Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: A Mennucc mennu...@debian.org
* Package name: wfrog
Version : 0.8.2 + svn
Upstream Author : Jordi Puigsegur jordi.puigse...@gmail.com et al
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/wfrog/downloads/list
* License : GPL 3
dear all,
sorry, I had completely forgotten that the debdelta signing key was to
expire on 20th August; I have issued a new one; to import it, save it
from attachment and issue, as root
# gpg --home /etc/debdelta/gnupg/ --import 2012_signed.key
I will upload a new 'debdelta' package containing
dear all,
I just uploaded 'debdelta' version 0.45, that has a better
implementation of error logs , and a provision for (automatically)
sending them to the main server (where I will be able to look at them) .
Brief explanation. A 'forensic file' is a file listing the content of a
Debian package
Il 03/05/2011 18:44, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
Out of curiosity, and given http://debdelta.debian.net has been around
for a long while now and is used (according to my exchanges with you)
regularly, do you have a plan for integration into debian.*org* proper?
I would like to. But so far
Dear all,
I just uploaded into experimental a new version 0.42exp of debdelta (
you may find some binaries also in [3] ).
This version adds an experimental feature : if you call
'debdelta-upgrade' with the option '--format=unzipped' , then in the
recreated deb the data.tar part will not be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi there,
the debdelta service is experiencing some problems.
There are two hosts involved: the first creates the deltas, and the
second is a public http server 'bononia' that serves them (under a
virtual host by the CNAME debdeltas.debian.net ).
The debdelta repository 'debdeltas.debian.net' has a new home! I thank
a lot 'md' for hosting it in ftp.linux.it; and also 'ansgar' ,
'formorer' for offering a host.
With a new server, the service should also be better: deltas should be
available no more than 1 hour later than the corresponding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 22/09/2010 22:46, A Mennucc ha scritto:
due to my PC running out of disk space, no deltas were generated in the
last week
It seems that there was another problem: there is broken pdiff in
amd64/experimental, so that debmirror was not updating my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 23/09/2010 08:59, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino ha scritto:
On 22 September 2010 22:46, A Mennucc mennu...@debian.org wrote:
due to my PC running out of disk space, no deltas were generated in the
last week (while I was absent); I found more space
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dear all,
due to my PC running out of disk space, no deltas were generated in the
last week (while I was absent); I found more space, so it will be back
online as soon as it generates all needed deltas.
If you do not know what debdelta is , see
toscani?
a.
NB: ogni spedizione è di 4 ombrelli o più
--
Andrea Mennucc
The EULA sounds like it was written by a team of lawyers who want to tell
me what I can't do, and the GPL sounds like it was written by a human
being who wants me to know what I can do.
Anonymous,http
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: A Mennucc deb...@mennucci.sns.it
* Package name: dvbstreamer
Version : 2~svn
Upstream Author : Adam Charrett charrea6 at users.sourceforge.net et al
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/dvbstreamer/
* License : GPL 2
Marco non sara' stato un Apollo Della Simpatia,
ma da qui a scadere nel turpiloquio ce ne corre.
a.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
we had to have this
http://xkcd.com/424/
a.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFILybU9B/tjjP8QKQRAr5xAJ4gI/2k/LQqlsVKWXtCW0Nsli0RPgCfTSMH
hi
It is all explained in
/usr/share/doc/sysv-rc/README.policy-rc.d
It seems that all you need to do is to create inside your chroot a
simple shell script /usr/sbin/policy-rc.d that just does an 'exit 101'
for example with these two simple commands
$ echo -e '#!/bin/sh\nexit 101'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi
you can use
$ reportbug --kudos PACKAGE
a.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG1GB09B/tjjP8QKQRAg+9AJ9WNuYwW2QDDuZ46l9rRgwrGIZVVgCfbU0j
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña ha scritto:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 12:04:51PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
I think I already pointed people interested in this to #268658.
If ftpmasters where given the tools to implement this seamlessly then you
could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi
just for the record : debdelta uses md5sums (when available) as a way
to speed up delta creation, to rapidly detect if there are any identical
files in the archives. So , yes, I (*) would be happy if md5sums where
always available.
BTW, I also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt ha scritto:
Yes, that sounds like a good idea. It might also be interesting to not
put those into the control.tar.gz, but directly into the deb, so that it
can easily be extracted.
I do not agree, for two reasons:
1) it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lars Wirzenius ha scritto:
It strikes me that if we want to make it policy, having dpkg generate
the checksums upon creating the .deb would be the simplest and best way
to do it. This way we wouldn't have to change packages to do it, and if
we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
In an attempt to prevent drift to a well-known counter argument:
DEBIAN/md5sums (used by debsums) are *not* intended as a mean to counter
security attacks, since they can be easily altered.
If md5sums become part
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Samuelson ha scritto:
[Lars Wirzenius]
It strikes me that if we want to make it policy, having dpkg generate
the checksums upon creating the .deb would be the simplest and best
way to do it.
I'd opt for dpkg generating the checksums upon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Goswin von Brederlow ha scritto:
So why waste all the mirror space and bandwith for something rather
useless?
I did not do statistics; but, knowing how compression works, I would
estimate that the cost of shipping md5sums is ~ 20 bytes for each
hi
Mark Brown ha scritto:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:23:53AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
The problem was due to a subtle change in zlib1g: in newer versions, the
compressed output has 0x02 instead of 0x00 at the 10th byte (that is in
the header). This change occurred somewhere between version
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: A Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: xdelta3
Version : 30q
Upstream Author : Josh MacDonald
* URL : http://xdelta.org/
* License : GPL v2
Programming Lang: C, Python
Description : programs and libraries
hi all,
about two weeks ago 'debdelta-upgrade' started failing. Unfortunately I
was away with (almost) no Internet access. Today I could finally fix the
problem.
The problem was due to a subtle change in zlib1g: in newer versions, the
compressed output has 0x02 instead of 0x00 at the 10th byte
Oliver Block ha scritto:
Hello list,
I am not very familiar with the debian developer tools. How to recompile a
package with debuggin option (gcc -g)?
usually packages are compiled with -g, but are stripped afterwards; to
avoid that, see example:
as root
# apt-get build-dep mplayer
#
hi
I am the mantainer of 'printtool'
brief history:
printtool was the GUI tool that Red Hat had developed for easy printer
configurations ; it was then ~2000 adopted by the GNULpr project at
http://lpr.sourceforge.net/ ; but, after the doc-com crisis, the project
was eventually abandoned.
hi
I am the mantainer of 'printtool'
brief history:
printtool was the GUI tool that Red Hat had developed for easy printer
configurations ; it was then ~2000 adopted by the GNULpr project at
http://lpr.sourceforge.net/ ; but, after the doc-com crisis, the project
was eventually abandoned.
Lucas Nussbaum ha scritto:
On 24/05/07 at 21:22 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 08:26:00PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
maybe the source code may be uploaded in the alioth project
that would be good yes.
Feel free to use the collab-qa alioth project for that, if you
hi
what about http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ ?
madcoder mentioned in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/01/msg00822.html
of the intention of getting the checklib service up again: any progress?
also, where do I get the source code from (since the link
dopo pochi gg dalla breve comparsata in
http://www.repubblica.it/2007/03/sezioni/scienza_e_tecnologia/creative-commons/creative-commons/creative-commons.html
ecco una altra breve apparizione del nostro O.S. preferito
ciao a tutti
un piccolo trivia tanto per rallegrare il primo dopopranzo:
la parola Debian � comparsa su Repubblica in
http://www.repubblica.it/2007/03/sezioni/scienza_e_tecnologia/creative-commons/creative-commons/creative-commons.html
Argomento: seminario di De Martin a Pisa, sulla stesura
hi thanks anyone
yes, in the past I had to accomodate for dual booting into that peculiar
other operating system (hereby called Windows, as by Santiago
suggestion) : I developed gtkmorph in the past, and it had to run on
both O.S.es ; but nowadays I dont, so I think I will switch my RTC to
UTC,
hi everybody
today is the first day of daylight saving time in Italy, (and many other
European countries); but something did not work as expected in my Etch box
--- brief summary of what I saw happening:
this morning, when I booted my PC, I looked at the date
# date
dom mar 25 08:34:22 CEST
... :/
ciao
domenico
Ciao, la mia applicazione è banale. Per descriverla in due parole...
data in input una lista di file, calcola la combinazione di questi file
che occupi al meglio un dato spazio
http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/file_set_split_utility.html
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
if interoperability would be achived , that would really help
my debdelta project
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
The EULA sounds like it was written by a team of lawyers who want to tell
me what I can't do, and the GPL sounds like it was written by a human
being who wants me to know what I can do
hi
xdelta is affected by bug 147187
this is Steve Langasek analysis:
the problem was that the xdelta file format includes information
telling xdelta how much memory it needs to allocate in order to read in
the patch structure -- and when allocating space for objects that
include pointers, this
Hello all,
I have packaged fuzzyocr 3.5.1 for Debian ;
the name of the package is fuzzyocr3 ;
I uploaded it into debian/experimental ;
it is also available at
http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mennucc1/fuzzyocr
a.
ps: I previously uploaded fuzzyocr 2.3b-1
as fuzzyocr
signature.asc
Description:
hi
I keep statistics of my email
before I activated greylisting and sender verification callouts, my
average was ~200 spam/day (with peaks of ~400) ; after that, it is ~40
spam/day (and most do not pass thru debian.org, but are delivered
directly at my account)
so I want to kudo all people who
hi [ thanks Ryan for the work]
Ryan Murray ha scritto:
The mail gateway, web scripts, and userdir-ldap command line interface have
all been updated to deal with the new fields.
I connected to the web interface at
https://db.debian.org/update.cgi?id=mennucc1
I found fields for birthdate and
[actually, my original mail had to go to d-release, but I
miss-auto-completed the To:]
Bill Allombert ha scritto:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:09:09PM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
anyway, shortly after I wrote that email, the situation reverted again
(for worse); so currently there is no agreement
to Moritz, and he answered me so
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:24:24AM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
BTW: I have been assuming that Moritz is reporting the consensus of the
whole security team , and not only his personal opinion... is it so?
I'm speaking for myself. However, we already have unfixed
Moritz Muehlenhoff ha scritto:
A Mennucc wrote:
Brief summary of bug: MPlayer contains an embedded copy of FFmpeg
(indeed, they are developed by ~the same people); Aur=E9lien G=C9R=D4ME a=
nd
Moritz Muehlenhoff ask that the mplayer package be dynamically linked to
the libraries
hi
I use amd64 here ; recently all tools (aptitude, debmirror)
started complaining that archives are not properly signed ;
here is a snippet of code to show the situation:
$ cd /var/lib/apt/lists
$ for i in *Release ; do echo === $i ; \
gpg --verify $i.gpg $i echo OK ; done
Martin Zobel-Helas ha scritto:
gpg --recv-keys A70DAF536070D3A1 (gpg --export -a A70DAF536070D3A1 |
apt-key add -)
$ gpg --recv-keys A70DAF536070D3A1
gpg: requesting key 6070D3A1 from hkp server keyring.debian.org
gpgkeys: key A70DAF536070D3A1 not found on keyserver
gpg: no valid OpenPGP
uh I see that there is a thread on that
a.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Luca Capello ha scritto:
Hello!
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:09:58 +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Noone answered, yet, why this key is not in debian-archive-keyring
package.
It's there since the last update:
=
debian-archive-keyring (2006.11.22) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer
actually, there is no need for tons of documentation:
the usage of the package debian-archive-keyring should
really automate the whole thing, as long as it is done correctly:
1) release team generates new key and new package debian-archive-keyring
2) users install it : in postinst,
Julien Cristau ha scritto:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 14:53:38 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
that package is only 2 days old and did not transition to etch yet
so it is too early to start signing etch archives with it
and it empties the whole idea : to restore my trust path , I
will have
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: A Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: fuzzyocr
Version : 2.3b
Upstream Author : Christian Holler, decoder_at_own-hero_dot_net
* URL : http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD
hi everybody
I just now notice the debate on mplayer going on;
so here are a few answers
[many people]
MPlayer dev team and Debian do not work together
this is not the case.
I have been working with Diego Biurrun (of the mplayer team)
and Joerg Jaspert (of ftp-master team)
many changes that
it)
it was uploaded into Debian incoming, and it is available from
http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mplayer/etch/
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
E' un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa! (Tonino Carotone)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
The command 'debdelta-upgrade' is meant to be run between 'apt-get
update' and 'apt-get upgrade'; it downloads .debdelta files and
recreate the new .deb files from them; always using the *installed* old
version of the .deb, and not the old .deb file itself.
Is
, no.
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in ftp.debian.org .
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Perhaps it fixed itself? :-)
yes it did.
The reason I posted is that, when I posted, the page
http://packages.debian.org/lightspeed
was showing the kfreebsd binary but not the i386 binary
that I had uploaded...I was very puzzled!
thanks for checking
a.
ps: it
)
a.
ps: note that the above is a NMU... I am helping fixing a bug; I
uploaded the new version in experimental to make it available
to the bug reporter and so that I would see if autobuilders do compile it
--
Andrea Mennucc
Ukn ow,Ifina llyfixe dmysp acebar.ohwh atthef
signature.asc
Description
hi
I had the same idea some time ago
if you ever decide to work on that, I may help
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I actualy have a little hack how one could implement patch debs now to
test this out:
1. Create an archive mirror with rsync batch files (or xdelta or
whatever) between the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Meskes wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:38:43AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
almost unusable ; including 'emacs-snapshot-gtk' 'display' 'xmms'
('xmms' is missing fonts for the menus but not for the main display);
Not sure if this is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Vega wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:22:42AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
hi
I use sid and Gnome ; I upgraded my box (after 3 weeks in which I did
not have time to) ; now I have serious problems with fonts.
Have you reconfigured xserver
hi
I did a similar thing some time ago; I used 'xdelta' on two versions of
kernel and of tetex; the results were impressive; I could prepare a
'debdiff' that was 10% (AFAICR) of the size, and that would recreate
an exact copy of the new version of the package, given the previous
version of the
to FontSet conversion
Warning: Unable to load any usable fontset
(starts, fonts look funny)
Does anyone have an helping clue ?
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
E' un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa! (Tonino Carotone)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hi everybody
According to the latest [1] Microsoft announcement, Vista will be released
in Jan 2007; according to our schedule [2], Etch may be released in Dec 2006.
If we accomplish it, it will be a great feat: Debian will (possibly)
show it is able to relase two versions of its distribution
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 08:07:48PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10603 March 1977, A. Mennucc wrote:
I hope we do manage to release in Dec 2005 (and I thank people who
work hard to this end).
We wont, im sure.
:- gotme
but in the beginning of the email I got it right :-)
excuse
hi everybody
a new version of mplayer 1.0pre7try2 is available ; add either
for the etch version, the line
deb http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mplayer/etch ./
or
for the sarge version, the line
deb http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mplayer/sarge ./
to /etc/apt/source.list .
a.
signature.asc
, but it never explicitly says that
binaries should be dynamically linked.
I noted this curious fact while posting bug 345506.
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
E' un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa! (Tonino Carotone)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
sorry, I was remembering incorrectly the dates
(and by no means meaning that I want the release to be 3 months later
than what Steve announced)
a.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:08:52AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
I *guess* mplayer could do likewise.
MPlayer was once very picky regarding the versions of ffmpeg that it
does compile with. Moreover MPlayer want to link all core libraries
together
Andrea Mennucc
Ukn ow,Ifina llyfixe dmysp acebar.ohwh atthef
--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDN8Bz9B
actually, there was a response in Aug 2004, as in attachment
A Mennucc wrote:
The oldest upload of 'mplayer' that I still find in my harddisk was
'Wed Jul 23 10:44:54 2003' (see attachment)
So 'mplayer' has been waiting in NEW queue for some response from
ftp-masters for 876 days
Anand Kumria wrote:
I'd like to congratulate our ftp-master team on their ability to timely
process packages progressing through the NEW queue.
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html [1]
I think you are an excellent example of people who are too busy for Debian.
I must say that I am
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:08:52AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
That would have been me:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/04/msg00997.html
at that time, you wrote/
/
/So, adding these two tentative conclusions together, it seems
likely that if
hi
I think that both sides are right:
1) people who express kudos to FTP-masters for express accepting new
packages due to the C++ name transitions
2) Anand Kumria and Thaddeus Black criticizing FTP-masters for never
addressing 'mplayer' 'xvidcap' 'rte' and such
I can understand why nobody
(separately) to install sarge using the
netinst cdrom, and failed
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
Ukn ow,Ifina llyfixe dmysp acebar.ohwh atthef
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 12:11:13PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On 12/4/05, A Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently that wasn't obvious.
Shouldn't it be made more clear what version is being used?
yes, I was thinking the same... maybe it would be useful
if the installer snapshots
checked this, and the above mirrors seem OK)
- some new package that comes from
deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main
is triggering the above prbl with e2fsprogs
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
E' un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa! (Tonino Carotone)
apt.tgz
Description: GNU Unix tar
That day, Florian Weimer wrote
I've seen this as well, but attributed it to an old sarge installer
which used testing instead of sarge (or stable) in the installed
sources.list file. In this case, an update from a pre-sarge testing
snapshot (is installed by the base system) to a current etch
hi
try this:
deinstall all xmms plugins that use GL graphics;
indeed the crash is in the add_plugin () call
Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
Well i discovered that it is not an xmms issue, but some problems with
NVIDIA non free graphic drivers, probalby it is a configuration
problem (specific of my own
would compile and test my fix to see if it really works.
--
Andrea Mennucc
E' un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa! (Tonino Carotone)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
involving gpg signing and email to an obscure address
using a set of keywords nobody ever documented properly
1 was my hope, 2 was my Debian-experience-induced-fear
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
Ukn ow,Ifina llyfixe dmysp acebar.ohwh atthef
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
snmpkit seem ready, are quite old, see
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=snmpkit
but still they are not going into testing.
what is happening?
a.
ps: please CC me
--
Andrea Mennucc
Ukn ow,Ifina llyfixe dmysp acebar.ohwh atthef
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
[omitted]
- End forwarded message -
--
Andrea Mennucc
Ukn ow,Ifina llyfixe dmysp acebar.ohwh atthef
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Andreas Barth wrote:
* A Mennucc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050908 13:39]:
(maybe I do not properly understand how the transition unstable - testing
goes , but...)
my packages from source libprinterconf, see
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=libprinterconf
are waiting for snmpkit
I approve
Drew Parsons wrote:
I remember some of us belatedly suggested sarge should be Debian 4.0,
though it was too late (May?) to accept that.
(it was me)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On 20050708T181259-0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
What signal is meant by 3.1 versus 4.0? Does your intended audience
have any concept of the distinction?
The usual distinction, when it is made, is that bumping the major number
indicates a disruptive upgrade
the same for me: I develop and mantain some gtk packages
there is no such thing as an easy transition from gtk1 to gtk2
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
And how hard is that? It seems that tons of stuff in the archive
still requires GTK1. It would be great
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I am wondering what the deal is with Luca and his packages,
specifically httperf.
httperf was uploaded once, 3.5 years ago. It has two important and one
normal bug [0]. He has never responded to any bug on httperf.
#215277: httperf: please update libssl dependency
Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Marc Haber wrote:
Their fault for releasing a book about unreleased software which is
bound to be outdated the day that sarge will actually release.
Uh-uh and when will that day be? And don't give me any of that when it
is ready nonsense.
Joey Hess wrote:
Andrea Mennucc wrote:
now that sarge is frozen, I would like to start a discussion
on the number to associate to Sarge release.
Now that sarge is frozen we have /etc/debian_version, the installation
manual, the release notes, and the website all containing the version
hi I see that some people are opposing using 4.0, so I give up.
I just write this e-mail to better understand why
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:17:45AM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
So I would much prefer if sarge would be called Debian 4
Do you agree?
I would
hi
I happen to mantain 'snmpkit' ; you may give it a look
a.
Christian Hammers wrote:
Hello
[regarding #306840 and with more info in #243870]
One of my packages, Quagga, is licenced under the GPL but is supposed to
get linked against NetSNMP. That now is problematic, as NetSNMP depends
hi everybody
now that sarge is frozen, I would like to start a discussion
on the number to associate to Sarge release.
According to
http://www.nl.debian.org/releases/sarge/index.en.html
Sarge may be released as Debian 3.1
In 2003, Scott James Remnant proposed in
I had forgotten mplayer_1.0pre7.orig.tar.gz
now it is there
A Mennucc wrote:
hi
mplayer 1.0pre7 is ready and packaged at
http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mplayer/sarge
a.
ps: still no news from ftpmasters... hope they at least will try to read
http://people.debian.org/~mjr/mplayer.html
hi
mplayer 1.0pre7 is ready and packaged at
http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mplayer/sarge
a.
ps: still no news from ftpmasters... hope they at least will try to read
http://people.debian.org/~mjr/mplayer.html
--
Andrea Mennucc
E' un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa! (Tonino Carotone
hi
reading the latest message on the status of the release
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/04/msg3.html
I understood that the release was near, and that, given good progress
with d-i and
testing-security, the main showstopper was the arm buildds trouble. (*)
Yesterday I
Steve Langasek wrote:
So I am curious : what is stopping the freeze now? testing-security?
What's stopping the freeze is all the people uploading their low-priority
packages and keeping the arm autobuilders from ever catching up on the ones
that are actually medium and high priority. ARM is
package depends on libgtk2.0-dev: I guess there are many packages
that has the same dependency
a.
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 09:25:56AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
reading the latest message on the status of the release
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/04
Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 02:31:15PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
when a buildd builds a package, it first install all
build-dependencies, then compiles, then remove all build-dependencies.
For my package, that was a total of 113 MB of data to be moved in and
out of disks; since
Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 00:56 +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, there are two issues here, one is why mplayer is not in debian.
Supposedly it was because the legal situation was not clear and that made it
dangerous and maybe illegal for us to distribute it. I wonder why
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
