at all?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Romain Beauxis (16/04/2010):
> > | 2009 | 1013 | 47.741 | 366 |361 | 43 | 35.636 | 7.56155 |
> > | 2010 | 886 | 44.648 | 459 |436 | 88 | 49.210 | 9.76513 |
>
> I voted twice and never received an ack. I am also not on the list
> of voters.
Yay for wondering in time.
>
Al Nikolov (07/04/2010):
> * Package name: drupal6-l10n-ru
> Drupal uses English by default, but may be translated to many other
> languages.
>
> This is Russian translation.
Can't it just be merged into the drupal package?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Luca,
Luca Filipozzi (03/04/2010):
> I hope that this information proves helpful.
terribly. That's the kind of mail which helps getting facts straight,
and helps getting a grip on real-life administration-related issues.
Thanks.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Russ Allbery (25/03/2010):
> Well, certainly the goal of Lintian is not to produce tags for which
> the project consensus is that nothing should be done about. If
> people don't feel like this is a good idea, we can remove it. It
> made sense to me personally, but that isn't a deciding crit
Jérémy Lal (20/03/2010):
> i wonder if there should be some notice sent to all package
> maintainers who use a custom debian/cdbs/scons.mk file, to make them
> use the one provided by cdbs now ?
reportbug lintian with a patch implementing detecting when scons.mk is
found below debian/?
Mraw,
KiB
Brian May (19/03/2010):
> On 19 March 2010 13:24, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > | k...@bowmore:/tmp$ sbuild -c sid-amd64-sbuild -d experimental
> > gtk2-engines_2.18.5-2.dsc
>
> What happens if you omit the -d and only have -c?
As already pointed out in [1]: #559659, whi
Brian May (19/03/2010):
> According to the man page in my version of sbuild:
>-d, --dist=distribution
> Fetch source packages from specified distribution.
>
> However this documentation doesn't say this will also override the
> distribution used in the changes file. Maybe it
Adam C Powell IV (06/03/2010):
> How can I change the temporary directory where it builds the
> tarballs? I don't see anything in the manpage or dpkg-deb --help
> output.
(Untested)
It probably honours TMP/TMPDIR environment variables.
> [Please CC me in replies.]
[Done.]
Mraw,
KiBi.
signat
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (24/02/2010):
> Hi!
Heya again,
> Thanks, did't knew about that.
Tag! You're it. Go and open a bug against developers-reference with a
patch. ;)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (24/02/2010):
> Indeed, they are not always a failure. A arch specific package I
> sponsor (rt-tests) send me some of these failed build
> notifications. The "Problem" the build fails, because the
> archittecure is not supported, as can for example be seen on the
> hppa
Roger Leigh (23/02/2010):
> 1) sbuild no longer defaults the distribution to "unstable", and
> requires setting by hand with --distribution unless configured in
> .sbuildrc. This is to prevent accidental uploads to the wrong
> distribution.
Yay. :D
> 2) sbuild now lists all p
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the blender package.
Blender is nice, but might benefit from more hands than only mine. If
you want to help, please have a look at this checklist which should help
you see if you fit the profile (if you don't, don't be afraid t
Reinhard Tartler (08/02/2010):
> I don't understand why this package is claimed to be empty:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/all/byobu/filelist
Because of:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/all/byobu-extras/filelist
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Julien Cristau (26/01/2010):
> I'd object to this. I believe apt-listchanges needs to be in the
> default install.
Seconded.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Michael Hanke (15/01/2010):
> out of date on hppa: fsl (from 4.1.1-1)
> out of date on mipsel: fsl (from 4.0.4-1)
>
>
> and that is supported by the arch listing on
>
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/fsl
“rmadison fsl” is usually how one checks for this.
> Unfortunately, the buildd logs
Matthias Klose (11/01/2010):
> I'll go through the list of build failures this week, trying to file
> appropriate bug reports for GCC or the distribution. Please let me
> know if somebody wants to work on this list as well.
Hi,
I might want to join this kind of effort for next runs: I might have
Ludovico Cavedon (10/01/2010):
> How am I supposed to proceed? Send all the info to the MIA team and
> keep making 10-days NMUs until MIA orphans the package or the
> maintainer replies? Or is in this case a take over acceptable?
I'd suggest taking it over. If the previous maintainer comes back,
Gunnar Wolf (04/01/2010):
> It seems the problem is reproducible on all Lenny hosts - And it is
> quite likely to be a proper bug, as the file is for some reason
> recognized as a v2.0 source package.
>
> My previous (accepted) upload was done on 2009-11-25, and dpkg-dev
> dies the same way when
John Wong (01/01/2010):
> I can not install xserver-xorg-video-vesa a few weeks ago.
>
> apt-get install xserver-xorg-video-vesa
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> xserver-xorg-video-vesa: Depends: xserver-xorg-core (>= 2:1.6.99.900)
> but 2:1.6.5-1 is to be installed
> E: Broken
Frank Lin PIAT (29/12/2009):
> It is a best practice to fill all the fields below (they wouldn't be
> in the template otherwise ;)
> […]
> Usually, it is a good idea to write the full package description
> that you would use for the upload... so people can give feed back.
Better yet, check the BT
Luca Falavigna (28/12/2009):
> Description : XFCE applet for Remmina
> Remmina-XFCE is a XFCE applet for the Remmina application. This XFCE
> desktop applet allows for easy-access of the Remmina main features.
> Remmina-XFCE is also able to list all remote desktop files and makes
> t
Brian May (17/12/2009):
> See bug #561401.
See bug #557667?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
301 - 400 of 678 matches
Mail list logo
