/replacement(?), powerpc specific, needs update:
Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
openhackwareBuild-Depends-Indep: gcc-2.95
I'll allocate some time to upgrade this to latest gcc.
thanks,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
Hi,
Initially I packaged pistachio because it was supposed to be the next
microkernel to be used by the Hurd. That's questionable now. Also the
package suffers some problems that I don't want to spend time fixing,
like it not building on all supposedly supported arches, upstream not
being much
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:40:56AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
I have problems fixing kdenetwork for unstable. With gcc 3
get/setenv aren't detected through C but through C++ which doesn't
work. That's a bug in automake. It should be fixed with a patch
in the following source:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 03:56:47PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
I think we should document this in the policy and force maintainers,
following this simple rule. When DEBIAN_FRONTEND value is Non-Interactive,
^^^
no question
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 09:39:36PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
I'd love to have it work but now the build complains about:
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/joey/kdenetwork-2.2.2'
*** Creating acinclude.m4
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/joey/kdenetwork-2.2.2'
make[2]: Leaving directory
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 05:39:14PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
sabre -- Fighter plane simulator. [#175226]
* Orphaned 97 days ago
* 1 RC bugs.
Hmm, would be a shame if noone would care for it. My son likes it and
the bugs on it do not
retitle 189820 ITA: glide -- development files for libglide3
retitle 189952 ITA: device3dfx -- Device driver source for 3Dfx boards for 2.2+
kernels
thanks
Hi,
I'll adopt those packages, and will start triaging all bugs. But I only
have a Voodoo3 2000 PCI, so I would like to have one or more
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 08:07:14PM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 12:46:03AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Apr 20, Jarno Elonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about keeping a whitelist database in which the users can add
themselves by sending a mail in certain format to
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 08:45:53PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
* Package name: png2ico
Version : 20021208
Upstream Author : Matthias Benkmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.winterdrache.de/freeware/png2ico/
* License : GPL
Description :
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 08:15:47PM +0200, Ramón Rey Vicente wrote:
Leo Costela Antunes wrote:
| PearPC does not need MacOS X or other non-free operating system to be
| fully used, it can be used with Debian/PPC for example, so, does it need
| to stay in contrib?
And, whats about dosemu?
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 08:51:03AM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
It took me a while to get SVN access to some projects at svn.debian.org.
It will be nice if someone can update web page contents of
svn.debian.org.
Done.
Of couse, svn+ssh with absolute path /svn/pkg-ime/ worked but this is
Hi Russell,
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 11:28:25AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: kernel-patch-linuxabi
Version : 20040724
Upstream Author : Various
* URL :
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:39:06PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
where can I find the official definition for the Release
file (http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/Release),
e.g. a BNF or an informal description?
Which is the tool (of choice) to create the files?
How are
Hi,
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:09:31 +0200, Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I see two possibility to implement this proposal:
1°) Let maintainers run tests in the build or binary target.
Eventually we add a notest DEBBUILD_OPTION to disable it.
2°) We add a test target in debian/rules.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:12:26AM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
If we want to introduce a new init system into debian, we should prepare
a generic init framework (like many distributions already have in place)
that allows for
- silent/verbose boot and output redirection
- fancy display of
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 09:48:29PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:35:55PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
If you're renaming them anyway, why not follow Policy 8.1 and
s/t1lib/libt1-/ (yielding libt1-1, etc.)?
Yes, I thought about it. But there is no strict rule in
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 09:44:50 -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
because non-glibc Debian architectures does exists (i.e.
FreeBSD,Solaris,Darwin), and it is time to consider them and accept
their existence. Those core architectures are open sourced and their
communities will only grow over time. It
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 03:06:09 +0300, Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote:
I don't see real obstacle here. Granted that the alternatives system
should be extended to look for
$HOME/debian/alternatives
Before checking
/etc/laternatives
Perhaps I should file a wishlist for it.
Please
On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 23:10:36 +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
Package: debian-policy
Severity: normal
[Side note: Buildds/dpkg-buildpackage has no robust way of telling if
the optional build-arch field exists and must call build. This is
wastefull for both build dependencies and build time.]
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 08:37:41PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-16
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: iftop
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Paul Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED], Chris Lightfoot [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
* URL
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:03:32PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
* Package name: apt-history
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Vittorio Palmisano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://redclay.altervista.org/archivio/python/apt-history/
* License : GPL
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 09:00:19PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I guess you would have to divert apt-get and aptitude for that and log
the invocations.
Actualy with aptitude taking the list of non automatic packages should
give you exactly the install list.
aptitude has had such kind
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:58:40AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Bill Allombert [Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:39:36 +0200]:
So I propose a alternate solution:
If the distro foobar rebuild packages on i386, they could use
i386foobar as architecture name instead of i386, this way every
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 09:09:25AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 16 septembre 2005 à 00:33 +0200, Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
It is maybe a crazy idea, but it is the only one that work. What you
suggest simply doesn't work, as not+linux is a provided package, and the
Hi,
A while ago bug 90989 was submitted, it was asking to extend the
definition of source control file fields to be all (physical not
logical) multi-line. I think it makes sense as we are supposedly
using RFC822, and more given some really long and obscene fields
in packages from d-i or xorg.
As
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: openhackware
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Jocelyn Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://perso.magic.fr/l_indien/OpenHackWare/
* License : GPL
Description
Package: wnpp
Owner: Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: proll
Version : 18
Upstream Author : Pete A. Zaitcev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/
* License : GPL
Description : JavaStation PROM 2
Hi!
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 18:00:14 +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
I was looking a method to just have ipv6 with autoconf network and
found this patch
http://mlblog.osdir.com/linux.debian.devel.ipv6/2005-05/msg00012.shtml
This link didn't seem to work, got this instead:
Hi!
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 16:23:12 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
I don't have the energy to push this any more, but I should probably
at least refer to my previous attempt to standardize bulleted lists:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/12/msg00531.html
You might find it
Hi!
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 09:18:32 +0200, Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
=== And the details: ===
* Control Files Parsing/Editing Library/Qt4-Debconf Qt4-Perl bindings *
---
Student: Jonathan Yu, Mentor:
Hi!
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 13:26:36 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Michael Banck wrote:
So it would be great if some numbers could be brought up first (maybe
Andreas has a rough overview now, because he looked at the different
kinds of itemizations).
Well, I had not but
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 19:14:14 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
I'm ready to do it but I think this makes more sense to submit the bug to the
upstream dev. Unfortunetely I couldn't find the web page of the ifupdown
upstream development. It's not a software specific to debian, isn't it ?
The
[ BCCed debian-dpkg for the proposed dpkg changes. ]
Hi!
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 21:04:30 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
we have an unfortunate situation where the practice in dpkg-buildpackage
and the policy do not match fully.
Ok, had finally the time to read and think about this. I've to say
Hi!
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 12:50:03 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Since etch, dpkg has supported architecture wildcards such as linux-any and
any-powerpc, which can, among other things, be used to express Linux-only
build dependencies like this:
Build-Depends: libcap2-dev [linux-any]
Hi!
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 22:18:51 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robert Millan rmh.debian@aybabtu.com
* Package name: vsag
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Robert Millan rmh.deb...@aybabtu.com
* URL : not yet released
Hi Pino!
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 01:02:12 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pino Toscano p...@kde.org
* Package name: kalternatives
Version : 0.12
Upstream Author : Pino Toscano p...@kde.org
* URL :
Hi!
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 12:32:23 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
Few days ago, I had a nice talk with Guillem, and he told me that dpkg
developers are working for cleaning up update-alternatives' code, and
planning
to convert it to C (along with provide a dpkg library); since the previous
Hi!
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 13:58:48 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de writes:
what can be done if the maintainer scripts of a package must behave
differently when unpacking the i386 deb on i386 or the i386 deb on
amd64?
We discussed this with Steve some days
Hi!
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 15:28:53 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Ryan Kavanagh ryana...@kubuntu.org (14/07/2009):
This package will also provide the library packages librpass0 and
librpass0-dev,
with long description:
Static library installed with tlock, it provides a function
Hi!
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 18:38:41 +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
Colleagues, I'm software engineer from Institute for System
Programing of Russian Academy of Sciences and we are developing a free
lightweight tool for checking backward/forward binary compatibility of
shared C/C++
Hi!
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 13:03:13 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Open questions:
* Can we require a one-to-one correspondance between binary package names
and debug package names that provide symbols for that binary package? I
think we should; I think it would make the system more
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 16:40:44 -0400, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 05:23:43PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
I hope the packages uploaded won't have a «project» binary in the
PATH?
At the moment yes, Turnin-NG provides /usr/bin/project since that's what the
original turnin
Hi!
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 11:15:37 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
BTW also Maintainer and Uploader fiels are uselessly exported.
Same here, they are used. While in stable the info might not be up-to-date,
in sid it does and those infos are used
Hi!
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 23:49:52 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
if you need to request an override change for your package, please use
the BTS in future, no longer reply to the override disparity mail you
will receive from the archive.
What about mass override change suggestions? Should those
Hi!
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 22:06:23 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 10:02:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 09:54:19PM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
* document that local policy will live in /etc/inetd.conf.d/ and any
manual
changes will
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 13:59:48 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:40:51PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
There are many obvious examples of update-foo scripts which behave in
this manner. The requirement to run a script to update the working
configuration is nothing new in
Hi!
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 10:20:57 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org
* Package name: libbind
Version : 6.0
Upstream Author : Internet Systems Consortium
* URL : https://www.isc.org/software/libbind
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 19:51:17 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Binary-only NMUs are a necessary evil. The implementation kind of
sucks, but I'm not sure how a better approach would look like. It's
not just the dependencies problem, it's also quite confusing that
you've got a source package
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 19:13:09 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Guillem Jover:
The resulting .changes will get a field like this:
Source: bacula (1.38.11-7)
which can be used to track back from which source this binary
originated.
Yeah, but this only helps if you've got a source
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 10:28:34 -0600, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote:
It is really this simple to do using mutt.
1. To encrypt the vote you need to have the key. It could be accomplished in
several ways. They way I did it was by copying
from the call for votes email into a file such as foo.txt
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 12:12:00 +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
Do we have plans for lenny to enable the use of bzip2 instead of gzip
for the upstream orig.tar source tarballs? Does dpkg/apt support this
already or has this already been thought about?
As other people have replied etch's dpkg
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-04-21 at 20:00:10 +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: swingx
Version : 20070415
Take into account that if upstream later on changes the version to
something not date based you
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 09:17:43 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Now I have complained an offical report at the dbd about it:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=421859
But without any answer.
This bug report has only been filed 3 days ago...
regards,
guillem
--
To
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 06:14:46 +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 03:29 +0200, Oliver Block wrote:
I am not very familiar with the debian developer tools. How to
recompile a package with debuggin option (gcc -g)?
1. Change the Makefile and/or debian/rules as necessary to
Hi,
I've been meaning to send this for some time, but latest docbook-xml
upload finally triggered it.
Please stop parsing dpkg status file from maintainer scripts. No
package should assume its location or format (except for now for
package managment frontends and the like, until there's a proper
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 02:19:33 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:26:00 +0200, A Mennucc said:
hi what about http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ ?
madcoder mentioned in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/01/msg00822.htmlof the
intention of getting the checklib
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 11:13:32 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 17:59:15 +0300, Guillem Jover said:
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 02:19:33 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Has this been fixed in the latest incantation?
Please fix this by adding an additional mode/view
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:51:00 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 30 mai 2007 à 07:53 +0300, Guillem Jover a écrit :
If you need to retrieve the conffile info, which is why most of those
packages are poking at the status file, please use something like:
$ dpkg-query -W -f
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 15:22:59 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2007, 07:53 +0300 schrieb Guillem Jover:
I've been meaning to send this for some time, but latest docbook-xml
upload finally triggered it.
Well, why didn't you send me a CC of this mail? I just stumbled over
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 21:49:00 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Michael Vogt wrote:
- support for the new dpkg Breaks field (thanks to Ian Jackson for
his work on this)
Although dpkg still doesn't have Breaks support, so we still can't use
it, AFAIK..
It will have on 1.14.5.
regards,
guillem
Hi Paul,
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 18:48:41 +0100, Paul Cager wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: plexus-i18n
Version : 1.0-beta-6
Upstream Author : Plexus Developers
* URL : http://plexus.codehaus.org
*
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 14:33:26 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Bill Allombert writes (Re: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for
lenny?):
At least, I would feel less alone.
FWIW, I agree with you. I think the proposed `Build-Options' source
control field is a sensible addition and
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 21:28:17 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
I do this in configure.ac:
dnl If and only if we're on Linux, use a mapfile to do symbol versioning.
dnl We'd like to do this on all platforms, but the syntax is different
dnl everywhere and I don't feel like dealing with the
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:04:14 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
So that it doesn't ask to install every driver each time. Actually the
xorg server does that using:
xserver-video-driver-all | xserver-video-driver-1.0 and each
individual xserver-video-driver-foo provides the latter. So
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 16:12:20 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
When looking at the tags it doesn't look like the programs can't run
in an X terminal. I tried worms from bsdgames, cadubi and pinball
(randomly picked) and they all worked flawless in my aterm.
Programs using the framebuffer directly, or
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 09:16:03 +0200, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
I'm not sure how useful lina is, but it's basicallly run
some random program against all files in Debian (binary as
well as source packages):
http://asdfasdf.debian.net/~tar/lina/
Any comments?
Could you poolize the checks
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 10:50:00 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
su, 2007-08-19 kello 18:27 +0200, Christoph Berg kirjoitti:
Please someone push forward the XB-Homepage: idea.
Does someone have a handy summary of where things stand with moving
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 09:43:06 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:05:28PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
I'd opt for dpkg generating the checksums upon _extracting_ the .deb
file. [...]
Where's the code for that?
Changing write_filelist_except to update a new .md5
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 08:49:57 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
Ok, just pushed the Homepage field support into dpkg git. Chose Homepage
as that was what was requested on 142324 and what has mostly been used
on the pseudo
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 21:42:34 +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 18:43 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
[]
I have question which is directly related: shouldn't a package own and
declare all the configuration files that it uses, even if it
Hi!
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 13:27:14 +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:40 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
PW Which date would it contain?
The date the maintainer made the polishing touches on the .deb.
We don't have that date. We do have:
[...]
And the date the .deb
Hi!
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 09:30:48 +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Introduction of the new fields
==
- Build-Recommends would list packages that are basically available in
the Debian archive, but are not available on all architectures or for
all kernels. [...]
A
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 20:37:06 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org writes:
What you actually want here is to use architecture wildcards, as in:
libasound2-dev [linux-any]
this is documented in dpkg-architecture(1), and has been supported since
dpkg 1.13.13
Hi!
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 12:31:14 +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
In Bug 515175, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
Package: file-roller
Version: 2.22.4-2
Severity: normal
On a default gnome-desktop system (Lenny), .deb files (application/x-deb)
are associated with file-roller, but it can't open
Hi!
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 20:48:06 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 06:08:17PM +0200, Teodor wrote:
There is no need to create another standard, FHS is being continued in
the LSB project at linuxfoundation.org / freestandards.org. FHS was
the starting point for LSB.
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 09:32:43 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org writes:
Reiviving the FHS is great! Something that is bothering me a bit,
though, is that historically it seemed to try to cater to Unix in
general, not only Linux, even if most of the participants were
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 09:02:18 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:02:11PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
winge
Insert the typical winge here about dpkg conffile renaming code
being deployed via cut-n-paste from a wiki page
Hi!
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 16:49:33 +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
dear maintainers of packages that contain lrmi.{c,h},
today Lucas has reported #518725 - atitvout FTBFS because of missing
*_MASK defines.
Seeing that bug and remembering fun with lrmi myself, I thought I can
have a look how
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 13:03:32 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Guillem Jover wrote:
I don't think it makes sense to have different Homepage fields on the
binary stanzas, but if someone can think of a case it might be useful
I could change it to override the source stanza field.
I have one
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 12:35:31 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
Will it be possible to have more than one homepage listed, comma-separated?
Because dpkg does not have any direct use for it, it's not checking for
the validity of the values. So technically, yes, you could. The question
though is, do we
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 15:08:16 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
Raphael - I'm in the middle of a rewrite of dpkg-cross, including the
diversion of dpkg-shlibdeps:
So far, pre1 is largely complete for dpkg-cross and the
dpkg-buildpackage diversion, barring an unknown number of possible
corner
Hi Raphael,
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 15:19:02 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I think my work is mostly ready for unstable as it is. The last step is to
convince Guillem Jover, the main dpkg maintainer, to merge that in the
master branch. He believes that supporting odd cases encourages bad
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 00:15:10 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 06:09:42AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
For libraries with versioned symbols, just checking for the needed
version nodes should be enough, and I'd say that adding symbols to
a previously existing version node
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 22:09:09 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 05:01:22PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Homepage field in debian/control
(...)
This was implemented in dpkg 1.14.6.
Vcs-* fields in debian/control
(...)
This was implemented in dpkg 1.14.6.
Do
Hi,
I've just finished porting svgalib to non-i386/amd64 systems, I think
it should build at least on sparc, mips, powerpc. I've not tested on
other boxes but except for alpha it should build on mostly everything.
I'd appreciate if someone could test on any arch (except alpha and the
current
be a cleaner
approach. I haven't done a thorough comparison to your list but the
results seem to be pretty similar.
$ grep-dctrl ! -FDepends -e '.' -a ! -FPre-Depends -e '.' \
-a ! -FArchitecture all -n -sPackage binary-i386_Packages | dd-list -i -u -b
Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gnumach
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 14:23:01 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 01/01/08 at 18:23 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the other hand, DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=n was ignored by packages
that have not been validated by the maintainers, and used by
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 10:51:16 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
libdvb-dev (U)
Only ships static libs; no idea why.
That's due to #218387, #226985 and #359697.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 08:55:06 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
Currently on dpkg I have 4 N: lines: one per deb + one for the
.dsc. That clutters the output a bit too much to my taste. And ideally
it should be at the end of the output (or at
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 17:01:27 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Oh, the other challenge with running lintian across multiple architectures
is that, at least in previous days, some things didn't work right unless
the binutils installed corresponded to the package architecture. I wonder
if that's
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 19:13:43 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
After noticing a few compiled Perl module packages were missing
${shlibs:Depends} and/or dh_makeshlibdeps, I looked a bit into how
widespread this issue is.
Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libdirectfb-dev
Fixed in svn for 1.0.1-6
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libbsd
Version : 0.0
Upstream Author : The FreeBSD project
* URL : http://www.freebsd.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : BSD compatibility
tags 339870 wontfix
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 18:47:53 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
* Error out if the toolchain used to build is not powerpc-linux-gnu.
(Closes: #322300, #339870)
Again, I don't agree here (backed by p2): The package is
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 05:30:47 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Guillem Jover wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 00:11:44 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
For 12.) and 28.), I'd file a wishlist bug providing a config file
snippet for /etc/rsyslog.d/
Can we please use /etc/syslog.d/ instead? this way
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 21:09:24 +0100, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
Adam Borowski wrote:
Uhm, and how exactly do you get the arch? At DNS time you don't have
anything but the requester's or his ISP's IP.
This would have to be placed inside sources.list at some point, then I
figure the
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 10:54:11 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Of course, that would mean that the few debian/rules (hi Manoj) in
Debian not being makefiles [...]
You were probably thinking about Josip (and now the VDR team):
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 20:23:37 +0100, Jonas Meurer wrote:
On 06/02/2008 Russ Allbery wrote:
I'm not sure whether this is an issue with dpkg or rather with lintian,
but if I check the cryptsetup deb+udeb packages after building them,
lintian reports that udebs don't allow the
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 10:23:51 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Except it will only work if the package uses 'Package-Type' and not
'X*-Package-Type'.
X*B*-Package-Type should work as well.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Now that the library transition is over, and all major bugs should be
fixed, I've been able to finally orphan the directfb suite of packages.
It might make sense for whoever takes over, to adopt the whole suite
(directfb, dfb++ and fusionsound), they have been
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 16:03:04 +0100, Fathi Boudra wrote:
Otavio Salvador, Luis Mondesi and me would like to adopt directfb and
friends.
Sure, I've transferred the alioth project now (you sort out the
project perms).
Something I forgot to say before about latest upstream release, I
didn't
1 - 100 of 1678 matches
Mail list logo
