Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Owner: Gianfranco Costamagna
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sphinx-qt-documentation
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Grzegorz Bokota
* URL : https://github.com/Czaki/sphinx-qt-documentation
* License
I agree.
With python2 being removed, we will have a lot of
"src:python-foo" providing only a "bin:python3-foo"
so this confusion will be even more a problem...
(will we ever rename also source packages now that python2 is going to be
removed?)
Gianfranco
Package: wnpp
Owner: Gianfranco Costamagna
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: sphinxcontrib-svg2pdfconverter
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : 2018-2019 by Missing Link Electronics, 2018-2019 by Stefan
Wiehler
* URL
Hello,
>Tobi, I never knew I could simply self-appoint myself to maintainer with
>a simple (sponsored) upload of libpng16 (a package you co-maintain) or
>tokyocabinet (a package you maintain), drop you to uploader or nothing
>and you'd be cool with that. Hey, it's in collab-maint after all, isn't
Package: wnpp
Owner: Gianfranco Costamagna
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: vim-bitbake
* Version : 0~git20170705-1
* Upstream Author : Chris Larson
* URL : https://github.com/kergoth/vim-bitbake
* License : MIT/Expat
Hi Ian,
>I just read this mail. Jolly good.
thanks, I'm working also to update libirman,
because the new lirc requires it (in some ways,
e.g. it builds also without that support, but the new libirman
is a real shared library and not a static one anymore)
thanks you all!
G.
Ok, lets put a deadline here.
The package currently on mentors (with an added newline on changelog line 2), is
now in deferred/15 for experimental.
I'll probably ask for feedbacks once it clears new queue :)
thanks to everybody,
(feel free to cancel, reschedule as you wish)
Gianfranco
>Part of this is the upstream, debian packaging which (besides changelog) is
>identical to the package in mentors. There has been several hundred downloads
>of this packaging without any packaging-related bugs reported.
I can also add that a colleague is happily using the new lirc on mentors on
Hi Paul,
>Did you try these?
>
>Contacting the team via other methods (IRC/Twitter/Facebook/etc?).
>
>Asking the alioth admins to add you.
actually the team was dead, nobody was active anymore (probably all the admin
aren't not
DD anymore).
The only member active was Stefan, that has been made a
Hi Don!
>
>The package has a team, but since it looks like it's been maintained by
>NMU for quite some time, I see no reason why you could "join the team",
>and then basically take over the maintenance of this package.
in more than one year, nobody managed to accept me and Alec.
(we both tried to
Hi, I would like to have the new lirc in time for Stretch.
Alec (upstream) really wants us to update it, for various reasons
(including bug reports about outdated releases), new features,
RC bug fixed, porting to new libraries, less Debian-diverging package,
package in sync between Fedora, Debian
Hi,
>Maybe I don't quite understand what VirtualBox upstream meant by this
>sentence, but if the SeaBIOS license does not allow modification,
>then it would not be DFSG-free, so the fact that VirtualBox is in
>contrib would actually be an error, because it should rather be in
>non-free. And that w
Hi Guus
>I don't see that anything has changed in the past ten years, so I don't
>think a clarification will do any good. Why does VirtualBox keep relying
>on the OpenWatcom provider? There's bcc and faucc. QEMU's SeaBIOS is
>compiled with GCC (but looking at the source, all the 16-bit code is in
(I'll drop -devel starting from next email, following up on debian-legal
isntead)
>If you agree, I think it's better to ask the question instead at
>‘debian-legal’.
Hi Debian-Legal list :)
forwarding the discussion from -devel here
Basically, we thought OpenWatcom license wasn't DFSG for Debain
Hi Paul
>I didn't see a question in your mail :)
would a clear statement from them satisfy Debian standards? or should them
relicense?
>Is there any reason they can't relicense to something more standard?
Not sure, big company, legal issues, difficult to track people for changing it,
I don't
Hi, this is a question mainly for ftpmasters, but I think some public
discussion here
might be beneficial for me :)
Basically, we thought OpenWatcom license wasn't DFSG for Debain standards, and
now since
I would like to put Virtualbox back in main, I'm trying to see if some statement
clarifying
Hi Arturo,
>I'm involved in a couple of related packages [0][1] which I would be
>very happy to integrate in this new team.
can you please join the team [1], and create the repositories/ask for
sponsorship?
You should just need a "setup-repository", change the maintainer/uploaders
fields,
Hi fellow Debian Developers,
as somebody has already noticed (according to the join requests in the last few
days),
a new team has been created by Raphaël Hertzog some weeks ago [1], and it is
now starting
to provide security tools [2] [3].
The main reason for this team is to provide a list of
Hi,
>igimenez@debian:~/debian/hdparm$ gbp buildpackage --git-ignore-new
[...]
running debsign failed
yes, you have to sign them.
By default the key is searched with a match on the debian/changelog last entry.
You can override it by exporting
export DEBEMAIL='youremail'
export DEBFULLNAME='name s
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Owner: locutusofb...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: keyutils
* Version: 0.3.0
* Upstream Author : Mihai Ibanescu
* URL: github.com/sassoftware/python-keyutils
* License: Apache-2.0
* Programmi
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Owner: locutusofb...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: knock
* Version: 3.0.0
* Upstream Author : Gianni Amato
* URL: https://github.com/guelfoweb/knock
* License: GPL-3+
* Programming Lang: Pyth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
the bug is already there
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797327
I packaged the new version locally, but the package is not team
maintained, and the maintianer seems mia.
At least on db.d.o reports the last Debian activity to
Hi, confirmed: it is still there.
cheers,
Gianfranco
well, in that case you can download the source package, build the dkms
module and then install virtualbox, right?
if you run a custom kernel you should know how to build a dkms module.
cheers,
G.
Hi James!
>This should work with a normal Depends relation (reread Policy 7.2).
>
>This commit helped since it prevented a circular dependency involving
>the two packages:
>https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-virtualbox/virtualbox.git/commit/?id=68f57408199e304df63285910a360bc2f6ae2372
>
>So aft
As shown in policy 7.2
"You should not specify a Pre-Depends entry for a package before this has been
discussed on the debian-devel mailing
list and a consensus about doing that has been reached. See Dependencies,
Section 3.5."
the problem actually is that virtualbox-dkms should be configured *
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name : xkcd
* Version : 2.3.1
* Upstream Author : Ben Rosser
* URL : https://pythonhosted.org/xkcd/
* License : MIT
Description : Python2 library for accessing xkcd.com.
This is a Python library for accessing a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Debian Developers,
due to no replies in the list might seem that nobody is worried about
a brew like tool in Debian.
If nobody has objections, I'll upload in new queue at the end of the
package revision (there are still some issues to address).
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name : vulndb
* Version : 0.0.19
* Upstream Author : Andres Riancho
* URL : https://github.com/vulndb/python-sdk/
* License : BSD-3-clause
Description : Providing access to the vulndb information
python-vulndb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name : ruamel.ordereddict
* Version : 0.4.8
* Upstream Author : Anthon van der Neut
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/ruamel/ordereddict
* License : MIT/Python-2.0
Description : Implementation of an ordered dictionar
Hi Debian Developers, I would like to let you know I would like to do an MBF
for ~11 packages
(not so mass bug filing actually) because they use a lena.jpg (or whatever is
called) that is
non DFSG for Debian.
The list of the packages can be seen here [1]
and I'm adding it below
cl-plplot 0
Hi Debian Developers!
I don't know how much is feasible and useful the field.
Problem: I have a package that might depend on a libfoo-dev
library.
"might" because it tries to detect it at configure time,
and if the libfoo is found some features are enabled, otherwise
the features are disabled.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gianfranco Costamagna
* Package name: python-darts-lib-utils-lru
Version: 0.5~git20140220-1
Upstream Author : 2011 Dirk Esser https://code.google.com/p/cld2/
* License: MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description: Simple dictionary
Package: wnpp
Owner: michele.mart...@uniroma2.it
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: fim
Version : 0.4~rc3-1
Upstream Author : Michele Martone
* URL : http://www.nongnu.org/fbi-improved/
* License : GPLv2+
* Programming Lang: C++
Description : scriptable frame b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gianfranco Costamagna
* Package name: cld2
Version : 0.0.0~svn193
Upstream Author : Dick Sites dsi...@google.com
* URL : https://code.google.com/p/cld2/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Compact
Hi Paul,
>This is the place in which I remind people javascript-common with
>multiple versions of jQuery would reduce maintainer burden and avoid
>filling the archive with tons of binaries if someone has a spare few hours.
this can fix the problem about symlinking a javascript version that gets
>IMO the proper solution is for Debian packaging of doxygen to untangle
>jQuery from extensions, depend on + symlink the jQuery part, provide the
>extensions as a shared package, and patch doxygen code to generate
>docuementation referencing each separately instead of the entangled one.
>...b
Dear Jonas,
>For the source package I believe you should either...
>a) ensure that the code is truly the code that it claims to be
>(filename "jquery-1.2.3" quite arguably is not adequate ensurance
>that it contains unaltered version 1.2.3 of jQuery).
>This can be difficult to ensure
Hi dear Debian Developers and Maintainers,
I'm stuck with this jquery problem, and I don't know the best solution for it.
Doxygen creates and embeds a patched jquery version (why they don't extend
jquery in another file or rename it to avoid clashes is obscure to me), then
symlink can result i
> Il Martedì 19 Agosto 2014 21:21, Sven Bartscher
> ha scritto:
> > On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 21:55:37 +0100
> Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>
>> Hi again Sven,
>>
>> I would just ask one (I hope little) feature, I'm not an haskell guy,
>
> From: Sven Bartscher
Hi again Sven,
>
> Greetings,
>
> If we have a package, which doesn't migrate to testing, we usually
> check the "Why does package X not in testing yet?" page or the PTS.
> Usually they do a great job in telling us why our package doesn't
> migrate.
>
> But sometimes y
a.debian.org/developer.php?login=costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it
>
I already use the developer.php page, but it doesn't say the _delta_ for the
newly open bugs, just the total amount (useful, but not too much)
Cheers,
Gianfranco
>
>
>On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Gianfranco Costam
Hi DD folks!
recently a bug has been opened against a package I maintain (debian science is
the maintainer, while I'm the only uploader), but I did not notice with a mail,
because:
A) I forgot to subscribe to debian-science archives
B) Even if subscribed I don't think I would have seen it, becau
Hi Emmanuel,
>Ok, but could you say it nicely please? I just came across this info and
>brought it on the list for discussion because it'll impact us at some
>point. So don't shoot the messenger.
>Changing the source/target is often a trivial modification. I'm not
>asking for actively updating al
> Il Domenica 6 Luglio 2014 15:51, Charles Plessy ha
> scritto:
> > Le Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 10:33:35AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
>> On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 04:37:16PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
>> > >
>> > > This violates the Policy's section 10.1, but it is still my
> favorite s
I am worried about clashes.
>
> Le Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 12:11:37PM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
>>
>> According to both popcons, and according to the fact that both of them are
>> really niche packages and in really different environments (one for
>> penet
Hi Charles
> Il Sabato 5 Luglio 2014 13:03, Charles Plessy ha scritto:
> > Le Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 11:56:28AM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
>>
>> I looked before at amap-align, but the package provided by your one is only
>> amap-align, there is no "
Hi Clarles,
> Il Sabato 5 Luglio 2014 12:48, Charles Plessy ha scritto:
> > Le Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 02:20:12PM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
>
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: Gianfranco Costamagna
>>
>> * Package
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gianfranco Costamagna
* Package name : amap
Version : 5.4
Upstream Author : Van Hauser
* URL : http://www.thc.org/thc-amap/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Next-generation scanning tool for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gianfranco Costamagna
* Package name : python-pyqtgraph
Version : 0.9.8
Upstream Author : Luke Campagnola
* URL : http://luke.campagnola.me/code/pyqtgraph
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description
> Il Martedì 13 Maggio 2014 11:19, Guus Sliepen ha scritto:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 07:47:06PM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>
>> cppcheck [1] has been removed from testing [2] because of a sourceless
> javascript file [3].
>
> Indeed, sourceless
Hi debian developers,
cppcheck [1] has been removed from testing [2] because of a sourceless
javascript file [3].
Because of this I packaged (with patch and thanks from Octavio) a new dfsg
version and uploaded on mentors [4] some time ago.
(I'm uploading it again right now since I forgot to put
> Il Mercoledì 23 Aprile 2014 10:29, Julien Cristau ha
> scritto:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 09:10:26 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>
>> Another package (just an example) is this one, gambas3 [2] that uses sdlgfx
> as B-D
>> that has been uploaded
Hi Debian Developers,
A while ago sdlgfx [1] package changed the API/ABI, and for this reason we
started a transition from .23 to .25 release
the new package has been uploaded on unstable (after two experimental
releases), on
[2014-04-07] Accepted 2.0.25-3 in unstable (medium)
so after that ti
Hi Stephen, I'm just wondering about one small thing
Look e.g. at one git repository
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-boinc/boinc.git
the URL field
Just my 0.02 $
Gianfranco
just shows only
URL https://alioth.debian.org/anonscm/git/pkg-boinc/boinc.git
the "git+ssh://git.debian.org
Hi developers, I write here since I don't know if there are any problems into
the ITP bug
I would like to reintroduce skype4py into unstable, since it is maintained
again and is working well.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717337
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/skype4py.htm
56 matches
Mail list logo
