Re: Bug#424844: ITP: ircservices -- Nick/channel/other services for IRC networks

2007-05-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 01:04:21PM +0100, Tim Retout wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 13:41 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Several, according to the table at: http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/testing/docs/2.html#1 I've tested with ircd-hybrid, but it should also do ircd-ircu and ircd-irc2

Re: [Help] AMD64 specific bug on libblitz0 (#424644)

2007-05-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:31:52AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: On 2007-05-18 Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to ask kindly for support regarding bug #424644 because I do not own any amd64 and thus feel unable to solve this problem. Any hints / patches?

Re: Intention to drop sparc32 support for Lenny

2007-05-21 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 09:58:00AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote: On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:00:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: The sparc32 port has been struggling for some time. Last month Jurij Smakov, currently the most active Debian Sparc porter, raised the question if support sparc32 should be

Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2

2007-06-06 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 07:55:28PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Jun 6, 2007 at 17:50:26 +, Oleg Verych wrote: Just as better alternative IMHO, please consider using `eu-readelf -ds` from elfutils. elfutils isn't build-essential. binutils is, and does the job, so it's better

Re: Archive rebuild with improved dpkg-shlibdeps

2007-06-21 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:59:53AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Hello, Lucas just rebuilt the archive with my new dpkg-shlibdeps and the symbols file that I provided him (http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/symbols.tar.bz2) and that I auto-generated. The resulting Packages file is here:

Re: transition of packages into testing

2007-06-22 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 11:29:32PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: Another criterion is that it's built on all the architectures the previous version in testing is built on. It seems it's missing builds on ^^^ That should be unstable. Anyway, the list of reasons why it

Re: Build the Debian Reference Card

2007-07-24 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 05:53:37PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: Am Dienstag, den 24.07.2007, 14:13 +0100 schrieb Neil Williams: On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:33:04 +0100 (BST) Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Has anyone any advice on how to build the Reference Card[1] from

Re: proposed release goal: DEBIAN/md5sums for all packages

2007-08-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:12:07AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It strikes me that if we want to make it policy, having dpkg generate the checksums upon creating the .deb would be the simplest and best way to do it. This way we wouldn't have to

Re: proposed release goal: DEBIAN/md5sums for all packages

2007-08-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:25:38AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Some packages (aspell and ispell packages in particular) ship files that they then modify in maintainer scripts and intentionally exclude them from the md5sums file for that reason. lintian has special code to deal with this

Re: proposed release goal: DEBIAN/md5sums for all packages

2007-08-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:27:45AM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote: The hash file, which is architecture dependend, is created on install. This is the only file in the package that is architecture dependend. If it is created on install, why is it in the packages filelist in the first place?

Re: proposed release goal: DEBIAN/md5sums for all packages

2007-08-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 03:13:32AM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote: He doesn't give any information _why_ this complicates packaging that much, while his decision imposes additional work and complexity on others (be it the exception in lintian and probably linda or the difference between dpkg -L

Re: Dependencies on shared libs, news and difference between archs

2007-08-22 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 03:19:02PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Hi, 2/ Second example, libconfig0 has a supplementary symbols [...] _PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_ on sparc and alpha. I don't know where it comes from. Is this a internal symbols that I missed?

Re: /proc and build environments

2008-09-14 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 10:43:40AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: This is probably a FAQ, and I guess I knew the answer at one point. What are the requirements for /proc and buildds? Can packages assume that /proc/self/stat exist in a buildd environment? There are packages that require it. I

Re: Chdir to / in cron job for selinux

2008-12-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
reassign 261213 ntp Bug#261213: ntp-server: Chdir to / in cron job for selinux I don't see why you reassign it back to the ntp package. I'm not sure what you think has changed that it should be reassigned. I'm also not sure why it got cloned in the first place. We still need a general way

Re: NEW processing

2008-12-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 09:50:04AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: As you can see, there are short times where the buildds for one arch have problem keeping up with the load, but that's often caused by : - one of the buildds being temporarily unavailable - one of the buildds building a very big

Re: The firmware GR

2008-12-15 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:36:50AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: Hi, I don't think d-d-a is meant to be used as a forum, but since others are doing so, I guess it's fine if I join. With these hopefully solid plans in place for the release, we feel the need to acknowledge that there is

Re: Upcoming Section changes in the archive

2009-02-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:07:35PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: Hello world, We also plan on adding a number of new sections. wanna-build will need to be change for this too, and will probably break if you give it an unknown section. Please wait until the list is added to wanna-build. Kurt

Re: Up for adoption: Xiph.org and OpenEXR packages

2009-03-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 12:31:25AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: I have no idea if these would be appropriate for the pkg-phototools group, but I guess it's worth a try. I'm also CC'ing the maintainer of openexr-tools, Pino Toscano, in case he has particular interest in OpenEXR packages.

Re: Breaking /emul/ia32-linux for squeeze

2009-03-11 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:46:31PM +, Clint Adams wrote: It may be time to change packages installing files to /emul/ia32-linux (which violates the FHS) to use /usr/lib32 instead. /usr/lib32 isn't exactly FHS either, but it's better than /emul/ia32-linux Will this also change for ia64?

Re: Breaking /emul/ia32-linux for squeeze

2009-03-11 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:50:23PM +, Clint Adams wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:12:31PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: /usr/lib32 isn't exactly FHS either, but it's better than /emul/ia32-linux Will this also change for ia64? As far as I know, there that path is hardcoded

Re: US mirror troubles

2007-09-06 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:24:24AM -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote: Using host from bind9-host, $ host http.us.debian.org http.us.debian.org has address 128.101.240.212 http.us.debian.org has address 204.152.191.7 http.us.debian.org has address 35.9.37.225 http.us.debian.org has address

Re: US mirror troubles

2007-09-06 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:19:51PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Kurt Roeckx wrote: See http://bugs.debian.org/438179 This bug was closed by adding a config option. Why wasn't it cloned to all the network clients (apt, ntp, etc) that exhibit undesirable behavior due to this change in glibc

Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?

2007-09-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 05:36:03PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote: It's not about one timezone. The new release refresh all available timezones. The whole package was synced with the latest Olson database. It would be good if you fixed #416206, and used tzdata yourself. So that we only need to

Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?

2007-09-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
tzdata doesn't mean it shouldn't try and use tzdata if it's available on Debian. The binary data in the tzdata should be easy to parse. See man tzfile(5). 2007/9/25, Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 05:36:03PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote: It's not about one timezone

Re: Conflicting bsdmainutils and bsdutils on mipsel and sparc auto-builders

2007-10-02 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 10:41:08AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, I'm wondering how to cope with the following problem: The auto-building of the wordnet package failed on mipsel and sparc with: ... Unpacking bsdmainutils (from .../bsdmainutils_6.1.7_sparc.deb) ... dpkg: error processing

Re: Bits from the listmasters

2007-10-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 01:44:47PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: How to help listmasters against spam * If you notice a spam in the list archives, press the 'Report As Spam'-Button. I don't see such a button on the list archives. I only see

Bug#446030: RFA: kbd -- Linux console font and keytable utilities

2007-10-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 02:10:37AM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: normal [Please add me to your CC list.] I request an adopter for the kbd package. Actually it was never my intention to maintain kbd, but its maintainer was the group Console utilities maintainers

Re: Bits from the Testing Security team

2007-10-15 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:48:02PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: Hi Ian, * Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-15 19:59]: Nico Golde writes (Re: Bits from the Testing Security team): Yes, dpkg for example links statically against libbz2 and zlib just to pick a famous example. IMO

Re: Bits from the Testing Security team

2007-10-15 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 09:08:06PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:48:02PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: Hi Ian, * Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-15 19:59]: Nico Golde writes (Re: Bits from the Testing Security team): Yes, dpkg for example links statically

Re: Bits from the Testing Security team

2007-10-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:34:36PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: Nico Golde writes (Re: Bits from the Testing Security team): quoting Adam Heath from #debian-devel: Thanks for passing that on. 2007-10-15 18:07 eigood dpkg's configure has an option for using shared

Re: Bits from the Testing Security team

2007-10-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 03:00:55PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: Indeed on modern multicore systems running the decompression in a separate process allows it to be run on a separate CPU, in parallel to the other processing done by dpkg proper. So it might be faster. (I haven't done any

Re: Mandatory support for -nocheck in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

2007-11-06 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 05:47:17PM +, Neil Williams wrote: Making the last stage optional means that -nocheck achieves nothing, IMHO. If the maintainer chooses to allow 'make check' during the build, I believe that Policy should stipulate that the maintainer must ensure that 'make check'

Re: Long-term mass bug filing for crossbuild support

2007-11-10 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:50:51PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: AFAIK there's nothing to be fixed here. If you specify both --build and --host, autoconf sees this as a request for cross-compiling. Of course, invoking the native compiler as a cross-compiler should /generally/ give the same

Re: Consistent handling of the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

2007-11-10 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 05:49:11PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: As I see what Neil wrote, nocheck (I prefer this over notest) affects only testsuite. As for *handling* packages that run compiled code during build.. well that's the reason why scratchbox was invented :) I'm confused about how

Re: buildds: Authentication warning overridden.

2007-11-11 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:24:12AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 01:27:14PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Wouter Verhelst: That's inevitable because http://incoming.debian.org is not signed; The update frequency of that repository (which is available only to

Re: Early adopters of symbol based dependencies needed

2007-11-22 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 01:20:33PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Raphael Hertzog wrote: With debhelper 5.0.61, dh_makeshlibs will also call dpkg-gensymbols if it finds debian/package.symbols (or debian/package.symbols.arch). So for packages using debhelper, the only thing to do is to drop the

Re: Injecting versions of build-deps in the deps

2007-12-02 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 05:11:52PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: An example would be package foobar3 build-depending on libfoo3 (= 2.10.2). When built against libfoo3 2.12.0-2 which provides a symbols file, the resulting binaries need symbols from libfoo3 (= 2.8.7) (as the symbols file

Re: -Wl,--as-needed considered possibly harmful

2007-12-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 07:23:00PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Hi, Le dimanche 09 décembre 2007 à 19:11 +0100, Bernhard R. Link a écrit : Just curing the symptoms instead of the problems will not help to get there any sooner. What if there is no problem? For example, pkg-config

Re: -Wl,--as-needed considered possibly harmful

2007-12-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:45:46AM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: Ok, let's consider another very simple case: libshout allows to perform streaming of speex, vorbis, and theora formats. Hence, when asking for the libs to link with, you got -lspeex and -ltheora since it's needed to

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-02 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:17:24PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: Hello all, I've written a script which tries to detect packages which should be architecture all based on the fact that they don't contain a Depends field. Your list seems to contain alot of packages that do have a Depends

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-02 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:38:32PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: Hello Kurt, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:17:24PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: Hello all, I've written a script which tries to detect packages which should be architecture all based on the fact

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-02 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:58:24PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: Just to clarify to everybody, the list was screwed up by dd-list (my bad, didn't see the '-b' option part). Thanks to Adeodato for pointing that out. So, here's the list of binary packages (attachment is dd-list -u again).

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-02 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 09:11:40PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:04:44PM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote: On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:58:24PM +, Raphael Geissert wrote: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] libgss-dbg (U) shishi-dbg (U) rrght...

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-02 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 09:39:17PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Raphael Geissert a écrit : Cyril Brulebois wrote: On 02/01/2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote: Though after a second thought, -dbg should probably not have empty Depends line. After a third thought, I still fail to see what

Re: Faster shutdown and the ubuntu multiuser update-rc.d extention

2008-01-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 12:01:17AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: # use SIGCONT/signal 18 to check if there are # processes left. No need to check the exit code # value, because either killall5 work and it make # sense to

Re: Faster shutdown and the ubuntu multiuser update-rc.d extention

2008-01-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 12:16:28AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 12:01:17AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: # use SIGCONT/signal 18 to check if there are # processes left. No need to check the exit code # value

Re: Bug#459403: libuuid1: missing depends on non-essential package passwd

2008-01-07 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:23:23AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: So e2fsprogs which is Essential: yes depends on libuuid1, so libuuid1 is effectively Essential: yes, right? So if I add a dependency on passwd, it will effectively make passwd Essential: yes, as well It's not because an

Openssl in experimental: please test.

2008-02-12 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Hi, I've uploaded openssl 0.9.8g-6 to experimental. It adds support for TLS extensions. This changes some structs in the public header files causing ABI changes. I believe those are harmless and shouldn't cause any problems. But I'd like some people to test it before I upload this to

Re: Openssl in experimental: please test.

2008-02-14 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:30:07PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:54:26 +0100, Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've uploaded openssl 0.9.8g-6 to experimental. It adds support for TLS extensions. Does this include MAC Padding? If so, expect some interoperability

Re: Debian mirror CDN had launched.

2008-02-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 01:08:39PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: I just try with host: cdn.debian.net is an alias for deb.cdn.araki.net. deb.cdn.araki.net has address 61.115.118.67 deb.cdn.araki.net has address 133.5.166.3 deb.cdn.araki.net has address 133.5.166.3 deb.cdn.araki.net has

Re: Debian mirror CDN had launched.

2008-02-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 03:35:08PM +0100, Leo costela Antunes wrote: [No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Keeping the other CCs since I don't know about their subscription status.] Hi ARAKI Yasuhiro wrote: I announce I start cdn.debian.net. You could have announced work on this

Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also, triggers)

2008-03-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:50:16PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: AHAHAHAHAHA I totally missed that part in the first read. You're totally on crack. Under C, NULL is defined as (void *)0 (and *NOT* (char *)0 that is TOTALLY wrong for obvious reasons), and someone is not going to #define

Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also, triggers)

2008-03-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 06:34:48PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:21:47PM +, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:50:16PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: AHAHAHAHAHA I totally missed that part in the first read. You're totally on crack. Under C

Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also, triggers)

2008-03-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 06:48:41PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: 6.3.2.3 Pointers [...] 3 An integer constant expression with the value 0, or such an expression cast to type void *, is called a null pointer constant.55) If a null pointer constant is assigned

Re: broken .orig.tar.gz (Re: package upload rejected - no email)

2008-03-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 01:37:29PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080315 21:12]: $ cat /srv/ftp.debian.org/queue/reject/rhinote_0.7.0-2_i386.reason Rejected: md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of

Re: s390 buildd?

2008-03-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 09:09:41PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Similar the ia64 buildd admin, see #464932. Or is there anything I could do myself about this? Hmm, you do realise that lcd4linux is mentioned in P-a-s because it includes sys/io.h,

Re: Default value for CFLAGS/LDFLAGS set by dpkg

2008-03-31 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:34:05PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: (moving to debian-devel as requested by Kurt) On Fri, Mar 28, 2008, Steve Langasek wrote: However, as Thiemo notes, this does break the expectation that LD_PRELOAD will be allowed to intercept symbols; so this is definitely a

Re: Default value for CFLAGS/LDFLAGS set by dpkg

2008-03-31 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 04:21:14PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I also have to wonder that if we have something like this as default, why -Bsymbolic-functions would be a good default, and not -Bsymbolic. It's also worth noting that the original

Re: Building with -msse

2008-04-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 07:05:17PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: gnubg supports optionally building with SSE support for increased speed in the analytical engine. I have to date kept this disabled to not generate binaries that might not run on all otherwise-supported Debian systems. However, a

Re: Building with -msse

2008-04-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 04:06:40PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you want to have different optimizations depending on the cpu, there are a two options I know of: - When you hace shared libraries you can put them in directories like /usr/lib

Re: How to handle Debian patches

2008-05-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 02:26:29PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: George Danchev wrote: Then comes even more, even Ben Laurie (as he writes in his blog) with all his aggression missed to find the debian's pkg-openssl VCS repo [1] unless he has been helped by someone at some point. I'm not

Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu

2008-07-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:42:27AM -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote: For discussion: Gnome, KDE, and XFCE are the the top three desktops used in debian and cover most users of desktops in debian. They all use xdg .desktop-based menus as their main menu. You already opened a bug against

Re: correct definition of localhost?

2008-07-06 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 03:09:09PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi folks, I've run across an ipv4/ipv6 configuration issue which I think needs to have light cast on it so we can try to resolve this in time for lenny (whatever the right resolution actually is), in order to avoid a pile-up of

Re: correct definition of localhost?

2008-07-07 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 05:14:44PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:39:37AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: You don't seem to request ipv4 addresses, you request AF_UNSPEC, which should get you both ipv4 and ipv6. You get 127.0.0.1 twice, and ::1 one time. You'll find

Re: Bug#518696: ITP: parallel -- build and execute command lines from standard input in parallel

2010-12-29 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:28:16PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Hello, Time has passed and parallel became a GNU project: http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/ I guess packaging it can be reconsidered? Do you know about parallel in moreutils? Is there an advantage over that one?

Re: List of override disparities

2011-01-12 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:47:17PM +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote: Policy § 2.5 [0] states packages must not depend on other packages with lower priority values. In order to better adhere to it, FTP Team recently implemented a new tool that generates a list of override disparities[1] daily. We

Re: Make Unicode bugs release critical?

2011-02-11 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:37:54AM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote: However, I'm curious: is there a lot of software that is broken with Unicode, particularly with the UTF-8 encoding? I can't remember anything much in recent times. ispell, aspell. I think hunspell got fix recently. Kurt --

Re: What's up with buildd logs?

2011-02-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:05:44AM +, Roger Leigh wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 09:29:01PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Hi, The buildd system is generally quite fabulous, but why does https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=insighttoolkit show version 3.8.0-1? This version is

Re: enable/disable flags in /etc/default

2011-02-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 09:44:07PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: ]] Harald Dunkel (This is from bug #602490, but it's more of a generic problem) | Would it be possible to add an enable flag to | /etc/default/nagios3 to control if the daemon is | started at boot time? I'd like us to

Re: new Contents generator on ftp-master

2011-03-12 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:01:21AM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: 5) Packages with duplicate filenames are marked just as such and no contents is recorded, e.g. DUPLICATE_FILENAMES text/inorwegian,text/wnorwegian So basicly apt-file search will fail to find any file in inorwegian and

Re: new Contents generator on ftp-master

2011-03-12 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 07:53:34PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote: So basicly apt-file search will fail to find any file in inorwegian and wnorwegian? It won't find any files currently for both packages. $ apt-file search

Re: new Contents generator on ftp-master

2011-03-12 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 09:44:51PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote: $ apt-file search bokmaal.aff inorwegian: /usr/lib/ispell/bokmaal.aff $ apt-file search bokmål.aff inorwegian: /usr/lib/ispell/bokmål.aff $ zgrep

Re: new Contents generator on ftp-master

2011-03-12 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:06:41PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 09:44:51PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote: $ apt-file search bokmaal.aff inorwegian: /usr/lib/ispell/bokmaal.aff $ apt-file search

Re: Meeting Minutes, FTPMaster meeting March 2011

2011-03-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:27:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:56:28AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: - The long standing project of enabling autosigning for the buildds also got finished. That means that packages successfully built can now be uploaded

Re: new buildd dependency resolution breaks self depends?

2011-03-29 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 05:52:23PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: As far as I can tell the problem is that you switched the mlton binary package to 'Architecture: all'. Which means it's available on all architectures already in the new version, even though it's not installable. If I understand

Re: new buildd dependency resolution breaks self depends?

2011-03-29 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 06:58:36PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote: As long as the Packages file for the buildds mentions this arch all package, no buildd can build it, because it only considers installing the latest

Re: new buildd dependency resolution breaks self depends?

2011-03-29 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 07:54:59PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: The problem is that the buildds currently also see the newer arch all version. But this version will go away after some time and it will only see the version from unstable. If I may ask, for what purpose do the buildds

Re: new buildd dependency resolution breaks self depends?

2011-03-30 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 06:45:50PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 07:54:59PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: If I may ask, for what purpose do the buildds have a special list of packages above

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections 2011: Call for votes

2011-04-02 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 08:28:41AM +0200, David Paleino wrote: Hi Paul, On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:09:02 +1300, Paul Waite wrote: Debian wrote: - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 0942471d-23ab-4b5e-b5a8-02c2e74cb588 [ x ] Choice 1: Stefano

Re: sslv2 and openssl 1.0

2011-04-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 02:52:17AM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: Hi, openssl 1.0.0-d is in unstable and by default disables sslv2 methods, so what's the correct decision to make, regarding packages that use ssl as client or server : 1) patch package to disable code that use sslv2, and explain

Re: some suggestions towards a Debian .desktop policy [Was: Warm up discussion about desktop files]

2011-04-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:47:25AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: 3) Comments should be used to describe the function of the program so that users who are unfamiliar with the program name will be able to understand how the program can help them achieve tasks or partake in an activity. Comments

Re: Bug#624997: writerperfect: FTBFS: Style.hxx:36:45: error: 'NULL' was not declared in this scope

2011-05-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 07:21:28AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: (Ccing -devel@, since I have been asked about that by others) On 03/05/11 at 01:16 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: tag 624997 - wheezy thanks On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:39:43PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source:

Re: /run in *unstable*: migration of /lib/init/rw, /dev/.*

2011-05-14 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 04:55:01PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: Packages using /etc /etc/adjtime That file should probably not be in /etc in the first place, but be somewhere under /var/lib. Since FHS 2.2 it even mentions that this file should be /var/lib/hwclock/adjtime. Kurt -- To

Re: Patch Tagging Guidelines (aka DEP3)

2009-09-23 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:03:37PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: You are welcome to share your feedback about this format on -devel, if we identify shortcomings or possible enhancements, we can still update the proposal (but only after we had time to get some real feedback based on actual

Re: Patch Tagging Guidelines (aka DEP3)

2009-09-29 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:25:17AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Kurt Roeckx wrote: For elfutils, I have 2 patches that I take from the upstream git repo. Both patches have their own branch, and upstream/redhat merges the master branch into them. So around the time

Re: GDM, getty and VTs

2009-11-14 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 03:45:11PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Hi, it's been a long-standing tradition on Linux to have 6 started getty processes, in tty1 to tty6. However this doesn't correspond anymore to the way we use our machines. * I don't think we need more than 2 of these.

Re: Clarify rationale for 'debian/rules' shebang line

2009-11-15 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:12:33PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: === modified file 'policy.sgml' --- policy.sgml 2009-10-21 20:49:37 + +++ policy.sgml 2009-10-31 01:10:42 + @@ -1725,7 +1725,10 @@ p It must start with the line tt#!/usr/bin/make -f/tt, so that

Re: Clarify rationale for 'debian/rules' shebang line

2009-11-19 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:51:31PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:20:17PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:12:33PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: === modified file 'policy.sgml' --- policy.sgml 2009-10-21 20

Re: relocation error: ABI change?

2009-11-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 09:27:06PM -0800, Ludovico Cavedon wrote: Hi, If you see en error message like this one (from [1]): qutecom: relocation error: /usr/lib/qutecom/libphapi.so: symbol CRYPTO_malloc_debug_init, version OPENSSL_0.9.8 not defined in file libcrypto.so.0.9.8 with link time

Re: relocation error: ABI change?

2009-11-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:35:24AM -0800, Ludovico Cavedon wrote: Kurt Roeckx wrote: qutecom: relocation error: /usr/lib/qutecom/libphapi.so: symbol CRYPTO_malloc_debug_init, version OPENSSL_0.9.8 not defined in file libcrypto.so.0.9.8 with link time reference It seems I missed

Re: defaulting to net.ipv6.bindv6only=1 for squeeze

2009-12-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 08:24:31PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: Applications can change the behaviour for their sockets using setsockopt and the IPV6_V6ONLY option[2], and many already do this to prevent the need of adjusting their configuration depending on how the system is configured. Why

Re: Bug#561401: heimdal: FTBFS: Uses quilt in debian/rules, patches fail to apply.

2009-12-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 05:07:48PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: With older versions of dpkg-dev, if quilt isn't already available, dpkg-source will use its own internal mechanism to apply the patch series, and that internal method did not maintain the .pc directory. If the patches are applied

Re: Bits from the kernel team

2009-12-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Hi, Now that we have a 2.6.32 kernel in unstable, can you updates us on the various things mentioned in this mail? For instance, as I understand it, most other distro's recently had a release with a 2.6.31 kernel? Do you know if there are plans to have a kernel with backported drivers, one

Re: Bits from the kernel team

2009-12-22 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 04:50:22PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 17:22 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Hi, Now that we have a 2.6.32 kernel in unstable, can you updates us on the various things mentioned in this mail? For instance, as I understand it, most other

Re: Switch on compiler hardening defaults

2009-12-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:51:35PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: What would be a step forward: [...] - Make any code PIC, including binaries (PIE) and static libs. static libs would need to be PIE, not PIC. This is something that's not properly supported on all our arches. Some people will also

Re: defaulting to net.ipv6.bindv6only=1 for squeeze

2009-12-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:47:45PM +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote: I have failures now with a client that cannot connect() to the IPv4 address but get an ENETUNREACH instead. The application DOES set this socket option: socket(PF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3 setsockopt(3, SOL_IPV6,

Re: Bug#562143: apt is no longer in base system created by debootstrap?

2009-12-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 01:39:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: Torsten Werner wrote: The Build-Essential: yes field has been updated 2 months ago to better match the declared Depends in the package build-essential as requested in bug #548801. It seems there is a misunderstanding about the

Re: Lintian error on- rpath: Would like an exemption

2010-01-08 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 07:58:36PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: littler (aka 'r') is a small wrapper around GNU R that Jeff Horner and I released in 2006 and have been maintaining since. It is similar to Rscript (which appeared a little later as part of base R) but implemented differently

Re: rebuild test of Debian packages with GCC trunk 20100107

2010-01-13 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:20:38AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, On Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote: Please don't forget to usertag the reports. Using the ftbfs-gcc-4.5 usertag should make it easier to track them (which would later make them show up on the

Re: rebuild test of Debian packages with GCC trunk 20100107

2010-01-14 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 02:28:41AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, On Donnerstag, 14. Januar 2010, Julien Cristau wrote: Except you don't want the squeeze tag for gcc-4.5 bugs, you want the squeeze+1 tag, which doesn't exist. I'd hope that tagging them sid is the right + working thing

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >